Don’t Disappoint the Founding Fathers…Buy an AR-15 Rifle Today

common sense gun control is intellectually lazy

Bigstock

Contemporary legislators have the hubris to believe that the Founders hadn’t envisioned any kind of technological advances in firearm technology. It’s an argument tantamount to claiming that free-speech protections are not operable because James Madison couldn’t foresee the incredible speed with which information can be disseminated on the Internet.

Not only did legislators in the late 18th-century witness the advent and adoption of long-range Pennsylvania rifles — ones that could fire at 300 yards with decent precision rather than 50 yards with none — but they were likely acquainted with the existence of weapons such as air-powered repeating rifles that could fire .46-caliber lead balls about 40 times before losing muzzle velocity.

No Founder ever said, “hey maybe we made a mistake.” In fact, in the subsequent 150 years — through the rise of the revolver, the repeating rifle, and the gas-powered automatic weapons — no one ever challenged the idea that the Second Amendment protected anything but an individual right. Heller, the decision that so infuriated leftists, simply reaffirmed what had been obvious to everyone since 1789.

– David Harsanyi in The Founders Wanted You to Own an AR-15

comments

  1. avatar Dude says:

    Free speech and the internet…They no longer go hand in hand. It isn’t enough that 90% of the news media has come out as democrat party activists. Now the most powerful companies in the world are going to decide what we’re allowed to talk about. They’re working overtime to hide negative information about Biden. Is it any wonder that they support Joe Biden? Who’s the wannabe authoritarian again?

    1. avatar Curmudgeon says:

      I agree, the argument that the 1st amendment is not being restricted because of technology advancements therefore the same extends to the 2nd is being shot to hell by social media and the MSM as we speak.

      1. avatar Debbie W. says:

        “Contemporary legislators have the hubris to believe that the Founders hadn’t envisioned any kind of technological advances in firearm technology. It’s an argument tantamount to claiming that free-speech protections are not operable because James Madison couldn’t foresee the incredible speed with which information can be disseminated on the Internet.”

        Contemporary legislators are biased. You cannot just fixate on muskets vs the AR15. When you factor in Black Powder was used in those muskets and the explosive making attributes of Black Powder there is no hubris.

        1. avatar LarryinTX says:

          Black Powder Matters!

        2. avatar Art out West says:

          “Contemporary legislators have the hubris to believe that the Founders hadn’t envisioned any kind of technological advances in firearm technology. ”

          Those legislators hate the founding fathers. They despite the Constitution. They abhor the Republic, and revile the Americans who live here.

        3. avatar enuf says:

          I guess my vote for Ho and Joe is a vote to take away more than just your guns.

    2. avatar C.S. says:

      The Left were Fascist then, still Fascist now.

      1. avatar UNLICENSED BOZO says:

        You might be interested to know that Wikipedia has Fascism a Far right activity. Which is of course wrong.
        Even the Nazi’s were leftist, socialist, and Adolf was head of the socialist party.

        1. avatar Ing says:

          Fascism is far right only in Europe, where everything is Left. If you’re not left of Lenin, you’re a right-winger over there.

          My daughter’s high-school history teacher (an Irish expat who didn’t like socialism very much) ditched the usual straight line of left/right for a circle, with anarchy at one pole and totalitarianism at the other, and you could go left or right to get to either place. Still didn’t fix the misidentification of fascism as “right,” but at least did a much better job than American academics.

        2. avatar C.S. says:

          IMO, the meaning of Left and Right isn’t the same. Left vs Right in that sense means Stratification, or as Dr. Jordan Peterson puts it: hierarchies. But Conservatives don’t think that way at all… Left vs Right for a Conservative is Authoritarianism vs Individual Rights, so Conservatives see both Communism and Fascism as Left wing tyranny.

          Big Tech is Fascist (and the Bidens and Clintons are clearly exploitative capitalist), the AOC/Bernie people are Socialist/Communist, and the American Right wants Individual freedom and to be left alone without excessive government regulation.

        3. avatar Garrison Hall says:

          Fascism is the “right” wing of the “left” wing. It is still a socialist model, the principal difference being its easy relationships with the concentrated wealth of powerful oligarchs. Instead of seizing their wealth, fascists invite them into the government and use their power and inventiveness to further fascist goals.

          When you read the political history of fascism, you realize that Mussolini was a genius. This is why the left hates hims so much. National Socialism in Germany was a version of Italian Fascism and allowed oligarchs to retain their vast properties. This included, GM, who owned the Adam Open Werks throughout WW2. The last royalty payment was to to the GM office in Switzerland in April, 1945.

      2. avatar Vic Nighthorse says:

        The whole notion that politics is one dimensional and along a right-left line is absurd and problem causing.

        1. avatar PminFl says:

          Yes even the most primative peoples accept that when a right wing and a left wing cannot get along civilly the bird can’t fly. (note I didn’t say agree)

    3. avatar Prndll says:

      I’m not sure what you mean? Free speech has NEVER been hand-in-hand with the internet.

      From day one, it has been all about connecting to someone else’s computers, servers, and terminals. That has never changed.

    4. avatar Prndll says:

      Free speech has NEVER been hand in hand with the internet. The company that owns the servers has the right to control them. Just as you have the right to control your stuff.

      1. avatar Dude says:

        They could have, but they mostly didn’t. The internet used to be the wild, wild west. It still is in a way, but that’s changing.

        Meanwhile, twitter is busy suspending Trump campaign and White House staff accounts because the tweets might hurt the Biden campaign. Where are the democrats? What happened to election interference being a “threat to our democracy?” Of course they didn’t really mean that. It’s all a game.

        1. avatar Prndll says:

          The people that run Twitter are king twitts. Suspending accounts never made any difference one way or the other to my vote. The world would be a happier place if more people looked at it that way.

        2. avatar Dude says:

          I think it matters because it will only get worse. Look at the trend. We’re heading in the direction of CCP style censorship. We’ll only be allowed to discuss and share approved topics.

        3. avatar Prndll says:

          You are correct. We are headed that way. Because too many people are giving away their right to vote. In this case…to Twitter.

          I am a free man. I decided for myself who gets my vote and why. Making the whole thing dependent on Twitter gives them power over me.

        4. avatar Dude says:

          I’m not sure what you mean by that. In the future, people will be making “informed” decisions for themselves based on “approved” information made available to them. We’re at the beginning stages of this. Do you think it should be nipped in the bud or ignored? For the record I don’t personally engage in facebook or twitter, but apparently many people do.

        5. avatar LarryinTX says:

          I wouldn’t know a Twitt if it Bitt me on my Asss. And my Face is not in the Book. And I like it that way, it’s not going to change. Why in the world people pay any attention to the trolls and self appointed kingmakers online, who are universally MORONS, I don’t understand, I guess I have failed to adequately educate myself on this billionaires’ bullshit.

        6. avatar strych9 says:

          In terms of where people get a substantial amount of their news information social media accounts for the following (compared to TV):

          18-29yo 36% (16%)
          30-49yo 22% (36%)
          50-64yo 14% (65%)
          65+yo 8% (81%)

          Overall 18% of adult Americans rely on social media for “most” of their news. These people are also statistically both less engaged and less knowledgeable on any given topic of the day.

          Note that in every ago demographic a combination of TV and social media accounts for a majority.

        7. avatar Prndll says:

          THAT is what I’m talking about. Too many people are setting themselves up to be manipulated and lied to. It goes hand in hand with being delusional.

        8. avatar Dude says:

          “setting themselves up to be manipulated and lied to”

          Okay, I see. I totally agree with that. The problem is, more and more people will get their news this way in the future. Plus, they’ll look to validate the views they were indoctrinated with in school.

          https://www.journalism.org/2020/07/30/u-s-adults-who-mostly-rely-on-social-media-for-political-news-are-often-less-knowledgeable-about-current-events/

        9. avatar strych9 says:

          “The problem is, more and more people will get their news this way in the future.”

          Is this a problem? That’s a valid question considering how many people take the idiot box as gospel and it’s quite obvious to anyone with two firing neurons that the “news” on TV is mostly horseshit, and dangerous horseshit at that.

        10. avatar Craig in IA says:

          In my opinion, people who rely on social media messaging as their source of the honest and balanced news information that will affect their lives somewhere down the road are lazy. Plain and simple.

          I’ve never tweeted, have not used Facebook and read several different internet sources daily as well as glean info from TV and actually communicate with my elected officials fairly often to come to my own conclusions. To rely on social media from sources I do not know nor can verify, for my life is about like listening to a radio-based weather report from a station 600 miles away to decide what I need to wear when I go outside.

          For God’s sake, look out the window once in a while…

        11. avatar PMinFl says:

          There is a reason that so many “polls” are reported every”news cycle”. The reason is the same one as “calling” state results(eastern states) before the rest of the states have closed their polling places. The reason is to discourage voters when “their” candidate is behind in the counting especially in the west (left) coast.
          Every poll has slo-joe ahead…ahead only in select areas. Do you feel manipulated???

      2. avatar BLAMMO says:

        Twitter is the “Assault Weapon” of the First Amendment.

    5. avatar Chris T in KY says:

      The Libertarians say you have not lost any freedom of speech. Only the government can deny you your 1st amendment rights. They say a private company can turn off your internet account. Or they can turn off the Presidents internet account. Its not a violation of civil rights. They say.

      btw
      Pass that “joint” around to the next person. That is “your real” freedom.

  2. avatar No one of Consequence says:

    At least use a picture of an AR, given the article title…

    1. avatar A says:

      I literally lol’d when I read this.

    2. avatar EpsteinDidNOTKillHimself says:

      @No One of Consequence,
      I thought the same.

      And, at this point, good luck finding one to buy, or the ammo to go with it.
      If you dont want to disappoint the founding fathers, buy any fire arm you can find, in your price point, and with ammo you can use.
      Be practical about it.

      Heck, I am looking at black powder rifles, more for S&Gs but never a bad idea to have something else.
      “Why, no, Mr. Power-hungry Leftist fascist, I dont own any rifles but this here old muzzle loading deer rifle!”

      1. avatar Dude says:

        Then if you find one, be prepared for a 50% markup and no ammo. If in the market for a long gun, a pump shotgun would probably be the way to go in the current situation.

        1. avatar tdiinva says:

          Semi-auto because in the popular imagination a defense shotgun has that racking sound. My LGS has way more semiautos than pumps. However, yhey are twice the price or more.

        2. avatar Dude says:

          I was thinking along the lines of affordability, but that makes sense that those have already been picked up.

        3. avatar DinWA says:

          @tdiinva
          Last night in an episode of Lovecraft Country someone managed to make the racking sound with a side-by-side!

        4. avatar MADDMAXX says:

          managed to make the racking sound

          If it ain’t already racked you are late to the game….

      2. avatar Vic Nighthorse says:

        I haven’t seen primers in while. I am down to my last thousand of each type. I have only been checking online but for at least five months now. Only checked in LGSs two or three times.I bought a lot of things in Jan – May but it didn’t occur to me that primers would be the bottleneck. I have had little trouble with cases, bullets or powder though.

  3. avatar TheUnspoken says:

    Strangely the article called “Don’t Disappoint the Founding Fathers…Buy an AR-15 Rifle Today” has zero AR-15s in the accompanying stock photo. Looks like a couple of AK types and a Dragunov?

    Note the quoted article does in fact show AR-15 rifles.

    1. avatar I Haz A Question says:

      Odd. I see a photo of two ARs when I view this page. Perhaps it was edited/updated in response to all the complaints before I got here?

      1. avatar We have a winner!! says:

        How’s the private investigator business going?

        1. avatar I Haz A Question says:

          You really do have to improve your identity-masking skills, Hail.

  4. avatar Ron says:

    A Dragunov and an AK, Really?

    I mean I would like an article on the new PSA AK74… please.

  5. avatar Alex Murphy says:

    Why, so I can hit someone with it?

  6. avatar Debbie W. says:

    For many that would be…”Don’t Disappoint the Founding Fathers…Buy Another AR-15 Rifle Today.” If you cannot afford the rifle purchase a receiver.

    Side note…little man enuf comes on this forum and boasts about buying guns and ammo after his 2016 vote went to hilliary rotten clintoon and to make matters worse he turns calls the POTUS “excrement.” By his own words enuf is a self serving pos who over the last 4 years has enjoyed the freedoms to say and do the things he boasts about doing all off the backs of every American who cast their 2016 votes for Donald John Trump.
    Today enuf continues his slander and libel of the POTUS in a despicable attempt to sway gullible voters. Bottom line. enuf is a self serving marxist democRat lint licking pos who tries to talk the talk only to stab you and your 2A Rights in the back.

    TRUMP/PENCE 2020.

    1. avatar Ron says:

      He doesn’t even own guns. He may not even be American. He or she, or it, is just one of many leftist troll farm members barely over the intelligence and effectiveness of a spam bot. Most people here have come to see through his BS, just like Vlad, Miner, and Chief. They may also all be the same troll farm guy.

      1. avatar James Campbell says:

        I’ve posted that the standard response to this entire group of TTAG trolls needs to be GFY, ESAD……..
        A few are just “time bandits”, copy/pasting reams of leftard “spin”, to advance the demoKKKRats narrative.
        TRUMP/PENCE 2020 trolls!
        Enjoy the TDS.

      2. avatar Southern Cross says:

        If he does they have to be Fudd guns. He said yesterday about like S&W snubbie revolvers.

        Here’s my list of approved Fudd guns.

        Pistols: revolvers in .38 Spl. SAA in .45 Colt. M1911 in .45 ACP.

        Rifles. Pre-1964 Winchester model 70 in .270 or .30-06. Remingtons are too modern. Or a sporterized M1903 or M17, also in .30-06.

        Shotguns: double-barreled side-by-side. 12g. Over-unders are just too modern.

        1. avatar Wheeler says:

          Dumb list, you sound like a Fudd.

        2. avatar MADDMAXX says:

          Here’s my list of approved Fudd guns.

          Don’t know who appointed you czar of FUDD recognition but I happen to own a couple of 1911s in 45 AND a 38 Special, it happens to be the most powerful handgun my wife will shoot and since a problem with tendons in her left hand make it painful to operate the slide on a semi-auto I was happy to buy that gun for her, I also have TWO side by sides in 12 ga.. one is a Coach gun and the other is a very special little (emphasis on the little) piece that can be carried in a modified western style holster and is easily concealed if needed… Anyway, for a person who claims to be from a country that doesn’t even allow it’s citizens to own a modern sporting rifle ( I also have several of those in various calibers) you are quite the opinionated individual…

        3. avatar Southern Cross says:

          You don’t take sarcasm well. But I was imagining enuf’s collection.

        4. avatar MADDMAXX says:

          You don’t take sarcasm well. But I was imagining enuf’s collection.

          Maybe you don’t DO sarcasm very well…. Spent 8 days in Sydney (Kings Cross) in 1969, had a great time, people were honest, accommodating (to a young Marine on R&R), respectful and fun… Beautiful women, some of the greatest legs on the planet, Bondi Beach at midnight and that accent, damn…. Actually got drunk on two cans (warm) of Fosters (big ass cans) in Darwin and slept through the rest of the flight to Sydney… It was October, Springtime… Always wanted to go back, never made it, oh well… Anyway, work on your delivery, add quotation marks or maybe use HIS instead MY (list of approved FUDD guns)… Just sayin, I’m not the only one that missed it…

    2. avatar Jimmy Beam says:

      enuf is a psyop agent. He’s probably a Fed, one of many monitoring this forum. Whatever stories he tells are flat out bullsh*t.

      1. avatar enuf says:

        You folks would be hilarious if you were not so very desperately wrong. I’d been a Republican since Nixon in 1968. Volunteered on Reagan’s first campaign. Quit the party over that dumbass Bush the Lesser being nominated and have been an independent ever since.

        I’m on the side of these folks:
        https://rvat.org/

        More great ideas here:
        https://repair45.org/

        You are a bunch of cultists believing that you are in some sort of secret majority that is about to enjoy a landslide victory.

        I do not know who will win, I make no predictions.

        I do know that you are in for a disappointment in the final numbers. Which, because you are a small delusional sect of the conservative population, you will spin up lies about to give yourselves comfort.

        You made a mistake, you supported Trump for the 2016 GOP nomination. An obvious and incredibly stupid mistake and you simply cannot bear it.

        1. avatar Dude says:

          Haha! Anthony Scaramucci was the biggest gung ho Trump supporter around…until he lost his job. Now he’s the biggest Trump hater around. Totally sincere guy, right? What conservative policies are they fighting for by electing Joe Biden? Joe’s been a U.S. Senator and V.P. for 47 years, but Trump ruined America in less than four? That’s a good one! Which policy did that again? It’s all about emotion. There’s a sucker born every minute…

        2. avatar Manse Jolly says:

          Are you going to change your name on Nov. 4th?

        3. avatar tdiinva says:

          You have yet to tell us why Trump is the enemy of the people.

          Has he used the organs of government to atteck his political opponents like Obama?

          Has he defied te Courts like Governor Whitner?

          Has he attacked religious communities like Governors Newsom and Cuomo?

          Has he sent his army of cultist to burn and loot like Kamala Harris?

          Has he taken money from Russian Oligarchs like Clinton and Biden?

          I keep asking but you keep ignoring why is that?

          Kamala Harris is going to be the next President. Go watch her interchange with Amy Barrett and then get back to us and tells how much better she will be than orangemanbad.

        4. avatar Ing says:

          You don’t have to vote for Biden just because you can’t stand Trump. If you consider yourself a conservative (or libertarian or classical liberal) and appreciate your Second Amendment rights, but can’t make yourself vote for Trump, just don’t vote.

          That would be a principled choice. Much better than actively helping a lifetime corruptocrat who has promised to gut the Second Amendment and has all those vile leftist authoritarians riding his coattails.

        5. avatar Jimmy Beam says:

          Okay, if what you say is true, then you’re a senile old fart. Obama wanted to take your guns away for not being able to manage your own affairs. Biden will do the same, so go ahead and vote for him. But clean out your depends first.

        6. avatar Dude says:

          Ing, it isn’t like that with enuf. He literally prefers Biden to Trump for whatever reason. I get voting third party. I voted for Perot, but I did it because I believed in his policies. I still do. Imagine if we had had fixed those problems back in the 90s! Perot was right! Yes, I know this video is from RT, but I couldn’t find one by the Times or Post.

        7. avatar Southern Cross says:

          Enuf, how many of the list of Fudd guns I made earlier do you own?

        8. avatar Ing says:

          Yeah, Dude, I know. I feel like I have to say it, though. Maybe somebody that isn’t a lost cause will see it.

          Funny enough, I voted for Perot too. Can’t remember any of the positions he ran on, just that they sounded really good to my younger self back then.

      2. avatar James Campbell says:

        “Are you going to change your name on Nov. 4th?”
        Of COURSE!!!!!!
        All these leftard trolls are hoping the MILLIONS of turds they dropped here on TTAG are somehow going to fly on November 4th.
        I wish we could make them eat the GIGANTIC sh!t sandwich they RIGHTFULLY deserve to consume, but they’ll all just ditch their identities.
        Trump/Pence 2020. Because PATRIOTS ACTUALLY use Avatars, and stand behind their words.

    3. avatar Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR says:

      “If you cannot afford the rifle purchase a receiver.”

      Have you priced a stripped lower recently?

  7. avatar S.Crock says:

    We are already disappointing them by buying AR15s instead of M4s.

    1. avatar edward kenway says:

      Why bother with a Colt nowadays? Outside of a few models there are better alternatives out there and manufacturers who actually want the public’s money. For example, the LE6920 is a very nice accurate carbine, but it’s not widely available or priced for the poors who’d consider buying one. Uppers in more effective calibers are out there, too.
      Hard pass on Colt.

      1. avatar TheUnspoken says:

        I don’t think the AR-15 vs M4 was in reference to various brands vs Colt, but semi-auto only vs select fire. The NFA tax/registration and then Hughes amendment killed that. And we should be able to buy or build a select fire M4, m16, m-249, MP5, etc, burst, full auto, bump stock, whatever.

    2. avatar Seans says:

      Well the M4 is a AR15.

      1. avatar James Campbell says:

        …… with select fire.
        HUGE difference.

  8. avatar enuf says:

    The Founders knew about many more repeating arms than the repeating air gun. They even tried to buy some from an American maker, but his price was absurd and Congress canceled the order.

    Repeating arms pre-date the American Revolution by well over nearly two hundred years. Repeating arquebus, wheelock and flintlock firearms having capacities of up to 30 rounds were used in European wars in the Baltic region and the Low Countries.

    I haven’t time to write a long history this morning. But do your own searches. the info i snot hard to find, pictures too.

    1. avatar tsbhoa.p.jr says:

      i snot hard too.

      1. avatar I Haz A Question says:

        I just laughed so hard, I almost snotted.

  9. avatar Prndll says:

    If you going to have an AR15, I recommend building it. You get more out of it. Not that it’s necessary cheaper.

  10. avatar jwm says:

    Buy an AR? Even if I did not live in CA, where would I buy an AR?

    1. avatar TheUnspoken says:

      Online, at various places. I just saw some spendy Geisseles in stock. But also some Ruger and even $500 PSA complete rifles. I don’t know that there will be a lot of $350 ARs available and definitely options and quantities are limited, but they are still out there for those that want them and can get them but for some $$$.

      As usual, people can’t wait until a crisis, unrest, or until they need one to get one. Sandy hook was when I realized I had been a fool not to have at least a lower on hand, I didn’t really have the cash for a rifle but I scrambled and found an overpriced stripped lower to get started on.

      I have what I think I need now, but one can always get more ammo. There are a couple guns on the wish list (sp5k-pdw or sp5) but quantities are already limited and you can’t find them nor get them anywhere near MSRP.

      1. avatar Mark N. says:

        Spendy rifles at $2000 and up are in stock, but anything under $800 is hard to find. I was at PSA last night, and they were almost sold out of their own rifles. The brand names I checked were out of stock.

    2. avatar No one of Consequence says:

      Any street corner on the internet, according to some politicians…

  11. avatar napresto says:

    “Don’t Disappoint the Founding Fathers…Buy an AR-15 Rifle Today”

    Not until I can buy one that isn’t a neutered, gender-confused, low capacity disaster with no features, a malformed stock, and FUAC permission papers. Until then, I’ll stick with my Mini-14, which gets the job done and still has its dignity.

  12. avatar S R says:

    Where can I buy an AR-15 today? I want to buy an AR-15 today.

    1. avatar Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR says:

      “Where can I buy an AR-15 today? I want to buy an AR-15 today.”

      Gunbroker.

      Prepare to *pay*…

      https://www.gunbroker.com/All/search?Keywords=AR-15

      1. avatar John in FL says:

        https://i.imgur.com/gGGsb5a.jpg

        Not sure if that will work, but it’s a great update on prices!

    2. avatar Wedge259 says:

      Plenty available at PSA right now, can get a complete one between 500-600.

    3. avatar IgotSeVeRaL says:

      I can hook you up for a grand

  13. avatar former water walker says:

    Already got an AR15. How about ammo? A free press? A “free” FB,internet and tweeter?!? The corrupt media is in the tank for Dims-especially for slow Joe & the Hoe. They went out of their way to get rid of Nixon which wouldn’t even be a blip on the radar for today’s dumbocrat! Patriots need to stand up. If you didn’t prepare last it’s too late…

  14. avatar Jeb says:

    Stock up on receiver sets.

    1. avatar John in FL says:

      No, stock up on 80% lowers.
      It’s not about the numbers. It’s about not being a firearm (yet)

  15. avatar Wheaton Jaeger says:

    The constitution notes you may own a private, state of the art, warship and apply for letters of marque. The founders wanted us to have aircraft carriers, if you can afford one and use it reasonably.

    1. avatar LarryinTX says:

      The basis for the most outrageously fun ’round-the-world cruise anybody ever dreamed of, 2-3000 passengers at a time!

    2. avatar enuf says:

      True. Under the US Constitution if you wanted to outfit a boat to fight Somalian Piracy, it would be perfectly lawful for the US Govt to issue you a license to do so, under our most sacred and fundamental law.

      That would be a good thing. Sadly, out of fashion.

      1. avatar Mercury says:

        No, the license (letter of marque) is so you can capture goods and ships of a country with which your country is at war, without being labeled a pirate (legally speaking.) Constitution or not, you could always arm your ship as you saw fit. Anything less would be absurd. Because of the pirates.

        You were being sarcastic, but you’ve accidentally demonstrated the point instead. Nothing about the keeping and bearing of arms has been changed by technology since the penning of the Constitution. The same utility in an individual owning the most destructive arms available applies now just as it did then. I make only an exception for nuclear weapons, because I don’t think anyone, even (especially) governments, should have those.

    3. avatar adverse6 says:

      I have a really well armed rubber duck.

  16. avatar tsbhoa.p.jr says:

    i really think they would have liked me to have a cannon.

    1. avatar Southern Cross says:

      You can in black powder.

  17. avatar JolJ says:

    Silly Rabbit
    The founding Fathers are dead, they do not care what I buy.

  18. avatar RGP says:

    Buy whatever you want. Don’t tell me what to get.

  19. avatar James Macklin says:

    The Second Amendment began as the 5th. The 1st began as the 3rd. Fact is all are equal. But why a Bill of Rights?
    Declaration of Independence say The People have right and duty to preserve freedom by changing gov’t. This was not limited to King George.
    After the War Patrick Henry objected to ratification of the new Constitution because only the state’s had a right to arms.
    The Bill of Rights was the answer. The People had to have parity with the gov’t.
    The Second Amendment protect the people/citizens power to control gov’t. That power restrains bad gov’t. The right for military arms is protected.
    Self-defense is a 10th AMENDMENT right because nobody considered controversial.
    SCOTUS almost got it correctly in 1939 and 2010 but they claimed SD was the reason.
    Certainly The People could be nuked but the socialist politicians want the machinery in place. Butter have schools indoctrinate the students and have MSM lie.

  20. avatar Guns are not the answer, AMMO is! Good luck finding it says:

    Ammo the answer to all of life’s dirtbag criminals!

  21. avatar Jeff O. says:

    Ugh. FINE. Twist my arm…but only because TJ and Georgie W. wanted me to.

  22. avatar Chris T in KY says:

    Make the Founders happy and save money at the same time. Just attach a bayonet to your AR-15. Or any long gun. Use duc tape if you have to. Also you can use a small knife for weapons without a bayonet lug.

    1. avatar Chris T in KY says:

      Or just give the company your long gun barrel dimensions. And they will make you a bayonet lug to fit your gun. Any gun.

      https://cogburnarsenal.com/product/two-part-clamp-on-bayonet-lug/

  23. avatar sound awake says:

    ive been buying or building at least 1 every year for a while…
    i now have 8:
    2 x 10.5 pistols in 5.56 and 7.62×39
    4 x 16 carbines in 5.56 6.8 and 300 blk
    an 18 in 5.56
    and a 20 in 6.5 cm
    havent i done enough already

  24. avatar adverse6 says:

    I’m going to run right out and buy a muzzle loading AR15.

    1. avatar Mad Max says:

      There were semi-automatic weapons around when the Bill of Rights was written and ratified.

      The Girardoni air rifle dates to 1779.

      1. avatar adverse6 says:

        Effective out to 125-150 yards. Adopted by the Austrian Army in 1780. Taken out of service in 1788, reissued in 1792 for use as sniper rifles. Probably illegal in The Socialist Territories. 22 round capacity and all that.

  25. avatar Mad Max says:

    “Don’t Disappoint the Founding Fathers…Buy an AR-15 Rifle Today”

    Or two or three or…

    Just like Lay’s potato chips… (Betcha can’t eat just one…).

  26. avatar adverse6 says:

    I’d want a plain jane AR-15, 20 inch barrel, “iron sights”. No hangers, no junk, other than whatever needed to make it more reliable than the original. The serious rifle in 5.56 NATO, as opposed to the clamor of the war toy. Then I’d get a 1952 Chevy or a 1948 Ford pick-up to haul ammo with. That might take awhile. (52 Chevy and 48 Ford were the tanks of the civilian world in their time).

    1. avatar MADDMAXX says:

      looking at a 49 Studebaker w/transplanted Ford 351 (pre-computer w/carburetor), 5 speed and 9 inch rear, disc brakes and coil overs w/air…. Add a couple of air bags in the rear and haul/tow anything you might need…. Late 40s early 50’s Fords in good condition are getting premium prices, I can get this one for less than $10,000 w/little cash exchange if we can come to terms on one my mid/late 80s or early 90s Mustangs… He wants my Terminator but that one is NOT for sale (03, DSG vert, 40,000 miles, 600 plus rear wheel HP) way too much fun and worth WAY over ten grand…

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email