Previous Post
Next Post

Bradenton, FL capitulates on firearms ban

A lot of people think the NRA does most of the heavy lifting when it comes to defending gun rights. While the NRA does great work, plenty of smaller state and local gun rights orgs score big victories, too. Take Florida Carry‘s noble efforts to effectively restore the gun rights of Bradenton, Florida’s public housing residents.

With a simple demand letter backed up by the letter of the law, Florida Carry convinced the Bradenton Housing Authority to rescind a firearms ban it had imposed on its residents. Chalk up yet another one for the good guys.

Lee Williams, of the Florida-based blog, publicized the BHA’s “no firearms” policy last week. BHA head honcho Ellis Mitchell Jr. (above) wrote to Williams and reluctantly provided a copy of their boilerplate lease language. In that lease, Mitchell wrote, “you will find clear language indicating that firearms are not allowed and is considered a lease violation”.

Florida Carry read Mr. Williams’ report and immediately got involved. After all, the BHA serves thousands of residents. Despite living in public housing, they still retain all of their rights as American citizens. Florida Carry wanted to make sure those rights include those protected by the the Second Amendment.

Florida Carry’s efforts paid off almost immediately. Mr. Williams broke the news Wednesday of the Housing Authority’s complete and total capitulation:

Florida Carry‘s demand letter, which was signed by Eric J. Friday, Florida Carry’s general counsel, was sent to Ellis Mitchell, the BHA’s executive director…

In his response, Mitchell thanked the pro-gun group for “bringing this matter to our attention.”

Mitchell also claimed that “the BHA had already begun the process of updating our lease to insure that all lease language complies with Florida Statues (sic) Federal and Local laws and that no lease language violates any residents’ rights under any statue (sic) law or regulation.”

In their letter, Florida Carry demanded that the BHA and their contractor, the Telesis Corp., must deliver written notice to their residents that:

  • No firearm or weapon prohibition will be enforced unless the weapons are illegally possessed.
  • The BHA respects the right to keep and bear arms.
  • Any person legally allowed to possess a weapon may do so in any residence.
  • Any person with a valid Florida Concealed Weapons Firearms License or a reciprocal license from another state may carry a weapon on property managed by the BHA and its contactors.
  • All lease renewals must not contain any language prohibiting the right to bear arms.
  • Any firearms laws cited in any BHA lease must fully quote and cite the applicable federal or state law.

In his response, Mitchell agreed to comply with all of Florida Carry’s demands, stating “we accept your demands outlined in your June 30, 2017 letter, and will notify all of our residents of the following within 30 days of July 3, 2017.

The NRA can’t be everywhere. There are plenty of local David vs. Goliath cases in which the NRA has no role. Instead, it falls to state and regional gun rights organizations do the heavy lifting.

This serves as just one example why you should not only belong to the NRA, but also your state or regional gun rights organizations, too. For the price of a box of ammo (or two if you buy the cheap stuff), your membership can make a real difference for you and your neighbors right where you live.

Previous Post
Next Post


  1. Very good news. While Florida Carry pushed the buttons, you can’t overlook the power available in Florida’s excellent preemption statutes. It should be the model for all other states.

  2. about time. its asinine to take away poor peoples defense options seeing as its their neighborhoods that are the toughest.

  3. Thank you to very much everyone. Now if someone can organize (black guns matter) classes so new gun owners don’t make mistakes and lose their rights.

  4. Well, when you call them on their BS, sometimes they back down.

    Call them on their BS. Make them own it. Helpfully suggest how they can get their preferences implemented in law, vs. some stealth fiat by some nameless functionary, when nobody’s looking.

  5. It is good to see all patriots don’t have to have a six figure income and indeed most patriots don’t. It is the rich elitist who think they deserve the rights that the remainder of us fought for though they were the draft dodgers of yesteryear or those that bought their way out of service to our country.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here