Top Shot’s Michelle Viscusi With Her Clothes On Entertainment by Robert Farago | Feb 16, 2012 | 42 comments facebook twitter linkedin email [HTML1] Happy now? comments Tim Tritt says: February 16, 2012 at 16:06 She even makes the Army BDU’s look good. Ummm, I wonder why they picked her for the NG “commercial” though? Reply Aharon says: February 16, 2012 at 17:58 This ad is so sexist and insulting to most women in the Army. I think it is discrimination to use a cute woman in an ad and not an unattractive, loyal, hard-working, and efficient large woman to represent the service. Reply Tim Tritt says: February 16, 2012 at 20:33 I’d imagine they would have had to look FAR and WIDE for one of those. Reply Ralph says: February 16, 2012 at 20:38 unattractive, loyal, hard-working, and efficient large woman Can the Secretary of State do a commercial for the Army? Reply Ropingdown says: February 16, 2012 at 23:11 She only does primary colors. Mr. Lion says: February 16, 2012 at 16:32 She had clothes on before. They were just better. Reply Ralph says: February 16, 2012 at 16:59 She wanted to better herself for her later career to become a police officer? Well, it could have been worse. Reply Ropingdown says: February 16, 2012 at 17:32 Don’t you think this lady could improve any PD? She shouldn’t carry a gun of course. But, just having her strut around HQ and parking lot doing “whatever,” could inspire the force to seek improved muscle tone and pounds shed. We need her it my township. It’s a health issue. (What a classic, thanks.) Reply Matt in FL says: February 16, 2012 at 17:02 I’d think she was pretty cute even if I hadn’t seen her with 85% less clothes on already. She wants to be a cop, and she’s listed as “Basic Training, Military Police.” Does this mean she actually did get to do what she wanted? I thought that’s just what the recruiter promised you to get your ass on the bus? Reply ST says: February 16, 2012 at 17:27 Joining the military is a “quick and dirty” method of gaining law enforcement experience needed for qualification into the FBI, Secret Service, or other federal law enforcement body. The alternative means the applicant has to either go to college and/or join a police agency, and college isn’t a financial option for a lot of families lucky to dodge foreclosure.Joining a civilian police agency in an age of public budget cuts is a shaky plan , but Uncle Sam is always hiring A lot of Air Force Security Forces troops I knew are in uniform with aspirations on joining other Law Enforcement agencies down the road. Reply Tim Tritt says: February 16, 2012 at 17:44 I believe the FBI (and other Fed LE agencies) require a 4-year degree either way. The difference is by joining the Military, you can go to college on the GI Bill and other Tuition Assistance programs the military has. But your point is still valid for the most part. Reply sdog says: February 16, 2012 at 18:37 my cousin who is a special agent was years out of college before she got into the FBI. Aharon says: February 16, 2012 at 17:20 Boring. Reply Ropingdown says: February 16, 2012 at 17:35 Miss South Carolina boring? She inspires ROFLMAO or lust, possibly both. But neither? Reply Aharon says: February 16, 2012 at 17:54 If she was in a thong she would not be boring. I didn’t find anything she had to say interesting or new, so yup boring. Reply JP in Tennessee says: February 16, 2012 at 18:21 The Army treated me well. It paid for me to attend college and law school. Reply sdog says: February 16, 2012 at 18:38 i really like the lady from Venezuela, she is on point, yet she was happy to celebrate with her teammates after her awesome string with the Vaquero revolver. Reply Phil H says: February 16, 2012 at 19:26 Robert, you’ve lost me. You are a silly, puerile, and sexist little man. For some reason you get off on triggering this kind of controversy, and I am tired of your juvenile posts. This is supposed to be “The Truth About Guns,” and instead it’s “The Truth About Robert’s Unresolved Issues About Women.” You are a walking advertisement for why 2nd amendment support is limited to men. Good work, dude. Reply Tim Tritt says: February 16, 2012 at 20:36 I am sure we can round up a search party and find you again – hang tight. Reply Mark Smith says: February 16, 2012 at 22:34 He’s not that far off the mark. Reply Aharon says: February 16, 2012 at 23:42 “You are a silly, puerile, and sexist little man” I hear you. How does it make you feel deep down in your gut that Robert is like that? Reply Ropingdown says: February 17, 2012 at 00:03 Phil H: Now you’ve done it. I just can’t believe you called Robert ‘silly.’ The Truth About Guns is in the reviews and certain of the editorial content. The rest is really, I assume, intended to lighten a break from options trading, trust drafting, or applied library science, once a person, be it a man or woman, has decided that unlike the SEC enforcement division staff, he doesn’t think eight hours of tranny porn is the healthy choice for leisure minutes. I, too, wish more articles dealt with the frank details of lower court soon-to-be-overturned holdings concerning evidence chain-of-custody, but this simply cannot be expected on a site with a general readership. I have yet to read here, I note, a credible comparison of 10 gun lubes on old revolvers in a salt-water torture test so I, too, have my reservations. You are not alone. Reply Jerk Jiggler says: February 16, 2012 at 19:30 What’s “puerile”? Reply Ralph says: February 16, 2012 at 19:46 What’s a “Phil?” Reply Jerk Jiggler says: February 16, 2012 at 20:45 Phil’s Dominatrix let him out of his cage to troll the Real Man web sites for an hour. Reply Phil H says: February 16, 2012 at 21:25 No, I’m just tired of this stupid-ass BS. My link to this site removed. Jerk Jiggler says: February 16, 2012 at 21:55 You’ll be back…. Jerk Jiggler says: February 16, 2012 at 22:17 http://missredstararms.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/photo_album_wizard_6029001.jpg Tim Tritt says: February 16, 2012 at 22:17 Oh no you didn’t! Patrick says: February 16, 2012 at 20:14 I’m not getting the dead horse beating. Brand identity? Reply Patrick says: February 16, 2012 at 20:18 Just caught this, guess so: Robert Farago says: February 16, 2012 at 6:24 AM If I did I wouldn’t post it. But this brand/website belongs to its readers. I am a slave to the brand. Reply Aharon says: February 17, 2012 at 00:01 You can’t be all things to all people. A PC “safe supportive environment” site is going to lose plenty of men. In most cases, when any organization liberalizes, feminizes, and tries to be PC the men take off and quality drops. Look at American firms that have gone all into that type of culture and look at the USG. Christian and Jewish denominations that have liberalized and gone all PC sensitive have had the men leaving in droves. Robert is probably aware of how Jewish men have disappeared from, the super-liberal PC Reformed Jewish Movement except for the few remaining eunuchs. The big question there, which they seem unable to answer, is ‘where are all the men?’ TTAG is no where near that type of cross-roads issue of needing to choose yet very long term the shrill yelping of the massing of the harpies intimidates men to shutting up and being dominated. Men either turn into zombies or grab their kit and bug out. Reply Dave J says: February 17, 2012 at 09:40 I think, or should I say “feel” that it is insulting that she talks about candy and ice cream. Yes she is obviously burning lots of calories running around in the woods with all those clothes on but Team 44 featuring Ms. O are out working very hard every day to make sure that our kids eat well. We cant have these attractive people in camo promoting poor habits…I think, I mean feel that I should report her to the Truth Team. Reply Aharon says: February 17, 2012 at 10:45 A very interesting non-PC article written by a military veteran on using and creating a unisex fighting force. Much of it ties in with recent pieces here at TTAG and the comments that followed. On military preparedness http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-issues/on-military-preparedness/ Reply Michelle Viscusi says: February 19, 2012 at 15:57 First off, it wasnt just me who got picked to do an interview in Basic. Yes i went to better my self as a person and i wanted some training and the experience to then become a cop later in life. I am going to college for my degree. Jesus people, could you judge an harder? “This ad is so sexist and insulting to most women in the Army. I think it is discrimination to use a cute woman in an ad and not an unattractive, loyal, hard-working, and efficient large woman to represent the service.” How is it sexist? I fucking worked hard through Basic like any one else. I was a PT stud, Paid attention, and had a great experience. If you thinnk i looked cute there… lol anyways. Who says im not loyal or hard working? Thats Bullshit. Plus why in the hell would a fat ass be in the army? That isnt Army standards. Reply Joe Zip says: February 19, 2012 at 18:21 +1 Reply JOE MATAFOME says: February 19, 2012 at 18:36 I hope you win Top Shot and not just because you’re cute. You come across as a hard worker who won’t quit until she gets what she wants. Good Luck. Reply ST says: February 19, 2012 at 20:01 This , kids, is what happens when your sarcasm detector needs service. Reply MadDawg J says: February 20, 2012 at 00:25 (never mind, I’ll be nice) Reply Germaine Donnelly says: February 20, 2012 at 23:30 You sure do have a filthy mouth Michelle. Reply GS650G says: February 21, 2012 at 14:07 Women who curse like guys can be very exciting. Reply Germaine Donnelly says: February 22, 2012 at 10:20 Whatever turns your crank. Enjoy. Write a Comment Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.