To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
In the article from Ruth Bass in the Berkshireeagle.com wrote:
The Second Amendment never meant that you and I have the freedom to own a weapon that’s a threat to family, neighborhood and town. It does grant “the right to bear arms,” which certainly was essential in the pre-police, pre-army days when an individual had to nail a coyote before it grabbed the last sheep or protect the family from a band of marauders. In either case, they did a lot of reloading.
Wrong ! Wrong ! Wrong.!
The second amendment Says nothing about what fire arm we have the right to own lady. Just that we have the right and that right SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED period !! And really ? She thinks we should revert back to using something akin to muzzle loaders . Lets just move to the country and live in mud huts and hunt with rocks like cave men. Of course now I am being ridiculous
Never ceases to amaze me just how ignorant people are about firearms ownership.
And a scant 37.8oz. 😉
The Shockwave is a very specific tool for a very specific job.
Up close and personal within an enclosed space. Home DEFENSE, and/or in a vehicle while sitting DEFENSE.
They are tapped for a rail and with a pistol laser and/or a light they are effective much farther than you would ever need in a house or vehicle..
The Shockwave was first released and the Remington followed.
As of this post the Shockwave is now also available in 20 ga.
Your choice, but carrying 1 more round and Mossberg ergonomics works for me.
Your mileage may vary.
Surprised the article on the Chicago PD didn’t ding them for the “7.62 caliber” rather than 7.62mm. 7.62 caliber does sound like a good weapon to get off the street…