Until this point our consistency testing’s been focusing on the .223 Remington / 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge. This time we branch out into another popular rifle caliber: the .308 Winchester / 7.62×51 NATO round. Specifically, I’m testing Prvi Partizan factory ammo, Hornady Match ammo, and SetPoint ammunition.
The basic testing outline was described in the first post and repeated ad nauseum, but this time we’re switching things up. As the ArmaLite National Match rifle we usually use doesn’t take .308 ammo, we’re substituting the recently reviewed Mossberg 100 ATR as our standard test rifle.
Using the Mossie (with a 22″ barrel and 1:10 twist) I fired 20 rounds of ammunition through a chronograph and record the results. At the end of the testing, I determined the interquartile range of the velocities and used that as our metric to compare the ammunition.
Prvi Partizan ammunition is considered by some to be the best of the western European ammunition plants. Prvi Partizan manufactures the ammunition for Wolf’s “Premium” Gold line. It also sells its own premium line of ammunition. We tested the cheap versions of their ammunition; the ammo found in the “bargain” section of a gun store and sold in nondescript white boxes. It’s the baseline for the tests: the “cheap” ammunition to which all “premium” ammunition would be compared, much like Wolf and XM192F in the .223 tests.
As we saw at the NRA convention, Hornady touts their new Superformance ammunition as being some of the best commercially available ammunition in the world. Today we’re looking at the 150gr SST version, with a claimed muzzle velocity around 3,000 fps (feet per second). This round has a polymer ballistic tip and match grade jacket specifically designed to improve accuracy.
SetPoint Ammunition is a brand new player in the match grade ammunition world. The company makes ammo to order: your choice of bullets, powder load, even the C.O.L (Cartridge Overall Length). SetPoint will happily churn out as few as 20 rounds to your oder, or as many as you want.
Each box of ammunition has your name on it. Literally. They also list your load data so you know exactly what you’re getting every time. I was a little hesitant about trusting someone else to load my ammo; I went with a conservative recipe: 44gr Varget under a 150gr Hornady FMJ BT bullet with a C.O.L. of 2.78 inches. When the ammunition arrived SetPoint had yet to open their doors to the public. They’re now taking custom orders for .308 rounds from anyone who wants to handload but doesn’t have the time / patience / practice / budget / equipment to do it themselves.
As we can see in the boxplot, Hornady Match ammunition is over 200 feet per second faster than the SetPoint load I chose, and over 100 feet per second faster than the Prvi load. But speed isn’t everything.
Consistency is what we’re looking for. In terms of consistency, Hornady takes the cake. While there is a definite “winner” and “loser” in terms of consistency, the difference between the two seems much smaller than the current best and worst in the .223 Remington brands.
Due to the difference in testing procedures, with one caliber being tested in a semi-auto firearm and the other being tested in a bolt action, it seems prudent to keep the results separated. For that reason this bar graph excludes all of the .223 ammunition we tested and only looks at the .308.
From these results, it looks like Hornady takes the lead in .308 Winchester ammunition consistency. SetPoint appears to offer acceptable consistency (much better than my handloads) while offering full ammo customization—something no one has yet been able to do on this scale. Expect a full report on their ammunition after I get some glass on my rifle.
Next time: Wilson Combat .308!
Brand and Weight | Caliber | IQR |
Hornady Superformance Match 150gr SST |
.308 Win | 26 |
SetPoint – 44gr Varget 150gr Hornady FMJ BT |
.308 Win | 52 |
Prvi Partizan 150gr FMJ |
.308 Win | 54 |
Here’s the current .223 Remington table as well, just FYI.
Brand and Weight | Caliber | IQR |
Wilson Combat 77gr Sierra HPBT Match |
.223 Rem | 19 |
Wilson Combat 65gr Sierra SP BT |
.223 Rem | 21 |
Hornady 75gr BTHP Match |
.223 Rem | 29 |
CorBon 69gr HPBT |
.223 Rem | 30 |
Winchester 64gr “Power Point” SP |
.223 Rem | 38 |
Wolf 55gr FMJ |
.223 Rem | 40 |
Federal XM193F 55gr FMJ |
.223 Rem | 40 |
Nosler Varmint 40gr Ballistic Tip |
.223 Rem | 44 |
Handloads – 20.8gr N-135 75gr Hornady HPBT Match |
.223 Rem | 49 |
Handloads – 21gr IMR 3031 75gr Hornady HPBT Match |
.223 Rem | 52 |
I really enjoy these ammunition reviews, but I would ask one question I think all of the audience would really also like a price comparison when comparing performance.
Custom ordered hand loaded ammunition sounds spendy when compared to thrifty Wolf classed bulk ammo.
The readers (please correct me if I am wrong) really want to know if an extra $1 a round is only going to get me consistently a potentially insignificant grouping at different distances, can I afford to go cheap or do I need to spend my grandkids college money to fund my shooting habits….
Thanks
Scotty V
Scotty, I’m with you, but a cost/benefit analysis is probably beyond the scope of this series. Besides, if you’re shooting in a match, you’ll probably spend the extra $, and if you’re shooting at the range, it’s probably unnecessary.
As a new(ish) shooter I have a question. Why would you practice with different ammunition at the range than you would use in a match? Doesn’t the different ammunition affect your accuracy and point of aim?
Bob H, thank you for asking that. A great question that I’ve often wondered myself. Unfortunately, I’m like you, a new(ish) shooter. Sorry I cant answer that one, but hopefully some of our “seasoned” shooters can.
Not really looking for a review taking cost into consideration, just what the cost is, I’ll make my own decision on how much I want to spend, but in any review I think cost is relavent, please let me know if I am way off base here…
On the contrary; I think you’re right on target. I’ll start including price per round as a metric when I do the tables at the end of the post, starting with the next test.
Online education is good for everyone who is thinking about changing
their career or are thinking about further studies while they’re working.
No one’s life has ever gone according to plan, so
you’ve got to make the best out of this time in your life.
I’m not stating that everyone does that, I’m these are the minority for
this one, but it just irritates the hell beyond me.
Comments are closed.