To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I don’t know much about ABCs but that bunny made fer good eatin and one fine hat!
With rights comes responsibility. Licenses are needed in hunting and fishing(and limits also). Back in the 18th century, many animals were hunted out, almost wiped of the face of the earth. We need some controls and agreement on those controls by all concerned, so our grandchildren can enjoy the land as we do(or should).
The over population problem is another issue, but proper management of natural resources, game and timber limits are the only reason we have game. No one person should have the rights to a forest(like the royals did back in Europe), no one person should be able to profit from his exclusive rights to public land.
‘All these dang gun laws, and I thought the Second Ammendment only had a few sentences…’
If the Second Amendment can be treated differently across state lines, so can the Thirteenth.
Is that what you want? Because I could use some honkey slaves…..
Elmer Fudd got an early start on hunting wabbits
I love the “It’s not the perfect bill/doesn’t put us immediately back to totally zero infringement” crowd. They’re cute, if not a bit naive.
The anti’s and progressives were always content to play the long game to erode our rights. We need to do the same to gain them back.
None of this reciprocity law will affect me personally in any way.
To me since Ill take what I can get out of all this. I dont want Gubbermint in any of my daily discourse.
Some things can be quite distasteful. This while not what Id like, nor should be. It is for now acceptable.
Nancy take your marbles and go home already. Ive had enough of you.
Just please go away. Enough is enough of you.
Your friends might get me in a rush, but not before I make your head into a canoe, you understand me?
Too much tension in my entire upper body. I have the grip, sight and trigger press down but I find myself sweating and glasses fogging after 50 rounds or so from just shooting “tight”. I need to work on breathing and relaxing.
Except that the government can impose limits on gun ownership and rights. Just like any other amendment. Constitutional carry is a ridiculous notion that allows people to carry with no training or experience. You may want to reconsider the implications of allowing anyone to carry.
Calling Adfotainment on this.
Shadow ad for Mossberg.
No follow-up? Got his Mossberg PIF and moved on.
Gettin wheddy fowh wabbit season…
Much talk, Constitution says I have the right to bear arms, and I do. It’s a misdeamnor anyway, grow some balls, support the Constitution.( busted in 1991 for concealed carry) and proud of it ,because Shall not be infringed
Man I want books about guns not kids stuff.
“If these people aren’t allowed to own a firearm, they definitely can’t carry one.” – And, the bill specifically excludes them from coverage.
‘To have the federal government mandate that every state shall observe every other state’s concealed carry permits is the definition of tyranny…a clear violation of states rights.’
States don’t have rights, they have powers as defined in the Constitution of the United States of American and the 10th Amendment. Individuals have rights and the 2nd Amendment says that those rights ‘Shall not be infringed’ and if it wasn’t clear that these infringements were not allowed by either the federal government or the states, it was codified into the constitution with the 14th Amendment. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment states that ‘The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.’
IMHO the imposition of a permitting system is in itself a blatant infringement. Would it be considered an infringement on voting rights if you first had to take, at your own expense, a civics course and then pay for a permit to vote that had to be renewed every 5 years? But I’m not opposed to incrementalism. It’s better than fighting a civil war to get our rights back.
But there’s nothing wrong with ‘The Congress’ imposing the Bill of Rights on the states. If they don’t like it, they can secede.
Well said.
Then there’s this little piece of the US Constitution called the “Full Faith and Credit” clause.
Article IV, Section I, I believe…
Wondering if Sig regrets getting the contract from the military after this fiasco ? Or are they still making a decent profit to outweigh this mess ?
So, one comment that I haven’t seen mentioned by anyone in discussing this is that very liberal states like CA, NY, etc., that currently issue permits will pass a law that they will no longer issue permits. Not sure why no one seems to see that coming. That’s my only concern, the wording about the if the states issue licenses part.
Nobody puts baby in a corner.
Among other things, the civil war and the 14th ammendment made it clear that the federal government has the power to uphold individual civil rights (like the right to keep and bear arms) and prevent infringement of the same by the states… in my opinion one of the more legitimate exercises of federal power.
I do think it would be best if the courts simply struck down ALL the unconstitutional federal and state infringements on gun rights, as they generally do with infringements on free speech, but until then, baby steps 🙂
It’s really impressive.
Andrew Cuomo might not be the most morally repugnant politician in America, but he’s in the top 5. True to form as a NYC elitist, he’s showing here how out of touch he is not only with the rest of America, but with the rest of New York State. I wish he’d make the distinction between NYC residents and the rest of us, it’s really embarrassing when he claims to speak for the whole state, considering the counties by NYC are pretty much the only ones where he got a majority vote in his last election and are the reason he’s Governor. It’s sad.
Man am I sick of reading the lies.
From ugly duckling to beautiful swan.
That photo on the truck tailgate is beautiful.
That could be a “Caption this” contest photo. What is he doing to that poor dog?
Don’t like how they live in Texas? Go back to your safe space in Commiefornia, ya snowflakes!
I’m a retired cop and had to use my service weapon more than once so reliability is an absolute must. I went through all the current crop of micro .380 pistols and almost gave up until I got the TCP on a whim. I shoot a couple of mags every time I go to the range and have never had a failure of any kind. Stopping power is a myth so if you want or need to carry a .380 don’t concern yourself. Besides, current stats reflect one shot stops about the same as with a snub .38, which is what I carried for years. As a handicapped senior citizen the TCP satisfies my need for a small & light carry gun.
Much better to take measures so the thieves and idiots don’t get in. Chasing after them is apt to be a serious problem anywhere. It could so easily have been a tragic mistake to go after them, especially unarmed. Glad she got her stuff back.
But yeah, don’t mess with old people. They’re too weak and tired to fight much. And some of us will just shoot you if we’re attacked.
Reasons:
1). They don’t want the locals to be offended they sent white guys with guns in their neighborhood.
2). They don’t want to offend the locals by implying that their neighborhood is not a nice place, but is instead filled with rapists and murderers.
3). They don’t want to highlight the difference between an inner city ghetto comprised of mostly one race compared to the low crime areas of say, the suburbs, comprised of mostly a different race from the inner city ghetto.
4). They must maintain PC, or a sensitivity mob of SJWs will show up at their homes with signs, vagina hats, BLM banners, and bags of urine to throw at them.
So yeah. If you have been paying attention to the theme here – these reasons are NOT about the well-being of the city workers or their defense, but are about the well being of the executives making the decisions for the city sewer workers.
He is preparing to go bunny hunting