It’s no secret that the Garden State is hardly Eden for Second Amendment supporters, who are subjected there to some of the strictest firearm laws in the nation. But now Democrat Gov. Philip D. Murphy is targeting New Jersey’s law-abiding gun owners and would-be gun owners with proposals to increase by several orders of magnitude the mandatory fees state residents must pay to own or carry firearms.
These anti-gun taxes would hit low-income residents the hardest, predictably pricing many of them out of the gun market entirely, even though they typically live in the state’s highest crime areas.
As reported in a New York Times article published on April 22, Murphy proposes to hike the fees for a firearm identification card from $5 to $100, a permit to own a firearm from $2 to $50, and a permit to carry a firearm from $20 to $400.
He additionally wants to impose excise taxes of 2.5% on firearms and 10% on ammunition.
The article states that although Murphy “is prohibited by state law from directing the new revenue toward specific programs,” he insisted “it would go toward anti-violence initiatives.”
The Times article mentions no evidence that Murphy’s plan would have any beneficial effect on violent crime, going so far as to say that “gun control advocates and researchers” were “not certain” that “higher fees alone would reduce violence.”
Indeed, as we have noted many times before, criminals typically go outside legitimate retail markets to obtain the firearms used in their offenses.
But research by economist John Lott reveals the most predictable outcome of raising fees for firearm-related permits, licenses, and mandatory training is simply to suppress the number of people who lawfully exercise their Second Amendment rights. Because fewer people can afford to participate in lawful gun markets, moreover, the promised funding for anti-violence initiatives never materializes. Meanwhile, the costs of policing low-income neighborhoods where law-abiding residents are disarmed may well increase.
All this presumably is not lost on Gov. Murphy, who believes imposing affirmative steps for voter registration (such as obtaining a state-issued ID) is tantamount to “voter suppression.” He can hardly escape the conclusion that punitive taxes aimed specifically at law-abiding firearm purchasers, especially when heaped upon the considerable delays and bureaucratic procedures New Jersey requires simply to keep a firearm in one’s home, are an even more drastic form of suppression.
Murphy’s proposals are so drastic and patently discriminatory that even some of his normally anti-gun Democrat colleagues are not enthusiastic. The Times quotes Democrat Stephen M. Sweeney, Senate President, as stating, “Just to check a box to say you did something, I’m not sure that’s necessary. I don’t think it’s going to raise a lot of money.” Former Colorado governor and current Democrat presidential candidate John Hickenlooper agreed in the Times article that raising costs would “reduce” participation in otherwise lawful activity. “But I’m not sure that’s the right way to make policy,” he admitted.
Murphy himself, however, seems unburdened by such concerns, proving that he’s just as comfortable with hypocrisy and double standards as he is with infringing the Second Amendment rights of New Jersey residents.
This article originally appeared at nraila.org and is reprinted here with permission.
First think I thought of: https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/12/kat-ainsworth/some-chick-on-twitter-poor-people-are-too-uneducated-to-own-guns/
Wouldn’t it be *awesome* if the (inevitable) lawsuit against that price hike ends up being the one that ends up declaring *any* fee for the constitutional right to carry armed gets declared by SCOTUS to be unconstitutional?
Do it, NJ. Jack up that price nice and high… 😉
Yes, if poll taxes (no matter how low) are unconstitutional limitations on the right to vote, then any tax or fee on guns (or gun permits, or FPID cards, or CCW permits, or ammo) at all is an unconstitutional limitation on the right to keep and bear arms.
If they want to profit from this make it easier to buy guns. As it is now it’s so hard to own one these fees are not an issue.
They’re not certain that higher fees will reduce gun violence? Huh? The astounding ignorance of someone who thinks that’s even a possibility. Maybe we could curtail teenage pregnancy by taxing the shit out of Natty Ice.
They’re saying they want to curtail teen pregnancies by having a much higher tax on condoms.
“They’re not certain that higher fees will reduce gun violence? Huh?”
Well, the British are about to ‘crack down’ on knife carrying, so there you go… :
“No excuses: there is never a reason to carry a knife. Anyone who does will be caught, and they will feel the full force of the law,” London’s Mayor Sadiq Khan tweeted on April 8.
Why does he look like a stupid simp? Where do these morons get these ideas? If such horse hockey is not infringement I need a new dictionary. This kind of stuff has to be taken to court on that basis. Heller sort of ruled that special restrictions ARE restrictions, ie, infringement.
NJ already make it near impossible to get a carry permit. WTF?
Since New Jersey only has about 1,200 concealed carry licenses at the present time — and only for specially connected people — I don’t think that price hike will affect any low-income people. Not that that makes it okay, just sayin’.
But he wants to hike the fee to $100 to get a card that allows you to own firearms, and another $50 for a permit for each firearm you want to buy. With tax and transfer fees, that would double the cost of a High Point. That’ll show ’em!
The NJ firearm puchaser id is not a permit to own firearms, it is a permit to purchase firearms, and you can an unlimited number of long guns with one purchaser id. However, with hsndguns you are correct, you must get a handgun purchaser id card for every handgun you want to buy. NJ is strictest on handguns the most, semi auto long guns second. Funny enough, there are no restrictions on pump action shotguns. Moreover, the whole NJ gun purchaser id system is bs.
On its own yeah. I just fear they are getting it in place just in case the NYC case goes badly for the commies to try and slow down freedom purchases (until challenged or they manage to find a workaround)
For a lot of Democrats, their main problem with firearms is that too many of the ‘wrong’ people have them.
And increased pricing/risk to exercise a fundamental right reduces the number of people who will exercise that right.
And yet they won’t do jack squat to stop their out of control violent crime and have many times refuse to enforce their own laws against the criminal element.
“out of control violent crime” WTF
New Jersey murder rate was 3.6 in 2017, Texas was 5.0
Keep pushing morons, Karma hammers down the nails what sticks up the highest.-30-
This latest move only makes sense: it is an integral aspect of New Jersey’s effort to boldly and proudly claim the title of the highest taxed state in the U.S.
Another closet racist. Trying to keep black people – and others they view as “undesirable” – from having access to guns.
It’s the same reason they hiked poll taxes… to keep poor “undesirables” from exercising their franchise.
Reminds me of a story I once heard. Back in the 1930’s a number of southern states had a “literacy test” to make sure the voter could read the ballot and know who was on it. A number of white redneck sheriffs decided to use that against black voters at the polls. A black voter comes into the polling place and tries to vote. The sheriff says to him that there is a literacy test and hands him a newspaper to read, a newspaper written completely in Chinese. The black man looks at the paper for a couple of seconds and his shoulders slump. “Well, do you know what the newspaper says?” demands the sheriff. “I sure do.” Says the black man. “It says that there ain’t going to be any black people voting in this here precinct.”
That’s where this country is headed. Only instead of blacks it will be anyone who isn’t a socialist.
The principal behind this reminds me of the Stamp Act. How did that work out for England?
Well somebody in Jersey is voting for these creeps…
You get what you vote for,,, apparently the thugs must be voting so as to keep their victims from obtaining guns,,, good Idea if I don’t say so myself…. the ultimate Democrats in Jersey could be the perps themselves,,, probably not though , Not many that can read .
Sorry, thugs are not waiting in a polling place. Murphy won in a landslide. Every they wiped every GOP congressional seat but one. So this the majority view in NJ in play.
Most of the conservative minded people already left the state. Now the excess liberals are moving to PA and DE unfortunately.
Coming soon to ILLinois. Dumbocrats hate you and want you defenseless…
Well, taxes aren’t the only reason people are leaving Illinois, but it’s a large part of it.
I have state repeatedly over the years I haven’t see an anti-gun politician yet who wasn’t deceitful crooked
immoral treasonous and socialist! And today’s corrupt Democratic Machine, including RINO’s: Republican
In Name Only, all stand equally guilty! Depraved Democrats vs. Reprobate Republicans, what is the difference?
James A. “Jim” Farmer
Merrill, Oregon (Klamath County)
Long live the proverbial State of Jefferson!
“and a permit to carry a firearm from $20 to $400…”
Wow, the state will have a budget windfall of $800! Just kidding, there are actually something like 500… out of 9 million residents.
“This article originally appeared at nraila.org and is reprinted here with permission.”
TTAG, why don’t you start writing your own content, rather than borrowing shadow-cover propaganda from thieves and conmen? Cut the cord with the Negotiate Rights Away now. They’ve done nothing but waste our donations and dues while lining their own pockets. Not saying the price-hike in NJ isn’t happening, and isn’t wrong, I’m just saying pick a source that hasn’t been lying and cheating to us.
“New Jersey Gov. Murphy Wants to Price Low Income Citizens Out of Armed Self Defense”
Where are the liberals/naacp/aclu on this…??? They yelled and screamed about voter ID laws, saying they were prejudicial and un-Constitutional, well, isn’t this the exact same set of circumstances…???
Because They think this is great. That why they backed him and most voters did to.
Good news, if the courts rule that this is legal, we can bring back the poll tax.
The Racist Roots of Gun Control (1993)
by Claton E. Cramer
The anti liberty crowd just recycles the same old shirt.
Racist gun control always kept the gun prices high in order to disarm and control the poor black population.
Meh, water remains wet, as it has since the Tammany Hall days. What else is new?
This stupid measure will not “price [poor people] out of armed self-defense.”
On the contrary, it will turn them into criminals, forcing them to buy personal protection items “on the street,” rather than from legitimate sources.
Not only will the poor be driven into criminality, but, by having done so, the state will lose control over the legitimate gun market.
Maybe “stupid” is too weak a word for describing this new law.
Racially invidious gun controls are the stock in trade of the Democrat party.