Home » Blogs » Louisiana Cops Nab Deer Poacher Bragging on Snapchat

Louisiana Cops Nab Deer Poacher Bragging on Snapchat

Liberte Austin - comments No comments

Ashley Edgeworth loves her some social media. Click here for her Instagram page. It’s kinda surprising it’s still up (at the time of writing), given the hot water the huntress dove into via Snapchat. thenewstar.com gives us the 411 from Monroe Louisiana (a.k.a., Sportsman’s Paradise).

According to an arrest affidavit for Ashley Edgeworth, 18, Forest Drive, a wildlife agent received a complaint about Edgeworth night hunting on Horseshoe Lake Road.

The suspect reportedly published a Snapchat video featuring footage of her shooting a firearm, admitting to using a “spotlight” and passing the deer she shot the next morning.

On Jan. 10, the agent interviewed the suspect. Edgeworth said she shot the deer on the side of Horseshoe Lake Road but did not retrieve the corpse.

She said the deer was shot at night using the headlights of a vehicle to see the deer.

Edgeworth reportedly did not have the licenses required to hunt deer and killed it on private property. The property owner indicated they wanted to press trespassing charges.

Edgeworth was booked on charges of taking a deer from a public road, hunting without resident big game licenses, criminal trespass, discharging a firearm from a public road, hunting without a resident license, taking deer in illegal hours and hunting from moving vehicle.

Other than that, #DidnduNothin

0 thoughts on “Louisiana Cops Nab Deer Poacher Bragging on Snapchat”

  1. Poachers are not hunters. Hunters are not poachers. I turn my back to this game thief and will not acknowledge her as one of us. She is Outcast and no longer welcome at our lodge.
    And the gun bigots will use her as an example of us anyway.
    ????

    Reply
  2. Caelum non animum mutant qui trans mare currunt

    Those not of the West bring their shit holes with them. That is why they must all go back.

    If they dont, the only difference guns will make, is who owns the shit hole after it has been created. And of course by then it will be too late.

    Reply
  3. You don’t have to live in a shithole. But many people do work in a shithole.
    San Francisco and Baltimore are shitholes. Both are politically corrupt. Street crime, assaults, break in’s are so common the residents are no surprised when they happen.

    Because they are run by gay democrats and straight democrats the media looks the other way. Crime is going down in areas where you have easy access to a legal gun and easy access to a carry permit.
    Crime is going up in shithole San Francisco and Baltimore.

    Reply
  4. Last time I was in TJ was 1979,it was a shit hole then and probably more so now.
    Some places are just shit holes,I have driven through Indiana just to avoid the shit hole known as Shitcago.

    Reply
  5. Exactly. He’s a Shitcago political machine cog. He doesn’t *want* solutions. He wants cogs in the Democratic political machine. Mindless Democrat voters, end goal.

    Reply
  6. I’ve followed this firearm and its story quite closely for years and years. My comments:
    1) AMMO: Bullets must be crimped with at least 30 foot-pounds of pressure for this firearm. That’s the easiest way to tell if a particular kind of ammo will probably work in it. Ammo companies, if you call and ask, will usually provide you with their torquing specs for any ammo you’re condidering.
    2) REGARDING CRITICISM OF MR. BOBERG, THE INVENTOR: In my limited experience, he was always very honest and humble in describing the shortcomings of his work, not a bad-customer-service type of man, and how about some acknowlegement of his successes? He invented this gun. Who invents anything in America anymore? And he did it in his garage, with almost no money. So yeah, he could only take his invention so far, but we’d have a big fat nothing of this kind of firearm if it weren’t for him.

    Reply
  7. Man all this whining about Chicago. Large parts of Chiraq are good to go to…including all of Illinois as a shitehole is just plain retarded. Yeah I avoid a whole lot of Chicago but some of you supposed gunowners sound like puzzies. I’ve been in every neighborhood-UNARMED too.

    Reply
  8. Please forgive an off-topic remark that occurs to me.

    We PotG assert that the 2A is NOT about hunting. The commentary above is one bit of evidence to that effect. Our State legislators and DNR officials adopt countless laws regulating the practice of hunting; and, even the bearing of arms in the context of hunting. We PotG debate the merits (or sometimes, lack thereof) of such hunting laws; nevertheless, we approach 100% compliance. Not perfect; but nearly so. We have governance of hunting “by consent of the governed.” Any 2A argument against hunting laws are nearly unheard-of.

    It’s perfectly clear that the 2A is about self-defense and the security of a free state. We PotG can tell the difference between management of “the king’s deer” vs. management of the “king” himself.

    Reply
  9. “You won’t find these scopes in stores or via other distribution channels. Only through the Revic website.”

    I can see *why* they did that, but it will cost them.

    Plenty of folks simply will not hand over that kind of money (+2K) without touching it for themselves, especially a company with little to no reputation beforehand…

    Reply
  10. taking a deer from a public road

    This should be legal. Why would it matter as long as you have a tag.

    <hunting without resident big game licenses

    This is just a deer right? What big game?

    hunting without a resident license

    This should be legal. All you should really have to pay for is a tag.

    criminal trespass

    I agree with this if there are signs posted or if the property owner has told them before to stay off the property.

    discharging a firearm from a public road

    This should be legal.

    taking deer in illegal hours

    This should be legal.

    and hunting from moving vehicle

    This should be legal. Was she even hunting from a moving vehicle? From the story, it didn’t seem so.

    Reply
  11. The Second Amendment is about more than just citizens keeping and bearing arms, per se, just as keeping and bearing arms is about more than just being prepared to defend yourself with deadly force.

    The 2A reflects an underlying trust and respect between the government and the governed. It’s an indication of the mutual understanding that a just government has nothing to fear from an armed populace. (Hand out AKs and RPGs like candy to the people of North Korea and see just how long Rocket Man is for this world.)

    Similarly, actually keeping and bearing arms is interwoven with concepts of individual liberty, personal responsibility, self-reliance, rugged individualism, heritage and posterity, among others.

    The lack of an explicit constitutionally enshrined right to keep and bear arms may not necessarily put you in shithole status, any more than its presence would qualify you for 1st world status. It’s a major metric, though. It’s symptomatic of how one’s government views you, whether as citizen, subject, property, or worse.

    Consider that most of the day-to-day misery in this world stems from the fiction that people are not sovereign, independent entities, but rather are tools/resources/chattel belonging to imaginary gods and incompetent governments. People can still make bad decisions on a nationwide basis and live in a less than ideal society. Having the right to keep and bear arms at least ensures an outcome something better than one man, one vote, one time. Having ready the means for a national do-over helps forestall ever having actually to conduct one.

    As the saying goes, the Second Amendment is unique in that it’s the only one you don’t really need, until they try to take it away.

    Reply
  12. Hey a novelty gun that could cause bullets to jump crimp and jam it up in the heat of battle? Something that doesn’t happen to normal pistols that cost less than half what this one does?

    I’m not bothering and neither should anybody else with a brain. Bond Arms makes high quality guns that are really works of art and engineering, but they’re all novelty guns.

    Reply
  13. Judge Parker’s enmity towards self-defense and stand-your-ground was his defining characteristic as a jurist. He is an odd choice for lionization amongst civilian gun owners.

    Reply
  14. Can someone explain the 4inch barrel on a carbine sized pistol? I get wanting an ar or carbine style pistol with 8 or 10 inch barrels but why would i want a carbine that spits 9mm out of a 4inch barrel thats less than most full sized pistols.

    Reply
  15. Careful, “common sense” can be dangerous. Its a quick way to get sued. Anywhere from, you should’ve know that a 20ft pool fence was needed to keep that punk kid, out to, knowing not to shoot that methhead while he wants to rob your home.

    Reply
  16. I think we need to regulate the media, you know, for “public safety” reasons.

    Keep it up, I think if you write for a newspaper go on air as a regular anchor person you need a journalist licence, doctors are licence, lawyers are, lets break the leftists back, shall we?

    Reply
  17. Interesting that only one side is wearing masks and nothing is said about that. I was taught that if wearing a mask in public, and not for the weather conditions or medical, that the mask wearers were considered ‘bad guys’ or criminals and you needed to defend yourself and others from them. Oh wait, there is criminal activity occurring with arson in the background and at least one masked person ready to commit assault, totality of the circumstances apply here. Since there are more than 4 individuals that is considered, and is by definition, a riot so you can now protect yourself with whatever tools at your disposal. The four unmasked are showing great restraint because, IMHO, they could be legally shooting now.

    Reply
  18. At that price you could buy 10, hide one under every pillow in your home and the most expensive thing would be to fill all those magazines with self defense ammo. For 250 there is no reason not to buy this if you are on a budged. Gone are the days where you wondered if hi-points still sell. Now they won’t. Nice.

    Reply
  19. I believe every company that manufactures and sells it under the idea of increasing accuracy for Glock pistols should post accuracy results against a factory stock Glock barrel. Otherwise only market it for changing athestics of the pistol or providing threads for a suppressor. I see way too many companies coming out with what they call match-grade barrels but zero evidence that it enhances anything about accuracy. Due to this lack of due diligence on their part, I have to come to the conclusion their barrels don’t actually increase accuracy.

    Reply
  20. Vermont, New Mexico, Maine, and Missouri are the only surprises/disappointments on the list. Although, these states are so far just considering a ban. It might not go anywhere.

    Reply

Leave a Comment