To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Any attempt to prevent crime that involves the destruction of inanimate objects – however collected – is simply a matter of attacking the wrong element of the equation. And further, more draconian attempts to eliminate the inanimate objects is simply an example of well recognized insanity. …expecting different results.
Not that this impresses – or is even recognized by the destroyers, of course. The destruction of whatever, and control of everything possible, is their only real goal.
“. . . is even recognized by the destroyers . . . ” That’s true. Nevertheless, the uncommitted on the gun-Rights/-Control issue can figure it out. We PotG should exploit such findings as the OP and explain to men of good will: ‘They are lying to you! This gun-amnesty farce is a feel-good effort at security theater. They are trying to convince you that guns are the problem, not their possessors. How about a “cutlery & clubs’ amnesty?’
Alpers is a discredited anti gun campaigner and even he is saying it’s all for show.
Details of his lack of qualifications-
https://ssaa.org.au/news-resources/know-your-opponent/philip-alpers-a-most-dubious-researcher/
Amnesties and “Buy Backs” are nothing but feel good exercises that someone in whatever ‘position of authority’ can point to and say ‘I did something’ even if that “something” did absolutely nothing.
You’re totally right. I can’t tell you how many friendly debates I had with my left-leaning acquaintances wherein I obliterated their arguments for this policy or that, only to have them fall back on, “Well, even if it won’t work I’d rather do something than nothing.”
For people on that side of the aisle, voting and legislating are essentially secular prayers.
All the recent amnesty in New South Wales did was collect rusty rubbish no one would want to use. Probably grandpa’s .22 found behind the cupboard. Even the police admitted there were no Glocks, SMGs, assault rifles, or other modern guns handed in.
PS Fix the name and email fields. And the mobile version as well.