Home » Blogs » No More Hunting With Lead? No Problem

No More Hunting With Lead? No Problem

Daniel Silverman - comments No comments

Screen Shot 2013-12-05 at 12.12.29 PM

Now that deer season is in full swing and AB 711 has put the kibosh on hunting with traditional ammo in California many of us are looking to alternatives. The whole lead scare was debunked here, but even still. While we can debate whether lead ammo is dangerous to you as a hunter, I think the whole ‘lead ammo kills wildlife’ argument has been looked upon as junk science. The only area where I might agree is in bird hunting, specifically in the wetlands here around San Francisco. We haven’t used lead shot in the San Francisco bay for decades, and the birds are doing just fine, I am happy to report . . .

So now that we are all happily freezing our backsides off in our tree stands, keeping an eye out for that ever elusive hogzilla or buck that would put bambi’s father to shame, what’s the best tool for the job? I’m sure many of you have taken your rifles to be blueprinted and spent more on a scope than you make in a month. You have more camo, funky smelling sprays and camping gear than you can shake a stick at. But why are you going after that big prize catch with bulk ammo? Are you using the stuff in the big box you snatched up at Wally World because the price was right? Sure it goes bang and it’s probably pretty accurate, but why not invest in the right tool for the job?

I got a chance to sit with my friend Scott Sterling recently who runs Monolithic Munitions. Monolithic hand builds hunting grade ammo. You could call it match grade, but shooting paper – beyond sighting in your rifle – would be a waste and honestly I couldn’t afford it. Scott and his team custom build their own, using non-lead-based bullets from GS Custom bullets out of South Africa.

Scott loves non-lead bullets for hunting. While the possibility of lead ammo causing health issues is probably quite small, it’s always better safe than sorry. More important is performance. We all want to take our catch with as few shots as possible, and have it remain humane. Having to go off and chase an animal through the woods to get a follow-up shot is a major pain. That’s why we want a bullet that works the best to it’s abilities. Accuracy, penetration and wound cavity are all important for hunters.

work_monolithic_munitions

Scott is the Mr. Wizard of ballistics and I mean that in the most endearing sense of the word. He knows more about internal, external and terminal ballistics than anyone I know. He loves bullets, eats, sleeps and breaths potassium nitrate. He can educate you on why a bullet does what it does, like Stephen Hawking’s can teach you physics. Because of his love of all things ballistic, he is a tinkerer. What does that mean? Well if you are looking for a 14.9 SOP, or the worlds fastest .223 Remington, Scott is your man.

The 14.9 SOP 1690g bullet 3000 fps.

Scott blows up fruit better than FPS Russia!

All kidding aside, the range time and testing have produced some really great loads. If you are a long-range hunter and want to give yourself the best chance at a clean kill, look no further.

The penetration of these bullets can’t be beat. Below is a shot of a ballistics gel test with the numbers.

“Testing 22-250 Remington loads 40g GS HV compared to a 40g Polymer tip varmint bullet from a major manufacturer. The HV impacted at about 4400 fps the 40g Poly tip at about 4200 fps. Notice the permanent damage of both bullets is similar. The large damage track for the HV goes 8.5” in, and what you can’t see is the HV went 26.5 “total penetration. The Poly tip only makes a good wound 2.5” in and total penetration is only 6.5” The Poly tip is a varmint bullet so it is expected to be fragile, but what really sets the HV apart is the damage in the first few inches is as good as a super fragile varmint bullet, without the lead fragments, and the penetration is equivalent to a big game bullet.”

Below is a picture of a grouping with 416 Barrett ammunition at 700 yards.

photo

His friend Chris was nice enough to stop by and show us a hog he took with a .223 round. The shot went from stern to stem and logged in the breast plate. The bullet never fragmented and did the job it was designed to do.

hog

Here’s the bullet itself. Notice how it remained intact.

Recoverd-boar-bullet-01-april-27-13-small

The bottom line is that Monolithic is the Holland & Holland of ammunition. It isn’t cheep and certainly isn’t something you will buy in bulk. But I can say that each of the hand-inspected loads will serve you well. If you are looking to step up your game in getting game, they’re worth your consideration.

0 thoughts on “No More Hunting With Lead? No Problem”

  1. Papantonio: “If you take a look at the real numbers … 1 million deaths….have taken place from guns since 1980. And that number is geometrically increasing is the best way I’ve seen it described. ”

    Well, of course it has! If you’re counting the number of deaths by firearms or murders by firearm since a particular date, any death is going to add to that number. The question is whether or not the annual rate of death/murder (whether with or without a firearm) is going up or down, and the numbers indicate that it’s been going down since the early-to-mid 1990’s:

    http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/07/gun-control-would-address-declining-crim

    Reply
  2. Crime on America’s college campuses is rampant. To suggest that you should not have a right to defend yourself against a lethal force attack there is asinine. Frankly, I’m surprised that any mindful college student wouldn’t be carrying anyway – whether legally or not.

    Obviously, the right to free speech cannot ever trump right to life. You cannot speak freely when you’re dead.

    Reply
  3. I do believe guns are great but the vast people should never have a gun. Like I said before I carry for work for 20 years never had a problem at all. If your gun goes off its your fault. Most of the people I work with are real good at gun safty. Now we have a couple of women as well and the women are the worst with a gun. One woman went to the bath room did her thing then left. # hrs later she looked at her rig and felt light yes in deed she left her gun in the bath room. How was this possible then I relized she has no need to have a gun. The gun was never recovered. Thank god she was fired. Threat to the public, Another woman was in line to get food and some how she shot her gun in her holster thank god she was fired she never should have had a gun. Then we had another female she shot her taz getting money from her front pants. she still has her job but we all know she should never have any kind of gun. All these women are a threat to the public. Bottom line in if your gun goes off you have no need or right to carry a gun. Women should never have guns they just don’t have the skill

    Reply
  4. Where DO we get these guys, Nut JObs.com??? All he has to do is to look upstream from his position in this administration to find bigger criminals than he is referring to.

    Reply
  5. Or the simpler three….

    1. ALWAYS keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.
    2. ALWAYS keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot.
    3. ALWAYS keep the gun unloaded until ready to use.

    So easy, a three year old can get it, unlike the Cooper Four.

    Reply
  6. 1. Be able to recite all four rules in your sleep.
    2. If you can’t, then stay away from all firearms.

    I get that everyone there was a jackwagon who played along and assumed the risk. Still, she was reckless, not just negligent, in firing that gun, and deserves to go to prison for many years. Too bad, so sad.

    Reply
  7. tdiinva: Where in Arlington is Westover? I used to be pretty familiar with NVA, but things have changed a lot since I’ve hung out there. It’s been decades, really. For a little while, I lived in Arlington, a couple blocks from the Naval Annex building, easy walking distance to Bailey’s Crossroads.

    Reply
  8. Steve Merchant, wildlife population and regulation program manager with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, conceded the NSSF’s point that no one can definitively say whether any species would be more abundant if lead ammunition was banned.

    Reply

Leave a Comment