Home » Blogs » Incendiary Image of the Day: Too Soon Edition

Incendiary Image of the Day: Too Soon Edition

Dan Zimmerman - comments No comments

image001

The levity-impaired libs who frequent the depths of thinkprogress.com are in high dudgeon over Tennessee State Sen. Stacey Campfield’s attempt to poke some fun at everyone’s favorite civilian disarmer, Diane Feinstein. Morose MOT Josh Israel fails to see the humor in Campfield’s assault pressure cooker takeoff. But even worse than the abject insensitivity to the welfare bombers’ victims still recovering in Beantown, the Senator then had the gall to point out that the gun grabbing community thought nothing of similarly using the still-warm bodies of 20 children (and six adults) to push their own agenda following Sandy Hook. Besides, who’d actually be ridiculous enough to propose regulating everyday items used safely by millions of people just because the Tsarnaev boys cobbled them together to make their explosives. Oh. Wait.   [h/t Tom P.]

0 thoughts on “Incendiary Image of the Day: Too Soon Edition”

  1. “Regardless, this is exactly what will keep happening if any sort of real clamp-down occurs on buying guns: bad guys will simply kill to acquire them.”

    This is what happened in Newtown.

    Reply
  2. The stupidity of the ban Nazis needs to be pointed out when it’s fresh. Otherwise it will just get buried and forgotten 6 weeks from now and nobody will be paying attention.

    Reply
  3. *gigglesnort*

    I will confess that after the horrific Boston Marathon attack by Islamic terrorists, I did see to it to isolate my personal pressure cooker and then I interrogated it pretty harshly. It revealed nothing to me that would lead me to believe it is out to kill me or my family, and told me it was not a follower of Islam. As my way of making it up to the pressure cooker, and as a way to allow it to prove to me it wasn’t Muslim, I used it to make some bean soup with ham.

    We are both happy with each other.

    Reply
  4. if you make this argument in opposition to gun control measures, then you can’t say that mass shootings are extremely rare when objecting to gun control. because this is orders of magnitude more rare. it also undermines the concept that good guys having guns acts as a deterrent to violent craine.

    Reply
  5. I took a chance once on a smooth talking snake oil salesman, never again. I don’t care if a Dem charges coma’s headquarters with a musket yelling “its for Paul Revere” No dems are ever getting anymore votes from me. Tea Party members are a plus, sure I’ll have to dust off my bible(Now where did I put that?) Randy

    Reply
  6. How about a pressure cooker march through Chicago, do you feel lucky rahm? well, do ya punk? I guess we could see the 3 people that support 2a then according to o. the mind of a grabber reminds me of some of the Monte Python opening shots, Randy

    Reply
  7. These guys killed and crippled more people with their bombs than they did with their guns. Evil finds a way. Hindering the lawful does nothing but make it easier for the evil.

    Since she has to sacrifice a virgin every 100 years to stay alive you would think difi would know enough about evil to understand this. Oh wait, she does.

    Reply
  8. Insensitive, indeed, but accurate. I absolutely support exposing the ludicrous ideas gun grabbers put forth in the wake of horrific tragedy. Since Feinstein and Obama *know* so much more about how civilian disarmament and taxation techniques will make America more safe the children, I have no problem with showing them otherwise. I am unapologetic about exercising my rights and supporting the rights of responsible citizens. I oppose the ridiculous idea that my right to self defense is dictated by the lowest common denominator – the mass murderer.

    Reply
  9. Don’t ever accuse a Democrat of having a sense of humor.

    They have no idea what a sense of humor is; they all take themselves way too seriously for something like that.

    Reply
  10. I had to admit that I laughed my a$$ of when I just saw your commentary. Here is something that I posted yesterday at my blog:

    In other news it has been rumored that a bill is being rushed through titled the patriot pressure cooker act that bans those large capacity 6 liter pressure cookers like the ones used in the Boston Marathon bombing. As an aside, it was also rumored that New Jersey’s Frank Lautenberg in his typical knee jerk reaction was frantically drafting an emergency bill to ban propane gas for cooks stoves. As of the July 4th deadline, possession of anything larger than a 3 liter pressure cooker will be a felony with a mandatory sentence of five years in the state of Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and other states not part of free America. Of course, existing 6 liter pressure cookers will be grand fathered in providing they are registered, and with the distinct stipulation that they can only be filled with 3 liters of any substance. Devices will be available to retrofit existing 6 liter cookers to insure compliance with the new law. Lawmakers stated that the reason for this ban, is that it makes the device less lethal forcing them to use multiple devices, and therefore when they are trying to reload in order to detonate the second device, they could be rushed and disarmed. Lawmakers were quoted as saying “why does anyone need a high capacity six liter assault cooker anyways?”, “if it only saves one life” and “it’s for the children”. (sarcasm off)

    Reply
  11. I would still like someone to point out under what authority the Federal government is going to use to intrude on private sales? Or even better, what imaginary precedent SCOTUS is going to use to justify it?

    Your recent article on the killings in Illinois(?) was a stark reminder that people HAVE to take responsibility first and foremost for their own DNA preservation. The objective of being an armed citizen is not to be a hero, but to survive.

    Reply
  12. Eighteen inch barrel is pushing ATF restrictions for length. After viewing several tests on shot shell penetrations and found #7 bird best to keep you from inadvertently killing the person in the next room.

    Reply
  13. an insensitive choice in the days after the failed assault weapon ban bill and a nation was still raw about both Newtown and Boston.

    Okay, so when would her choice not be insensitive? A year from now? Ten? Ten thousand? Dear Daily Snooze: ES&D. Sensitively.

    Reply
  14. Great. Deport yourself.

    “Is it Time for Piers Morgan to Go?”
    Forget about go – It was never time for Piers Morgan to come.

    Reply

Leave a Comment