Previous Post
Next Post

Another one related to the ATF’s new pistol brace rules.


Previous Post
Next Post


  1. Q whats the difference between a woman and a dog
    A lock both of them in the trunk of your for an hour and the dog will be happy to see you when you let them out

    • “Q whats the difference between a woman and a dog”

      Democrat politician answer: “Whats a woman?”

    • Not sure I’d place much value on the affections of something too stupid to recognize that I’m abusive to it, but whatever.

      • Think there are plenty of lonely people more than willing to put up with the abuse. Unfortunately.

        *And just as unfortunate, plenty of sick people that are more than happy to provide said abuse.

    • Even if you ascribe pure and morally good motives to everyone in ATF and the whole thing goes off without a hitch and everyone who applies for the tax stamp gets one (and Hunter never took bribes for his daddy). What happens when the next Democrat administration (bound to happen eventually, 2036?) decides that the ATF is never again going to give you permission to take your SBR out of state? You did know you have to ask and also be given permission to take your SBR out of state, didn’t you?

  2. I don’t concern myself with novelties so I don’t care how much paper they can shuffle. Goes for bump stocks too.

    • We need to care.

      Because tens of *millions* of the damn things is stark proof that they are indeed, “In common use.”

      That’s our ‘Golden Ticket’, since “In common use” is the exact term Scalia used in the watershed ‘Heller’ decision to identify what guns are expressly protected by the 2A.

      And what better way to drive that point home than a literal mountain of applications being dumped at the BATF offices? 🙂

      • I have no desire for a brace or bump stock, BUT if the ATF and TPTB think I won’t support others owning/using them then they wrong. We were once a country of live and let live but bureaucrats gotta bureaucrat.

    • It’s the classic principle of the matter. I don’t want or need an SBR because they’re far noisier and have less range, power and accuracy compared to a longer barrel, but I don’t want the ATF going anywhere near anyone’s range toys because that isn’t where they will stop; it’s only where they’ll start. Give them an inch and they’ll take the entire circumference of the planet.

  3. They’ve said, once you submit the paperwork, you are deemed to be in compliance.
    If and EVER they process it is inconsequential, they have your information and that’s all that matters.

    • I’ve been thinking about their little trap…

      A question for the actual lawyers –

      Say you submit your photograph of your ‘offending’ firearm without a barrel on it? Or with a rifle barrel on it. Claim the gunsmith who will cut and thread it is backed up with work, but you wanna be legal.

      With no physical short barrel, there’s no hard proof you were ever in possession of an SBR. After all, had you submitted a photograph of a receiver with a rifle-legal length 16-inch barrel on it, it’s just a rifle.

      Could that strategy work?


    • NTexas, You may not need/want one now but keep living and there may come a day when one is rather handy. I don’t need one either(age 80) but do support those who do and am against the idea of making them illegal.

  5. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) outs ex-twitter execs and fbi data collection on citizens via twitter while she assailed ex-Twitter executives over her ‘shadow ban’.

    • Just another conservative exposing their abject ignorance of the constitution, not realizing the first amendment applies only to government and not to private citizens or businesses.

      And thereby exposing the conservatives’ fascist conspiracy to censor private citizens free speech by forcing businesses to display their crazy conspiracy rants.

      It’s clear Lauren Boebert should’ve finished high school, rather than hanging out with a sexual predator of children.

      “Boebert’s future husband, Jayson, also had brushes with law enforcement. In January 2004, he was arrested after allegedly exposing his penis to two women at a bowling alley, according to an arrest affidavit. Lauren Boebert (then age 17 and known as Lauren Opal Roberts) was also there. Jayson Boebert pleaded guilty to public indecency and lewd exposure, earning himself four days in jail and two years’ probation.“

      Of course, Boebert herself has been arrested for grooming underage children by supporting the underage consumption of alcohol and interfering with LEOs’ attempts to prevent the children from consuming alcohol:

      “Back in June 2015, Boebert was cuffed for disorderly conduct at a country music festival near Grand Junction, Colo., after police said she attempted to interfere in the arrest of minors busted for underage drinking and encouraged the accused to run off. Boebert said the revelers had not been read their Miranda rights and that the arrest was illegal.
      “Lauren continued yelling and causing the underage drinkers to become unruly,” an arresting officer said in a statement at the time. “Lauren said multiple times that she had friends at Fox News and that the illegal arrest would be national news.” At the time, Boebert was running Shooters Grill in Rifle, Colo. The story was first reported by Colorado Newsline.
      Boebert subsequently missed two court appearances and was arrested again in December 2015. The charge was dismissed“

      It’s good to have corrupt friends in high places who can conceal your grooming of adolescents.

      • The government has been caught red-handed using multiple tech companies to censor speech. Government censorship via proxy is still government censorship. It’s a clear-cut civil rights violation.

        • “The government has been caught red-handed using multiple tech companies to censor speech“

          You mean when Donald Trump ordered Twitter to remove a tweet where he was correctly identified as a “pussy ass bitch”?

          “It was revealed Wednesday during a Congressional House Oversight Committee hearing regarding Twitter’s handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story, that the Trump White House demanded that the social media platform take down a Chrissy Teigen tweet calling the onetime Chief Executive of the United States a “pussy ass bitch.”

          You are correct, President Donald Trump’s attempted censorship was indeed a clear-cut civil rights violation.

          “The government has been caught red-handed using multiple tech companies to censor speech“

          Do you have a specific example other than Trump?

        • Per your link:
          “The tweet in question, from Sept. 9, 2019, was not removed.”

          So there was no suppression of speech from Trump. Got it. Is that what you guys are clinging to?

          “Do you have a specific example other than Trump?”

          Have you been chained inside of a cave for the past two years?

          I have examples where the IC was conducting regular meetings with tech companies, and feeding them misinformation with the intention of suppressing speech. The suppression of speech was for the purpose of meddling in an election. You know, the thing you freaked out about for three years straight? Except this time, it isn’t a lie. There are other examples where they directly asked for and received suppression of speech. This was mostly to protect their Covid and election-related narratives. You aren’t allowed to question the government! What sort of bootlicker would be for that? Want to figure out what the important issues are? Find out what you aren’t allowed to question.

          The FBI successfully meddled in the 2020 election via an influence operation that pushed Big Tech platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube to suppress certain information online, putting to bed defenses that tech giants can suppress whatever speech they want because they’re private companies, not government actors.

          Berenson’s legal discovery unearthed internal Twitter documents and Slack conversations showing Biden administration officials instructed the social media company to de-platform him because he was dissenting from the official line on school lockdowns and the efficacy of vaccines.

      • minor you don’t know squat. charges dismissed. maybe? because they couldn’t prove it. I don’t know, neither do you.
        they dismiss the charges against you for grooming your little brother and lewed acts with barnyard animals yet?

      • You do know that when the FBI colludes with a private company your argument goes right down the drain right? Let’s hear your spin on this.

  6. Two Would-Be Carjackers Routed By Armed Citizen >

    Teen Shuts Down Home Invasion With Mother’s Pistol >

    [Video] Man Attempts To Abduct Barista Through Drive-Thru Window > (not a DGU but does illustrate that the threat can happen anywhere any time, and that’s also why we carry)

Comments are closed.