Gun Review: CZ Shadow 2 9mm Pistol

By Austin Knudsen

For those TTAG readers who have read any of my previous reviews on this site, you know I like to acquire and review affordable, “value” guns in order to find our readers the best bang for the buck. But for this article, I tread into new territory and make the following admission: I paid almost $900 for this pistol.

That’s a lot of money, especially when I typically buy, review, and use sub-$400 pistols. But that doesn’t mean the CZ Shadow 2 isn’t a tremendous value.

Anyone who has read anything about this pistol knows has a huge following on the USPSA circuit in the Production division. A couple of YouTubers whom I believe actually know what they are doing when evaluating pistols (Honest Outlaw and the Military Arms Channel specifically) give this pistol very high marks.

Now that I’ve owned mine for several months and have put several hundred rounds through it, I agree with them.

3-Gun Beginnings…or how my wife got me to switch pistol platforms

I started shooting 3-Gun a few years back and continue as often as my remote Montana locale allows. For all of that time, I used a GLOCK 34 for my 3-Gun pistol because, 1) I got a great buy on it, 2) I own other GLOCKs, 3) I shoot GLOCKs well, and 4) almost all of my squad mates also shoot GLOCK 34s, so magazines and parts were available at matches.

About three years ago, my wife started shooting 3-Gun as well and she absolutely REFUSED to shoot a GLOCK. She hates how they feel in her hand, hates the triggers, and couldn’t be convinced by anyone on our squad to get on the GLOCK bandwagon.

So, a few years ago while we were at the SHOT Show, we made a deal: if she could find THE pistol she wanted for 3-Gun, we’d buy it. We walked around SHOT for two full days, going to all of the handgun manufacturer booths and she handled every handgun she could.

She handled 2011s. She handled SIGs. She handled Walthers. She handled M&Ps. She handled XDs (a personal favorite of hers). But none of them was perfect. Then we wandered into the EAA booth. There she handled an EAA Witness Stock III, which is a CZ-75-based competition pistol built by Tanfoglio of Italy.

That’s when the clouds parted, angels sang and her eyes teared up. This was the ONE.

A few weeks later, we finally found one for sale, and per our deal, we purchased it. We got her all set up with a competition belt, holster and extra mags for our next 3-Gun match, the Montana Multigun match at Boulder, Montana.

We went and a funny thing happened: she kicked my ass with her new pistol. After shooting my GLOCK 34 on the first three stages, she challenged me to run one stage with her CZ-75 pattern Witness.

I did, and then a funny thing happened to me: the clouds parted, the angels sang, and I cleaned off a Texas star pistol target faster and easier than I ever had, with a pistol I had literally never shot before.

Author’s wife’s EAA Witness Stock III

I came to the stunning realization that I had to work to shoot my GLOCK 34 accurately, but I didn’t with my wife’s new CZ-75 pattern EAA Witness Stock III. The steel plates just seemed to fall as gracefully as the pistol swung onto target. I needed one of my own.

Fast forward about a year and half. I receive word that a USPSA competitor in Montana is looking to sell his lightly used CZ Shadow 2. The CZ Shadow 2 is a near identical, feature-for-feature duplicate of the EAA/Tanfoglio Witness Stock III, except that it is an authentic CZ pistol, not an Italian replica. [Author’s note: Tanfoglio pistols are awesome and I’m not knocking them].

A phone call is made, a price is negotiated, and voila, I was the owner of said CZ Shadow 2, complete with six magazines.

Details

CZ-75

The original CZ-75 9mm pistol CC BY-SA 2.5, Link

For those unfamiliar, the CZ Shadow 2 is CZ’s ultimate competition pistol, designed with input from CZ’s professional shooter and guru, Angus Hobdell. The Shadow 2 is based on the CZ-75, a full size, all steel high-capacity 9mm pistol originally designed and built in Czechslovakia (now the Czech Republic) during the Cold War.

Due to its design and manufacture behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold War, the CZ-75 was largely unavailable to the American shooting market until the collapse of communism in eastern Europe.

Since then, the CZ-75 (and its many, many clones) has been steadily gaining popularity with U.S. shooters. It earned high praise from none other than Colonel Jeff Cooper, who liked everything about the pistol except its 9mm caliber. CZ pistols have always been a closet obsession of mine, but as a red-blooded American, I always felt slightly dirty lusting after a communist gun.

Today, however, the Czech Republic is as capitalist as it gets, and CZ is a quality manufacturer that keeps turning out excellent firearms. On top of that, CZ-USA has had facilities in the U.S. for years now to serve the American market.

Author’s CZ Shadow 2 after its first 3 Gun match earlier this year

The CZ Shadow 2 is a heavy, steel framed, competition-oriented version of the legendary CZ-75. Like its progenitor, the Shadow 2 is a double action/single action pistol. Unlike most DA/SA pistols, however, it has no de-cocking lever. Rather the CZ-75 was designed with a traditional thumb safety. I love this operating system as it is very versatile.

It allows the pistol to be carried in almost any configuration the shooter desires: including cocked and locked like a 1911 (which is my preference) or DA/SA, with the hammer down on a loaded chamber, requiring a double-action first shot. While the Shadow 2 is pure CZ-75, the CZ Custom Shop included some very important enhancements on the Shadow 2 like…

A full-length Picatinny rail dustcover, for added weight on the muzzle end to decrease muzzle flip (it also allows attachment of various lights or lasers)…

A deeper, higher grip cut and upswept beavertail on the grip frame for a deeper grip and better control of the pistol . . .

Aggressive checkering on the front and rear of the grip frame, and on the slim aluminum grips . . .

A squared-off trigger guard, with serrations on the front (CZ-USA’s pro shooter and president of CZ’s Custom Shop, Angus Hobdell, places his support hand index finger on the front of the trigger guard) . . .

An extended, adjustable magazine release . . .

A magazine well integral to the frame . . .

A redesigned competition hammer . . .

And a sleeker, straighter trigger, tuned for competitive/target shooting and fitted with an overtravel set screw.

Another CZ-75 idiosyncrasy is the fact that the slide rides inside the frame rails, which is a feature that distinguishes it from almost every other pistol design in the world. Fans of the feature claim that this lowers the bore axis — thereby reducing recoil and muzzle flip — and that it enhances the CZ-75’s reliability by better keeping out debris and dirt.

The Shadow 2’s narrow inside-the-rails slide and angled slab cuts make the overhand slide grasp technique a little tougher

While both of these may be true, one thing is certainly true: the CZ-75’s slide-inside-the-frame-rails setup equals less slide surface area for the shooter to grasp and manipulate. This takes a little practice to get used to, and is further exacerbated on the Shadow 2.

As you can see, the CZ Custom Shop designers angled/beveled the sides of the Shadow 2’s slide almost completely down to the frame (to shave weight off an already heavy pistol), thereby removing even more real estate for the shooter to grasp the slide.

To alleviate this, CZ included deep, wide slide serrations, to give the shooter some purchase. Additionally, the rear sight has a nice front edge “shelf” for the shooter to hook on something and operate the slide.

Frankly, I consider the angled slide sides a minor issue, as I have no trouble operating the Shadow 2’s slide. However, shooters unfamiliar with the CZ-75 pistol may find the Shadow 2’s slide setup takes a little practice to get used to.

Beveled slide sides and deep slide serrations

Actually operating the Shadow 2’s slide is a sublime experience. The slide glides on the frame rails as if it’s buttered. The machining, fitting, and build quality of the Shadow 2 is amazing, and as one of my shooting buddies said, “That thing runs like a sewing machine.”

On any target handgun, I prefer a narrow front sight and a square notch, black rear sight that allows plenty of light clearance on both sides of the front sight. This is exactly the setup that CZ delivered on the Shadow 2.

Big, blocky sights, while good for combat applications, are difficult to use for precise target shooting. The Shadow 2’s sights are perfectly suited for its intended role on the target or competition line.

The Shadow 2’s front sight is a pinned-in fiber optic (if you’ve never tried a fiber optic front, you owe it to yourself), and the rear is CZ’s proprietary adjustable rear sight. The rear face of the rear sight is serrated, and the shape of the rear sight is tapered on both top corners (see above picture), to follow the lines of the slide.

I love the trigger on the Shadow 2, and the quality and pull weight again reflects the Shadow 2’s intended role as a target pistol. The double action trigger pull is amazingly smooth, but since I never shoot the gun double action, I didn’t even bother to weigh it.

The single action trigger is one of the best I’ve fired on a semi-automatic pistol. It has just the slightest hint of creep before breaking crisply at a shade over 2 ½ pounds. You read that right: 42 ounces, according to my trigger scale.

The trigger reset is short and tactile. I’m a well-documented trigger snob, and have sent many-a firearm down the road for having a poor trigger. The reason? You can’t shoot good groups with a bad trigger. But the Shadow 2’s trigger is a joy, and makes it easy to realize every ounce of potential this pistol possesses.

One nice feature of the Shadow 2 is the ability to install either narrow “carry” ambidextrous thumb safeties, as shown in this company picture:

Picture courtesy www.cz-usa.com

or larger, left side “gas pedal,” competition/1911-style ambidextrous thumb safeties.

Competition-style large left-side safety installed

The Shadow 2 comes with both safeties: the narrow “carry-style” installed, and the “gas-pedal” in the box. As a dedicated 1911 man, I opted for the larger gas pedal-style safety, and thus had to switch out the narrow safety on my Shadow 2 when I got it.

Changing them out isn’t quite as simple as one would expect, and all the online forums recommended the same thing: get on YouTube and watch a video on how to do it first. It was good advice, and with a bit of video help, the swap took only a few minutes. In either case, safety operation is smooth and positive, with a good tactile “click” on and off safety.

The Shadow 2 is a large, heavy pistol, intended for target and competition. In other words, this a not a concealed carry piece. I suppose it could serve as a bed stand/home defense gun.

Since I’m going to use my Shadow 2 in 3 Gun competition, I ordered a Kydex competition holster from Red Hill Tactical . I had heard good things about RHT, and upon visiting their website, saw they specialize in competition rigs for CZs. On top of that, RHT holsters are quite competitively priced.

Red Hill Tactical offers double layer Kydex for heavy pistols like the Shadow 2, and it’s an option I’m glad I opted for. The holster fits perfectly, the build quality is excellent, and the double layer Kydex is heavy enough that the gun doesn’t flop around or pop out of retention while I’m running.

The author’s CZ Shadow 2 in his new Red Hill Tactical competition holster

Because this is a review, I have to be critical about something and here it is: the finish on the frame of the pistol. While the slide appears to have some sort of a blued or nitride finish, the finish on the Shadow 2 frame is a painted, baked-on finish (Polycoat, according to a few sources).

An action competition pistol like this comes in and out of a Kydex holster dozens of times over the course of a match, and the inside of that Kydex holster is not always clean.

As you can see in the below picture, the frame finish is wearing and scuffing from all of that holstering and unholstering. It hasn’t worn down to the bare steel, but it is something to note. Honestly, I bought this pistol to use, so I expect the finish to acquire a little personality.

Closeup showing muzzle wear of the frame finish

So, how’d it shoot?

I had high hopes for the Shadow 2’s accuracy, and I’m thrilled to report  that it didn’t disappoint me. For my testing, I fired four different full metal jacket target loads through the Shadow 2: PMC Bronze 115 grain, Blazer Brass 115 grain, American Eagle 147 grain flat point, and my own hand load of a 115 grain Rocky Mountain Reloading plated bullet pushed by 4.6 grains of Bullseye.

No hollow point, defensive ammunition was tested because I have no intention of ever using such ammo in this pistol. This is my gaming gun, pure and simple.

For each load tested, I fired a 5-shot group at exactly 25 yards while seated, off of a sandbag rest. A sixth loaded round was loaded in each magazine to maintain consistent pressure on the bottom of the chamber for all 5 papered shots (if you believe in such things).

The author’s accuracy test setup

The results, from best to worst:

Tie for first: Handload of Rocky Mountain Reloading 115 grain plated FMJ and 4.6 grains of Bullseye. My bulk reload pleasantly surprised me by putting up a 1 ½ inch 5-shot group at 25 yards.

Picture courtesy author

The other number one was Blazer Brass 115 grain FMJ. This one genuinely stunned me. I have tested this value (cheap) ammunition in almost 10 different 9mm pistols, and it has NEVER shot worth a damn in any of them.

In the Shadow 2, it tied for best group, with another 1 ½ inch group at 25 yards. If not for a lone slight flyer, this would’ve been a ¾” group. I will be buying another case of Blazer Brass.

Picture courtesy author

Next was PMC Bronze 115 grain FMJ. Normally a top performer in other pistols, this factory load put up a 1 ¾ inch group at 25 yards.

Picture courtesy author 

Finally, American Eagle 147 grain FMJ flat point. This load put up a 2-inch group, but note the very tight 3-shot group, opened up by two distinct fliers.

Picture courtesy author 

In the future, I’d like to try some 124 grain FMJs in the Shadow 2, as I didn’t have that bullet weight on hand.

Bottom line

The author firing his CZ Shadow 2 at a 3 Gun match. Note the minimal muzzle rise at full recoil. The empty case here is not a jam; it’s on its way to a long ejection arc.

I. Freaking. Love. This. Pistol.

The Shadow 2 is so comfortable, accurate, and intuitive to aim that honestly, shooting my plate racks at 20 yards with it is boring. I had been searching for a dedicated target 9mm that truly possessed target-level accuracy.

Another picture of the author’s CZ Shadow 2 in action. Note the 2 ejected empty cases in the air. And yes, that is pro shooter Dianna Muller, serving as range officer.

Not only did I find such accuracy in the CZ Shadow 2, it’s also a perfect fit for action pistol competition as well.

Specifications: CZ Shadow 2

Caliber: 9mm Luger
Capacity: 17 + 1
Barrel length: 4.89 inches
Overall length: 8.53 inches
Height: 5 ¾ inches from top of rear sight to bottom of the factory magazine
Weight: 46.5 ounces
MSRP: $1,349 blue or grey grip base model (about $1200 retail) 

RATINGS (out of 5 stars):

Accuracy: * * * * *
The Shadow 2 fired 1 ½ inch groups at 25 yards with the cheapest ammo I had on hand, which includes my reload. With a little more time (and less coffee), I bet I can tighten those groups up more. In any case, phenomenal accuracy. ‘Nuff said.

Ergonomics: * * * * *
Aside from 1911s, nothing fits my hand better than CZ-75s. The controls are all right where I want them, and single action trigger is easy for my short, fat fingers to reach. The thin aluminum factory grips also make this high capacity pistol easy for me grasp. Some may surmise that the beveled slide slabs make operating the slide difficult, but that’s not my experience. Effective slide serrations and excellent machining make manipulating this pistol a breeze. LOVE the gas pedal right side thumb safety. I really dig the high, deep grip cut and beavertail, which anchors the pistol in the shooting hand and gets your grip as high up on the frame as possible for maximum control.

Trigger: * * * * *
Superlative. Sublime. A near-religious experience. And a factory single-action trigger tuned to 2 ½ pounds. What would a 2 ½ pound trigger on a 1911 cost you?

Reliability: * * * * * 
Nary a hiccup yet.

Customization/accessories: * * * * *
The Shadow 2 was designed for competitive shooters, and competitive shooters are special unicorns. We like individuality. Different grips and sights are all possible with the Shadow 2. The Picatinny rail dustcover will accommodate any light, laser, or chainsaw bayonet you hang on it. Holsters will not be found at your local Sportsman’s Warehouse, but neither will a holster for any high-end dedicated competition pistol. The only thing the Shadow 2 does not have is an RMR cut, which I suspect is something that CZ will be remedying in newer versions.

Fit and finish: * * * * ½
The ONLY thing I can find to pick on the Shadow 2 about is the frame finish. While the slide is blued or nitride, the frame is some sort of baked-on finish. It has worn some, but it hasn’t gone to bare metal. It appears tough enough, which is important for a competition pistol that is coming in and out of a Kydex holster (which is often filthy inside with range dirt/sand/funk) a lot. I would actually argue that the Shadow 2’s baked-on finish is more practical for a competition-oriented pistol. BUT, the traditionalist in me actually prefers the look of a true blued finish pistol, like Tanfoglio did on the EAA Witness Stock III.

Overall: * * * * *
CZ has hit a home run with the Shadow 2. I like the Shadow 2 so much, I am seriously considering switching to a compact CZ-75 pistol for my everyday carry gun, just to have uniform operating platforms. The Shadow 2’s MSRP may seem like a lot, but for the features and performance it delivers compared to other similarly outfitted and performing pistols, I think it’s an absolute steal. If you have the means, it is highly recommended.

comments

  1. avatar George in NC says:

    Try the PCR as a carry gun. The stock rubber grips are great – the only negative are the weird dim greenish factory sights and Trigicon will fix that.

    1. avatar Just Saying says:

      “..About three years ago, my wife started shooting 3-Gun as well and she absolutely REFUSED to shoot a GLOCK. She hates how they feel in her hand, hates the triggers, and couldn’t be convinced by anyone on our squad to get on the GLOCK bandwagon..”

      Why are glock people like Borg? Always trying to force the inherently compromised and out-dated blocks on others. They have been surpassed by other guns in modernization and innovation and they are overpriced to boot.

      “..I came to the stunning realization that I had to work to shoot my GLOCK 34 accurately..”

      As have many shooters, because the glocks are fundamentally flawed, and they have refused to innovate their design because of all the kool-aid buyers (the 19X being a fine example).

      P.S. Kudos to the wife for sticking to her guns, obviously a keeper.

      1. avatar Austin Knudsen says:

        Most of my 3 Gun squad mates shoot Glocks because Glocks work. Another reason is Glocks are easy to work on and maintain. But probably the biggest reason: Glock gives great support to 3 Gun. One of my friends had a G34 locking block crack at a match, and the Glock representative there got him a new pistol, free of charge. That kind of support generates a lot of loyalty. I personally like Glock, and carry one quite often. But for competition, I’ve found something I shoot better.

      2. avatar matthew newton says:

        Yeah, my Glock 17 just plain works. It doesn’t shoot amazing. It doesn’t wow me. But it shoots okay. It holds 17+1. With brass cased ammo it runs 100% (runs about 99% with steel cased). Controls are all easy to get at. Ergonomic (for me). Recoil is tame. Really easy to work on. Parts everywhere. Was inexpensive.

        It is not my favorite handgun, but it is usually the one that gets taken to the range with something else and its at the front of the safe and is my go to right after my AR.

  2. avatar RCC says:

    I’ve had Tanfoglio “Duty” model DA/SA for about 25 years and have used friends competition ones as well. Still runs well and will probably be kids someday.

    I was told that the front serrations are meant for an overhand grip on the slide. Never had a problem using it this way. Had one ipsc range officer tell me I was wrong and ask if he could show me the correct way. He promptly cut himself on the rear sight. In his defence he then shut up about it.

  3. avatar Major Cal Iber says:

    I though the czc ao1 ld was there premier pistol?

    1. avatar Dan W says:

      That’s a custom shop one. You could argue that it’s separate from the factory ones.

  4. avatar Specialist38 says:

    I agree with George above about the PCR.

    The author’s comments beg the question as to whether it’s easier to hit with a pistol with some weight and a decent trigger.

    If it’s easier in a game, then it will probably be easier in a defensive situation as well.

    We carry the light, spongy trigger pistols because they are easy to carry and “good enough” to hit with.

    I like carrying a model 48 Glock, but I shoot a PX4 compact faster and better.

    Something to think about if weight is not an issue.

  5. avatar Kendahl says:

    When shopping for a 9 mm pistol three years ago, I handled a CZ 75 B SA. The gun was a little bit too big for my hand. (The Gold Cup I’ve owned for decades fits me perfectly.) I ended up with an S&W Performance Center M&P 9 which I shoot with the smallest backstrap.

    1. avatar Nobody Cares says:

      Wow, really?!?! Tell me more.

      SNORE

      1. avatar Geoff "Run, Bloomie, run!" PR says:

        Well, you just proved you cared…

        *snicker* 😉

  6. avatar Jablome says:

    If you own this gun you’re telling the worldly you’re willing to settle for mediocrity.

    1. avatar Austin Knudsen says:

      How is that, exactly?

    2. avatar Swarf says:

      And what, to you, is above mediocre?

      1. avatar Heywoodja says:

        If the CZ Shadow 2 defines mediocracy, I’ll take 5 more samples please!

  7. avatar Hoyden says:

    Can we just agree on a new internet gun blog rule, to wit:

    “Any CZ (pistol) reviewed is an excellent, high quality, reasonably priced, and well designed/built choice for _______ (activity: carry, competition, etc.). “

    1. avatar rosignol says:

      You can leave out (pistol), the rifles are also very good.

      The older I get, the more I appreciate nice things, and the more CZs appear in my gun safe.

    2. avatar Joel says:

      I can certainly agree with that statement. I’ve never read a bad CZ review.

  8. avatar Charlie says:

    Thanks for publishing this. I have been coveting a P210, but now you’ve got me wanting a Shadow 2 instead.

    The ergonomics are about the same. The big difference is the decocker on the P210, which I am slightly more comfortable with (I have no use for a safety on a DA/SA handgun). Maybe I’ll flip a coin.

    Charlie

    1. avatar Bucephalus says:

      I have both the P210 and a Shadow 2. My pick? Definitely the CZ. I can shoot the Sig well, but I can shoot my CZ even better. I will say that you can’t go wrong with either pistol but if you have to make the choice, go with the Shadow 2

      1. avatar Charlie says:

        The only disadvantage I can see is the lack of leather holsters for the Shadow 2.

        I don’t shoot 3-gun or IDPA, I just like big heavy handguns, and I’m allergic to Kydex. I once bought a Fobus holster for my P226, put the handgun in it, and wondered how I was going to get it out without taking off a square inch of finish! So I put the holster back in its bag, sold the wretched thing, and never looked back.

        I’ll keep looking, and I’m not above getting a custom job done for something I really like.

        Charlie

    2. avatar Dan W says:

      I have an original Swiss 210 and I’ll take my Shadow 2 over it every time, even ignoring the extra capacity. It’s a bit closer with the new 210s but I still like the shadow more.

      Not to mention the going price for the shadows is a few hundred less than the 210s.

  9. avatar Keyword Spam says:

    I have a standard issue C75B in 9mm. I adore it. I took a friend to the range a while back. It was her first time shooting anything. I gave her that pistol and within half an hour she was getting 2″ groups at 20 yards. It’s a breeze to shoot accurately, and comfortable too.

  10. avatar Shwiggie says:

    I shoot a fully Cajunized 75B stainless in competition but bought a Shadow 2 last week. So far, while I like the feel of the S2 for that purpose, the older gun’s trigger is better. I may send the S2 out for trigger work, but whatever route I take it’s going to be CZ all the way.

  11. avatar Jason(Possessor of 2.5 TTAG points) says:

    I read all the way to…..

    “The double action trigger pull is amazingly smooth, but since I never shoot the gun double action, I didn’t even bother to weigh it.”

    What kind of gun review would the author not bother to weigh a trigger pull? You literally have a better trigger pull gauge than my spring powered wheeler engineering el cheapo yet you couldn’t be bothered?
    I appreciate the review of your gun but with a review on a mainstream gun blog, you have to go the distance. Nits have been picked. Handled another 75 varient tonight. Not my cup of tea.

  12. avatar possum says:

    “She hates Glocks” ,,,,, Im rich, Ive got a gazzilion acre ranch and a bazillion dollars.. Hows you alls marriage doing? .

    1. avatar Erik Weisz says:

      I know – I was just thinking the perfect woman doesn’t exis……

      1. avatar Sebastian says:

        Well the fact she hates glocks does elevate her one step closer to ‘perfection’.

  13. avatar StuckInIllinois says:

    Been shooting CZ75\85 pistols of various flavors (all, real, Czech) for almost two decades. I have yet to talk with anyone that regretted buying a CZ and have yet to see one in the used section of any LGS I have been to. Your mileage may vary as they say.

  14. avatar lepke says:

    cz 97b ?

  15. avatar Matchman says:

    Bet wiffie is still kicking your ass with that Tanfo.

  16. avatar Erik Weisz says:

    I have a SP-01 Shadow (this gun’s predecessor that’s still made and sold as well). Not only is it my carry gun, I have an S7 SS break on a CZC match threaded barrel and a CZC bare alu magwell. Also a Deltapoint Pro. It is the only pistol I own, and if I’m wearing pants, it’s on me, even at home. It conceals just fine, as in no one notices it whether I’m printing or not. I have only ever removed it once, to go through a metal detector to get in a courthouse. Otherwise, never been called on it after years of the same exact rig. I have a stealthgear IWB holster on double tac belts, and really don’t know it’s there. Probably too mall-ninja for those with delicate girl fee-fees (aka Fudds), but IDGAF.
    All yooos guize thinking a decocker is better than a safety are just wrong. My wife shoots a P-01, and I work on them both. DCs are a PAIN to work on, while safety models are a pleasure and you can put a gas pedal safety on safety models. But at least D’s aren’t Omegas, those just suck by comparison. I have one on mine and love it. I have 2 1/2# <1mm (0.5mm reset) SA , 5#~ DA, did all the work myself

  17. avatar BusyBeef says:

    The Shadow 2 worked over by CGW or CZ Custom is the best Production class pistol available today.

    Mine’s out at Primary Machine getting the slide done up so that I can mount an RMR and lightened so that I make weight for Carry Optics.

  18. avatar Charlieq says:

    I went to my LGS for parts today, and there in the case was a Shadow 2 with blue grips. So I fondled it, and the feel and heft are awesome!

    I’m gonna get one. I’ll have to sneak it in the house because I don’t want the GF thinking I’ve got spare money, but once I put it in the safe I’m in the clear. One firearm looks much like another to her, and if it’s in the safe she won’t have a clue that it wasn’t always there. 🙂

    Charlie

    1. avatar Erik Weisz says:

      Well played, Charlie – I like how you think.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email