To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
OK. It's ridiculous. But it's so over the top, it's pretty good.
Then again, I thought In Bruges was one of the funniest films of the decade.
I was with ya, ihatetrees, right up until the comment about In Bruges. In the pantheon of sucky films, that one was positively sucTACular. Suckish to the Nth degree. A real Suck-a-saurus Rex of a film.
This, however, was pretty funny for an Indie YouTube thang. And the lack of trigger discipline was completely believable within the context of the film's œuvre.