Home » Blogs » TTAG Weekend Photo Caption Contest – Win a Box of IMI 5.56 Ammunition

TTAG Weekend Photo Caption Contest – Win a Box of IMI 5.56 Ammunition

Dan Zimmerman - comments No comments

Oliver Reed's broom handle Mauser
“Oh, so you ‘improved’ it??? Philistine.”

Last week’s champ was bfitz76239. This week’s winner will receive a box of IMI Systems 5.56 ammunition. To win, just enter the best caption for this photo in the comments by Sunday at midnight. Good luck.

 

 

0 thoughts on “TTAG Weekend Photo Caption Contest – Win a Box of IMI 5.56 Ammunition”

  1. “it takes me more time to spot the laser and put it on the target and fire than just looking down the sights and firing.”

    Can I get an amen! By the time I acquire the red or green laser dot, I could pump ten rounds directly on target with iron sights.

    Lasers are fine for training, allowing the shooter to see how shaky his hold might be and whether his trigger press is moving the gun off target.

    Reply
  2. As noted here, often, by others, the second amendment is my national reciprocity law. I do not like any legislation that attempts to overturn, or supercede the constitution, unless that legislation is in the form of a constitutional amendment published for ratification. If mere legislation can reinforce, enforce, propagate, repeal or impose “gun rights” in the states, mere legislation can reverse the first, or severely constrain it.

    We would be hit with apoplexy if the anti-gunners proposed national legislation to make illegal, any reciprocity between states. (We would retain the RTKBA, but not the ability to concealed carry in any state but that of our residence; not an infringement).

    Let this one go. It will eventually be used to choke us.

    Reply
  3. U put to many articles in one article?, Which one am I to respond to with my undisputable sage comment? California is the bestest, most wonderful, only State to live in. It’s citizens are premiere and every State should strive to be just like California. My “fly over” State totally sucks ass .

    Reply
  4. youse Yanks really strike me as gullible dead-shits believing this Vegas BS!
    obviously, the Deep State fuckers wanna dis-arm youse…..for what?
    tyranny? alien invasion?
    nothing good!
    if they make the slightest move to dis-arm, youse better start a CIVIL fucking WAR ASAP….just start blowing away any cunt who wants to take yr guns…

    Reply
  5. You’re sure that they’re gonna say Solo acted alone and even when they release the documents decades from now, they’ll keep my involvement redacted?

    Okay. Greedo is one dead Rodian.

    Reply
  6. I am a member of the Armed Citizens’ Legal Defense Network. In addition to their financial protection, they offer excellent training materials. I had no desire to shoot anyone before I joined them, and none at all afterwards.

    The problem with the gun grabbers is not the idea of our having insurance, of course, but the fact that it is turned around to protect us rather than offer deep pockets for their false idea of our liability in ANY use of our guns.

    Reply
  7. I talked with a paralegal about these a few months ago. Keep in mid that for every lawyers opinion there is an equal and opposite lawyers opinion. Her take;
    1. Could be considered proof of intent (me, but so is a gun)
    2. All have a common flaw. It’s illegal to insure a criminal act.
    3. If you are found guilty of a crime, you owe everything they spent on you back to them.
    4. These considered, the insurance company makes out better if your found guilty!

    Reply
  8. Is it just me or does carrying a 1.28 inch thick revolver and two reloads seem less concealable and less practical than carrying a .9 inch thick semi with one reload?

    Reply
  9. Is the promotion price the dealer cost or MSRP for the promotion price version?

    Wonder how the tactical rifle kit will compare, price and performance, to the PSA kit (which has sights) for $420+$10 sling plate.

    Reply
  10. Same thing in the “Peoples Republic of Illinois” (Madiganistan)….HB 4117 a bill to ban bump stocks and trigger modification devices and the more ominous HB 4107 bill to outlaw all semi-auto long guns were quickly brought to the forefront for a vote……thanks to republicans and downstate dems HB4117 failed to pass it’s first major hurdle despite a major push from Chicago area “lib’tards…..realizing their defeat they did not bring HB4107 to a vote at this time….many thanks to the NRA, The Illinois State Rifle Assoc. and Guns Save Life….we were able to contact our congress people as these bills were rapidly being pushed through…….once again given time cooler heads will prevail.

    Reply
  11. I liked ya’lls old layout better than this current system. I don’t know about the rest of the visitors here but this new layout seems super fake and wierd. Go back to the old system.

    Reply
  12. What’s the boyfriend loophole, Sam?
    Does that mean you can ask your current boyfriend to straw purchase a firearm for you when you’re a prohibited person for perpetrating domestic violence on all your ex-boyfriends?

    Reply

Leave a Comment