You can see our two previous posts in which we count down TTAG’s most-read posts in 2017 here and here. Today’s group gets us most of the way home. It’s a good mix including a gun review, some ballistic talk, a couple of gear roundups and a sample of the usual uninformed stupidity blurted out by one of our “betters” who actually make the laws we have to live with. How scary is that?
No. 15 – AR-15 Muzzle Brake Shootout #3
Welcome to the third installment of our 5.56 muzzle brake testing series. This time around we’ve put 42 new muzzle devices to the test, measuring the recoil reduction performance of each.
Recoil Testing
The procedure for this test was the same as the previous brake tests. You can find the first one here, the second one there, and a .30 caliber version here. For the Operators out there, we got a sweet Lux meter and tested the muzzle signature reduction effectiveness of various flash hiders, brakes, and comps. Flash hiding test #1 is here, and #2 here.
No. 14 – The Truth About Barrel Length, Muzzle Velocity and Accuracy
Josh Wayner’s taken it upon himself to challenge what everyone “knows” as far as barrel length, velocity and accuracy are concerned. According to his results, the conventional wisdom ain’t all that wise when it comes to longer-barreled ballistics. The only question then is, if you buy in and go with a short barrel, can you stand the noise?
Abstract: This is an independent scientific study that has been conducted in western Michigan. This study addresses the misunderstanding of the concepts related to barrel length, muzzle velocity, and accuracy in a rifle . . .
No. 13 – Senator Tim Kaine: “Las Vegas Shooter Only Stopped Because He Didn’t Have A Silencer on His Weapon”
In the video below, Senator Tim Kaine repeats his former running mate Hillary Clinton’s post-Mandaly Bay shooting anti-silencer rhetoric. According to the Virginia Democrat, silencer deregulation should be spiked because killer Stephen Paddock “was only stopped because he didn’t have a silencer on his firearm, and the sound drew people to the place where he was ultimately stopped.” The Senator then asks . . .
“Can you imagine what would have happened if he’d had silencers on these weapons?”
In fact, nytimes.com reports that it took police nearly two hours to locate Paddock’s 32nd floor room. They did so — ultimately – by hearing the sound of the smoke alarm in Paddock’s room.
No. 12 – Gun Review: Smith & Wesson M&P9 Shield
The market for guns is growing faster than the national debt. Paradoxically, the guns themselves are shrinking. Powerful handguns are getting smaller, easier to carry and less expensive. The Smith & Wesson M&P9 Shield continues this trend. It’s a pistol trimmed down to a size often reserved for weaker cartridges like the .380, but it maintains many of the ruffles and flourishes of its larger siblings in the M&P series. That’s all well and good, except that there are hidden costs that can outweigh the benefits of proliferating pistol shrinkage . . .
A smallish handgun can be difficult to shoot with accuracy due to its short sight radius. A small 9mm gun can twist around in the hand like a python with abdominal cramps. And reliability can suffer when power overwhelms small springs, feathery frames and partsmade by pixies. I tested the Shield because I wanted to know if the baby M&P is a worthy entry into the M&P family, or just some marketing maven’s idea of a profitable brand extension.
No. 11 – 5.56 muzzle device shootout
King Armory contacted TTAG and asked if we’d like to review their KA-1222A muzzle brake/flash hider. As there are just way too many options from way too many manufacturers to review them individually, the project quickly escalated into doing a bit of a “shootout” with muzzle devices from multiple companies. Hopefully we’ve achieved a decent mix of well-known units from well-known manufacturers as well as some from smaller shops that many folks may not be familiar with. Basically, the intention here is to highlight a variety of muzzle device options — we gathered 35! — state my blunt opinion on machining, fit/finish, and utility plus any items of note, along with relevant stats. Since many of these devices specifically claim to reduce recoil I created a test rig to measure just that, and a winner has been declared . . .
First, a quick note: not all of these muzzle devices are brakes/comps, or were otherwise designed to mitigate recoil. For some that is the primary goal. Some balance recoil management with flash hiding, and some have no recoil reduction consideration whatsoever (e.g. dedicated flash hiders or a linear compensators). For most brakes and comps, felt recoil reduction is only one goal anyway, with the other primary benefit being the reduction of muzzle movement in any other direction. The slow-mo footage for each device in the following video does show some noticeable differences in up/down muzzle movement as well as flash, but this test was specifically designed for measuring recoil — rearward energy.
The answer is no. In my view the guy in the image is a do*che bag and anyone else that would enjoy something like that is a DB also.
I disagree in part, and agree in part.
I agree that quality components are the reason you’re having a custom rifle built. If you’re not going to select custom components, then what was the point of paying to have a custom rifle built?
While we’re on that topic, if you’re paying to have a custom rifle built, then why bother starting with a low-grade action like a Remington, and then having to pour money for gunsmithing time into it for blueprinting, bushing the pin, etc, etc.
Just buy a high-quality action in the first place, and start there. You’ll likely be break-even with the cost of improving a stock Rem700 action; the only difference is who gets the money? Your local gunsmith, or the company that made the high quality action?
Where I disagree is the importance of a trigger vs. a barrel in a custom rifle. If you don’t spend the money on a high quality barrel, an excellent trigger will still only take you so far. If you’re going to spend the money on a custom rifle, then get a single point cut rifling barrel, and get it with the correct twist rate for the bullets you want to shoot, and then have it fitted to a high quality action, then hang a high quality trigger off said action, then put it into a high quality stock.
Rossi 92 in .38/.357. Feeds everything from .38 semi wadcutter reloads to full power .357s and its fun to shoot. A great companion piece for my Uberti Cattleman if I want to go old school or Smith 686 if I want to play in the 20th century. A post here says that Rossi no longer builds the 92 in .357 so let’s pay a few more bucks and substitute Henry for Rossi.Yeah I know that the Big Boy doesn’t have a loading gate but a magazine tube full of hot .357 hollow points will stop 99% of all fights this old man can imagine. My Henry Big Boy in .44 is more of a full size rifle but its fun too. If I lived in a people’s republic like New Jersey I’d sleep well with the Rossi loaded with 158gr Keith style .357 semi wadcutters under the bed and my 686 loaded with the same rounds in the night stand drawer.
The direction a pinwheel spins has nothing to do with the coriolis effect or its location relative to the equator. The direction a pinwheel spins is dependent upon the direction and pitch of its blades and the direction of the wind.
The one way, that the leftists don’t seem interested at all in actually pursuing.
If a prohibited person is found in possession or commits crime with a gun, he goes away for at least 20 years guaranteed. Make this a federal law, to work around sanctuary city leniency.
Criminals should be terrified of being caught with a firearm.
Personally speaking, despite numerous accusations, I do NOT have a bug up my butt.
The comment about “stand your ground” is actually accurate. By the time of the Bill of Rights was adopted, it was well established in every colony that the original victim had to retreat before he could use lethal force insomuch as the retreat could be done safely and he wasn’t inside his home or business (because of the castle doctrine). The issue, as Mr. Cornell linked to in his article, had to deal with “necessity.” Consider this recent post on the subject by Eugene Volokh at Reason: http://reason.com/volokh/2017/12/21/the-duty-to-retreat-in-the-founding-era
For those of you who don’t know, Mr. Volokh was the one who created the argument that won the day in DC v. Heller. He is also a top tier expert on the First Amendment. You can see a good bit of his academic writing here: http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/#GUNCONTROL
“…A nod’s as good as a wink, to a blind bat”
Thanks for dropping that reference, and I second how excited I’m going to be if Ruger really follows through with magazine adapters.. CZ P-10/0-07 mags, please!