Is Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell’s H.R. 7977 Another Bait And Switch Gun Control Bill?

Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell

Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, foreground, D-Fla. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)

Another Democrat, one Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell [FL-26], who apparently has no concept of the currently laws regulating firearms in this country, has filed a bill to criminalize dealers selling firearms to straw purchasers, the mentally ill, or drunkards.

Florida congresswoman wants gun dealers held accountable for suspected straw purchases

Brown said that when her organization uses its legal team to challenge gun laws in court, they must provide evidence that a gun dealer engaged in gross negligence while making a sale. She said Mucarsel-Powell’s bill would create a “knowing standard,” meaning that a gun dealer would be held responsible if they knew that a person was violating the law at the time of purchase.

Regular TTAG readers will immediately see the problem. For newcomers — particularly those millions of new gun owners who need to know this for their own protection — let’s brush up on existing law. In this case, 18 U.S. Code § 922. Unlawful acts.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to sell or deliver—

(2) any firearm to any person in any State where the purchase or possession by such person of such firearm would be in violation of any State law or any published ordinance applicable at the place of sale, delivery or other disposition, unless the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the purchase or possession would not be in violation of such State law or such published ordinance;

So gun retailers already can’t knowing make those sales. To continue . . .

(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) is a fugitive from justice;
(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
(5) who, being an alien—
(A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or
(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(26)));
(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;
(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—
(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and
(B)
(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or
(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
(9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

The prohibition of unlawful firearm sales isn’t even limited to dealers. It’s alreay unlawful for anyone to knowingly sell a firearm to prohibited persons.

So what is the point of Mucarsel-Powell’s bill? Is she the ignorant idiot she appears to be, or lying through her teeth (not that those are mutually exclusive)?

I’d love to analyze H.R. 7977 and tell you which, but for some strange reason, despite having been filed nearly a month ago (weirdly, her press release claims it was only filed on September 1, 2020), the text isn’t yet available. I attempted to email Mucarsel-Powell, but her contact form is impenetrable.

In the meantime, she has a “summary” of her bill which is enlightening. According to that, it would mandate regular training on identifying unlawful sales, redundantly makes illegal sales unlawful, adds intoxicated people to the prohibited list, and regulate store signage.

Oh, yes. Mucarsel-Powell would also mandate that gun sellers carry more “business” and “liability” insurance. I strongly suspect that the real text — once it’s revealed — would gut the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, enabling violence-enabling victim-disarmers and their allies in the tort bar to sue gun retailers and manufacturers into oblivion.

Why else would they need to carry more liability insurance, unless she’s trying to increase their liability for acts beyond their control?

The devil is always in the details with these bills.

comments

  1. avatar Rob says:

    It’s a setup for a gut and amend

    1. avatar Kyle says:

      Yup, that is the latest game the left is playing to get rid of that stupid 250 year old birdcage liner.

      Gut and Amend, the Totalitarian’s best friend.

      1. avatar Matty 9 says:

        Or, she’s just trying to score points with her libtard base.

        Either way, this should be stopped.

  2. avatar Specialist38 says:

    It has achieved her goal.

    I cite this article about HER and her “Bill”.

    1. avatar Geoff "Ammo. LOTS of ammo..." PR says:

      I have a better idea – Let’s make a vehicle manufacturer or dealer criminally-liable if an end-user commits the felony crime of DUI manslaughter in a vehicle they made or sold.

      We’ll call it “The stopping the scourge of needless DUI deaths by holding the manufacturer’s and dealers liable act of 2020”.

      When enough manufacturers and dealers are sued into oblivion for selling such dangerous machinery, they will make sure who they sell to will be responsible when using them! DUI deaths will plummet! The highways will be safer!

      Won’t it? 🙂

  3. avatar tsbhoa.p.jr says:

    hyphenated last names are a sign of mental illness.

    1. avatar Never worn a mask never will says:

      Hyphenated last names are a sign of failure to commit. A need to hold on to ones own individuality (wants and desires) while at the same time vowing to be true to another (person, job, position). The way she “wears” her mask is a perfect example. This individual should never have been elected to a position of authority. But then this country is packed full of individuals who have zero discernment.

      1. avatar Green Mtn. Boy says:

        Can you imagine being the putz that married that pice of work.

        1. avatar gene says:

          Imagine if the hyphenated last name came from a first spouse and you’re further down the line of succession.

      2. avatar Tired of the bs says:

        She needs to pull that mask up! My eyes! It burns!

  4. avatar Nullification says:

    After the defund the police and leftist violence movement…
    We know their goal is to genocide their political opposition.
    So, I expect any new gun legislation will be widely ignored.
    Or in other words, they can get F’d.

  5. avatar Fernell Hominger says:

    The 2nd Amendment is the only amendment in the Constitution with the words: “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

    Yet, it is the most infringed amendment in the Constitution….by far.

  6. avatar Tim says:

    Murdercrats promise to not burn your house down if you vote for them.

    Might rape your daughter, though.

    1. avatar Rusty Shackleford says:

      That is how they got the name Pedocrats!

  7. avatar Sam I Am says:

    One more law to pile-on in hopes of getting a plea deal that prohibits whoever from ever possessing firearms again.

  8. avatar Green Mtn. Boy says:

    Why not make it unlawful for her to be a Marxist plague on Floridians in particular and Americans in general,Eff off witch.

  9. avatar Mitch says:

    Just another liberal Gink.

  10. avatar MADDMAXX says:

    meaning that a gun dealer would be held responsible if they knew that a person was violating the law at the time of purchase.

    I believe that is already a law somewhere… uhmmm… Oh yeah I know, Federal Firearms Act of 1938 (“FFA”): Requires that gun manufacturers, importers, and those in the business of selling firearms have a Federal Firearms License (FFL). Prohibits the transfer of firearms to certain classes of people, such as convicted felons.
    I’m pretty sure that covers “KNOWLEDGE” that a person was violating the law at the time of purchase… Nice try Debbie-Downer, but it won’t fly…

  11. avatar Pb_fan59 says:

    I never trust anyone with pterodactyl arms

    1. avatar Montana Actual says:

      lol wtf. Me neither.

    2. avatar Bob in Calif says:

      Those aren’t pterodactyl arms. They are tyrant-asaurus arms.

  12. avatar Montana Actual says:

    so… what exactly is new here? Has she even read the previous 100 bills that are currently in place?

    It’s pretty despicable how these democrats just run on passing bills they know are either already in place or doomed to fail just for the marketing gimmick, and it works on simple hive minded dems.

    1. avatar Sam I Am says:

      “Has she even read the previous 100 bills that are currently in place?”

      Politicians get creds for authoring, or co-sponsoring legislation….whether it passes or not. If the bill does pass, even more creds. Shows they are “leaders” when jockeying for position on committees.

  13. avatar Jim DeGraaf says:

    She’s a Democrat. Democrats’ stock-in-trade: Hate civilian-owned guns, demonize legal civilian gun owners, do everything in their power to, by force of law, remove all guns from civilian hands and eradicate any and all means to legally obtain them.

  14. avatar Alan says:

    How is it that such ignorant clowns obtain elective, law making office?

    1. avatar Sam I Am says:

      “How is it that such ignorant clowns obtain elective, law making office?”

      Voted, “Most Likely To Succeed”, by their peers.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email