Home » Blogs » Quote of the Day: We Don’t Need No Steenkin’ Warrant Edition

Quote of the Day: We Don’t Need No Steenkin’ Warrant Edition

Dan Zimmerman - comments No comments

Sean Caranna courtesy floridacarry.org

“I can understand seizing a gun if it’s on the person, but going into the house and taking all the guns is against the law. Now they’re asking him for a court order and they’re shifting the burden of proof on him to prove that he’s not mentally ill.” – Sean Caranna in Second Amendment group sues Chief Chitwood, Daytona over seized guns [at news-journalonline.com]

0 thoughts on “Quote of the Day: We Don’t Need No Steenkin’ Warrant Edition”

  1. I jumped to one of the You Tube videos and listed to a woman whinning about background checks. I was going tomleave a comment and give it a thumbs down but realized comments and likes were turned off! Apparently they want to suppress discussion so no one can post a discouraging word. I guess if you don’t have a problem with infringing 2A rights you will eventually have no problem infringing on 1A rights too.
    They must be afraid of losing the argument on facts and logic.

    Reply
    • Progressives never want opposing viewpoints. They want to pontificate without discussion. They are so rock-back-and-forth deluded that everyone agrees with them that any desent is attacked as an absolute aberration. And since it’s hard to tow the “peaceful” anti-gun line with frothing anti-gun rage in the comments, they turn comments off. It’s not to silence us, it’s to keep their mask from slipping.

      Reply
  2. My next door neighbor who is black told me that these type of people give African Americans a bad name and he actually dropped the n-bomb on these types. I have always thought the same…does that make me racist?

    Reply
  3. Historically a 21 gun salute was used by naval warships to show they were disarmed by firing all their ammunition. The posted video however is not a 21 gun salute since it is not being performed by artillery but rifles and is instead a three volley salute.

    Reply
  4. To be fair, the Atlantic has published some thoughtful gun writing by Jeffrey Goldberg and Adam Winkler. But this article was absolute drivel. The quality was representative of something I would have expected to turn up in the comments sections. If they wanted to even out their coverage, they could have done much better.

    Every time I read stuff like this, my blood starts to boil. It reminds me of what we’re up against.

    Reply
  5. Criminals AKA “bad guys” already hunt humans, regardless of the weapons available to them. Or the silly notion of licenses. (ha!)

    Regular people (“the hunted”) deserve the right to choose to protect themselves, including the ability to arm themselves with the same weapons as those that might prey on them. Yep.

    Reply
  6. I love how these “Thinkers” think they know so much…

    They extrapolate opinion based on no concept of jurisdictional desisions. It is as if their head is so far up the cereal box looking for the prize, they fail to realize that the prize is no longer in the empty box & the toy has been given to the “Good” kid.

    Does anyone not read anymore?

    Reply
  7. Washington state has a pistol registry that pops up on a police officer’s mobile terminals if they look you up.

    During the debate for universal background checks in our state (which are working so well for California), the Second Amendment Foundation said they would support it, IF, the state did away with the pistol registry.

    The state initially went for it, but balked after Law Enforcement groups said they wouldn’t support the bill in that form. Thus UBC didn’t get the support of gun rights groups and rightly died.

    Funny how they ask for compromise, but when real compromise comes up, they decide it wasn’t really worth it anyway.

    Reply
  8. Yet another old Fudd who was born before the invention of plastic and thinks anything new is “witchcraft”. Pay him no mind, he’ll die of natural causes soon enough.

    Reply
  9. Can we please end this BS “war on drugs” so that we can stop this incrementalism eating away at our rights? Nothing has done more to eat away at our freedoms than “the drug war” that will NEVER, EVER end. If someone can take $5 of coca leaves in Columbia, and then sell its refined product for $5000- there is NOTHING you can do to stop the flow. Legalize, tax, and regulate it, and leave my damned rights alone!!!

    Reply
  10. Bought one from bass for 349.85 to all you haters out it works just fine it’s easy to handle and operate . The chrome look is more appealing than the all black look if you really care much for that sort of thing .Its just fine for hunting or home defense haven’t really tried trap or sporting clays but I have my o/u for that stuff .

    Reply
  11. I posted it in the last one and I’ll post it again:

    They’re a bunch of terrorists, fighting like terrorists do, and there are some in American who actually want to support them with arms and money.

    Did they not learn from Afghanistan? They don’t care about us.

    Reply

Leave a Comment