U.S. Senatorial candidate Roy Moore (courtesy outdoorhub.com)
Previous Post
Next Post

“The National Rifle Association, working in lockstep with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the Republican establishment, spent big money trying to stop Roy Moore from winning the party’s primary in Alabama’s special Senate election,” The Trace reports. “Now, undeterred by the multiple, detailed allegations of child molestation leveled against Moore, the NRA is joining President Trump, McConnell, and the Republican National Committee in giving Moore a thumbs up.” Evidence?

Moore campaign manager Bill Armistead said that he has met with representatives of the NRA “and they are on board with us now.” The NRA has indicated that it will not release its official endorsement until closer to the December 12 vote.

You OK with this?

Previous Post
Next Post


  1. Absolutely not, but I am far more uncomfortable with the anti-gun party gaining control of the Senate.

    Get Moore in the seat, investigate, and if anything is proved, then kicked him out of office and let the governor appoint for the remainder of his term.

    • Sigh…
      I’m so sick of this… so an investigation is started. No evidence or corroborating witnesses are found. All we have is the accusations of a couple of Democrat operatives and maybe an independent (exactly HOW independent has not been asked) self-proclaimed victims who cannot actually prove anything they’ve said. Meanwhile, Roy keeps consistently denying everything and anyone who dares give him the benefit of the doubt risks being labeled as a misogynist or worse.
      I’ll make what I think will be a vert safe prediction: if Roy wins (hey, it could happen) these accusers will fade to the background and claim that “they just want to put this behind them now.”

        • Which is evidence of jack shit. I can get “corroborating witnesses” of my manned Mars mission where I talked to lizard people, it would be about as credible.

        • No, there aren’t, and the accusers absolutely refuse to turn over all the “damning evidence” for independent analysis. And since when do yearbooks get given out around Christmas? Instead of, you know, MAY?

      • In addition, Roy Moore initially admitted to knowing his accusers. Then he denied knowing them. So how does that affect the credibility of his denials?

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER59sO7UK6I

          Judge Roy Moore on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show. Sean Hannity interviewed Alabama Judge Roy Moore. Listen at ~3:50 and again at ~5:20. Moore admits knowing two of the women.


          AP Fact Check [comparing those statements with what Moore said last week at campaign stops]:


          In a Nov. 10 radio interview with Sean Hannity, Moore said he remembered two of the women, Debbie Wesson Gibson and Gloria Deason, who were 17 and 18 at the time. He said he remembered both of them but didn’t remember dating them. Asked by Hannity if he generally dated teenagers as a man in his 30s, Moore replied. “Not generally, no. If I did, you know, I’m not going to dispute anything, but I don’t remember anything like that.” Asked if he remembered having a girlfriend in her late teens while he was in his 30s, Moore replied, “I don’t remember that, and I don’t remember ever dating any girl without the permission of her mother.” ”


          Moore said twice last week in campaign stops that he did not “know any of these women.” He did not list their names but at one stop said their faces were appearing on his opponent’s advertisements. Democrat Doug Jones has run advertisements with the photos of all of the women who have accused Moore. “These allegations are completely false. They’re malicious. Specially, I do not know any of these women, nor have I ever engaged in sexual misconduct with anyone,” Moore said in a campaign stop in Henagar, Alabama. At a campaign stop in Theodore, Moore said, “Let me state once again: I do not know any of these women, did not date any of these women and have not engaged in any sexual misconduct with anyone.”

        • Go away commie. Nobody cares about your left wing propaganda. Moore is going to win in a landslide.

        • “Nobody cares about your left wing propaganda.”

          What I see is that you (and, apparently, many others) don’t care about facts.

          Sean Hannity’s interview of Roy Moore is “left wing propaganda” now? Wow. So Fox News is now a communist media outlet. That is really going to surprise Rupert Murdoch. Do you think that Hannity made up some kind of doctored recording of Roy Moore? Do you contend that Roy Moore did not make the quoted statements a trecent campaign stops? The ones where he stated that he did not know any of the women involved?


          Powerful Serge: Waaahhhh! Commie, I don’t need to know things, I used to BE a commie so…molesters are commies, or not molesters are commies, wait what was I saying…Waaahhh! but now I”m not a commie, but I like teenage girls, I mean girls, grass on the field…but they have to show me their ID’s, gotta be 16 now, because I’m not a molester, I’m a completely normal former commie who likes teenagers, Waaahhh! Why do you wanna make me know things, knowing things makes my head feel funny, like there’s stuff there…I don’t like stuff there…it makes me have feelings and stuff, like stuff like that is not cool…I like girls, I hate commies…and stuff…words…more words….Waaahhh!

      • Well, I am now 71, and if I went to AL and began dating and sleeping with a 16-year-old, it would be none of anyone’s business except hers and mine. The age of consent in AL is now and was 40 years ago (!!) 16. If someone is trying to go all holier than thou on Moore, fine, but no one claims any laws were broken, nor that he has done *anything* similar in the past 30+ years, and this has never come up before in 40 years of his running for one election or another, while the statute of limitations is several decades over. Whole issue is stupid, and stinks of politics real bad.

        • The lying bastards of the NY/DC mainstream media swampcritters claim. The correct response to ANYTHING they saym is to extend to them the middle finger of friendship and then move along with life in the real world.

          And his opponent is a truly despicable marxist progtard POS.

        • Eww, stop, just stop. You must have an enormous…wallet. And eww, and the kids granddad will kick your ass, you know, the guy younger than you. And did I mention eww.

        • Well, yes, at least two do claim laws were broken. He is alleged to have had sexual contact with a 14 year old girl (stripping her to he underwear and fondling her while clad only in his tightywhities) and to have sexually assaulted a 16 year old in his car, although it apparently did not go well for him and she managed to get out of the car.

          As to the rest of your post, I suppose that legally it might be none of anyone’s business as between the two of you as long as parents did not object, but a parent could still step in and stop it since since the girl would still be under 18 and subject to her parents’ discipline. You could act like Roy Moore and seek her mother’s permission, I suppose. In my family, such a request would have been stamped in bright red ink “DENIED ON THE BASIS OF UTTER CREEPINESS.”

        • Umm, I don’t think telling the armed intelligentsia that your a 71 year old coming for our 16 year old daughters and saying that it is only between you and the 16 year old, would get the response you think. I think the response you may get would be very good ventilation.

        • Does anyone remember enjoying “your 16 your beautiful and your mine” by Ringo Starr? And do you have the record or CD in your collection???
          If you did enjoy the song does that make you a pervert????????????????????????????

        • You mean the song that was banned all over the South because of the immoral content? Why I do in fact, immoral content about a man in his 30s didling a 16 year old. Why it’s almost like you’re pro Hollywood values, good for you.

    • I have been involved in the investigation of two fellow ministers involved in sexual misconduct (in these cases these acts were completely consensual). One of the primary things one looks for is confirming or refuting evidence.

      In the case of Roy Moore such evidence exists (a year book entry) – and Roy Moore called for it to be tested as soon as it was presented to the media. The woman, through her attorney, said she would allow it to be tested – but not until after the election. That was a huge red flag for me – at least in regards to this accusation. In addition, the statements of some of the other accusers are contradicted by witnesses.

      Additionally, the most recent accusation is more than 25 years old. It is highly unusual for sexual misconduct simply to stop. Where are the more recent accusations that are more likely to have evidence and more reliable witnesses?

      Then there is the issue of timing. This man has been in the public spotlight for decades – and all of this comes out one month before this election?

      The bottom line for me is simple: As mush as I dislike Moore for refusing to recognize the authority of the Supreme Court, the evidence against him is far from irrefutable. If I were in GA, I would vote for him and trust the Senate to do a thorough investigation before he is seated, as the Senate leadership has said they will do.

      • I wouldn’t trust the Senate to fold my laundry. They have no authority to investigate something that Moore did as a private citizen prior to his election.

      • “If I were in GA, I would vote for him and trust the Senate to do a thorough investigation before he is seated, as the Senate leadership has said they will do.”

        Roy Moore is a candidate for Senate in Alabama. Your attention to detail speaks for itself.

        • Yeah, because he is a *Republican* candidate for US Senate from AL. Everybody knows that Dem candidates have Dems from neighboring states visit for long enough to cast a vote or two each election cycle.

      • The evidence is worse than you are making it out to be. Multiple women have come forward with corroborating witnesses. These women are not connected to each other nor are they connected to the democratic party organization. One we know even voted for Trump. Having other people call them a liar with no additional proof isn’t enough. They have corroborating witnesses who remember the dates, that he came to pick them up romantically, that he hung around and went to their recitals, etc.

        There is substantial evidence, see Hollywood, Conyers, Bill O’Reily, Laur, etc. that women felt powerless and that it would actually harm them in the long run to come forward until now. The timing makes sense given how quickly the culture has turned towards belief in their stories. See also all the allegations against catholic priests by alter boys. Same exact situation.

        Of course there’s no proof other than testimony. This kind of predation doesn’t leave a “paper trail”. Nothing here is going to court except the court of public opinion. That’s why the argument that “only one woman” was technically underage is moot. They were all under 18 and that’s sickening enough in a man in his 30’s.

        • 18 is an arbitrary number not applicable in most states. You need to troll harder “Denton”… Funny how this is the first time I see you on these pages.

        • Yes, 18 is an arbitrary age, but in most states it is in the law as the age of adulthood, as it is under federal law. Before that age, you are not an adult, and in most states there are laws to protect you from adults who are more than three years older than you. So, for example, if a thirty-two year old man wanted to be sexually active with a fourteen or sixteen year old girl, that would be illegal (and just plain creepy).

        • 16 is the age of consent in AL and has been for over the subject period of 40 years. 18 is meaningless.

        • Again, 18 is not the age of consent in most states. You have no idea what you’re talking about commie.

        • If it’s acceptable now to be gender fluid why not age fluid also? Roy may have identified as a 15 year old at the time of the accusations. That’s not any more unreasonable than someone deciding what gender they want to be.

        • The Actual Law Today: Alabama statutory rape law is violated when an individual over age 18 (or 16 or older if the victim is at least 2 years younger than the offender) engages in sexual intercourse with a person over the age of 12 and under age 16. The offender commits the crime of sodomy If an individual age 16 or older engages in deviate sexual intercourse with a person under 16 and older than 12.

          I find the entire age-of-consent bit mysterious. The age is, today, 14 in Germany, Austria, Portugal, and Italy. It was 13 in Spain until a few years ago. These all seem a bit young, no? But the numbers show that the matter is cultural. In many of these countries it is apparently not that unusual for a 15 year-old woman to marry a 20 year-old man, having previously had a “relationship.”

          It does seem pervy, if not actually illegal in 1972 (no intercourse was involved) for a 30-something DA to be stalking or grooming a teenager for sex. I figure the guy guy felt experienced women would laugh at either his clumsiness or his p@cker. It was a long time ago, though. Most nations in western Europe/Scandinavia wouldn’t let charges like this come forward. Perhaps, though, we need one round of outing to let young women know they can and should come forward much sooner.

        • lol, pwrserge, that is some weak response there. It’s a logical fallacy to equate my tenure on this site with a worthwhile comment. Seriously though, you and I have been trading comments on here for months now, last week even. Did you switch meds or something?

          18 is the age of adulthood in all other areas except consent. And it’s less for consent because it’s not unheard of for 16 year olds to fall in love with 18 year olds. The law doesn’t generally consider anything further because its socially unacceptable and morally wrong, in the 70’s, 80’s, and today for grown men to go after girls under 18. Some circles, like the rock n roll stars of the era, are the obvious exception.

        • Whatever you say kiddo. You may be shocked that your NYC puritanical standards don’t apply to everyone. The law is the law. Moore is not accused of doing anything illegal. Just because it offends your feminazi sensibilities does not mean anybody gives a shit.

        • That’s the first time I’ve ever heard NYC and Puritanical ever put together like that. NYC is not known for its conservative family values. Traditional Family values, as I’ve always found them in the rural south, tend to frown on 30 year olds dating 16 yr olds.

          You’ve now taken the position that immorality is fine so long as it is legal. And that immorality is still ok even when it is pushed on a 16 yr old from someone as powerful as the assistant DA of the county who is twice her age. That’s one of the men you want running our country?

    • I thought the complaints against judge Moore were just too convenient to be entirely credible. The fact that they “might” be true could very be nothing more than the work of carefully rehearsed crisis acting. Just because someone sounds convincing doesn’t always mean their claims are legitimate. In the midst of the current sexual harassment hysteria we are asked to take at face value the word of any woman who claims that she was harassed. It looks like voters in Alabama are unwilling to do that. I tend to agree with them.

    • I think everyone needs to take a good hard look at themselves and realize how many rapists and murderers they’ve already voted for and how many other congress critters have similar behavior. The mask is starting come off now. As someone who works in criminal justice I will tell you I am not surprised one bit. For the same reason child molesters become priests and daycare workers, disturbed individuals seek positions of power to increase their depraved behavior and protect it. What better way to hide from the man other than to become the man? By far the single best and only way to really challenge this trend is by limiting government power and providing checks and balances. That way, when the perverts and murderers come to power (they already have, and will continue to do so) it is that much harder for them to increase their power, and that much more likely they eventually will be caught. Ultimately it shows just how universally important the RKBA is…

    • Right, not just “unsubstantiated allegations”


      Yes, JONES is an evil POS kill-babies-with-scissors-and-use-them-for-food satan worshiper(D).

      A N D – has a sh_tty 2A record.

      Moore is none of that, and FU for continuing to spread sh_t that’s already been retracted. Pay attention to FING current events or FING kill yourself you lying sack.

      • Yikes, Joe! With friends like you…..

        All the guy was doing is deleting “detailed” and replacing it with “unsubstantiated”, to make the point that we still have no solid evidence against Moore. That some prior evidence may have been discredited doesn’t change that.

        You’re excoriating the guy for being accurate, but nonetheless not capturing the full flavor of your shared sentiment? Good grief, man. Relax.

        • Let’s tally the count then.

          Moore currently has ZERO (0) un-refuted accusers / detractors (their witch attorneys).

          ALL of Moore’s detractors / accusers have been shown to have political motives and have been purposefully coached to say/do things WITHOUT FURTHER REGARD TO THE POS (D) EXPENDABLE ACCUSERS, much less Moore.

      • Take a freaking breath Joe, I’m on your side, and just left the courthouse after voting for him. I was simply pointing out that all the allegations are unsubstantiated. No one has come forward with any credible proof. Having lived in this state for years, and through several of his elections, were there any credible dirt against him some yellow dog would have dug it up and slung it long before now. I would guess that Mitch was still pissed he couldn’t get Big Luther elected, and pulled out all the stops in an attempt to discredit Moore.

      • “Satan worshiper”? Oh, please. Being anti-gun rights is enough reason to oppose him, you don’t have to make up sensationalistic claptrap.

        • What’ya call killing unborn infants and using them for food? There could be additional purposes they do it, but it definitely satisfies “satan worship”. “Monster” sounds at tad “DC Comics”

        • “What’ya call killing unborn infants and using them for food?”

          I call it an absurd accusation. Please provide documentation that this man is turning fetuses into soufflés.

        • Jones and his people know it’s repulsive enough that he’s tamping down his, support from, and HIS SUPPORT OF, Planned Parenthood (a/k/a: the POS MFs that demand tax $$$ to kill unborn infants even though they make millions [billions?] selling off the infant-parts). They also collect $$$ from charities like the POS Pink Ribbon MFs – Susan G. Komen Foundation.

          Know how you can tell Planned Parenthood is making bank on their satanic work? Because they donate hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to each of several major candidates, and the (D)NC. “They have to” you say? “Because they might encounter unfriendly regulation and overturn of Roe v. Wade”? Ya, doesn’t explain it all.

        • He’s pro-choice.

          So what? I’m concerned about his record on gun rights.

          Still waiting for documentation of your assertion that this man is turning fetuses into food.

        • Hal, Jones has murdered babies, or something, and raped babies, or something. Roy Moore is Jesus reborn, completely without sin, he will save us all from, something.

          So how many teenage girls have accused Jones, if its as simple as just purely accusing someone, couldn’t there be a girl find a safe space on Breitbart or Fox to accuse him.

  2. no.
    Nothing says the NRA must pick someone, if there isn’t an acceptable candidate, just don’t support anyone. I already don’t like that the NRA has become a wing of the Republican party so if they do this it’ll just cement my negative opinion.

  3. Yeah, whatever. I dont see the NRA supporting a candidate who plans on aligning himself with the DNC’s platform, although I would suggest from a PR perspective that a simple press release would be sufficient, and then to move on to bigger battles.

  4. Given the accuser won’t turn over the year book with the signature to third party independent forensics, I don’t believe a word of the accusations. (not to mention it was copied incorrectly!) Why now, right in the middle of his election? Hes been in the public eye for years! Almost every election its always women from decades past, so far past, it could never be proven true or false, but is an attempt to destroy someones career, character, and life. They usually have no paper trail either, no complaints filed, never told anyone, not even a diary entry!

    I don’t want an America were “But he touched me!” accusations are enough to ruin you.

    Besides, its not an issue if someone from the left rapes, only the right, and America has become accustomed to sexual deviancy anyway.

    He supports my rights, my causes, and my ideals, elect him. Hes worlds better than the alternative, even if everything turns out to be true. Maybe while hes in the senate, we can get some legislation passed that puts a time limit on how long people can cry rape. If someone is sexually assaulted, they should get five years to start the legal process, otherwise, it obviously wasn’t bad enough to be worth the effort.

    • We already have “an America where ‘But he touched me!’ accusations are enough to ruin you.”

      Just look at sex offender laws: they assume right up front that if a minor makes an accusation, that accusation is true unless proven false by the accused. Some, maybe many, are written so that if the accused was unconscious due to a drug in a drink and a minor got sexual with the unconscious body, the accused is defined by law as being responsible and guilty. Some, maybe many, are written so that if you’re taking a shower in your own home and a minor breaks in and sees you scrubbing yourself, you’re guilty of a sex crime.

      The whole system is purposely written as “guilty until proven innocent”, which means that all it takes is a kid to say “He touched me!” and you’re screwed.

    • “Besides, its not an issue if someone from the left rapes, only the right, and America has become accustomed to sexual deviancy anyway.”

      Which clearly explains why John Conyers just retired from the House of Representatives after public allegations of sexual impropriety . . .

  5. This Roy Moore story is one of those stories that I’ve been trying to avoid because I just don’t care and the nonstop coverage of it bores me to death. That said, it seems like an awful lot of people, especially in Alabama either don’t believe any of the allegations or don’t believe the worst of them. And judging by what I’ve observed from the Democratic political machine I believe they have a right to be suspicious. Anyway, Alabama is not about to put a Democrat in the senate, so that just makes it even less interesting to me.

    • One point you’re missing is that stringing things along making the D’s think they can win is a good strategy because they end up dumping tons of $$$ into the campaign.

      Which makes it so there is less $$$ for other campaigns….

        • Hillocrap Foundation ain’t providing any other $$$, Hollywood’s eating it’s own WHILE ALSO HUGELY FAILING IN REVENUES ITSELF. Silicon Valley is tepid. The only thing left is Planned Parenthood; Gun-Study Universities; Soros; and foreign $$$.

          F em.

  6. Bedrock of American Justice system, “Innocent until proven guilty”. Accusations are just that facts are what makes the truth, “It’s not what you know(how many people know stuff that isn’t true!!) it’s what you can prove! Let him run, let whoever wants to support him do so until such time as there is actual evidence of a crime.

    • This right here. I still support innocent until proven guilty. I don’t want an America were accusations alone can ruin you.

      Its a liability to even tell women they look nice anymore.

      • Pretty much BS. “Innocent until proven guilty” applies to criminal trials. Not some guy trying to get elected.

        Anyway, was Obama “innocent until proven guilty” when you were lapping the Jeremiah Wright stuff on Hannity? I thought his attendance at that church was really bad and was not sure how you could listen to that “preacher” and yet love this country. But it had nothing to do with a criminal standard of proof.

        • Obama’s self-selected membership at a church where the pastor preached hatred and anti-Americanism is totally different, in every logical and rational manner, than being the victim of a false accusation.

          Obama CHOSE to go to Rev. Wright’s church. Wright’s views were VERY well known, and Obama still CHOSE to go there. So yes, it is 100% appropriate to judge people by the company they keep.

          On the other hand, if a woman you work with decides she wants to ruin your marriage, all she needs to do is pick up the phone and call your wife and tell her you’ve been boning behind your wife’s back. You didn’t do anything, but your life is still ruined.

        • The (WRONG) rev. Right stories were ALWAYS true. Nobody but Ohole denied them, even after citing them in his books.

          (D) sh_t ain’t NEVER NOT been broke, and POS, as are all of its voters.

    • Due process. Roy Moore knows what it means. Gloria ALL-Red knows what it means. Which of the two actually care so long as ignoring it promotes their political agenda?

      “…the multiple, detailed allegations of child molestation leveled against Moore…”

      It makes absolutely ZERO difference how detailed the allegations are if you cannot provide a SHRED of credible evidence that the alleged incident actually occurred!

      And a year-book entry? Proof of child molestation? Even if the entry were legitimate, which seems extremely unlikely since they are not willing to allow a third party handwriting analysis, a note in a yearbook is not molestation unless it is blatantly suggesting a time, place and details of the hoped for meeting. Which even a classmate of the accuser would have to be a damn fool to write AND sign his name to.

      This is an ad hominem witch hunt from the start by political opponents who have no other way to defeat Moore than to destroy his character and reputation by innuendo.

      “A man’s reputation is like a china plate – once cracked it is NEVER successfully mended.” – Benjamin Frnaklin

    • So, is your only filter on moral suitability for office a criminal conviction? You seem willing enough to accept almost any allegation against a Democrat as likely true, but demand proof beyond a reasonable doubt for Republicans. Hillary Clinton has never been convicted of a crime, but Republicans generally were more than happy to throw all sorts of unsubstantiated allegations at her and her campaign. If political positions alone are the only valid criteria for judging fitness for office, then that standard should run in both directions. I would remind you that the so-called “Pizza-gate” child sexual abuse allegations ran rampant among the right during the last election, including a misguided effort by a severely disturbed young man to “rescue” non-existent children. So, are allegations of child sexual abuse only disqualifying if they involve Democrats?

      • She was never convicted of a crime because she paid off the AG. There is more than enough evidence of her criminality to put her behind bars for life. The FBI admitted as much when they said they recovered classified emails from her private server. That’s a crime. Or are you saying that the FBI was lying?

        • 1. Your proof that she “paid off the AG” is what?

          2. But apparently evidence against Republicans does not count unless it is in a criminal trial. Is the same true as to Democrats. There is now a Republican president and a Republican attorney general, and these alleged violations by Clinton took place well within the applicable statute of limitations, so regardless of prior alleged “payoffs” this could still be prosecuted, if there really is a case. If no case is brought by the current administration, then Republicans ought to just give up on “Crooked Hillary” meme and move on to try something constructive. The problem is that most of the current Republican platform is/was predicated on being opposed to anything that happened in the Obama administration rather than being oriented to any program to affirmatively doing anything.

        • Yes. Yes I do. Lynch met with Bill in private while his wife was under investigation. That alone is enough to throw them both in jail. Oh, and I expect Clinton to be going up against the wall as soon as this “muh’ Russia” garbage is dealt with. There is enough evidence there to hang her four times.

          There is exactly zero evidence against Moore other than the testimony of some paid off shills and women who have an axe to grind due to being worthless vermin that had to have their kids taken from them.

        • Serge, that tarmac meeting was not just “in private”, it was “in SECRET”! Very planned, and only discovered by accident. Even the FBI was more concerned about the meeting being uncovered than they were about the legality of the meeting itself. All in order to discuss golf and grandchildren for 30 minutes. The usual question of “how stupid do they think we are?” has been answered.

    • Specialist38 Yeah so hard to imagine, he shoots the pavement 4 or 5 yards away and a wild richochet travels 26 yeards and kills her and they dont conclude that he purposely killed her, murdered her, so hard to imagine… of course if this had happened to someone you like or even someone you consider to be fully human you would rightly conclude that this obviously isnt a murder.

      Its fascinating to watch yalls xenophobia and racism and ethnocentrism cripple whatever small capacity you have to think… naturally your hero Gump endlessly demagogically mischaracterizing this as a murder had an enormous impact as yall Gumpite groupies drooled all over yourselves cheering him everytime he lied that this was a murder… such small dumb men posing as hard authorities, embarrassing to watch…

  7. Yeah, I’m good with it. If he’s committed a crime, let them charge him, otherwise I for one am not all that concerned with what he did in private forty years ago….

  8. What I’m not ok with is making everyone quit or resign the minute any accusation is put forward about alleged misconduct. We are all innocent until proven guilty according to the rule of law in the US. And this whole trend of shaming people through accusations, because we have to believe the victim is a sham. We should believe the victim as much as we should believe the accused. That is the standard we should follow. This is being used as a weapon by the left to smear people they don’t like to either silence their viewpoint or preclude them from positions of power. Roy Moore was in many positions of power before he ran for Senate, and only now after he won the contested run off, which no one thought he would. And only now that he will be in a position to help Trump do the spurious allegations come out.

    • If it endlessly amusing that the “listen and believe” narrative of the feminazis is coming back to bite the DNC in the ass. While I don’t normally support witch hunts, if a Demokkkrats wants to throw himself on his sword over allegations, I’m not going to stop him.

      • “Feminazis” Pretty hostile to women there. Do you agree with Moore’s view that women should not run for public office, and that giving women the vote has led to problems?

  9. No, these allegations are carefully documented and supported by 30 named witnesses. The man’s actions were reprehensible. He is a liar and a predator on underage girls. Gun rights will remain well-protected without him in the senate. I am sad and disappointed that the NRA is spending even a fraction of a cent of my dues to support this dirtbag.

    • Were any of these supposed “victims” under 16 at the time? That was the age of consent then In Abalama (sic), you know, “The law is the law” ? Hell in Abalama it’s probably bonus points that none of them that we know of were first cousins…..

        • Who was proven to have lied in their account of ever having met Moore (by her employer). Accuser didn’t even give a crap that her narrative in her accusation of Moore might throw (albeit long after the fact) her employer under the bus. Much like the bs about Moore being blocked for visiting a mall, and the poor old mall manager (who nobody thought was still alive) had to drag his oxygen tank to the mic to call bullsh_t.

          F all the cr_p, and everyone spreading it.

          In all other cases F ALL OF THE POS EVIL (D).

        • Because the only thing that matters is whether its illegal to touch a 15 year and 364 day old vs 16 and a day for a dude in his mid 30’s. That’s the only thing, legal vs right, legal vs good doesn’t matter.

        • Bullshit matters, and the accusations against Moore have ALL proven to be false so far.

          Bullshit like that needs ALL of the shit beat out of it.

          The problem is the evil (D), even if Moore was a problem THE FING POS PROBLEM EVIL (D) ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SAY WHAT OR WHO THE PROBLEM IS, NOR WHAT THE FIX SHOULD BE.

          FIX THE EVIL POS (D).

    • They aren’t. The money NRA spends on political advertising is all from donations to NRA-ILA. Don’t believe in what NRA stands for, don’t donate.

    • And just as thoroughly refuted by other witnesses swearing that these women cannot be trusted, are partisan Democrats, frauds and congenital liars.

      Can it not be considered for even a moment that the impressions of a teenage girl when complimented or shown any attention at all by an older man might be inaccurate or his actions misconstrued? Those would be the ideas they bragged about to their friends, or revealed as SHOCKING truth of how much more desirable they were than their friends.

      What 16 year old girls tell their parents and police is a lot more credible than what they whisper to their friends.

        • Which, again, is evidence of jack shit. I bet the check they got from Soros and co would be rather easy to track down. Audit their finances.

    • Obvious commie troll is obvious. I can get 30 people to swear on a stack that I am the rightful czar of Russia and that Putin is a lizard alien wearing a Putinsuit. Both of those cases would be about as credible as what came out about Moore.

      • As a former commie, you should know that its a Tsar, and I don’t think you could get 30 people to swear you’ve ever been out of your mom’s basement. Take a shower, get a job. You’re probably a Patriots fan too.