ATF: Hawaii’s Gun Laws Are Irrelevant

“When it comes to firearms laws, Hawaii has some of the most stringent statutes in the country,” reports, and not without reason. “Residents who want to enjoy their right to bear arms legally need to comply with a lengthy checklist of state-specific prerequisites and guidelines — and that’s on top of federal gun laws. But incidents like the recent shooting spree that killed one and seriously injured two others raises the question: Have Hawaii’s strict gun laws help nurture an active underground firearms market?” For that answer we turn to the agency that knows exactly how to create an active underground firearms market: the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (and Really Big Fires) . . .

Probably not, says Jordan Lowe, resident Agent-in-Charge of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Hawaii, the federal law enforcement agency that investigates illegal firearms use and trafficking . . .

Lowe says he doesn’t think Hawaii’s strict gun laws are exacerbating the state’s underground weapons trade. According to Lowe, Hawaii’s firearms black market probably isn’t any more high-octane than those in states like Arizona and Alaska, where gun laws are much more lenient.

The fact that most of illegal guns recovered by police were once legally registered are another indication that strict state gun provisions probably haven’t had much of a bearing on the magnitude of the black market, Lowe said.

“There’s illegal firearms trafficking in every state,” said Lowe. “There’s obviously a market for it everywhere. If there’s a demand, there’s going to be a market.”

It’s rare that a federal agency with no reason to live makes such a compelling and clear-cut case for its dissolution. Strange times.



  1. avatar Brad Kozak says:

    Somebody in the ATF got caught telling the straight, unvarnished truth? Stop the presses! This is a better lead than “Man Bites Dog!”

  2. avatar Will Litten says:

    Good enough for me, I would like my tax dollars back now.

  3. avatar Bob H says:

    This is interesting (From the link) sub link “licenses to carry”
    Licenses to carry
    Reference: §HRS 134-9

    No person shall carry concealed or unconcealed on the person a pistol or revolver without being licensed to do so under this section or compliance with section 134-5(c) or 134-6.

    Note: There is no compact agreement between Hawaii and other states that would permit police officers on official assignment in Hawaii to be armed and exempt from the provisions of the Hawaii Revised Statutes relating to firearms.

  4. avatar JOE MATAFOME says:

    It’s a good thing I don’t consider those no good COMMIES in hawaii part of the United States.

  5. avatar CUJO THE DOG OF WAR says:

    How ironic that the outspoken gun control advocate Jack Lord is the picture for this post. Prior to his so sage comment that only police and military should have handguns, in his world, he went into a gun shop to buy a handgun. He threw a first class hissy fit when he was told there was a waiting period. Book ’em Danno.

    1. avatar Dex says:

      *yawn…ho hum. hawaii is not a relevant state anyways.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email