As an advocate for Americans’ Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms, I’ve got no problem with Call of Duty or other combat-oriented videogames. Anything that encourages Americans to safely and responsibly exercise their 2A-protected rights is a good thing, not a bad thing. We can argue over whether or not violent videogames in general—or specific games in specific (e.g., Grand Theft Auto)—accomplish that goal. But then, the First Amendment. Even though proponents of civilian disarmament will see the timing of the release of COD’s new machine gun as an affront to the memory of the victims of the Sandy Hook slaughter, it isn’t. ‘Nuff said?
here is a radio interview with the woman.
part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gTZI1BVzMg
part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoNXZU92kQc
Its “chambered” in 5.7×28 too.
Something else to consider…http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=554450714573750&set=a.158856280799864.34626.100000264791923&type=1&theater
8 maids a plinkin…
Same general premis to me: blame the thing not the person. Remember rock and roll was the DEVILS music too, but not all of us are cannibal killers roaming the land for blood are we? Moderation in all things, as well as personal responsibility. Nuff said…
I’ve been a video gamer since as far back as I can remember, cutting my teeth on the Atari 2600. Call of Duty rocks, but I’m a Battlefield fan myself…:)
Jim- Go F@!k yourself.
Well, I think it’s good. Anything that encourages normalization of guns and the feeling of ownership of them that COD and other FPS’s instill as you unlock and upgrade them over time is only a positive thing.
No lions, a lot of cheetahs here though, too corny? I thought so, Randy
Lol sorry to be that guy but what gun is that?
Great to have you here!
They don’t have everyone, but remember of you have a FOID, an FPID, a CCW permit, a sound suppressor, a short barrel rifle, short barrel shotgun, a machine gun, or if you live in NJ, Illionois, NY, CT, or CA they know you have a gun. Also dont forget the border state registration. And don’t forget the FFLs, or if you have been forced to say so by the military. That is a lot of ways to end up on a list, but it still actually leaves alot of room to have a gun and not be on the list. Realistically there is no way to have a list of everyone but that is one he’ll of a way to start.
Federal law prohibits any federal agency to keep records of who owns guns. That said they probably do have a list.
The real issue is what can they do about it, there are far more gun owners than there are federal agents.
Im almost 100% positive they know who owns guns and who doesnt.. maybe not a completely accurate accounting of all your weapons but if you’ve ever gotten a CCW or purchased a firearm where they call in to do the background check Im sure there is a list.. all anybody has to do is take a quick look at DARPA and see these guys are on top of things and thats pretty damn scary..Im not saying get your tin foil hat and start following alex jones but DARPA is in fact a real functioning body that excels at its work..
Well since Climate Change is a global phenomena, we should be seeing the same rise in murder rates everywhere, right? Dumba$$es!
Does anyone here realise that Brian Blessed was an MI-6 asset?
I didn’t think so.
OK, RF, you’ve educated your Lola very well. You’ve built a great blog. The Post comments are perhaps down on you a bit, at least all those that were written by 15 year olds. If it gets to you, I suggest trading in the Benz. Something Ferrari would provide such a lift. It seems you are single for the moment. I double down on my recommendation. Switching cars could make single-for-the-moment so fun you never wish to give it up. Besides, it would go well with the Benelli.
I am a gun owner.
I keep my weapons in a locked safe at all times when not at the range.
I have passed checks to have my firearms licence.
I think people who want to walk around carrying pistols may often be suffering from sexual inadequacy.
I wonder at 2nd amendments ‘absolutists’ who apparently can’t read the words ‘well regulated’.
I can’t understand why anyone needs military-type weapons for any sporting purpose.
I believe many of those leaving the most extreme comments here are delusional and some are profoundly mentally ill.
Hello, Mr Troll. Nice of you to join us.
I think people who want to walk around carrying pistols may often be suffering from sexual inadequacy.
Please take a moment tomorrow to remove the seat belt from your car, disable any air bags, remove all fire extinguishers from your home, and deactivate any security systems. When you’ve done all that, please unlock all of the doors and windows on both your home and your car.
Since you are clearly convinced that risk mitigation is a waste of time, I invite you to demonstrate for the rest of us how this should work in the real world.
It would be great if you and your giant manly c*ck could check back in a few months to let us know how that works out for you. Police reports detailing the number of vehicle and home burglaries you’ve suffered would be interesting reading.
If you were an individual that depended on the government an article like this shakes the cage and forces denial. To even acknowledge the idea that the entity which you have deemed your ultimate protector cannot in fact protect you would mean the structure of your entire life would be shattered. That which you considered safe is no longer safe. This is the difference between two ways of life; those that are ultimately responsible for themselves and their family, and those that defer the responsibility to others. Those that defer the responsibility may not want that responsibility or may not feel up to the requirements. Neither side will understand the other because they have completely different views of the world at pretty much every level.
The question of need has come up for me a couple times now. “Why does anyone need 30-round magazines?” “Why does anyone need an assault rifle?” Well, why do we *need* life insurance? Why do we *need* homeowners or property insurance? Why do we *need* car insurance? Do you play to kill yourself, burn down your home or place of business, or ram your car into the first thing you see? After all, why would you purchase those things if you don’t plan to use them? That’s usually the assumption, if you buy an AR, or any gun, you plan to use it with malicious intent. From the statistics we know that is not the case. Our (mostly) unrestricted Second Amendment Rights are our form of insurance policies (read protection) against crime, bodily harm, and government tyranny (in order of likelihood). I may never (and pray I will not ever) need to use those any of those protections, but denial does not protect you or your family.
Secondly, why should there be a double standard? When there is a potentially dangerous situation the police escalate to an AR with 30 round magazines. Before the police arrive, which can be quite a long time, you are the only responder. Why should your response as a law-abiding citizen be less effective than the police? Personally, I want the same effective response as soon as possible, whether it’s from my wife, my neighbor, or the police. As we’ve seen from real situations on the DGU of the day page, sometimes all it takes is the gun, most times it just takes defensive shots fired, a few times it takes hitting the intruder, and in a few cases it requires lethal action. Assuming the popular notion that police are better trained why is that even a factor when most times simply having the gun can save your life and lethal action is rarely needed. Knowing the police aren’t as well trained as most assume why would you want to wait for them? I have the utmost respect for law enforcement, but I am under no delusions, most of the time they’re there to file the paperwork after the incident, they are not in any position to stop it in the first place. That’s where our Second Amendment Rights come in.
Well, I believe the list of folks buying actual ASSAULT RIFLES is damn short. Since actual assault rifles are select fire and are absurdly expensive since the ban on their manufacture in 1986. I’d guess less than 10 have changed hands. ;^/
And just sayin’, judging the souls of other men is very poor form. You’ve lost a fan jackass.
Just spoke with Ruger in NH. A customer rep said they have no plans on selling standalone 10/22 barrels as they don’t want customers interchanging parts. So I can’t purchase the new threaded barrel portion and attach to my original stainless steel version? Booo…..
In light of this info, I think the extra pockets inside the bag were meant for cleaning rods and such, not for extra barrels.
Hey, Nick–I got my 10/22 TD at a gun show last year and really like it. I was excited to see the threaded barrel version announced at the SHOT show. I contacted Ruger to see if I could get the threaded barrel.
“We’re delighted to help Nick learn the ropes to assist him in elevating his game to a higher level.”
Translation: Foghorn is going to get his ass kicked mercilessly until he can keep up. In a good way, of course.
Congratulations, Nick. Looking forward to the stories.
Because of those that have served, I have never had to.
For that I am eternally grateful.
Ron Paul should be too.