Home » Blogs » York Arms to NY Govt and LEO Customers – FOAD

York Arms to NY Govt and LEO Customers – FOAD

Dan Zimmerman - comments No comments

courtesy yorkarms.com

Another firearms company chooses not to do business with those who make it their business to disarm civilians. From York Arms’ web site:

Based on the recent legislation in New York, we are prohibited from selling rifles and receivers to residents of New York. We have chosen to extend that prohibition to all governmental agencies associated with or located within New York. As a result we have halted sales of rifles, short barreled rifles, short barreled shotguns, machine guns, and silencers to New York governmental agencies . . .

For “civilian” customers residing in New York: 
At your choice, we will:

  • complete your order and ship to a dealer of your choice outside of NY
  • refund your payment in full
  • hold your items here for up to 6 months, at no charge – if you are in the process of leaving NY and taking residence in another state.

For LE/Govt customers in New York:

Your orders have been cancelled.

[h/t Kelly A.]

0 thoughts on “York Arms to NY Govt and LEO Customers – FOAD”

  1. New York Arms I Salute You. Thank You For Taking A Stand On this BS!!! going Around Now days. We All got to stick together. THANK YOU..

    Reply
    • Way to go Templar Arms!

      I read the posting. I like how they quoted “we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal”. NY, Obama, DiFi, and the gun-grabbers obviously do not believe all people are created equal. They are haters and bigots.

      Reply
  2. I spent hours yesterday looking for a rugged, compact handgun for carry in 9mm that fell somewhere in the 3.5″ – 4″ barrel range and had 1911-style controls. Wild that you just posted this today; now I’m eyeing the LH9C. Looking forward to hear your impressions of the full-sized LH9!

    Reply
  3. It would be impressive to see Colt and Glock do this since they have huge LE market share nationwide. That would make headlines in the MSM.

    Reply
  4. While I applaud the companies who so far have done this, they really are a drop in the bucket. What I would like to see is a major player, such as S&W, Glock or SIG to do the same. They won’t, because the short-term dollar is more important than the longer-term prospect of being legislated out of business completely. Imagine if Glock told NY that no more Glocks would be sold or serviced until their draconian laws change. I do not understand why companies based in NY, such as Remington, are still there.

    Reply
  5. Fake event is fake.

    L.A.P.D do not want to seize guns because of the danger it will put them in so this entire story was fabricated in order to support the tin-foil hat crowds claim of needing long rifles for protection from the authoritarian “Police State” “Global Nazi Bilderberg” conspiracies.

    The Ex-Military Ex-Police ghost hunt is simply to re-balance the wheel.

    Reply
  6. New York (CNN) — Three defendants pleaded guilty in federal court Wednesday to conspiring to defraud a Holocaust reparations organization out of $57.3 million, according to court documents.
    Genrikh Kolontyrskiy, Moysey Kucher and Dora Kucher, all of Brooklyn, helped produce and process some of the thousands of fraudulent applications for the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany that are under investigation.
    The organization, also known as the Claims Conference, distributes more than $400 million a year from funds provided by the German government to victims of the Holocaust.

    Reply
  7. Right- lets give up the 4th to protect the 2nd. Do these ppl even stop and listen to what bat-shiat crazy ideas they are suggesting?

    Reply
  8. Thumbs Up.

    In addition I insist that effective immediately , every ammunition vendor and maker cease all orders and business with New York State public agencies. Since guns are tools of oppression and citizens are disarmed , there’s no reason for federal and state LEOs to have cop-killer or any other kind of bullets.

    Reply
  9. Perhaps the gun industry has learned a lesson from the tobacco industry experience: Hardball or be relegated to BBB minor league.

    Reply
  10. Where is the manufacturing process taking place on these? Seems like they are just importing through the company. Are these guns sold elsewhere with a different name on the slide?

    Reply
  11. interesting that there is no scale on those figures, and I think I know why. I was talking to my dad during the SOTU and he was constantly voting on the poll (negative).. and the numbers for even the democrats was at a -50 or so for most of the speech.. with republicans and democrats even lower. I had checked it out and it was lucky to go over -40 (on a scale of -100 to +100), with the democrats.

    At one point my dad said that they took the live graphic off the screen as it was soooo bad.

    not posting the scale sure makes it look better. I dont think it ever broke above 0 during the speech.

    Reply
  12. How about we try this experiment. We let all people exercise their constitutional rights regardless of their zip code. We insist that the government and it’s employees play by the same rules we do. Let’s try this for about ten years as a trial, since apparently it’s never been done before. At the end of the 10 years let’s have a national discussion on whether or not following the constitution works or not.

    Reply
  13. I’ve sent each of the companies boycotting NY a thank you email. They are glad to get them as it confirms their choice. It is especially good for them if you are a New Yorker.

    Next, we need to get the NY mfgrs to vote with their feet and then follow suite.

    Reply
  14. I was surprised to hear the president using the phrase “They deserve a vote.” Instead of something stronger, like “They deserve justice.”, or “They deserve a plan.”.

    I think that the language was telling. It shows that he knows that he doesn’t have the votes, but he wants to try and force the show down anyway. I heard it as almost a concession. I sincerely hope that I am right.

    But as other have pointed out, the real fight is in the blue states.

    Reply
  15. Friends, this was a set-up from the git go. They never intended to listen to those testifying. I got a tad bit irate about that (g)..
    .
    PLEASE, if you want to make a difference get up, get involved, and work your tails off this election cycle in your district. All 120 legislative seats are up for grabs and we need people to go be primary candidates against the liberals who’d destroy our constitutional liberties.
    .
    It’s time we turned this beast around. Melt Senator Sweeney’s phones so these bills never hit the floor for a vote. He has aspirations for Governor some day. Let him know he’ll never get anywhere unless he supports the constitutional rights of the people.
    .
    WELL DONE to all who were there. So proud of y’all.
    .
    Sincerely,
    Nora Craig

    Reply
  16. New Jersey is a small state and I bet Pensylvania and Delaware ammo dealers are just salivating at all the new business they are going to get. Do any of the bill prohibit a person from buying ammunition out of state? Are they going to post troopers outside of Cabella’s looking for New Jersey plates?

    Reply
  17. I’ll concede that the articles left off a couple important shootings, but the trend is the same: The US has a disproportionate number of the world’s most deadly mass shootings.

    The Kates and Mauser article relies on Kleck’s overstated data. I say overstated because according to DOJ (www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/165476.pdf) and NIJ which is linked in the Debunking 18 Pro-Gun Myths, Kleck’s research has a positive bias.

    Lott no longer publishes in peer reviewed journals because of his ethical fails. He keeps changing his data and omitting important calculations and downright lying. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2003/10/double-barreled-double-standards

    Reply
  18. I agree this shows like other profs we are the majority. Most americans dont mind us owning AR-15s. Most gun owners own AR-15s. Good news. Hopefully see DiFis bill dead soon.

    Reply
  19. I really wish the focus group went from indifference to “HULK SMASH!!!!” every time some dumb politician tried to curtail our 2A (or any other) God-given rights.

    Reply
  20. These rifles are wonderfully engineered tools built for only one purpose: to kill and maim as many human beings on the battlefield as quickly and efficiently as possible.

    This must be why all the assault weapons bans include a law enforcement exemption, because as we all know, the function of the police is to kill and maim as many human beings on the battlefield that is our nation as quickly and efficiently as possible.

    Reply
  21. “An argument that escalates generally make the Pro-2A guy look like the “nut job” while the other comes off as a logical thinker.”

    Speak for yourself. I have shredded the illogical and hysterical “arguments” of more anti-gun nuts than I can remember. They rarely have a single fact to bring to an argument and generally have little to no skill at rhetoric or logic. It’s like taking candy from a blind baby.

    Reply
  22. Once again, the proposed congressional and executive actions will not save lives. Instead, they will prevent law abiding citizens from acquiring the weapons necessary to protect themselves, their families, and their property. Also, these proposed measures are simply a step closer to the liberals’ goal of disarming Americans.

    Reply

Leave a Comment