Defensive Gun Use of the Day: Detroit Mom Wields “Assault Rifle” Edition


It’s amazing, astounding really that the’s printed version of their TV report [click on screen cap to see it] doesn’t mention the fact that the “brave Mom” defending her brood against home invaders ended the attack with an “assault rifle.” The video report calls it “this rifle.” Of course, CNN chat show host and rabid anti-gunner Piers Morgan will highlight the weapon wielded for this defensive gun use on tonight’s show, admitting that “I was wrong to say that Americans never use assault rifles for self-defense.” Or not. Here’s what happened . . .

The mother tells Action News she “didn’t have time to get scared.” When she heard the door to her home on Woodrow Wilson being kicked in, she immediately warned the three teenage intruders and then opened fire.

One of the teens dropped a handgun on his way out the door. He then tried to get back inside the house a second time, but was again met with gunfire. Once again, he took off and all three were arrested shortly after the incident by Detroit Police.

Recalling the panic she felt, the mom says “I let them know I had a gun once they were in the house. They said no you don’t so I shot off the first round. I wasn’t feeling anything at the moment, I got scared afterwards.”

One wonders how the antis will spin this AR-style defensive gun use. More likely they’ll just ignore it.


  1. avatar Nick says:

    This happens all the time, it just doesn’t make the news.

    1. avatar Cameron says:

      That’s one beat to shit high point

      1. avatar Tom says:

        Call it a junk gun or “Saturday Night Special” , it worked when it had to.

        1. avatar Rick says:

          Roger that. You don’t get any points for “pretty” after a gunfight. Besides, the po-po are going to take it away after the DGU; I wouldn’t get all tore up over this particular unit.

          Hi-Points are pretty much the Bic lighters of the gun world.

        2. avatar Jonathan - Houston says:

          Hear hear! Whether there’s an appropriate time and place for gun snobbery is debatable. Whether that time and place is zero dark thirty in one’s own hallway, however, is not.

          Run the gun ya brung, I say, to coin a phrase with no hope of ever catching on.

        3. avatar Tomy Ironmane says:

          @Rick: You mean cheap, replaceable, and go off the first time every time?

      2. avatar Cameron B says:

        Off the cuff comment on my part.
        My remark wasn’t so much about the make or quality of said gun but the condition it appears to be in. The surface rust and dust if it were a less robust firearm I wouldn’t elect if to feed reliably. I use my tools, trucks, and guns hard, I also take care of them, a little wd40 and a rag goes a long way.

        1. avatar Anmut says:

          HiPoints don’t care about oil – they’ll run dry and rusty. Then, when it finally does lockup hard you just send it back to HiPoint and they’ll honor their lifetime warranty, no questions asked! People hate on HiPoint because they’re ugly and clumsy (both true), but they are an All American Firearms Company of The People!

        2. avatar CA.Ben says:

          WD-40 is not oil, it’s a water displacer. Great for keeping rust away as you mentioned, but if you use it in your guns internals, then all you are doing is making sure that they aren’t wet while they grind themselves into dust.

        3. avatar Russ Bixby says:

          It is oil, but not intended as a lubricant.

          Non-gaseous/non-wax/non-tar petroleum fractions: oil.

          I’d not lubricate a gun with heating oil, either, but it’s oil.

        4. avatar Tom says:

          Just pointing out how inexpensive firearms demonized by libtards, fulfill meet a market need.

    2. avatar Carlos U. says:

      You need to re-title this article:

      “Moms TAKE action.”

      And that would be a great title for a series, BTW.

  2. avatar Kenpm says:

    Since when is a High Point carbine an assault rifle? I’d barely call it a rifle at all.

    1. avatar Nathan.B says:

      Remember, it’s purely based on appearance, not whether it’s any good:
      Color=Black: Check
      Pistol Grip:Check
      Military Style:(read, black) Check
      Offensive and Scary looking:confirmed
      =Assault weapon!

      1. avatar peirsonb says:

        My browser here doesn’t always render images correctly, but the picture I see would be more “Color: Rusted”

      2. avatar Peter says:

        Yeah, but it doesn’t have the shoulder thing that goes up

        1. avatar Tomy Ironmane says:

          true, the shoulder thing is fixed in the up position, which makes it MORE dangerous because you can hit someone with it.

      3. avatar fuque says:

        Brought to bear in a Liberal infested shithole- check

      4. avatar FoRealz? says:

        It has them .30 caliber magazine clips too.

        1. avatar Russ Bixby says:


    2. avatar seans says:

      Its not a assault rifle, its a “assault weapon”. Huge distinction there.

    3. avatar Jeremy S says:

      Funny you should ask, since the Hi-Point carbine was specifically designed to be compliant with the ’94 AWB law. But, one was used in the Columbine shooting, forever sealing it as an “assault weapon” in the eyes of the media. This is, of course, despite the fact that the one used was specifically NOT an AW under the AWB and all 13 magazines possessed by the shooter were of compliant, 10-round capacity flavor. 96 shots were fired through the Hi-Point there.

      Compare the above to the other shooter’s primary weapon, a TEC-9, which WAS an assault weapon under the law, including the 52-, 32-, and 28-round magazines the shooter had with him. Despite this, the TEC-9 only fired 55 times.

      1. avatar Aaron says:

        dammit Jeremy, stop it with all the facts and stuff! You are a buzzkill for liberal “feel-good” legislation.

    4. avatar John says:

      When DiFi rewrote her proposed (thankfully failed) AWB again recently, she had the Hi-Point on it.

  3. avatar Bill says:

    trusty rusty hipoint carbine for the win!

  4. avatar JoshinGA says:

    The Hi-point carbines also make excellent bludgeons if you run out of ammo, tipping the scales at over 6 pounds.

    1. avatar lolinski says:

      You can’t honestly say that about 3 kg (6 pounds) is bludgeony. Yes, “bludgeony” is a word (adjective).

      1. avatar JoshinGA says:

        Most baseball bats are longer than the hipoint “carbine” and weigh about 1 kg. I think we can agree that baseball bats are very “bludgeony”. Something 3x the weight in a shorter package definitely qualifies as “bludgeony” in my book.

      2. avatar Marcus Aurelius says:

        I’d say a two pound sledge is pretty dang bludgeony.

      3. avatar William Burke says:

        The noun would be “bludgeonry”; I love the sound of “bludgeonry”, don’t you?

        “After shooting the perp down, the little lady of the house committed bludgeonry upon his still body.”

        1. avatar Tomy Ironmane says:

          It is preferable to not commit bludgeonry with a loaded weapon, however. If you still have ammo, use that instead.

        2. avatar FoRealz? says:

          As they used to say in ze Army regarding bayonets, if you’re close enough to stick ’em, you’re close enough to shoot ’em.

  5. avatar Tyler3923 says:

    I will never understand why someone would fire a warning shot within their home. If I had to fire within my home, I want “something” to catch lead that I dont/didnt have to pay for.

    1. avatar Manimal says:

      Based on just the information here, I didn’t really get the impression she had fired a warning shot.

      1. avatar TheBear says:

        Nor I.

        Plus everyone is different. Everyone reacts to stress differently, and no sane human being easily takes a life.

      2. avatar FoRealz? says:

        I took her account to be that she warned them verbally she had a gun and when they proceeded against her she showed them her lead farming skills.

      3. avatar Larry says:

        The advisability of a warning shot depends on the distance. As in, if you miss, that was a warning shot, jerkwad.

    2. avatar William Burke says:

      Lead-catcher. Check.

  6. avatar Paul G. says:

    Who cares if it was a hipoint, it did what she needed it to do.

    1. avatar Mark L says:

      That was my thoughts. It was a firearm and it fired. I doubt the teens at the receiving end stopped to ask her, “say, is that a Highpoint rifle you just fired at me? Well if it is, I’m not scared”
      That’s like concerning yourself over what kind of rock you just got hit in the head with. It makes no difference if it was crushed rock, river rock or a chunk of Utah red rock.

      1. avatar NJ2AZ says:

        heck it wouldn’t surprise me if the gun the attacker dropped was a hi point C9

    2. avatar CentralIL says:

      Yep. On the “Money Spent vs. Utility for Self-Defense” graph, the slope is greater between $0 and $300 than between $300 and $1000.

      Going from no gun to a Hi-Point is more of an improvement than going from a Hi-Point to a Sig.

      1. avatar Kevin A. says:

        I’d say going from no gun to
        A hi point is more than going from a hi point to a Wilson Combat.

      2. avatar Tomy Ironmane says:

        I would argue that for some people going from a hi-point to a sig would be a step down…. if you have to shoot someone with it, the local po-po ain’t gonna let you KEEP it. And with the savings from keeping a hi-point instead of a Sig… you can buy another hi point.

    3. avatar FoRealz? says:

      Yup. They have a face only a mother could love, but like a fat girl at an all you can eat buffet, they just go and go.

  7. avatar Frank Masotti says:

    Good for her. ๐Ÿ™‚

  8. avatar Adam says:

    And this why we need a company or two like Hi-Point in the gun market.

    I know a lot of us gun snobs think they are crap, but for a single mom in the inner city (not that this was necessarily the case here, but you get my point) on a budget, a gun that goes boom on the cheap is what they need.

    Bravo Hi-Point!

    1. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

      I agree vehemently.

      I know I’m probably one of the worst about being a gun snob here on TTAG. I like nice guns, nice old guns, nice guns that were made 100 years ago. I wave my hand dismissively at higher-priced modern guns.

      But… I’ve been inside a Hi-Point carbine in .45 ACP. It wasn’t a plan, and it wasn’t a customer of mine. A LGS where I sometimes breeze through to talk to the folks behind the counter had sold a Hi-Point Carbine to a customer of theirs who came in a week later wondering how to detail strip it for cleaning. The gent behind the counter asked a favor and I happily helped show the customer how to strip it. Never been into one before, but it was straightforward enough.

      When I was done, I thought “If I want to recommend an inexpensive, handy little rifle for home defense, this is probably going to be it.” There’s nothing “nice” about it whatsoever, but it fills the price gap, it works reliably and it is offered in 9, .40 and .45, so a person could have only one type of ammo to worry about. For what it is intended, it works.

      A person who has problems aiming a handgun could do far, far worse than getting a Hi Point carbine in .45 ACP. Load it with some heavy JHP rounds and call it good.

      1. avatar ropingdown says:

        A simple .45ACP carbine (or a Mech Tech “pistol accessory” for a 1911 or G21) is quite a good indoors defense weapon. With a 230-grain bullet in a standard load it stays sub-sonic even with the longer barrel, produces less muzzle flash, has little recoil, and is a bit less loud. Almost everybody can fire it more accurately than a .45ACP pistol. (With a light-for-caliber 165-grain +P load it’ll go super-sonic in a hurry.)

        1. avatar Tomy Ironmane says:

          I remember hearing somewhere that hi-points all are rated for +P… unlike some .45ACP pistols… and actually seem to cycle better with those +P rounds.

        2. avatar John says:

          Speaking from experience with my Hi-Points I can confirm it.

    2. avatar FoRealz? says:

      For sure.

      I’m a bit of a snob running around with the latest German steel and plastic, but any gun that runs and has a track record of doing so, is a good enough gun. I’m glad there are options for people of all economic situations and would like to see more come to market.

      I know if I had been in that house I’d be damn glad to have it if that’s all I had to protect my kids.

  9. Detroit local stations don’t generally use the term “assault weapon”, they also don’t seem to be shy about running stories on defensive gun use. Especially not wxyz.

    1. avatar Gladstone Payton says:

      The reporter is a good friend of mine and I’m going to tell him to follow-up with this story to highlight self-defense heroes/heroines.

    2. The bad news is that on tonight’s broadcast they referred to it as an “assault rifle” they must have re-edited it for broadcast on the network (ABC).

      1. avatar ropingdown says:

        Isn’t that sort of good news if a mother defending her babies against hoodlums found an evil assault weapon to be just the thing. I’m going to start calling them MHDW, Mothers’ home defense weapon.

        1. I don’t think it is ever a good thing when journalist call things by what they are not. It is like calling a Ford a Chevy, it leads to craziness.

          They didn’t even say ‘assault weapon’. They said ‘assault rifle’. Wrong on so many levels.

          I regularly watch wxyz local news and abc world news (they are on back-to-back-to-back-to-back) and this always seems to happen to stories that start local, then get picked up by abc. They are ‘re-written’ to lean to the left. Of course, stories that wxyz picks up that came from abc already lean that direction, and wxyz tends to just ‘read’ them ‘as-is’.

  10. avatar ToddR says:

    Lady, stop talking about your DGU.

    P.S. I own one of those. It’s fun, cheap, simple, and works every time.

    1. avatar Bill says:

      did you watch the video? The cops are happy she did this, they aren’t charging her with anything, she can talk all she wants. There is a time and a place for paranoia, but in this instance, it looks like the system is working for the citizen, not against.

      1. avatar JTwig says:

        I think Detroit’s new police chief is changing views on private gun ownership in the city (and surrounding areas). Because of the city’s budget issues he has, on multiple occassions, said that if more citizens were legally armed then the entire city would be safer.

        As for the Hi-Point… I’ve always said a Hi-Point in your hand is better than a Glock on the gun store shelf. Purchase what you can when you can, then save up for what you want.

        1. avatar Jeff says:

          The new Chief is the best thing that could’ve happened for Detroit and the Detroit PD. The PD simply doesn’t have the resources to respond and they openly admit it. Detroit is a HUGE city geographically, and the PD really only has the resources to mount active patrols in the downtown core. Their presence in the outer areas of the city is more akin to a Sheriff’s department.

          If people want to live in Detroit and take it back from the criminals, they’re going to have to buck up and do it themselves. They NEED the active support of people like Chief James Craig, who unlike so many police chiefs and politicians, states flat-out that you have a responsibility to protect yourselves before the police arrive, and that you should do everything you can to exercise that right.

        2. avatar JR says:

          One addendum, Jeff:

          The Police NO WHERE have the resources to respond. And it’s not even that; it’s not a money problem.

          Detroit’s present chief is just being honest about what applies everywhere.

        3. avatar Jeff says:

          JR I’m not sure how accurate that is for absolutely everywhere, but as far as major cities are concerned, I would say you’re correct.

          I’ve lived in smaller cities (~50K) where I’ve had to call 911 for suspected burglary, etc., and have an officer show up in under 5 minutes. But, those are places where virtually nothing is going on.

        4. avatar Tomy Ironmane says:

          That’s his point, Jeff…. 5 minutes is a long damn time in some instances… and you’re responsible for your safety… actually, legally, the police CANNOT be held responsible for your safety. Only you.

        5. avatar FoRealz? says:

          A lot can happen in five minutes. A lot can happen in five seconds.

      2. avatar Dave R. says:

        The idea that we have the rights as ordinary people to defend ourselves and not have secret service or special guards is entirely out of line to those who are in politics or have a big bank accounts. Wake up people – WE have the right.

  11. avatar Tyler says:

    High points are butt ugly but they seem to get the job done. Glad to hear the lady is OK and I hope that someone explains to her for future reference that warning shots, are a terrible idea. The main stream media will do what they always do and pretend this did not happen.

    1. avatar Jeff says:

      They’re totally uncomfortable to me. It’s a shame because they’re mechanically reliable and pretty accurate. I just wish the carbine had a completely different stock design, not only to alleviate the ugly factor, but to better the ergonomics.

  12. avatar ST says:

    Gun snobs, take note. There is a necessary space for ugly, functional firearms which do what they’re told when Goblins call.

    We may think that’s an ugly Hi Point carbine, but to its grateful owner that gun is doubtlessly the prettiest weapon ever made by mankind.

    Nothing wrong with liking HKs and Sigs, but we should welcome the Hi Point owners with open arms. This incident is why.

    1. avatar peirsonb says:

      There is a necessary space for ugly, functional firearms which do what theyโ€™re told when Goblins call.

      If there wasn’t, GLOCK would be out of business by now…

      1. avatar S.CROCK says:

        exactly! when i read the words “ugly” and “functional” i immediately though of Glock.

    2. avatar ropingdown says:

      My hunting weapons, most of them, are beautiful. My go-to home defense weapons are ugly. I think an ugly gun puts a person in the right frame of mind for the task at hand.

  13. avatar T says:

    Just goes to show you that even inexpensive arms can protect people. I’m pretty sure this will boost Hi Point a bit in sales.

  14. avatar Texheim says:

    Hi-Points are butt ugly but they go boom every time, from what I’ve heard, and their customer service is top notch. The pooooooooor need access to inexpensive fire arms for defense too…

    1. avatar daveinwyo says:

      And Hi-Point has a great warranty! Have one and is more fun to shoot than my higher priced weapons. Butt ugly? Beauty..eye..ect. Only complaint is that without extra TLC it WILL rust. Mine has had about 300-350 rds through it with any cheap 9mil I can find (haven’t tried Russian ammo yet). The one I have was able to hit a steel 8 inch target at 100 yds reliably right out of the box with iron sights. BTW if you get one in .40 or .45 you can also get a pistol in the same caliber that uses the same mag as the carbine, how cool is that? Might improve sales for some companies to copy that trick! A .22 pistol that uses the same mag as the 10/22? Ruger?…Ruger?….

      1. avatar Dustin says:

        Well, Ruger had a pistol, but it looks like it did not take off.

  15. avatar David says:

    Piers Morgan is an ass clown he got banned from the UK BBC broadcasting for lies. He is anti-american till the end! his last job in the UK was for a newspaper very similar to The Enquirer, A BS newspaper rag that carries a bunch of non existent unrealistic totally fabricated BS! we really should revoke his visa and kick that lousy piece of garbage out of our country! I like to see that some b**** come to Florida, just remember this Mr Pierce Morgan you’re in the United States of America home of the free and the brave. We are civilians not subjects and we’re not ruled by a king or a tyrant no matter how bad Obama is! The people of America are sick of you and want you gone, go back to the UK man! I’ll by you at no class ticket back to the UK on my tab!

    1. avatar JPD says:

      David: Stop being NICE about Piers!! I want your REAL opinion of him……….

    2. avatar ropingdown says:

      No need to underplay it, David.

  16. avatar Internet Guy says:

    Even a 10-shot, non-armor-piercing pistol carbine can be an assault rifle in the news.

    1. avatar daveinwyo says:

      A 15 round mag is available from Hi-Point. Also, the stock can be replaced with an after market one. The replacement stock looks a little less assault rifelish.

      1. avatar Morseus says:

        Hmm. I know ProMag makes one, but Hi-Point called it out as violating the warranty. Hi-Point only sells 10 rounders. I have 3 for my 995TS, which is decidedly not rusty.

  17. avatar Harry Watson says:

    Detroit has long taken a positive approach to DGU. What else can you do in a city in which the state has seriously failed in its primary duty of protecting property rights and personal safety.

  18. avatar Maineuh says:

    I love how video is becoming more and more available all the time. Reading about a DGU is one thing, seeing it in action is another. I never want to be the guy who wishes for someone to get shot, but gawd help me, I was hoping one of these pukes would take lead in a hip. I just don’t trust the courts to keep them away from the family down the street.

  19. avatar Gruney says:

    Title has assault spelled assautl, please fix.

    1. avatar Heretical Politik says:


      1. avatar AGreenSmudge says:


        It has the power of a small mesoamerican deity.

        1. avatar Matt in FL says:

          Best comment in recent memory.

        2. avatar jwm says:

          That was a small splash of genius.

  20. avatar MothaLova says:

    I love it when mothers defend their families. First, it’s great news in and of itself, for a host of reasons. Second, it reveals just how anti-family, anti-child, and anti-woman the gungrabbers’ policies are.

    1. avatar TheBear says:


      I’ve been saying for a while that gun grabbers are pro-criminal. I tend to label gun grabbers as racists and homophobes too since many of the people who need self-protection the most are inner city dwellers or fringe/counter culture people who may be targeted by hate groups.

  21. avatar justAMan says:

    I have a Hi-Point 9mm carbine. The gun is seriously fun to shoot. A pain to clean and it rusts like non-other, but a blast to shoot.

  22. avatar cubby123 says:

    Hey Pierce, Take THAT!

  23. avatar Bryan says:

    Fuggly Hi-Point, mother tested, Detroit approved!

  24. avatar dwb says:

    well done. I vote the next contest this Mom get a spanking new gun. This one seems more like a club than a gun.

  25. avatar mirgc says:

    hmm. Looks like a good one for a drudge report submission

  26. avatar Matt in FL says:

    Mom says, “I give them [the police] a lot of credit, because they handled it the same night.”

    Tells you a little bit (as if you didn’t already know) about what residents of Detroit have come to expect from the cops there. It’s not really the cops’ fault, either. This is just a comment on the state of things there in Detroit.

    1. avatar uncommon_sense says:


      Now can you imagine the plight of good people in Detroit if everyone (not including criminals of course) were forcibly disarmed as in London?

      This lady and mother shows us firsthand why we truly NEED our right to keep and bear arms.

  27. avatar Tom396 says:

    I have a Hi Point carbine in .40. If it just had better feeding magazines, it would be my wife’s go to home defense weapon. As it is, she’ll grab her .40 M&P instead. She really likes the way the Hi Point shoots. I can get her to practice more with the Hi Point than with the M&P. Excellent home defense weapon, IMO, for somebody who is recoil sensitive.

  28. avatar racer88 says:

    Missed every shot. Let’s get her some lessons! ๐Ÿ™‚

    1. avatar Rickoshay says:

      Yes, they were all warning shots.

  29. avatar Hannibal says:

    That gun looks scary as shit. Does she have her tetanus shot? ๐Ÿ˜€

  30. avatar James says:

    It’s always a wise idea to place your warning shot through center body mass. That generally serves as an effective warning to any other malefactors who might be watching, helping them understand that they picked the wrong line of work.

  31. avatar Jeremy says:

    The HiPoint carbine is absolutely one of the all time most fun sub $300 dollar guns EVER! The two I’ve had in 9mm have been dead nuts reliable and very accurate to 75 yds.

    Also it looks like it makes great teenager repellant.

  32. avatar Curtis in IL says:

    So, for those of you who follow the legislative details better than I, tell me how many states that gun would be illegal in?

    1. avatar rybred says:

      I know it is illegal in kali without a bullet button, probably illegal in NY and I’m sure a few other slave states

      1. avatar Hannibal says:

        Correct, illegal in NY. A pistol with the same amount of ammunition in the mag in the same caliber? Fine.

  33. avatar Rick says:

    I maintain that all a warning shot does (besides expose you to financial risk) is convince the goblin that for all you posturing, you are not serious about shooting them.

  34. avatar Ralph says:

    The situation was ugly, not the gun. I’d call that carbine a thing of beauty.

  35. avatar R Long says:

    That looks like a plasma rifle or other gun you’d find in Fallout 3. ๐Ÿ™‚

  36. avatar Dirk Diggler says:

    If Obama had three sons . . . . . oh wait.

  37. avatar jwm says:

    Warning shot? She just cleared the rust out of the barrel of that hi-point. I’m damn glad she had that gun and didn’t wind up the guest of honor at a gang rape.

    My prayer is that we hear about these stories more often and not stories like the Petits.

  38. avatar Jus Bill says:

    Amazing! It made it to the NYDN:
    NOT IN MY HOUSE! Detroit mom armed with rifle opens fire on three gun-toting thugs trying to rob home โ€” SEE THE VIDEO

  39. avatar BLAMMO says:

    Some moms demand action.

    And some moms TAKE action.

  40. avatar S.CROCK says:

    there is nothing wrong with an ugly HiPoint, but i would not like my life to depend on a gun that beat up. (anything from Mikhail Kalashnikov is exempt) i guess a gun beat to a pulp is better than no gun.

  41. avatar Aaron says:

    This story warms my heart. Not the part about the poor mother getting broken into – that’s no fun. But the part where she busts caps in thugs’ asses, now that part warms my heart.

  42. avatar Aaron says:

    This story warms my heart. Not the part about the poor mother getting broken into – that’s no fun. But the part where she busts caps in thugs’ azzes, now that part warms my heart.

  43. avatar Grumpy in Kali says:

    Momma almost fixed the 3rd robber’s stupidity problem when he tried going back in AFTER being shot at.

    Good for mom. Now can Detroit PD shake down the trio of “misguided” youths’ parents to pay for the damage their little angels caused to her door and door frame? Pawn their TVs, cell phones, chains, and Xboxs if they have to…make this woman whole.

  44. avatar Jacen says:

    New respects for a Hi Point Carbine

    1. avatar TX Gun Gal says:

      According to article: She gave a verbal warning “I have a gun” then fired when they did not leave.
      Real deal, no warning shot.

  45. avatar JAS says:

    Inexpensive and it runs. Should be renamed the “Detroit Carbine”. Or maybe the “Mommy Gun”.

  46. My mom would have saved herself. This lady is awesome! Care to adopt a 29 year old?

  47. avatar Billy396 says:

    Hi-Point carbines shoot great, are NOT assault weapons of any kind, and are guaranteed for life at a very reasonable price. I’ve shot them, and they flat-out work. I don’t own any Hi-Points, but the carbines are great. I may just buy one now. I do have a Mech-Tech Carbine Conversion Unit for 1911’s, and it’s approximately the same thing. These carbines will get more accuracy and are easier to be accurate with than pistols for those who don’t shoot on a regular basis.

  48. avatar Bruce L. says:

    Just noticed the video is on CNN, with the police chief saying she did nothing wrong but did defend her home and family. The Detroit TV station that reported it said people in the neighborhood will also be happy since this crew has been causing a lot of trouble.

  49. avatar RobGR says:

    CNN refers to it as an “assault rifle”, flawed, but at least the flawed term was used in a positive light… still flawed though.

    Vid includes camera footage of these scumbags kicking in her door. Good for her. And her husband, who trained her how to use it. Also includes the police chiefs nod of approval. Good for him.

  50. avatar Highvoltage says:

    A lot of the good people living in this city are the most in need of a defensive firearm. The shootings of home invaders is very common in the Detroit media.

    The video shows some good points: the mere threat of a gun isn’t always a deterrent to an attacker, nor is actually firing said weapon. The “kid”-I use this term because we often see violent attackers portrayed in the national news as somehow harmless due to their age- drops his handgun after the first shots while retreating. He then picks it up, and attempts to enter the home, knowing full well it’s occupied by someone shooting at him. He finally changes his mind after another barrage. This goes to show that simply racking a shotgun, or even a “warning” shot will dissuade an attacker.

    We are a shall issue state, and Wayne County has been pretty good in my experience with issuing CPLs. Michigan has also streamlined the purchasing process, making it easier to buy a handgun.

    The fact that the DPD responded, and made arrests in a prompt manner is great, as there are really dedicated officers working in that department. There are currently under 2,500 sworn officers. They are facing major obstacles. Detroit was the first city to have radios in their squad cars, the current system works so poorly, that officers are sometimes forced to use their cell phones to contact dispatch. Their vehicles are a combination of barely functioning old crown vic’s, and new cars that were donated. Many don’t have MDT’s, and officers are looking at losing their retirements, health care (retirees and survivors of officers killed on the job already have) along with other morale destroyers. If you think being a cop in that city is some overpaid cake union job, you’re crazy. Their healthcare and retirement helps working for a lousy salary bearable. Yet still there are some men and women in blue doing the job for the right reasons. Hearing they caught the scum in this attack is a rare positive headline for those folks. Even so, in the best case the police are minutes away.

    At least in this city, citizens can obtain and use firearms to defend themselves against the animals that are trying to take over. From the news stories I’ve seen, it appears the home owner was allowed to keep possession of her firearm.

  51. avatar Jeff says:

    Kudos to the mom. She did everything right. The lesson learned is A) a defensive gun can be a good idea and B) it’s how you handle the situation that makes the difference.

    I would like to know if she called 911 before she discharged the weapon. If she did, then it was a textbook DGU. Period. Plus the video was a clincher. Curiously, she has surveillance video going? – can’t be that poor a household. This should sell a lot of surveillance cameras.

    These are the things she did right:
    1) She recognized the danger and took action immediately – executed the battle drill.
    2) She had positive control of her weapon.
    3) Put the bad guys in a kill box (the door frame) โ€“ however a door frame that leads to the neighborhood is not the best because of stray bullets flying around โ€“ but letโ€™s not be picky.
    4) Declared to the bad guys that she had a gun โ€“ and had it recorded โ€“ best done with a 911 call. BTW, you call 911 to make sure that they record you telling the bad guy you have a gun before you shoot them, not to talk to a 911 operator. You dial 911 and then put the phone down and take aim.
    5) As they declared hostile intent, she USED the weapon in an unambiguously legal manner. Aggressive – yes – but she is literally fighting for her life and her childrens lives. It’s a fight she cannot lose. Period.
    6) Stayed in the house and let the cops do their job.

    She became her own militia in the split second it took her to rise up and defend herself, her children and her property. This IS the 2nd Amendment. If she wasnโ€™t trained to do this, then sheโ€™s just plain smart. This video is a lesson in HOW. The gun was only a small, but critical part of the overall LEGAL defense battle drill.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email