# Modern building structures used for military purposes.

1. TYPES OF SPHERICAL SPATIAL STRUCTURESThe spherical structures have been used since ancient times. Nowadays they are parts of the most visited and impressive edifices in the world (Figure 1) [2, 3].

Introducing the golden section rule in the architecture, the concept of the perfect proportion of the elements that constitute the spatial spherical structures has developed. Ifa segment is divided so, that the ratio of the whole and the larger side is equal to the ratio of the larger side and the lower side, than the ratio is equal to the golden number, <D (Figure 2, a) fl, 2, 3],

AC/AB = AB/BC = ([right arrow] [[PHI].sup.2] - [PHI] - 1 = 0. (1)

The results of the equation are as follows:

[[PHI].sub.1] = [1 + [square root of 5]/2] > 0 (2)

[[PHI].sub.2] = [1 + [square root of 5]/2] < 0 (3)

The results show that the negative value is not a solution of the equation, as the [PHI] golden number is the result of the ratio of two positive numbers [1, 3, 5], So, the value of [PHI] = [1 + [square root of 5]/2] [approximately equal to] 1,618 ... having an infinite number of decimals.

The ratio of the diagonal and the edge of a regular pentagon has as result the value of the golden number, [PHI] (Figure2, b).

By rotating around axes the flat surfaces obtained with the proportion rules of the golden number, [PHI], spatial structures can be built on, based on parallelepipeds, prisms or pyramids. Such spatial objects have been first imagined and drawn by LEONARDO DA VINCI (Fig. 3) [3. 5. 6].

Domes are spherical structures that cover large openings and they are built in two ways: monolithic ones--using concrete as the base raw material and geodesic ones, a structure made of bars (preferably steel or wood).

The building principle of the geodesic domes has been developed and implemented by R. B. Fuller in "Laminar geodesic domes" (1965). Using isosceles triangles, Fuller found a way to divide the spherical surface into equal flat surfaces, obtaining thus an image of a complete spherical structure made of bars (Figure 4). These spatial structures have two main characteristics: each node is the joint of 6 bar ends; the nodes are connected into triangle shapes.

By using Fuller's principles into architecture, public structures or even single-family homes were built (Figure 5) [7,8,9,10,11],

Defining the spherical spatial

structure, the properties of regular polyhedrons as tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron or icosahedron can be used in buildings architecture (Figure 6).

For an optimal use in building architecture, the angle between two adjacent polygons must be as large as possible. The most suitable polyhedron to be used in spherical structures is the dodecahedron, for which the angle between two adjacent polygons is 1150.

In case of rotating the pentagons of the dodecahedron, so that they no longer have a common edge, but a common point, an irregular polyhedron with 60 equal edges is obtained, composed of 12 initial pentagons and 20 equilateral triangles in addition. The polyhedron thus obtained is modified as follows: each pentagon is moved at a distance equal to the length of an edge, so that the 20 equilateral triangles are turning into regular hexagons, each node consisting of 3 edges. Thus, another irregular spherical polyhedron composed of 90 equal edges and 60 identical vertices is obtained (Figure 7) [4, 14],

When cutting the irregular polyhedron, valuable structures can be obtained for the building architecture (Figure 8) [12, 13].

The projection of the spatial structure shown in Fig. 8a is obtained by alternating edges with length a and 2a respectively (Figure 9). The radius of the circumscribed circle (the projection circle) has the value of 2,441244516a. The height of this structure is shown in Figure 10 [15, 16, 17].

If a part of the projection that alternates a and 2a edges is mirrored at a distance of 0,850650808a, a module consisting of equal bars is obtained. They form hexagons and half of hexagons. (Figure 11)

Repeating the module, a half cylinder structure is obtained. This structure is composed of hexagons reinforced with anchors with the length 2a, namely the diagonal of the hexagon with edge of length a (Figure 12).

2. TENSEGRITY SYSTEMS

Tensegrity systems are light structures, suitable for knock down and foldable structures. Tensegrity systems are composed of cables and rigid bars and have the following characteristics: the static stability of the structure is the result of pre-tensioning the cables; the rigid elements (bars) are not connected one to the other and they are subjected only to compression strains; there are no rigid joints in the structure, but articulated joints only. (Figure 13) [16,18],

2.1. SPATIAL SYSTEMS OF THE ARTICULATED JOINTS BARS

The way of calculating the bar strains is presented here below: all bars are considered to be sectioned; the sectioned bars are replaced by their unknown axial internal force in the bar; the equability of each node is expressed by equations, resulting thus 3n equations with (b + r) unknown values,

where: n is the number of nodes;

b--number of bars;

r--number of single bearing bonds.

The equation of the internal stress of the bars results as follows:

A x N = F (4)

where:

A is the equilibrium matrix;

N--vector of the axial internal forces;

F--vector of the forces in the nodes.

If det (A) [not equal to] 0, than N = inv (A) x F;

The systems of articulated joint bars have the following characteristics:

* b + r = 3n, det (A) [not equal to] 0--statically determinate system;

* b + r < 3n, rang (A) = (b + r)--mechanism with m = 3n--(b + r) degrees of freedom;

* b + r > 3n, rang (A) = 3n --statically indeterminate system, s = b + r--3n--degree of statically indetermination;

* q = rang (A) < min (3n, b + r) -critical system, s = b + r - q; m = 3n - q.

In critical systems there is a number s of vectors with [N.sub.0] [not equal to] 0, so that A x [N.sub.0] = 0 and these can be pre-tensioned and there is a number of m degrees of freedom for each mechanism, so that an infinite number of mechanism could exist.

[N.sub.0] is the number of self strains that meet the conditions of equilibrium, without loading the system. If corresponded displacements are applied to the infinite number of mechanisms, than, theoretically, there are an infinite number of strains in the system. For certain loads, the critical system behaves as a statically indeterminate system. For other loads, the system behaves as a mechanism.

The tensegrity systems are critical systems, when are subjected to a set of self strains (s = 1) and have one ore more degrees of freedom as a mechanism (m [less than or equal to] 1). By pre-tensioning the system, it becomes stable and the kinematic freedom of degrees become rigid ones. After removing the disruptive external actions, the resultant of internal stress of the bar restores the system to its initial state. (Figure 14).

In Figure 15 the use of the tensegrity systems in case of geodesic domes is presented.

3. CONCLUSION

A possible destination of the spherical structures could be the military buildings, due to the fact that they are light structures and even knock-down ones, able to be placed on any kind of land. If the structure fulfills the conditions imposed by the tensegrity systems, then it can be easily transported as modules, and can be used for military building purpose.

The proposed spherical structures can be fixed or knock-down structures and for the last one the tensegrity structures are recommended.

For fixed structures (sheds for example), sections of the structures with 90 equal bars can be used, but the most appropriate one is the modular structure presented in Fig. 12.

As the strength point of view, the presented structures are possible to be optimized. The structures behave as mechanisms, but using tensegrity systems, they can be optimized so, that the reaction of the structure (and especially of the system) to the action of the external factors to be superior to the current structures used for military building purpose, and not only for them.

REFERENCES

[1] Bobancu, S, Secpunea I Calculul armoniei proporpilor si culorilor, Seria: Inovare inginereasca in design.

[2] Diaconu, C. P., Curtu, I., Moraru, G. C., s. a.:Large curved surface sustained by 3D spherical structure formed by 90 equal wooden bars, in Proceedings of 10 Congresso Ibero-Latino Americano da Madeira na Construcao, Coimbra, Portugalia 7 - 9 iunie 2011, ISBN 987-989-96461-2-4, pp. 111-112 (Book of Abstract) si pe CD lucrarea in extenso: https://www.dec.uc.pt/cimad11/en.

[3] Diaconu, C. P., Curtu, I., Moraru, G. C.: Conceppi noi in structura de rezistenta a cupolelor sferice realizate din bare egale, in Buletinul AGIR nr. 1/2012, ianuarie--martie, Creativitate, Inventica, Robotica, An XVI, ISSN-L 1224-7928, p. 17-23 si pe CD lucrarea in extenso: http://www.agir.ro/buletine/1243.pdf.

[4] Diaconu, C. P., Curtu, I., Moraru, G. C.: Calculul de rezistenja si rigiditate al cupolelor sferice realizate din bare, in Buletinul AGIR nr. 1/2012, ianuarie--martie, Creativitate, Inventica, Robotica, An XVI, ISSN-L 1224-7928, p. 24-30 si pe CD lucrarea in extenso: http://www.buletinulagir.agir.ro/articol. php?id=1244.

[5] Fuller, R. B. Laminar geodesic dome. Inventatori: R. B. FULLER. US3203144A. 1965-08-31.

[6] Fuller, R.B. (1954) Building construction, U.S. Patent No. 2,682,235, June 29, 1954.

[7] Fuller, R.B. (1961) "Tensegrity", Portfolio and Art News Annual, No. 4. pp. 112-127, 144, 148.http://www. rwgrayprojects.com/rbfnotes/fpapers/ tensegrity/tenseg01.htm

[8] Fuller, R.B. (1962) Tensile-Integrity Structures, U.S. Patent No. 3,063,521, November 13, 1962.

[9] Fuller, R.B. (1964) Suspension Building, U.S. Patent No. 3,139,957, July 7, 1964.

[10] Fuller, R.B. (1967) Octahedronal building truss, U.S. Patent No. 3,354,591, November 28, 1967.

[11] Fuller, R.B. (1975a) Nonsymmetrical tensegrity, U.S. Patent No. 3,866,366, February 18, 1975.

[12] Kajikawa, T., Tensegrity structure, its module and unit. Inventatori: Taiji KAJIKAWA. JP9166286A. 1997-06-24.

[13] Miller, R. T., Geodesic dome. Inventatori: R. T. MILLER. US2002088185 A1. 2002-07-11.

[14] Moraru, G. C., Structura spapala sferica formata din 90 de bare egale. Inventatori: G. C. MORARU. BOPI Nr. 4/2010 (Buletinul oficial de proprietate industriala).

[15] RAMCO YKK. Dome truss structure. Inventatori: YKK RAMCO. GB2277539. 1994-11-02.

[16] Skelton, R., Mauricio C. de Oliveira: Tensegrity system, Springer Science and Business Media, 2009.

[17] Wolfram, B. F., Connector for geodesic dome structures. Inventatori: B. F. WOLFRAM. US2009056239 A1. 2009-03-05.

[18] Valentin Gomez Jauregui, Tensegrity Structures and their Application to Architecture--Msc Thesis.

Ciprian Petrica DIACONU *, Mariana Domnica STANCIU *, Ioan CURTU *, Adam DOSA *, Florin-Eduard GROSARU **, Camelia COSEREANU *

* Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania

** Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies, Brasov, Romania

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Author: | Diaconu, Ciprian Petrica; Stanciu, Mariana Domnica; Curtu, Ioan; Dosa, Adam; Grosaru, Florin-Eduard; |
---|---|

Publication: | Journal of Defense Resources Management |

Geographic Code: | 1USA |

Date: | Apr 1, 2014 |

Words: | 1799 |

Previous Article: | Uncertainty in process design and process economics using HYSYS. |

Next Article: | Unmanned aircraft vehicle (UAV) in the Romanian airspace. An overview. |

Topics: |