Biden on Guns: I Am Coming for Your ‘Assault Rifles’

Joe Biden

Joe Biden (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Biden, after all, has repeatedly demonstrated that he has zero comprehension of either the purpose or importance of the Second Amendment. Whether your sons are “hunters” or not is completely irrelevant in this conversation. And just as “yelling fire” is protected by the Constitution, so is owning an “AR-14.”

(Let’s also take a moment to note that Biden is such a champion of the Second Amendment that not only can’t he get rudimentary gun facts right, almost everything he says on the matter is fatuous. A few week ago he was telling a cheering crowd that 150 million Americans had been murdered on the streets of the United States by firearms since 2007. This was about week after his silly rant noting that revolutionary AK-47-wielding Americans would be slaughtered by F-15s.)

The man in the video — whose name I wish I knew — is right. Biden supports every single serious national effort to restrict gun rights, all of them part of a concerted effort to incrementally terminate civilian gun ownership in the United States. It’s all right there on his campaign issues page. When CNN asked Biden what he had to say to gun owners who claimed that “a Biden Administration means they’re going to come for my guns,” he answered, “Bingo, you’re right if you have an assault weapon.”

– David Harsanyi in Of Course Joe Biden Wants to Take Your Guns Away



  1. avatar AlanInFL says:

    I love how Uncle Joe keeps showing his IQ level.

    What a dumb shit.

    1. avatar napresto says:

      Jobama O’Biden is a lying dog-faced pony soldier. He’s full of Malarky. He stops talking when others don’t. He’s… you know… the thing. In short, appoint him to the Canadian Senate on Super Thursday, and make America something something zzzzzzzz….

      1. avatar Porridgeweasel says:

        Nicely done.

      2. avatar Eric Swalwell says:

        You’re taking this out of context and you are obviously too ignorant to understand the nuance of Vice President Biden’s statements. We, with a heart full of love of and compassion, support the 2nd ammendment and are on the side of gun owners. And as we’ve stated over and over again: any American who opposes us will be slaughtered with F-15’s, Hellfire missiles, and nuclear weapons. So, for the sake and safety of your families, we should sit down and come to a compromised solution on the national gun violence epidemic.

        1. avatar I Haz A Question says:

          Hmmm…TTAG’s gremlin is pulling wires in the back office again. Posts are disappearing. Let’s try this a third time to see if it will stick this time:

        2. avatar Eric Swalwell says:

          I think it has to do with the hyperlink my friend. The gremlins have to check it before the post goes live to make sure it doesn’t send the viewer to a site that will wreck their computer….. like the NRA home page or any website where you can donate to Trump. Seriously, don’t go to those websites; you’ll get herpes, and herpes makes you fart on MSNBC.

        3. avatar strych9 says:

          Said gremlin is very likely on the wing.

        4. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

          F.U. I’ve got Neutrino Fission Bombnms , Shitfire Missiles and a F150 Ford pickup. Don’t threaten me with your crap a bombs and sparrows

        5. avatar JBS says:

          Compromise? What isyour side ready to give up?

        6. avatar Eric Swalwell says:

          Us? Give something up? No, no, no…. you misunderstand my friend! You think this is a compromise, as in we both walk away from the table with something we want. This “compromise” means YOU compromise your standards and values so I get what I want.

        7. avatar Glenn Lego says:

          I don’t care about nuances of Creepy Joe. He’s full of “nuance.”

    2. avatar Country Boy says:

      and just think….he was VP under Muzbama for 8 yrs.before present.

      1. avatar Dude says:

        At least he had enough brain power back then to make his family wealthy.

      2. avatar D.T.O.M. says:

        “… It’s all right there on his (Biden’s) campaign issues page….”

        And from that page “… Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more than three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children…”

        So next time you buy that duck and child (!) hunting license, make sure to keep it “Joe Biden legal” and only use three shells when you legally hunt children.

        These are the stupidest… most corrupt… morally deficient people… ever!

        1. avatar Glenn Lego says:

          Is that like Barney Fife who had to keep the bullet in his pocket?

      3. avatar Miner49er says:

        Yes, the glory days of Barack Hussein Obama, I remember them well!

        Relaxing ATF regulations on NFA items like machine guns and silencers by removing the requirement for approval from the local CLEO makes it much easier for citizens to own machine guns, silencers, etc.

        And, Obama’s administration approved both the arm brace for all the SBR fans and bump stocks, the poor man’s machine gun.

        And the capstone of Barack Hussein Obama’s expansion of American gun rights was the abolishment of the Reagan era prohibition against carrying firearms on federal lands. Obama signed into law the Bill making it legal for citizens to carry firearms on hundreds of thousands of acres of federal lands.

        After three years, I’m still waiting on Donald Trump to expand American gun rights… Crickets.

        Well, he did ban bump stocks and publicly support red flag laws. “Let’s just take the guns first and worry about the courts later… “

        1. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

          . Weird that under Obama I never worried much about gunm rights, but now under ” Your second amendment rights are safe with me” I’m wishing I had stock piled more ammo. Biden ain’t Obama though, Bloomberg’s got him in his pocket.

        2. avatar D.T.O.M. says:


          Listening to you arrogantly play the “But he banned Bump stocks and he said the words Red Flag” record again and again and again, ad nauseam, as if you found some magic incantation, has gone beyond pathetic.

          Few honest people (outside the swampers making money selling the U.S. out to China and other foreign countries) look back wistfully at the Obama presidency. He was a feckless narcissistic fool, that decimated the Democratic party, and gave rise to not only Donald Trump, but to Cortez and her merry band of shrieking virtue-signaling socialist/communists.

          So like your likely nominee Biden (another Obama legacy) you need to change the record, it’s been skipping for quite some time.

        3. avatar Miner49er says:

          D’tom, the facts bears repeating.

          And the fact is, Barack Hussein Obama expanded gun rights for American citizens in many different ways.

          Fact is, Donald Trump has not only not expand the gun rights, he has taken right away from American citizens. Hundreds of thousands of American citizens who own bump stocks have now become felons.
          What did trump mean when he said maybe we should just take the guns and worry about the courts later?

          “outside the swampers making money selling the U.S. out to China”

          So, you do know, it was Republican president Richard Milhouse Nixon who secretly went to China without the approval of Congress to negotiate trade deals,.

        4. avatar Kyle in Upstate NY says:

          Trump says a lot of things but it is what he does that one has to look at. That said, Miner49, you are ignoring all the ways that Obama infringed on gun rights. He tried for universal background checks, made gunsmiths the equivalent of gun manufacturers, made it where if you needed help as a disabled veteran, you lost your gun rights, his BATFE tried to ban M855 ammunition, etc…but Trump bans bump stocks and that is a big thing to you.

    3. all I know is the Democrats love to Lie and Lie and Coverup too and that is their Motto Period

  2. avatar bryan1980 says:

    His handlers have a quandary on their hands: Every unscripted interaction this guys has with the public ends in disaster, so the easy answer would be to limit his contact with the public. But, how is that possible while you’re running for president?

    This would be really hilarious if there was no possibility that he could become leader of the free world.

    1. avatar Omer says:

      Easy: No public contact because of the Wuhan Flu.

      1. avatar SAFEupstateFML says:

        Prerecorded “live” debates.

      2. avatar Wiregrass says:

        Perfect. A disease designed to prevent the public from seeing the truth.

        1. avatar SAFEupstateFML says:

          Any crisis for an opportunity.

        2. avatar says:

          Sounds like TDS

        3. avatar Casey says:

          I thought for sure it was created to gin up demand for socialized healthcare.

      3. avatar bryan1980 says:

        Well, he’s more than old enough to be in the high risk group, that’s for sure!

    2. avatar Craig in IA says:

      “Every unscripted interaction this guys has with the public ends in disaster, so the easy answer would be to limit his contact with the public. But, how is that possible while you’re running for president?” Well, it’s the same tactic used by Hillary in 2016. Who needs public appearances when they have the media in their back pocket? The People were not duped in 2016, I believe Trump will win by a larger margin in 2020, regardless of how the media spins coronavirus and anything else they can concoct.

      1. avatar George from Alaska says:

        I also believe Trump will win bigger in November, taking the electoral college vote and the popular vote. Many Black, Brown and other groups that were on the fence last election have seen such positive change in their lives and in the American economy that people are going to vote Trump behind the curtain even if some of their friends would ridicule them if they knew. The pollsters continually forget about women who work, shoot and have somewhat conservative values and they pollsters have no way of accurately garnering good information about our military and their voting preferences. When I watch young conservative meetings on college campuses cheering to conservative speakers while unwashed, goofy headed ANTIFA types try as hard as they can, but consistently failing to make any valid points or headway I know that those meetings/gatherings influences people who are still deciding.

  3. avatar Dennis says:

    Come ahead crazy man, I’ll defend my right to keep my ar 14’s, my mp 76’s, and OP 57’s with my last breath. (Also my bullet clip mags)!🤪

    1. avatar KenW says:

      Keep it up and I’m pulling my ace in the hole out. See how well you can handle the shoulder thing that goes up.

    2. avatar stredford says:

      You forgot your “High Velocity Magazines”

  4. avatar Omer says:

    I’m surprised he was coherent enough to have a conversation, as incoherent as it was.

    1. avatar UpInArms says:

      When you think about it, Idiot Joe was right on script with the union worker.

      Just about every “conversation” I’ve had with a grabber went the same way. They start by telling me I’m full of shit, then they launch into some irrelevant nonsense, then they get mad and belligerent and call me a horse’s ass. And then they accuse us of refusing to have a conversation.

      Idiot Joe is too stupid to know it, but he was actually right on the Democratic playbook when he did what he did.

      1. avatar russell D. remmert says:

        that is hitting the nail on the head

  5. avatar Shire-man says:

    In his defense he likely can’t remember what happened last night so expecting him to recall events nearly a year ago is really not fair.

  6. avatar Ogre says:

    This is Shotgun Joe wearing his war face. It’s probably also Shotgun Joe about to tell another lie about his gun control agenda. Oh, and all of us common, ordinary little people are full of shit.

    1. avatar Omer says:

      It would have been hilarious when the worker was call Biden out on his aggressiveness if the worker would have said “Take it easy, I’m not PopCorn!”

    2. avatar Jonathan-Houston says:

      The *only* positive thing I can say about Creepy/Sleepy/Corrupt-y Joe is that he did at least stand toe to toe, face to face, with this man and exchange these heated words. I’m not saying he was right, that this was to his advantage politically, or that he maintained the dignity the office of the presidency deserves. It’s the opposite of all three of those.

      Still, compared to Supplicant-in-Chief Obama, Biden did at least stand there and do his thing just inches from his interlocutor. Look at Obama’s body language and listen to his voice whenever he found himself in an encounter, whether with Joe the Plumber or Vladimir Putin the Impaler. Wholly hesitant and deferential. Pure [wussy].

      Granted, the crowd and Biden’s bodyguards would have stepped in had the questioner become physical, but there’s nothing anyone could do if he were a crazy man and threw that first punch. Biden put his mug out there, vulnerable to that potential. It’s not much, but it’s something, and still much more than Obama could pull off.

      1. avatar tsbhoa.p.jr says:

        the only time barry showed spine was when galifianakis called him a nerd, and that was a staged rehearsed episode of between two ferns. or an aca ad.

  7. avatar Randy Jones says:

    Please people, quit correcting Biden. Eventually he might listen and get something right.

    What should scare us is that so many Americans are voting for him (and Sanders). Too many people are getting brainwashed by the media nd colleges about the Second Amendment and firearms in general. They look at reality but don’t see it. Every large city in America is a crime haven and all have heavily restricted gun laws. But they are blind to it.

    If Biden gets the Democratic nod, I worry about who his vice president will be. How long can he remain in … The Thing…with his mind the way it is.

    1. avatar pwrserge says:

      This is why anybody voting Demokkkommie should have their right to vote permanently stripped from them for demonstrable abject stupidity.

      1. avatar pot n kettle says:

        By your logic shouldn’t we also strip the right to vote from any former inhabitants of eastern block nations?
        I mean look you were a commie once so why should we trust you?

        1. avatar pwrserge says:

          Because eastern block nations didn’t vote. Choices have consequences.

        2. avatar Southern Cross says:

          The ballots were usually pre-filled to make sure the votes were “correct”.

  8. avatar Nanook12 says:

    Joe has a hard time keeping his fighter plane’s and assault rifle’s numbers/letters straight. In the last years as Obama’s VP, they were constantly trying to do damage control on all of Biden’s gaffes… you know it gotten nothing but worse in his scrambled brain pan.

  9. avatar tsbhoa.p.jr says:

    he stands for nothing. fickle.
    a feather in a variable zephyr.

  10. avatar eagle10 says:

    If sleepy (creepy) Joe get elected – I picture his subjects saluting him like the did Hitler. Heil Biden!

  11. avatar guy says:

    What a moron! I assume he means Ars and aks but like most anti-gunners I don’t think he has the mental faculties to purposefully call them assualt weapons to confuse the less knowledgeable.

  12. avatar I Haz A Question says:

    Remember how Bernie was way ahead only a couple of weeks ago, and the DNC was scared stiff of the possibility of a Sanders-vs-Trump showdown in November that would be a sure loss for the Dems? Interesting how suddenly Biden is getting all these delegates now and performing 10x better than he was before. Sanders was screwed by the DNC in 2016 (Hillary) and is likely getting shafted again in 2020 (Biden).

    1. avatar bryan1980 says:

      The fix is in, everything’s coming together nicely in time for the convention. I wonder how some of the BernieBros feel about their exalted leader pussing-out, just like he did last year? He talks a good game about the establishment, but when gets down to real sh*t, he falls right in line.

      1. avatar Old Guy in Montana says:

        I wonder if Biden will buy him off like Hillary did…that was some house he paid cash for right after conceding to the Hellmonster….was that his third or fourth mansion? Bernie is doin’ pretty good for an old Communist.

        1. avatar former water walker says:

          So did the ruling politbureau members in the the old Soviet bloc. It’s a normal communist thing. Bernie didn’t honeymoon in Russia for nothing! Oh and old Joe reminds me of that old Star Trek episode when Kirk et all landed on a Nazi planet. They propped up an old federation guy who was braindead to spout propaganda-just like s l o w Joe😩

        2. avatar pwrserge says:

          Naw… Bernie is going to get the standard communist retirement package… Icepick to the head in a bathtub.

    2. avatar jwm says:

      Now they’re talking about just skipping the rest of the primaries and giving the nod to slow joe.

      I hope they do. The fools that fell for bernie will abandon the dems and split the party. bernie will still be a rich old white guy when the dust settles and all the bernie bros will be lost and leaderless.

  13. avatar J. Jackson says:

    Anyone who lives in Delaware know if it has a red flag law? Mental Joe has threatened and challenged to fight several people so far on the campaign trail. He also claims to own shotguns. If there is a red flag law someone should file against Mental Joe and then make sure the local media finds out as well as the NRA. Realistically his wife in my opinion should be charged with elder abuse for going along with his nonsense and allowing him to campaign.

    1. avatar UpInArms says:

      Yes, Delaware has a red flag law.

  14. avatar Old Guy in Montana says:

    AR14 – Interesting concept. A short-stroke piston, over-engineered in steel, 7.62 x 51, heavy fiberglass or oil-soaked walnut stock, no pistol grip, cotton sling, no provision for a rail or vertical “thingies”, difficult to mount a scope to…hmmm.

    The perfect Democrat designed rifle…it fits all their (current) demands for what a rifle should be.

    I’ll take one for grins n’ giggles.

    1. avatar LarryinTX says:

      I assume you forgot, needs to be select fire.

      1. avatar Old Guy in Montana says:

        Darn…knew I forgot something…the “giggle” switch.

        Thank you for reminding me.

  15. avatar Prndll says:

    Biden doesn’t know if he’s coming or going. He needs to be under a doctors care, not handed the most power job in the land. No one on the left knows what an assault rifle is. The only reason this is even a concern is the level of power these lunatics have. It really is Inmates running the asylum.

    1. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

      Biden doesn’t know if he’s comming or going . That’s probably correct as his “shooter” only shoots the color yellow

      1. avatar Geoff "Guns. LOTS of guns..." PR says:

        “That’s probably correct as his “shooter” only shoots the color yellow”

        At his age, it only dribbles yellow and wakes him up 3 or 4 times a night…

        *snicker* 😉

  16. avatar uncommon_sense says:

    The First Amendment to our United States Constitution protects most speech. It does not protect all speech such as slander or yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there is no fire.

    Biden is trying to claim a similar stance on the Second Amendment: that it protects most firearms and yet it does not protect all firearms. Of course that would mean the Second Amendment only protects whatever classes of firearms that the Ruling Class declares as protected, and all other classes of “dangerous” firearms (such as AR-15s) are unprotected.

    That is problematic because it is not a direct analog to the First Amendment. The reason that the First Amendment does not protect slander or yelling “Fire!” (when there is no fire) is because such statements are demonstrably false and harm people.

    Owning and possessing “dangerous” firearms does not harm anyone. And prohibiting their ownership and possession simply because the owner/possessor could harm someone is no more righteous than requiring that everyone put on a muzzle before entering a theater since they could yell “Fire!” when there is no fire.

    1. avatar pwrserge says:

      Fun fact, the “yelling fire” standard has been overturned for about half a century. The current standard is the known likelihood of IMMINENT harmful acts resulting from the speech. Aka, the speech itself is not illegal, it’s the CONSEQUENCES of the speech. As such, no gun itself should be illegal, just the consequence of using it for illegal purposes. Fortunately, we still have murder, assault, and reckless endangerment statutes on the books.

      1. avatar Dave says:

        It’s imminent *lawless* action. But it’s still disturbing how many people still mouth the “shouting ‘Fire!’” trope.

    2. avatar Gman says:

      The First Amendment to our United States Constitution protects most speech. It does not protect all speech such as slander or yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there is no fire.

      Incorrect. All speech is protected. What is not protected is the consequences of harming others with that speech. We don’t ban words, thoughts, or ideas which are the tools of the first. And hence the government does not have the power to ban the keeping or bearing of arms of any kind.
      You are correct that our keeping and bearing arms, of any kind, harms no one.

      1. avatar uncommon_sense says:


        All speech is protected. What is not protected is the consequences of harming others with that speech.

        I do not agree that all speech is protected. (I will not argue why at this time.)

        Regardless, even if all speech is protected and only the consequences are not protected, it is the same end result. We are simply arguing semantics.

        1. avatar Gman says:

          Oh no sir. The difference is what it is all about. The difference ends up being whether the government can preemptively restrict rights because of what you might do or not. There are no Constitutionally permissible restrictions upon the exercise of a right. This is the only position which ends the tyranny. If you agree with the false Scalia premise that rights are not absolute then you have already lost the argument, and your God given rights.

    3. avatar LarryinTX says:

      The first Amendment only protects speech, religion, assembly, etc from action by Congress, not from action by states or municipalities, as in, “Congress shall make no law …” 2A, OTOH, protects RTKBA from any infringement, period. That is why RTKBA is not simply included in 1A.

  17. avatar Matt in Oklahoma says:

    Jerry Wayne is his name. He did a very good job at representing us.

  18. avatar Hooda Thunkett says:

    Waiting for Mr. Wayne to be doxxed. And Biden is just a vehicle for the Dems. If they get him elected, he’ll be moved out of the way by incompetence, medical “emergency”, Arkanicide, or something. Their real president will be his VP, unelectable via the democratic process.

    1. avatar Pen & Sword says:

      I’m afraid so. There is no limit to the Dems’ trickery / subterfuge.

    2. avatar LarryinTX says:

      “Arkanicide”. I am so stealing that.

  19. avatar Rusty - Always Carry - Chains says:

    “…you know the thing!” With all of the other confusion and combativeness, Shotgun Joe is now Alzheimers Joe as his mental acuity is clearly failing for all to see.

    1. avatar Vote for the lesser of two evils says:

      So you’re saying that on November 3rd we have a choice of two senile old men in their 70’s!
      So vote for the lesser of two evils.

      1. avatar LarryinTX says:

        And Keep America Great!!

  20. avatar Pen & Sword says:

    This all reminds me of a great response I received on TTAG years ago…

    Me: That Joe Biden sure has a BIG MOUTH.
    Reply: Big enough to fit a double-barreled shotgun.

    1. avatar pwrserge says:

      We all know that if he gets elected, Joe will shoot himself in the back of the head… three times. Then throw himself down a couple flights of stairs.

      1. avatar StLPro2A says:

        I believe the term is Clintonicide????

        1. avatar Southern Cross says:

          Is Hillary anywhere in the line of succession?

  21. avatar Green Mtn. Boy says:

    The only thing the Buffoon is coming for is a bed in the dementia ward, watch carefully who he names as his VP picks that will be the DNC candidate.

    1. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

      I heard it would be Sanders

    2. avatar Dude says:

      Stacey Abrams?

    3. avatar LarryinTX says:

      Hillary. Then SHE will select Abrams as VP.

  22. avatar Jay O says:

    Wait until Trump destroys this guy during the debates. If you think Joe can’t remember his name now, just wait….

    1. avatar SouthAl says:

      I think there is a real chance that Trump could make him cry on a debate stage. I think there is even more of a chance that on a debate stage with Trump we could see behavior from Biden that makes what we have seen look minor (what you describe).

  23. avatar SamsonSimson says:

    This makes total sense. In Senile Joe’s mind, it’s still 1934 and the NFA hasn’t been enacted. Too bad it’s 86 years later, and they’ve already taken our “assault rifles.”

  24. avatar Chris T in KY says:

    I am so happy that Joe Biden is making such anti Liberty statements. I hope he keeps talking about taking people’s guns away. It’s a gift from Heaven to have him say these things.
    He and the Democrat Party will never be able to take back their support for gun confiscation.

    1. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

      I don’t know about that. Seems the new voters do not see eliminating the 2 amendment as taking away freedom. It’d be a different story if he was banning XBox

    2. avatar LarryinTX says:

      They already have. Remember AWB in 1994? Clinton was reelected in 1996 and Osama in 2008. Only pain was later in 1994 when Dems got thumped and pretended it was for another reason.

  25. avatar Debbie W. says:

    The Jim Crow Gun Control Klansman Joe Biden wants to storm your home and take your Black Rifle like his KKK democRat ancestor lynch mobs stormed the homes of Black Americans. Something about Black that brings out the Rat in democRats.
    Gun Control? Its roots are in racism and genocide.

  26. avatar Gman says:

    The First Amendment to our United States Constitution protects most speech. It does not protect all speech such as slander or yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there is no fire.

    Incorrect. All speech is protected. What is not protected is the consequences of harming others with that speech. We don’t ban words, thoughts, or ideas which are the tools of the first. And hence the government does not have the power to ban the keeping or bearing of arms of any kind.
    You are correct that our keeping and bearing arms, of any kind, harms no one.

  27. avatar MLee says:

    It doesn’t matter, uncle Joe isn’t fit for office and no matter how his handlers try to protect him and keep him on script, the cats out of the bag. The mainstream media can try and show the 2012 Joe, but it’s not going to work. Joe is showing clear signs of dementia. As he is pushed harder in the race and gets lack of sleep, symptoms are only going to get worse.
    Just what are they going to do the next debate? The guy is senile. What are they going to do when he tries to debate Trump? He’s going to lose it and Trumps going to shred him.

    1. avatar Miner49er says:

      Darn it, you’re spoiling the kids’ fun!

      “The AR-14 Assault Rifles are chambered for 5.56×39 mm round and have folding buttstocks.
      Forearm, magazine, buttstock and pistol grip are made of high strength plastic. Protective coatings ensure excellent corrosion resistance of metal parts. There is a dove-tail side rail for optical and night sights.“

      So, Joe was right and everybody who claimed he was incorrect are themselves, in fact, the boobs.

      As always, fascinating…

      1. avatar Yellow Devil says:

        lol Joe Biden doesn’t even know his own family members half the time, let alone proper weapon nomenclatures. You know he meant AR-15 but goofed up because his handler didn’t keep a tight leash. Good try trying to cover up Biden’s gaffs though.

  28. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

    I only vote for the guy who’s got the best looking ole lady. Putins ain’t bad, but can’t buy Russian gunms either.

    1. avatar LarryinTX says:

      Just heard Russia has just changed the rules so Putin can stay in power until 2036! No doubt because that is exactly what 100% of the Russian people want, right?

  29. avatar Kimber says:

    Even the most diehard Trump people know and understand that Joe will be the next president in a landslide election. You cannot beat the triumvirate of Biden, Beto, and Obama. Please tell me one midwest state that Trump will win. Please tell me one southern state that Trump will win. Please tell me one eastern seaboard state that Trump will win. I won’t even bother with the west coast. Eat that for lunch 2A people.

    1. avatar Possum dislikes dicks says:

      Elections should have nothing to do with Our bill of rights. Just a hint buckaroo, “they” won’t stop with the 2a,

      1. avatar Kimber says:

        Correction. Elections pave the way for a new order in society. In this order guns are not needed and thus obsolete. Violence is not condoned and an aggressive nature is a threat to civilians.

        1. avatar Sian says:

          protip: If you don’t have the means to at least make members of a government death squad fear for their safety, you’re not a person, you’re property.

    2. avatar LarryinTX says:

      It is certainly possible that Biden will be our next president in a landslide election, but what is certain is that will not happen in 2020. Possibly not in 2024. If SloJoe can cancel any campaigning because of people catching cold (watch him!), then Trump can cancel the election for the same reason.

  30. avatar Tommy357 says:

    You all miss the main truth. Joe has no agenda other than “beat Donald Trump.” He is an empty (headed) vessel into which his handlers can pour whatever word-strings they think will get him through the primary, and then the general. Sure, those word strings get scrambled and come out in unpredictable ways. But never mistake them for actual thoughts.

  31. avatar Ralph says:

    O’Biden Bama’s first order of business should be to blame Trump for his Alzheimer’s. Hildeb!tch can call it racist, a 16 year old autistic Swedish dropout can travel the world complaining about it and Al Gore can cure it and get another Nobel prize.

  32. avatar James W Crawford says:

    President Trump should delegate the task of debating creepy Joe Biden to Goverrnor Sarah Palin so she can kck his ass again.

  33. avatar stredford says:

    This compilation on Biden tell what kind of character he is.

  34. avatar 007 says:

    Joe Biden can have all my AR 14s, all three of them.

  35. avatar Don’t be a freaking baby says:

    I’m not shopping at Dick’s!
    I’m not shopping at Wal-Mart!
    I’m not shopping at Hobby Lobby!
    I’m not eating at Chic-fil-a!

    Grow up. No one cares.

    1. avatar anonymous4goodreason says:

      “Grow up. No one cares.”

      You should and that’s not crying, that’s called taking action. To supply resources to those who would use them to support tyranny and oppression is worse than foolish. For you to advocate for those who would do such things is incredibly stupid.

  36. avatar Jaakko Talvitie says:

    *** Let’s keep things in a proper perspective ***
    FBI: More People Killed by Hammers, Clubs than with Rifles of Any Kind
    By AWR Hawkins August 12th, 2019

    The most recent FBI crime stats show that more people were killed in 2017 with hammers and clubs than were killed with rifles of any kind.
    • 467 people were killed with “blunt objects (hammers, clubs, etc.) while
    • 403 were killed with rifles.
    And it must be noted that the category of “rifles” used by the FBI includes bolt action, pump action, single shot, and semi-automatic, as well as those the left describes as “assault weapons.” This means only a percentage of the 403 deaths attributed to “rifles” would have been carried out with an “assault weapon.” So the gap between the number of persons beaten to death with hammers and clubs verses those killed with “assault weapons” would be even greater than the gap between those who died in a hammer/club attack versus those who died being shot with “rifles” of any kind.

    2017 crime figures showed
    • 1,591 people were killed with “knives or cutting instruments” while
    • 403 were killed with “rifles.” This means nearly four times as many people were stabbed to death as were killed with any kind of rifle.

    It is not only the Guns – 2016 Bastille Day in Nice by a Truck
    • 87 Death – 434 Injured

  37. avatar charlie says:

    Sleepy Joe Biden Sitting on the Democrap Potty donkey; a tail of two assholes!

  38. avatar FREEDOM says:

    Well come and try Buttercup Biden and Swallowscockwell, all of you Nazi wannabe power happy control freak Tutu wearing anti everything whiny cry baby drama god busy body nosy can’t mind their own Fing business LIBTARD coward sheeple Tyrants and your Lapdogs pigs that try will have a bullet placed perfectly between your/their eyes. WE THE PEOPLE ARE NOT OWNED BY ANY HUMAN PERIOD.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email