The video above shows robbers mugging a bicyclist in South Africa. It’s something of a Rorschach test. Gun control advocates will see it as proof positive that robbery victims should comply with their attackers to avoid violence – avoiding any mention of victims who comply with their attackers and “still” pay the price with their life. Gun rights advocates see it as a situation where a firearm could have prevented the possibility of serious injury or death – pointing out that there’s no way of knowing that the robbers would refrain from physical violence. Can you see it from both points of view? If you had a gun, what would you have done?