Josh Shapiro ghost gun
Yes, that's Josh Shapiro's face on the magazine well of this 3D printed gun. (Courtesy CTRL+Pew)
Previous Post
Next Post


This is TTAG’s weekly roundup of legal and legislative news affecting guns, the gun business and gun owners’ rights. For a deeper dive into the topics discussed here, check out this week in gun rights at FPC

New Ghost Gat Celebrates Free Speech


CTRL+Pew, our friend and a humble master of memes, this week released an art project that has been in the works for some time. The debate on 3D printable guns and files has been focused on the status of design as a form of speech, something it unquestionably is. This week, CTRL+Pew released a special upgraded version of the Tec-9 printable receiver, to celebrate political expression as an art.

Josh Shapiro ghost gun
Yes, that’s Josh Shapiro’s face on the magazine well. (Courtesy CTRL+Pew)

So what’s special about this new blaster? Well, it’s a love letter to a state politician who wants to destroy our First and Second Amendment rights. The receiver has a rendition of Pennsylvania AG Josh Shaprio’s face, with anime eyes, adorned with hearts all over, and “We love you Josh Shapiro” emblazoning the side.

It also has a link to and “Cereal Number 1,” a dig at anti-gun politicians’ senseless obsession with enumeration. Oh, and there’s also a handy spot to hold a spare mag, which is super neat.

The release is accompanied by a video, music track, and T-shirt to celebrate the occasion. It’s an intentionally and unquestionably upbeat affair, showing that our side is something more than what gun controllers want people to believe. The whole affair is undeniably vibrant and I can’t recommend checking it out enough.

VA Assault Weapon Ban Sneaks out of Committee

We previously thought the Virginia legislature had stalled on the assault weapons ban, possibly spurred by the display of 20,000 protestors around the capitol. This week we saw that wasn’t quite the case, as Virginia House Public Safety Subcommittee passed HB 961, an aggressive assault weapon ban, along with a host of other bills.

This spurred a crowd full of activists to erupt in anger, and be ordered out by police.

The bill, which focuses on firearms with a fixed magazine of twelve or more, or a “points test,” is presented as a “compromise” (the original version outlawed possession of assaulty-looking rifles, mandating their destruction or confiscation). The sweeping ban applies to handguns and rifles alike, and would render illegal the sale of some of the most common firearms in America.

To be clear, all bills reported out of the House Public Safety Subcommittee still must pass the full House (HBs 1499, 264, 600, 1288, and 961), and are all likely to do so late next week. Thus the fight now moves to Senate, where some Dems have announced they will oppose the bill.

If the Senate intends to take HB 961 to floor, it will likely have to go through the Senate Judiciary committee, the full Senate, and a conference committee, whereas other pending gun legislation has corresponding (“companion”) legislation in each chamber and may need fewer steps. The assault weapon ban still faces substantial, but far from insurmountable, procedural hurdles.

Bloomberg Lies About Child Deaths in Super Bowl Gun Grab Ad

In his race to buy for the DNC nomination, Mike Bloomberg is pulling out all the stops, poaching staffers, flooding the primary race with his own cash, and in his latest stunt, lying to about 100 million viewers during this year’s Super Bowl.

So, what was his claim? Citing to Everytown, the anti-2A organization that he bankrolls, Bloomberg claimed that “2,900 children die from gun violence every year.” Seem high? That’s because it’s bullshit.

Per the CDC, to whom Everytown attributes their own stats, deaths of individuals under the age of 18 totaled 1499, about 40% of which were suicides. So how did Bloomberg get to his bogus number? By including people over the age of 18 in an attempt to inflate the total and deceive viewers.

This isn’t the first time gun grabbers have fudged the numbers; it routinely occurs with situations like mass shootings.

Everytown for Gun Safety Announces Plan to Influence Minnesota Senate Election

Moms Demand Action
Moms Demand Action members (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

This Wednesday, “non-partisan” Everytown for Gun Safety announced its intention to spend $250,000 on Minnesota’s state senate elections in an attempt to flip Republican-held seats.

While some may find this alarming, this isn’t Everytown’s only attempt at buying elections; they plan to spend $60 million on elections this year, double the amount the Bloomberg-backed group spent in 2018. The election ads will push for universal background checks and red flag laws, and they will target “suburban and African American women.”

Hawaii Legislature Pushing “Do Something” Bills in Wake of Police Shootings

Officers Shot in Hawaii
Honolulu Police Chief Susan Ballard speaks at a news conference after announcing the death of two police officers responding to a call near Diamond Head, Sunday, Jan. 19, 2020, in Honolulu. (AP Photo/Marco Garcia)

Never letting a tragedy go to waste, Hawaii lawmakers are using the murder of two police officers last month to justify pushing new gun control legislation.

What kind of “common sense gun laws” are they trying to pass? There are three on the table, none of which have any logical relation to the incident. Proposals include banning .50 caliber machine guns, requiring permits for ammunition purchases, and making it a felony to buy spooky “ghost guns.” Because DO SOMETHING.

Florida Supreme Court Justices Question Assault Weapons Ban

ban assault weapons now

Initiative #19-01, Florida’s assault weapons ban ballot initiative, after failing to meet signature requirements for the 2018 and 2020 cycles, with zombie-like dedication, is positioning itself for 2022. The state Supreme Court recently reviewed Its proposed ballot summary, which reads as follows:

“Prohibits possession of assault weapons, defined as semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition-feeding device. Possession of handguns is not prohibited. Exempts military and law enforcement personnel in their official duties. Exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to this provision’s effective date. Creates criminal penalties for violations of this amendment.”

So what’s wrong with it? Everything. Mass shootings, the impetus for the initiative, are incredibly rare. On top of that, the odds that someone will be killed with a rifle or shotgun of any kind are remarkably low.

Of the 14,123 homicides reported to the FBI for 2018, they were only used in 532, or 3.77%. Compare this to the 1,515 homicides committed with a knife or sharp object (that’s 10.72%), or the 672 murders committed with hands and feet (4.76%). You read that right, you’re more likely to get kicked or punched to death than shot with an AR-15 according to the FBI’s 2018 stats.

Aside from not being supported by the numbers, the bill and proposed language is unconstitutionally vague; the chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court described the ballot summary as “prohibitively misleading.” Supporters of the proposed amendment believe that, like the medical marijuana initiative in 2016, this firearm ban will be revised and passed by Floridians. We’ll see about that.

Florida Carry, Inc. Promises Police They Will Sue if Gun Owners Rights are Violated

After all of the hooplah from anti-gun legislators this session, Florida Carry issued an open letter to all of Florida’s police chiefs. The organization lists a dozen examples of the myriad civil rights violations conducted by the police against Floridians, ranging from the ambush and disarmament of innocent fishermen to the heinous slaying of a homeowner who was armed when he answered unexpected knocking in the middle of the night.

Florida Carry asserts they will bring “lawsuit after lawsuit” until Florida police understand that gun owners are not second class people and that they are not to commit further violations of their constitutional rights. Not only does the organization promise to bring suit, but it also intends to demand criminal prosecution of the officers and deputies who commit the violations. It will be interesting to see how Florida law enforcement chiefs respond.

Changes to ATF Form 4473 Include Addition of Non-Binary as an Option Under Sex

new 4473 form
Courtesy ATF

The ATF is accepting public comments on its proposed changes to Form 4473, its standard form for making purchases or exchanges via an FFL dealer. Most of these changes are for practical purposes.

For example, the list of serial numbers and descriptions of firearms to be purchased or exchanged is now on the first page of the form. The form also includes a change pertaining to individuals who are serving in the military at the time of their purchase or exchange, asking whether they are currently facing court martial for UCMJ violations.

Most striking is the addition of a box to the form – an option for non-binary individuals to check pertaining to their sex. The form’s simple structure was inherently discriminatory because it precluded transgender, intersex, and other individuals who identify as non-binary from purchasing a firearm, and ATF was of the position that not “picking a box” was grounds for denying the transaction. Thankfully the ATF is trying to mend this transgression. Still, one wonders why one has to “check a box” at all.

Illinois State Police Pass the Buck on $29.5M Gun Licensing Fund Diversion

Image Via Illinois State Police Facebook page

According to documents obtained from the state government toward the end of 2019, nearly $30 million of firearm owner fees that were intended for funding Illinois’ Firearms Owner Identification program were diverted for other purposes over the preceding five years. The fund diversion is allegedly a temporary scenario, but FOID and concealed carry applications are backlogged several months, and there is no indication that the Illinois State Police will be reimbursed.

Instead of owning their deficiency, the police have insisted that they have no authority to “sweep” the funds in question, while also claiming that this fiscal year the department has been filling positions for the Firearms Services Bureau, that they have been procuring equipment to aid in processing, and that they are building a new bureau for appeals, all because funds have not been swept this time around. Kind of makes a fellow wonder what they could do if funds from the last five years hadn’t been swept in the first place.

Illinois Supreme Court Recognizes Gun Ownership as a Civil Right

Close up of Constitution of the United States of America with the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights

Despite deficiencies with Illinois’ executive branch (see above), its highest court has come out swinging in favor of the Second Amendment. In an opinion issued at the end of January, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the right to keep and bear arms is a civil right.

You may be saying to yourself, “of course it’s a civil right,” but here’s the thing: until now, only the right to vote, right to hold office, and the right to serve as a jury member were considered by the court to be civil rights in the Land of Lincoln.

This is a major victory for individuals who had been previously convicted and had their convictions expunged because it allows them the right to challenge to have their right to gun ownership restored. It’s not all good news, though. The court partially reversed a decision finding the state and federal statutes unconstitutional as applied to petitioner. While this may be a victory, it’s not as wide or sweeping as it deserved to be.

Minnesota Supreme Court Refuses to Recognize Expungement of Gun Owner’s Record

When one state giveth, another taketh away. In a decision rendered Wednesday, the Minnesota Supreme Court declared that a man with an expunged criminal record was not entitled under federal law to purchase firearms.

So what happened? The man was convicted nearly a quarter century ago, but the expungement of his records didn’t remove them from state and federal databases. Using what can only be described as galaxy-brained logic, the court concluded that although the records were otherwise sealed, the appellant wasn’t entitled to restoration of his rights because the records weren’t destroyed or eliminated by the executive branch. Nice.

In other words, The court reasoned that expungement as granted didn’t meet the federal definition of expungement. What kind of backwards pony pageantry is that?

Delay in California Assault Weapon Suit

ar15 trigger AR-15 safe fire
Dan Z for TTAG

Miller v. Becerra, a challenge for California’s assault weapon ban, was scheduled for a hearing on Thursday, but this was re-set to mid-March. No reason was given by the District Court, and no party asked for it. If I were to guess, it’s probably just the court needing some extra time to get through its extensive record.

Matthew Larosiere is the Director of Legal Policy at the Firearms Policy Coalition.

Previous Post
Next Post


  1. The police are not your friend.

    The police appeared to be setting up a team in Florida to deal with open carriers. To the point the Florida open carriers believe they saw them with a rifle on top of a building getting readying to open fire on them when they get the chance. The police are escalating when they already been through many open carry events without issue. The police simply don’t want Americans exercising their rights and owning guns.

    Snipers on the roof like in Virginia?

    • This is for intimidation purposes. They are trying to paint anyone who owns a gun and carries it in public as a huge threat to society. It’s just the state fear mongering. When they received too much attention they fled so they could go be assholes elsewhere. The dude with a rifle on the roof was just icing on the cake for state stupidity.

      • What do Republicans think about police setting up sniper teams to gun down “law abiding” gun owners for exercising their human rights?

        What should be the consequence of breaking their oaths with intent to injure or kill?

        • The consequence, according to federal law, is 10+ years in prison and huge (several thousand dollar) fines. And if the police threatened death or actually caused death, they could even face the death penalty.

          Sadly, I have yet to hear about a federal prosecutor who will actually charge said police under the appropriate federal law (deprivation of rights under color of law).

    • Right police are not your friend! They are the ones that are going to come and get your guns they are the ones that enforce tyrannical laws. Yet people think we should feel bad when they get the raw end of the deal like in New York! Well guess what I don’t feel bad just like they won’t feel bad when they come and take your guns!

    • We see a good possibility of snipers being deployed here, and they were at the rally in Virginia as well. Snipers or counter snipers were deployed to the super bowl and would be to any outdoor event for a high ranking dignitary. I have been dismissed as crazy by all sides for suggesting that the event in Vegas with 22K people in attendance should have had about three teams of guys occupying the high ground for protection. A quick and effective defense wouldn’t have helped the narrative I don’t guess

  2. Still bring the Hawaii shooter into the topics?
    Has the shooters name ever been released?
    Why would it NOT surprise me if the HI shooter was none other the Lon Haruchi, made famous for shooting Vicki Weaver in the face at Ruby Ridge. A top level sniper with the best equipment, shoots a match grade 7.62×51 round from a static “prone” position, at a distance of approx 180 yards, yet misses his “intended” target by a few FEET, killing the mother with a child in her arms. Lon needed to rot in jail.

  3. The 9th Circus just needed more time to figure out how to screw gun owners over. They figured the excuses they had were not going to fly and needed more time.

    • Nah, they can take all the time they want after oral arguments. There is no timeline for a court of appeals to issue its decision. So moving the date is just a convenience/scheduling thing and nothing more.

  4. The Florida AWB has a huge hole because anti-gunners know nothing about guns. If ths passes, I foresee an explosion of braced AR-receiver pistols and the like among the lawful owners. Of course, prohibited persons who would even bother to have a rifle wouldn’t care about bans and would use whatever they would be able to obtain on the black market.

  5. So, does that “special upgraded version of the Tec-9 printable receiver” produce a functional, reliable, and durable firearm???

  6. Chief Sensor,

    Good find on that video. That was pretty disturbing to say the least.

    West Palm Beach Police behavior on that video tells me that they have a HUGE amount of contempt for people who own firearms and exercise their rights. In fact their behavior indicates to me that their level of contempt is so huge that it is irreconcilable and unrecoverable.

    Where is the rational basis for West Palm Beach Police to be so concerned about a public exhibition of Natural, inalienable, constitutionally-enumerated rights? And not just any exhibition of rights, an exhibition from a group that has previously notified police of their exhibition and that has a proven track record of being peaceful, law-abiding people.

  7. “…The form’s simple structure was inherently discriminatory because it precluded transgender… and other individuals who identify as non-binary from purchasing a firearm…”

    Fair, I guess not everyone with a mental illness should be prohibited from owning guns.

  8. Our rights, written BEFORE the Constitution, are unalienable and are endowed from our CREATOR – not our legislators, not our government and certainly not from the United Nations and their attempt at gaining control.
    Understand something, when it comes to regulations and such, the ATF has not constitutional authority to be determining anything. All rules, which are laws, are to be determined by Congress. However, the American people never gave Congress the authority to restrict or regulate arms of any kind.

    • The American people CAN’T give Congress the authority to restrict or regulate any individual rights. The people cannot give authority that they themselves do not possess!!!!!!!!! In other words no individual can restrict /regulate, or take away the rights of another individual, so they cannot singly or as a group give someone or something (government) that ability either! Any and all laws that infringe on the rights of the eole are NOT-laws!

  9. “the bill, which focuses on firearms with a fixed magazine of twelve or more…”

    i’m sure the ~points system~ would snag some of my items, but the above restriction targets nothing i own except perhaps a tube fed .22.
    who does a fixed mag of a dozen? i’ve never seen a blind or floorplate that voluminous.
    not gettin’ sumpin’.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here