Claire McCaskill Democrat Gun Control Bump Stock Ban Semi-Automatic Large Capacity Magazine Lies Project Veritas
courtesy dailywire.com and Getty

MCCASKILL: “Well if we elect enough Democrats we’ll get some gun safety stuff done. They won’t let us vote on it, we’ve got 60 votes for a number of measures that would help with gun safety, but McConnell won’t let ’em come to the floor.”

JOURNALIST: “Like bump stocks, ARs and high capacity mags…?”

MCCASKILL: “Universal background checks, all of that… But if we have the kind of year I think we might have I think we could actually be in a position to get votes on this stuff on the floor and we’d get 60 [votes]…”

JOURNALIST: “So you would be on board with the bump stocks and… high capacity mags.”

MCCASKILL: “Of course! Of course!”

Red state Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill in Project Veritas’s “People just can’t know that.” MO Sen. McCaskill Hides Agenda Including “semi-automatic rifle ban” from Moderate Voters, Staffers Reveal in Undercover Video it “could hurt her ability to get elected.”

63 COMMENTS

    • Democrats only have three solutions to any given problem. All of them are morally wrong and repugnant.

      1). Raise taxes for some government service.
      2). Ban it. Make it illegal.
      3). Regulate it. Tax it – so you can raise taxes more, so you can have some more government regulations banning some aspects of it while taxing others later, enforced by some government service.

  1. James O’Keefe is doing legendary work and should be considered a Patriot in the mold of the brave Sons Of Liberty some 250 years ago.

    • OR even a few decades ago ocassionally a “journalist” in the the main stream media would do a REAL story rather than reading from a demtard party fax.

    • Nope. That guy has fabricated a lot of stuff, to the point of untrustworthiness. Now, I don’t doubt that McCaskill really did say those things, but Project Veritas is a joke, and makes you look like an idiot if you bring it up as evidence. There are plenty of true things to bring up about the left. When you resort to fabrication, you only hurt our credibility.

      • Actual video of her saying exactly those things isn’t likely to be fabricated. That’s evidence that only PV could produce, now.

      • That’s leftist propaganda. PV has always released unedited footage whenever the filthy, subhuman Liberal Terrorists™️ have tried to diminish him. So typical of thenpost-modernists whontry to convince folks that the truth is “flexible”. What, the words out of the treasonous gash’s mouth wasn’t enough for you? Where’s your unequivocal condemnation for lying to her constituents?

        • “Where’s your unequivocal condemnation for lying to her constituents?”

          Please dont tell me that you think politicians tell their constituents the truth….even ones you support. If you do you’re dafter than warren trying to prove her indian heritage.

          All politicians are trash, they are to be used for our purposes but never to be trusted. Never forget that or you will become a tool to be used by them.

      • Found the Shill

        Alright Ivan, what exactly did Project Veritas ‘fabricate’? I’ve followed them for some time and about the only thing that could remotely be considered ‘fabrication’ is how they’ve tried to BS their way into a Federal Facility to get an interview (something which O’keefe was charged for) and how his organizations also tried to BS their way into Planned Parent hood to investigating claims that they were engaging in illegal for profit fetal tissue trafficking.

        And to go even further… why exactly did multiple high level personal in the DNC get fired when Veritas exposed illegal actions during the 2016 Presidential Election?

      • The only thing they fabricate is their identities in order to get folks to open up with their real thoughts. They pose as left wing media. There”s NOTHING wrong with that if the truth comes out.

      • Fabricated what?

        Project Veritas uses their target’s own words against them.

        Any time Project Veritas is accused of deceptive editing they release the un-edited videos.

        Project Veritas uses deception to get their targets to say, in their own words, what they really think and feel.

        Thank God for James O’Keefe and his crew.

      • Seems to me that I have enough of an understanding of the English language(i.e., the words recorded in the videos), and vision clear enough to objectively determine what I see in a video is factual or not. The contextual perspective of the video is a relative issue, in that the context itself brings into play political perspectives.
        As it stands for me, all of the Project Veritas videos I have seen to date I consider factual and totally representative of the event recorded.

  2. “MCCASKILL: “Universal background checks, all of that… But if we have the kind of year I think we might have I think we could actually be in a position to get votes on this stuff on the floor and we’d get 60 [votes]…”

    You might get 60 votes (doubtful), but what you want to push through will be so extreme Trump will cheerfully veto it.

    If Trump looses in 2020 and the Leftists get an administration similar to what Obama had in 2008 and they ram a shit-sandwich of gun control through, the blowback will make what happened after the ‘Affordable Care Act’ look like child’s play. And SCOTUS will likely bitch-slap it so hard their heads spin. ‘Universal background checks’ will be seen as gun registration.

    And gun registration has never been considered ‘traditional’.

    Do it, Leftists. Overreach. See what it gets you…

    • I’m not gonna lie- I’m by no means complacent, but I sleep better at night knowing that the chances for unconstitutional laws being overturned at the Supreme Court are higher than they’ve ever been (in our lifetime).

        • Roberts’ vote won’t be decisive once RBG or Breyer are replaced, that is statistically likely to happen sooner rather than later.

          Then there’s Sotomayor’s diabetes.

          President Trump is going to have lasting consequences.

  3. There are probably 20,000,000 modern sporting rifles out there. Folks who own such firearms need to vote….against the democrats…..sure, many GOP politicians stink, but they stink a lot less than democrats. While the polls show the GOP is doing better lately, take nothing for granted.

    VOTE

    • “…sure, many GOP politicians stink, but they stink a lot less than democrats.”

      Which is why we have the GOP we have. Since at least 2000, the only thing Republicrats seem to offer is, “We’re not as bad as them”.

      • The GOP Senate has delivered Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. If that’s the only thing they accomplish all year, I will be eternally grateful.

        • “The GOP Senate has delivered Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.”

          Not seeing GOP running on such achievements. Maybe other places. But can the GOP prevail on just two wins in two years?

      • And it’s true. Make no mistake, I want a vibrant and strong GOP that is loyal to the Constitution as written. But I’ll take anything better than the overtly communistic present day Democrat party. If I have a choice between cutting off my head (dem) or my arm (Republicans) I’ll take the lesser of 2 evils EVERYTIME so I can fight another day.

        • “If I have a choice between cutting off my head (dem) or my arm (Republicans) ”

          It seems the choice is really between quick death for the republic, or slow death.

  4. You might get 60 votes (doubtful), but what you want to push through will be so extreme Trump will cheerfully veto it.

    I hope so but in spite of their craziness, the dems are not stupid. I could see something like this being tied to an omnibus spending bill putting Trump in the situation of signing it or shutting down the government. Last time he signed off on such a bill without border wall funding. Hopefully next time around he doesn’t.

  5. I read about this 2 1/2hours ago and searched for news outlets in Missouri to have covered this. Nothing. Not even crickets. Shows how the media is covering for the leftist agenda. I don’t normally post things like that, but this is ridiculous.

  6. I lived in Missouri when this [flame self-censored] defeated Jim Talent. Missouri republicans were stupid for voting for Claire then, and they remain stupid for continuing to vote for her. (All a democrat has to do, historically, in Missouri is put on the fake Missourah accent, and play to the union crowd, and they get elected.

    At least this year, Hawley appears to be leading and keeping Claire under 45%. This year may finally be the year. Project Veritas may have just put Hawley over the edge for good.

    • I’m still here, Chip and I remember the time you mention. She’s been ingrained in this area for decades just like Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver has. Their root systems are as deep as a 50 year old oak tree. Claire signs are everywhere in this region and she will more than likely get voted in by the low information voters with help from the lazy republicans who don’t bother going to the polls. You lived here. You know what it’s like.

  7. The GOP needs every Senate seat they can get in 2018. In 2020, they are REALLY on the defensive. 2020 is probably what Schumer is eyeing.

  8. That this crazy geriatric shrewbat still, in Oct, needs to shore up her progtard base by talking gun control, just proves that she is going to LOOSE.

    By the fall any dem that not transitioned to lying about what they believe (IE lying about loving American, Vets, respect the 2nd and rule of law, etc in order to attract “swing” voters). is going to LOOSE. If they don’t have their idiot kook leftist party base locked down by now, they are going to LOOSE. So sad.

  9. I wish I could be optimistic of her loss in the senatorial race in Missouri however she will more than likely get elected due more to the low information voters than anything else. Then those same low information voters who also have guns, and around here they do, will one day say, “Hey, hey, HEY, what are you doing limiting MY gun and gun shooting accessories?”. She’s been a staple in the Kansas City region for decades and Josh Hawley who she is running against has not. I can drive up and down the roads anywhere in the multiple counties that make up the western side of the state and see plenty of “Claire” signs. However….I did see lots of Hillary signs, too….hmmm………(chin stroke)

  10. I don’t know what the attraction is of these angry feminists in their Chairman Mao pantsuits. Politicians were always out to serve themselves but would at least give the people a little something . Even Ted Kennedy had a bill passed that a person without medical insurance could not be refused medical treatment. Prior to that you were left to die. You couldn’t find much worse a person than Ted , but at least he made it look good. These modern liberals don’t even good at lying . They are so transparent and still get elected .

  11. Since the items she mentions are enumerated in the Constitution wouldn’t it reason that what needs to be banned is Claire McCaskill instead .

  12. Claire is one of those people that causes me to start hearing a certain song whenever I see her likeness.

    In her case I start hearing the beat to Big L’s “The Enemy”.

  13. The Democrats have turned hard left (communist) in the last 60 years or so. In 1959 a democrat politician running for the presidency did an interview with GUNS magazine where he lauded the second amendment and was a life member of the NRA. Who was that politician? John F. Kennedy.

  14. It’s not “gun safety,” it’s “politician safety.”

    Can’t let those Americans have firepower that can rival good old government.

  15. My only choice for Governor in M-assachusetts is that [email protected], “Globalist RINO and his LT., F–rated by Gun Owners Action League of Massachusetts “/ Current Gov. Charlie “The Barker ” Baker…Or The new Latino, illuminati, DemoCommie Gov. Candidate/ Gonzalez…!? WFT?!? True [email protected] GOP candidate/Lively was knocked out of the GOP primaries by Marching Morons, and GOP low information voters—-who DON’T care about the 2nd Amendment in M–assachusetts!

  16. You know, when it comes right down to it, the only reason some people are alive is because it illegal to kill them.
    Yes I said that and approve it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here