Previous Post
Next Post

Lever fever continues to rage amongst TTAG’s Armed Intelligentsia; we’re doing our best to cool your collective brow. A couple of Marlin 1894c’s are headed are way; one for Mr. Dumm’s expert appraisal and one for our Cowboy Assault Rifle project gun. There are other examples in the editorial pipeline, including a lever gun that fires the Smith & Wesson .500 cartridge (to accompany a .500 snubbie in an upcoming Extreme Carry feature). Put it all together and I’m still not going to be out-of-pocket tens of thousands of dollars. As one would be if one (not me, one) purchased this New Haven Arms Company Engraved .44-caliber Henry Rifle, set to be sold by at the end of May. Obscure? Check . . .

Most of the approximately 9000 Henry rifles manufactured by the New Haven Arms Company between April 1862 and May 1865, were standard rifles intended for sale to individual soldiers or purchased by the Ordnance Department. Relatively few factory engraved Henry rifles were manufactured during the Civil War and surviving examples are rare.

Desire? Well, that’s down to personal preference, of course. But even those of you who consider fancy scrollwork on a gun about as classy as a velvet Elvis above a Tikki bar should note that this work is exceptionally . . . restrained. Here’s an example of Mr. Hogdson’s work on a similar, less expensive Henry.

While the dandified version of “that damned Yankee rifle” is a beauty, collectors are advised to heed Wiki’s words of wisdom: “As it was designed, the rifle was not a very safe weapon. A Henry rifle, when not in use, would either have the hammer cocked or resting on the rim of the cartridge. In the first case, the rifle had no safety and was in firing position. In the second, an impact on the back of the exposed hammer could cause a chambered round to fire.”

Is that enough to put a collector off? Hardly. Despite the Henry’s high estimate and the usual blather from the auction houses, vintage gun prices are as soft as a cavalry man’s saddle. Personally, I’d prefer a 19th century Henry that saw action, or at least looked like it saw action. But I understand the desire for a bit of firearm frippery on a deeply desirable classic design. This gun’s like Angelina Jolie—back when she only had one tattoo and decided to enact a multi-ethnic version Cheaper by the Dozen in a French chateau. If you know what I mean. If you do, hide your checkbook.



Previous Post
Next Post


  1. If I wanted something really hot looking to hang on the my wall of my study, I’ll send away for a studio picture of Salma Hayek and it won’t cost six figures.

  2. “…that this work is exceptionally . . . restrained.”

    Yes, and patterned to fit the gun. So many contemporary machine-engraved guns have a very “cut and paste” look to them, with what are obviously stock patterns inserted wherever they will fit. The scrolls on this gun conform to fit the contours of the receiver, as any custom work should.

    It’s a very pretty rifle, I would love one in .357 Magnum.

  3. shot a replica 1873 in 357 at a range once. It was fun. but I have enough levers already.
    these actions cannot handle power but they are smooth.

  4. I can’t wait for the snubbie carry test, but the extreme test would be to carry the BONE COLLECTOR. The only guy in RI who has a license to carry a 50 cal is 6’8 and has two snub nose 500’s in shoulder holsters.

  5. $10K for that? It looks like crap.
    No finishing on the hammer, trigger or lever, engraving boarder rough, and wood/metal fit poor.
    I wouldn’t accept this firearm as a gift.

Comments are closed.