Guns are a sad fact of life in American culture and are a constant topic in modern journalism. A good Journalist has a duty to get involved and make a difference in this important societal debate. By following certain guidelines, the concerned Journalist can be assured of having the maximum impact on this shameful problem. The concepts discussed here apply to both broadcast and print media. For the purposes of this guide our work is divided into routine stories about gun violence and coverage of the political debate about gun control. They are both equally important. Let us first address the proper way to construct a news story involving common gun crimes . . .
COMMON GUN CRIME STORIES
The purpose of routine gun crime coverage is to create the impression of a continuing, growing and terrifying tidal wave of gun violence. Your goal is to plant the fear of guns in the minds of ordinary people, fear for themselves and especially for their children.
The first and most critical principle to remember is that subtle use of terminology can influence the reader. For example, when describing a gun crime, victims must be shot “by” a gun, not “with” a gun. This may seem like a small detail, but it helps establish the principal that guns are responsible for crime.
We would all love to cover the big ones: those mass shootings that really get the 24-hour news cycle humming and our faces on screen during times of gut-wrenching emotion. Unfortunately, most shootings involve only one victim, but this should not discourage a talented Journalist. There are ways to make even the smallest shooting incident serve the greater good.
When telling the story, adjectives should always be chosen for maximum anti-gun effect. When describing a gun, attach terms like “automatic,” “semi-automatic,” “large caliber,” “deadly,” “high powered,” or “powerful”. Small pistols can be called “cheap” or “concealable.” Almost any gun can be described by one or more of these terms. More than two guns should be called an “arsenal”.
Try to include the term “assault weapon” if at all possible. This can be combined with any of the terms above for best results. Nobody actually knows what an assault weapon is, so you cannot be criticized for this usage. A brief visit to the web site of a national anti-gun organization can provide you with a list of the latest talking points and propaganda terms like these old classics: “junk guns,” “Saturday Night Specials,” “cop-killer bullets” and “the criminal’s weapon of choice“. If we control the terminology, we control the debate.
These days it’s important to include the size of a gun’s magazine. If you don’t know, just call it a “high-capacity clip.” The type of ammunition used is fair game too. Hollow point bullets sound especially sinister.
Don’t worry about getting technical details right. You don’t need to know anything specific about guns. Many a reporter has accidentally written about semi-automatic revolvers or committed other minor factual errors. Since most people know little about guns themselves, this isn’t a problem. Only the gun nuts will complain and they can be easily dismissed. The visceral impact of your article is much more important than any specific factual details, since people are more easily influenced through their emotions than through logic.
Broadcast Journalists should have stock video on hand showing a machine gun firing on full automatic. Run this video while describing “automatic” weapons used in a crime or when a gun is confiscated by police. At the least, a large graphic of a handgun should be displayed behind the on-air personality when reading any crime story, even if guns are not involved.
Don’t waste words describing criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Instead of calling them burglar, rapist, murderer, or repeat offender, simply use the term “gunman”. This helps the public associate all forms of crime and violence with the presence of guns.
Whenever drug dealers are arrested, guns are usually confiscated by the police and this is ripe for exploitation. Mention the type and number of guns more prominently than the type and quantity of drugs. Include the number of rounds of ammunition seized, since the number will seem large to those who know little about firearms. You may simply call them “bullets” if your editor prefers that you dumb down your stories for your particular audience. If possible, find a way to imply that each round could have resulted in a dead child had the police not intervened. Obviously, the drug dealers who had the guns should be referred to as “gunmen”.
Never question the effectiveness of gun control laws or proposals. Guns are, by their nature, evil and kill people. Removing guns from society can only be good. No one really uses guns for legitimate self-defense purposes, especially women or children. Any stories about armed self-defense must be minimized or suppressed where possible.
Be careful about criticizing the police for responding slowly to 911 calls for help. It’s best if the public feels the police can be relied upon to protect them at all times. If people are buying guns to protect their families, you’re probably not doing your job.
Emphasize stories where people kill family members and/or themselves with guns. It is important to make the public feel like they could lose control and start killing at any moment if they have a gun in the house. Any story where a child misuses a gun is front page material.
View every shooting as opportunity. Always include emotional quotes from the victim’s family if possible. If they aren’t available, the perpetrator’s family will do nicely. The quote must blame the tragedy on the easy availability of guns rather than any bad decisions by the perpetrator. Photos or video of grieving family members are worth a thousand facts. Most people will accept the assertion that guns cause crime. It is much easier than believing that some people deliberately choose to harm others.
Your story should include terms like “tragic” or “preventable” and mention the current toll of gun violence in your particular city or state. Good reporters always know exactly how many gun deaths have occurred in their area since the first of the year. To increase the impact of these numbers, include accidents and suicides in this total, even if your story is about intentional murders. List two or three of the most shocking recent incidents to give the impression of a continuing crime wave.
As you know, cities with the strictest gun control laws usually have the highest crime rates. If you work in one of these markets, it’s critical that you focus the blame for gun crime on weapons illegally transported from other cities and states with weak gun laws. You may embellish this concept by stating that most crime guns are purchased at gun shows in those states and flow into your area in a virtual “iron river”. Include the fact that criminals are able to buy all sorts of weapons, including machine guns, at gun shows without undergoing background checks.
Little space should be devoted to shootings where criminals kill each other. Although these deaths pad the annual gun violence numbers, they distract from the basic mission of urging law abiding citizens to give up their guns. Don’t dig too deeply into the reasons behind these shootings. The fact that a gun was involved should be the major point of emphasis unless someone under 18 is affected, in which case the child angle is of equal importance.
One detail that is often overlooked is the model of the gun used to kill someone. Get this information from the police and do an Internet search for other crimes involving the same model. This is how gun bans are born and your reporting can be a part of it.
Any article about gun violence should include quotes from anti-gun organizations or politicians who are promoting their latest idea for the next new gun control law. One quote should say that we must do something “for the children”. If a proposed gun law might be seen as ineffective, include the comment, “If it saves only one life, it’s worth it.”
THE POLITICAL DEBATE
The ongoing public debate about the role of guns and gun laws in society has remained at a high level since the 1960’s. Although many restrictive laws have been enacted, it’s important to make people believe otherwise. It is also good to imply that little debate has been going on at all when we should be having a “national conversation about guns.” Make your audience believe that the gun lobby has never given up anything. The pro-gun control side just wants reasonable compromise and an honest dialogue. There is an old saying, “What is mine is mine, but what is yours is negotiable,” that’s a helpful axiom. You can also study the negotiating tactics of North Korea for additional perspective in this area.
Mainstream Journalism mounted a massive and courageous attack on the gun lobby after the Sandy Hook massacre in December, 2012. By coordinating with our sources in government and the gun safety groups, we were able to facilitate the largest gains in two decades. One reason for this success is that we have finally overthrown the old concept that Journalists should at least appear to be unbiased.
Corporate media managers have found that conducting on-air interviews with gun lobbyists boosts ratings, so if you work on air, you must be prepared for this kind of confrontation. Always refer to these organizations as part of “the gun lobby”. When talking to them on the air, give free reign to your feelings. Don’t worry about appearing condescending and self-righteous. In the current climate, it’s considered acceptable to shout and call them names.
Do not let representatives of the gun lobby confuse you with facts or engage you in an actual discussion. Since you’ve ended up in this business, you’re probably aware that you’re not the sharpest tool in the shed. Have your list of anti-gun talking points in front of you. If you must improvise, stick to the most emotional statements and questions you can think of. Children should be mentioned in every other sentence. Don’t ever admit that any of their facts are correct. Just move on to your next talking point without the slightest affirmation.
This is no time for honesty. For example, it’s recommended that you state at the outset that you believe in the Second Amendment. You can even say that you’ve owned a gun yourself. Media analysts believe that this gives you more credibility with the public, as long as you sound sincere and, of course, that’s what you do for a living.
The National Rifle Association should be a primary target of your talking points. A great deal of work has gone into nurturing a general hatred of this organization. Although the NRA isn’t among the top campaign contributors, you should always mention “NRA money” whenever discussing how they influence politicians. Their lobbying efforts should be described as “arm twisting” or “threatening”.
Gun owners must never be portrayed in a positive light. Do not mention that these individuals may actually be well-educated or have respectable jobs and normal families. They should be called “gun nuts” if you can get away with it or simply gun owners, at best. Mention details about their clothing, especially if they are wearing hunting clothes or camouflage. Note any simplistic slogans on their bumper stickers to show that their intelligence level is low. Many gun owners drive pickup trucks, hunt and live in rural areas. Use these details to help portray them as the ignorant rednecks they are.
Don’t be afraid to interview these people, they are harmless even though we portray them as a menace to society. Try to solicit comments that can be creatively edited to show them in a negative light. Gun shows are excellent venues for this kind of journalism. Many in the business refer to this as “bumpkin hunting.” You will not be allowed to conduct interviews inside a gun show, but the parking lot may be available. Try to interview only white males over age 50 who sound and look unintelligent. Make them look ridiculous, especially when they talk about gun ownership as a barrier to tyranny. Find ways to blame them for the gun violence in the inner cities. Never show or refer to any gun owners who are women, minorities or might be perceived by your audience as liberals.
Feel secure in your advocacy journalism. The vast majority of your fellow Journalists support your activism. Simply being an urban, Journalist makes you one of the elite in the eyes of your readership and people will generally let you guide them.
The nation will be a better place when only the police and military have guns. Remember that since you’re doing it for the children, for the greater good, the end justifies the means.
Please feel free to share a PDF version of this guide with any Journalist friends you believe will benefit from it.
Dr. Michael Brown is professor emeritus of the Brady School of Journalism at Vancouver College of Liberal Arts
I look forward to the State Media picking this up and running with it. Wonder who will be the first one to bite the hook.
Are you aware that many in the media have confused articles in The Onion for legitimate news stories?
Thanks Professor MikeB!
Even though this is satire, it’s so true that it actually is a guide on how to write against guns and gun owners.
I wasn’t even sure it was. It seemed like a leak offered for comments.
Brady School I think was the give-a-way as in Brady gang gun-grabbers.
It’s NOT a leak. It’s a sophisticated (gun word again – usually used to describe meth labs or simple pot grow rooms!) look at how the press actually works this scam on the gun-ignorant public at large.
Nicely done, too – EXCEPT Brown BLEW IT BADLY with respect to “arsenals”.
As every observer here knows, more than ONE gun is to be described as an “arsenal”, not two! And be sure and heap BB guns and water pistols into the photo of the perp’s “arsenal” – the public will be impressed. They don’t know any better. Even if they DO know better, they’ll be happy to believe they’ve made a discovery – it’s ALL evil!!!
Include paintball guns, also!!!!!!!!!!!!
I suspect it was intentional that it wasn’t clearly identified as satire, no doubt in the hopes that our pro-gun readership would think this was an actual left-wing guide to writing anti-gun propaganda and respond with the appropriate amount of outrage.
What’s scary is the likelihood that many low-information liberal voters would never catch on that its satire. Reads like a Talking Points Memo
or something from ThinkProgress, The Soros funded propaganda oops I mean “narrative” source for the Left.
Additionally, if you do have to report on a shooting involving two criminals, please refer to the most seriously-injured as “just turning his (or her) life around”. The number and type of prior convictions is irrelevant. Additionally, do not address whether current firearms laws made it illegal either for the gun to be in the area where the shooting occurred or if the people involved could legally possess firearms. Mentioning any of these issues might plant some doubt in the mind of the audience about the efficacy of gun laws.
Even if you took a statistics class in your education, never comment on the statistical validity or study design of any study which supports gun control. Studies supporting the safe, defensive use of firearms are probably just written by gun nuts who can barely count, so no need in citing them.
Don’t forget to include soundbite from grieving/wailing mother. Something about he was a “good boy” and “loved his family” ignoring the fact he got shot in a dispute over drug sales turf.
Dr Brown forgot to include “Shot to death” in the gun crime section. Always useful to brand guns as the murder machines that they are.
I’ve heard a reporter describe a 10/22 as a high-powered assault rifle. And I’ve also heard a revolver described as a semi-automatic revolver, on numerous occasions.
This piece couldn’t be more accurate.
It IS a high-powered assault rifle – TO A MUSKRAT!
Well, there are the Webbley-Fosberry, Union, Zulaica and Mateba…
I find that to a pretty accurate representation of how things work. Minor quibble: I think it requires 3 or more guns to be an “arsenal.” If it’s two or less, it’s a “cache,” especially when accompanied by ammunition, i.e. “a cache of weapons and ammunition were discovered…”
That’s probably why it says:
“More than two” == “3 or more”
Always emphasize the “thousands of rounds of ammunition”, because you know, a day of plinking should only require 30 or 40 cartridges.
Best piece of satire since “A Modest Proposal” – brilliant! The corollary to this is what we need, perhaps Dr Brown can do something in this regard?
Wow. I took a journalism course in ’81. Things were… different then.
The piece seemed rather shallow… & obvious, Randy
Thanks for your feedback, but my name’s not Randy.
One key addition to the Journalist’s Guide:
When some poor, misguided youth (anyone younger than 35) is shot by an EEEVIL homeowner (described as a “vigilante”) for ALLEGEDLY breaking in to the vigilante’s home, be sure to describe the misguided youth as a “victim”, and have an interview with the youth’s mother, sisters, or grandmother (in the event the mother is in jail). (Forget trying to find the father – no one knows who he is, let alone where.) Get the grieving female relative on film describing the misguided youth as “a good boy”. They will be happy to say that several times, while artfully dabbing their eyes with a journalist-provided hankie. “He was a GOOD boy.”
Because they all are, really, “good boys”. Who just happen to have a $500/day drug habit that they have to support with armed robbery, murder, home invasions, etc. But that isn’t their fault – it is the NRA and gun owners (aka “vigilante terrorists”) who are to blame for the tide of violence threatening our urban youth! Yeah, that’s it!
I would be laughing like crazy at this, it’s so well done. I can’t though, because it’s so 1) true, and 2) pathetic. Still, many thanks for this. Bookmarked, for use in future discussions with those who might be on the fence.
Don’t forget to click on the link for: “weapon of choice” 🙂
Change “principal” to “principle” in the second paragraph. Otherwise, spot on.
Of course, we know that there has been at least one semiautomatic revolver, one I desire with a yearning that no journalist could comprehend. Anyone who’s watched The Maltese Falcon has seen one.
I never noticed that, and will peel an eye next I watch that.
“The Webley-Fosbery Automatic Revolver was introduced at the matches at Bisley of July 1900.” Wikipedia has a decent article on them.
One in working condition will cost you somewhere in the general neighborhood of $10,000 today.
I thought this was a joke until the end. Wow!
But if this is legit, why didn’t the professor put his name and affiliation in the pdf file?
Hey come on, April fools is over, right??
I absolutly need to know if this is real or not.
I don’t want to but I can believe it is real.
Please verify Please
Dr. Brown originally wrote this piece of satire back in 2000, when it appeared in the NRA’s First Freedom magazine. This is an updated version, taking into account the experience and wisdom the good doctor has accumulated in the intervening 13 years.
“Don’t worry about appearing condescending and self-righteous. In the current climate, it’s considered acceptable to shout and call them names. ”
it should have read
“Don’t worry about appearing condescending and self-righteous. In the current climate, it’s considered acceptable to shout and call them names. Now if they shout or call you names then you should immediately point that out and call them irrational, rude, inconsiderate, disgruntled, and even go as far as to say their argument is illogical and that there is no talking to them.”
Very funny stuff. It would be even funnier if it wasn’t true.
Don’t worry about getting technical details right. You don’t need to know anything specific about guns
They forgot that when a 17 or 18 year old thug gets shot by a rival gang banger, it should read “local teen was gunned down”.
You left out that if you do have to cover a self-defense shooting, you should try to delegitimize the defender’s action by inserting a racist overtone if you can: e.g. “white hispanic”. This is verging on another topic, but all stories should be written from the understanding that “whites” (never use the more pretentious “caucasian-” or “european-american” type of formulation employed for other backgrounds) are all racist by genetic makeup.
That is absolutely brilliant! It seems to fit all the “journalism” being done today not only on 2nd Amendment issues but on taxes, deficit spending, and immigration.
My son is a budding journalist. This is a must read for him to understand how to get ahead in his profession. Thanks for spelling out what we already knew, but had never heard articulated.
“Many a reporter has accidentally written about semi-automatic revolvers or committed other minor factual errors. ”
Cool! Another one – I have only seen the Webley-Fosbery.
Also dont call any hunting rifle or other bolt action gun a hunting rifle. Call it a “sniper rifle” or a “military grade sniper rifle” especially if it has any optics at all.
Ive noticed this one as well in the media.
Dont forget, after every single incident of “gun violence, regardless how small, show footage of spree shootings… all of them, even ones from 20 years ago. One person may have been shot but its a great excuse to remind everyone of old shootings to keep the fear up, so no one forgets.
Also, talk about “guns” killing people so the acts of the 0.0001% who use guns for crime are grouped together with the 99.9999% who use them to save live, protect life, for self defense. This way laws can be passed against self defense rights in the name of “preventing gun violence”.