The States Parties to this Treaty.
- Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.
- Recalling that the charter of the UN promotes the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world’s human and economic resources;
- Reaffirming the obligation of all State Parties to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered, in accordance with the Charter of the UN;
- Underlining the need to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade of conventional arms and to prevent their diversion to illegal and unauthorized end use, such as terrorism and organized crime;
- Recognizing the legitimate political, security, economic and commercial rights and interests of States in the international trade of conventional arms;
- Reaffirming the sovereign right and responsibility of any State to regulate and control transfers of conventional arms that take place exclusively within its territory pursuant to its own legal or constitutional systems;
- Recognizing that development, human rights and peace and security, which are three pillars of the United Nations, are interlinked and mutually reinforcing.
- Recalling the United Nations Disarmament Commission guidelines on international arms transfers adopted by the General Assembly;
- Noting the contribution made by the 2001 UN Programme of Action to preventing combating and eradicating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects, as well as the 2001 Protocol against the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in Firearms, their parts and components and ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime;
- Recognizing the security, social, economic and humanitarian consequences of the illicit trade in and unregulated trade of conventional arms;
- Recognizing the challenges faced by victims of armed conflict and their need for adequate care, rehabilitation and social and economic inclusion;
- Bearing in mind that the women and children are particularly affected in situations of conflict and armed violence;
- Emphasizing that nothing in this treaty prevents States from exercising their right to adopt additional more rigorous measures consistent with the purpose of this Treaty;
- Recognizing the legitimate international trade and lawful private ownership and use of conventional arms exclusively for, inter alia, recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities for States where such ownership and use are permitted or protected by law;
- Recognizing the active role that non-governmental organizations and civil society can play in furthering the goals and objectives of this Treaty; and
- Emphasizing that regulation of the international trade in conventional arms should not hamper international cooperation and legitimate trade in material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes;Have agreed as follows:
Guided by the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations, States Parties, In promoting the goals and objectives of this Treaty and implementing its provisions, shall act in accordance with the following principles:
- The inherent rights of all States to individual or collective self-defense;
2. Settlement of individual disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered;
3. The rights and obligations of States under applicable international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law;
4. The responsibility of all States, in accordance with their respective international obligations, to effectively regulate and control international transfer of conventional arms as well as the primary responsibility of all States to in establishing and implementing their respective national export control systems; and
5. The necessity to implement this Treaty consistently and effectively and in a universal, objective and non-discriminatory manner.
Goals and Objectives
Cognizant of the need to prevent and combat the diversion of conventional arms into the illicit market r to unauthorized end users through the improvement of regulation on the international trade in conventional arms,
The goals and objectives of this Treaty are:
– For States Parties to establish the highest possible common standards for regulating or improving regulation of the international trade in conventional arms;
– To prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and their diversion to illegal and unauthorized end use;
In order to:
– Contribute to international and regional peace, security and stability;
– Avoid that the international trade in conventional arms contributes to human suffering;
– Promote cooperation, transparency and responsibility of States Parties in the trade in conventional arms, thus building confidence among States Parties,
– A. Covered Items
– 1. This Treaty shall apply to all conventional arms within the following categories:
– a. Battle Tanks
– b. Armored combat vehicles
– c. Large-caliber Artillery systems
– d. Combat aircraft
– e. Attack helicopters
– f. Warships
– g. Missiles and missile launchers
– h. Small Arms and Light Weapons
– 2. Each State Party Shall establish and Maintain a national control system to regulate the export of munitions to the extent necessary to ensure that national controls on the export of the conventional arms covered by Paragraph a1 (a)-(h) are not circumvented by the export of munitions for those conventional arms.
– 3. Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of parts and components to the extent necessary to ensure that national controls on the export of the conventional arms covered by Paragraph A1 are not circumvented by the export of parts and components of those items.
– 4. Each State Party shall establish or update, as appropriate, and maintain a national control list that shall include the items that fall within Paragraph 1 above, as defined on a national basis, based on relevant UN instruments at a minimum. Each State Party shall publish its control list to the extent permitted by national law.
– B. Covered Activities
– 1. This Treaty shall apply to those activities of the international trade in conventional arms covered in paragraph a1 above, and set out in Articles 6-10, hereafter referred to as “transfer.”
– 2. This Treaty shall not apply to the international movement of conventional arms by a State Party or its agents for its armed forces or law enforcement authorities operating outside its national territories, provided they remain under the State Party’s ownership.
- A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty if the transfer would violate any obligation under any measure adopted by the United Nations Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular arms embargoes.
- A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty if the transfer would violate its relevant international obligations, under international agreements, to which it is a Party, in particular those relating to the international transfer of, or illicit trafficking in, conventional arms.
- A State Party shall not authorize a transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty for the purpose of facilitating the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes constituting grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, or serious violations of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949.
- Each State Party, in considering whether to authorize an export of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty, shall, prior to authorization and through national control systems, make an assessment specific to the circumstances of the transfer based on the following criteria:
- Whether the proposed export of conventional arms would:
- Be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law;
- Be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international human rights law;
- Contribute to peace and security;
- Be used to commit or facilitate an act constituting an offense under international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism or transnational organized crime, to which the transferring State is a Party;
- In making the assessment, the transferring State Party shall apply the criteria set out in Paragraph 2 consistently and in an objective and non-discriminatory manner and in accordance with the principles set out in this Treaty, taking into account relevant factors, including information provided by the importing State.
4. In assessing the risk pursuant to Paragraph 2, the transferring State Party may also take into consideration the establishment of risk mitigation measures including confidence-building measures and jointly developed programs by the exporting and importing State.
5. If in the view of the authorizing State Party, this assessment, which would include any actions that may be taken in accordance with Paragraph 4, constitutes a substantial risk, the State Party shall not authorize the transfer.
- Each State Party, when authorizing an export, shall consider taking feasible measures, including joint actions with other States involved in the transfer, to avoid the transferred arms:
- being diverted to the illicit market;
- be used to commit or facilitate gender-based violence or violence against children;
- become subject to corrupt practices; or
- adversely impact the development of the recipient State.
- Each State Party shall implement this Treaty in a consistent, objective and non-discriminatory manner in accordance with the goals and objectives of this Treaty;
- The implementation of this Treaty shall not prejudice previous or future obligations undertaken with regards to international instruments, provided that those obligations are consistent with the goals and objectives of this Treaty. This Treaty shall not be cited as grounds for voiding contractual obligations under defense cooperation agreements concluded by States Parties to this Treaty.
- Each State Party shall take all appropriate legislative and administrative measures necessary to implement the provisions of this Treaty and designate competent national authorities in order to have an effective, transparent and predictable national control system regulating the transfer of conventional arms;
- Each State Party shall establish one or more national contact points to exchange information on matters related to the implementation of this Treaty. A State Party shall notify the Implementation Support Unit (See Article 13) of its national contact point(s) and keep the information updated.
- State Parties involved in a transfer of conventional arms shall, in a manner consistent with the principles of this Treaty, take appropriate measures to prevent diversion to the illicit market or to unauthorized end-users. All State Parties shall cooperate, as appropriate, with the exporting State to that end.
- . If a diversion is detected the State or States Parties that made the decision shall verify the State or States Parties that could be affected by such diversion, in particulate those State Parties that are involved in the transfer, without delay.
- Each State Party shall take the appropriate measures, within national laws and regulations, to regulate transfers of conventional arms within the scope of the Treaty.
- Each State Party shall conduct risk assessments, as detailed in Articles 4 and 5, whether to grant authorizations for the transfer of conventional arms under the scope of this Treaty. State Parties shall apply Articles 3-5 consistently, taking into account all relevant information, including the nature and potential use of the items to be transferred and the verified end-user in the country of final destination.
- Each State Party shall take measures to ensure all authorizations for the export of conventional arms under the scope of the Treaty are detailed and issued prior to the export. Appropriate and relevant details of the authorization shall be made available to the importing, transit and transshipment State Parties, upon request.
- Importing State Parties shall take measures to ensure that appropriate and relevant information is provided, upon request, to the exporting State Party to assist the exporting State in its criteria assessment and to assist in verifying end users.
- State Parties shall put in place adequate measures that will allow them, where necessary, to monitor and control imports of items covered by the scope of the Treaty. State Parties shall also adopt appropriate measures to prevent the diversion of imported items to unauthorized end users or to the illicit market.
- Importing State Parties may request, where necessary, information from the exporting State Party concerning potential authorizations.
- Each State Party shall take the appropriate measures, within national laws and regulations, to control brokering taking place under its jurisdiction for conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty.
Transit and Transshipment
- Each State Party shall adopt appropriate legislative, administrative or other measures to monitor and control, where necessary and feasible, conventional arms covered by this Treaty that transit or transship through territory under its jurisdiction, consistent with international law with due regard for innocent passage and transit passage;
- Importing and exporting States Parties shall cooperate and exchange information, where feasible and upon request, to transit and transshipment States Parties, in order to mitigate the risk of discretion;
Reporting, Record Keeping and Transparency
- Each State Party shall maintain records in accordance with its national laws and regardless of the items referred to in Article 2, Paragraph A, with regards to conventional arms authorization or exports, and where feasible of those items transferred to their territory as the final destination, or that are authorized to transit or transship their territory, respectively.
- Such records may contain: quantity, value, model/type, authorized arms transfers, arms actually transferred, details of exporting State(s), recipient State(s), and end users as appropriate. Records shall be kept for a minimum of ten years, or consistent with other international commitments applicable to the State Party.
- States Parties may report to the Implementation Support Unit on an annual basis any actions taken to address the diversion of conventional arms to the illicit market.
- Each State Party shall, within the first year after entry into force of this Treaty for that State Party, provide an initial report to States Parties of relevant activities undertaken in order to implement this Treaty; including inter alia, domestic laws, regulations and administrative measures. States Parties shall report any new activities undertaken in order to implement this Treaty, when appropriate. Reports shall be distributed and made public by the Implementation Support Unit.
- Each State Party shall submit annually to the Implementation Support Unit by 31 May a report for the preceding calendar year concerning the authorization or actual transfer of items included in Article 2, Paragraph A1. Reports shall be distributed and made public by the Implementation Support Unit. The report submitted to the Implementation Support Unit may contain the same type of information submitted by the State Party to other relevant UN bodies, including the UN Register of Conventional Arms. Reports will be consistent with national security sensitivities or be commercially sensitive.
- Each State Party shall adopt national legislation or other appropriate national measures regulations and policies as may be necessary to implement the obligations of this Treaty.
IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT UNIT
- This Treaty hereby establishes an Implementation Support Unit to assist States Parties in its implementation.
- The ISU shall consist of adequate staff, with necessary expertise to ensure the mandate entrusted to it can be effectively undertaken, with the core costs funded by States Parties.
- The implementation Support Unit, within a minimized structure and responsible to States Parties, shall undertake the responsibilities assigned to it in this Treaty, inter alia:
- Receive distribute reports, on behalf of the Depository, and make them publicly available;
- Maintain and Distribute regularly to States Parties the up-to-date list of national contact points;
- Facilitate the matching of offers and requests of assistance for Treaty implementation and promote international cooperation as requested;
- Facilitate the work of the Conference of States Parties, including making arrangements and providing the necessary service es for meetings under this Treaty; and
- Perform other duties as mandated by the Conference of States Parties.
- States Parties shall designate national points of contact to act as a liaison on matters relating to the implementation of this Treaty.
- States Parties shall cooperate closely with one another, as appropriate, to enhance the implementation of this Treaty consistent with their respective security interests and legal and administrative systems.
States Parties are encouraged to facilitate international cooperation, including the exchange of information on matters of mutual interest regarding the implementation and application of this Treaty in accordance with their national legal system. Such voluntary exchange of information may include, inter alia, information on national implementation measures as well as information on specific exporters, importers and brokers and on any prosecutions brought domestically, consistent with commercial and proprietary protections and domestic laws, regulations and respective legal and administrative systems.
4. Each State Party is encouraged to maintain consultations and to share information, as appropriate, to support the implementation of this Treaty, including through their national contact points.
5. States Parties shall cooperate to enforce the provisions of this Treaty and combat breaches of this Treaty, including sharing information regarding illicit activities and actors to assist national enforcement and to counter and prevent diversion. States Parties may also exchange information on lessons learned in relation to any aspect of this Treaty, to develop best practices to assist national implementation.
- In fulfilling the obligation of this Treaty, States Parties may seek, inter alia, legal assistance, legislative assistance, technical assistance, institutional capacity building, material assistance or financial assistance. States, in a position to do so, shall provide such assistance. States Parties may contribute resources to a voluntary trust fund to assist requesting States Parties requiring such assistance to implement the Treaty.
- States Parties shall afford one another the widest measure of assistance, consistent with their respective legal and administrative systems, in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to the violations of the national measures implemented to comply with obligations under of the provisions of this Treaty.
- Each State Party may offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and other forms of assistance as needed, upon request.
Signature, Ratification, Acceptance, Approval or Accession
- This Treaty shall be open for signature on [date] at the United Nations Headquarters in New York by all States and regional integration organizations.
- This Treaty is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval of the Signatories.
- This Treaty shall be open for accession by any state and regional integration organization that has not signed the Treaty.
4. The instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be deposited with the Depositary.
5. The Depositary shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States and regional integration organizations of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession and the date of the entry into force of this Treaty, and of the receipt of notices.
6. “Regional integration organization” shall mean an organization constituted by sovereign States of a given region, to which its Member States have transferred competence in respect of matters governed by this Treaty and which has been duly authorized, in accordance with its internal procedures, to sign, ratify, accept, approve or accede to it.
7. At the time of its ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, a regional integration organization shall declare the extent of its competence with respect to matters governed by this Treaty. Such organizations shall also inform the Depositary of any relevant modifications in the extent of it competence.
8. References to “State Parties” in the present Treaty shall apply to such organizations within the limits of their competence.
Entry into Force
- This Treaty shall enter into force thirty days following the date of the deposit of the sixty-fifth instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval with the Depositary.
- For any State or regional integration organization that deposits its instruments of accession subsequent to the entry into force of the Treaty, the Treaty shall enter into force thirty days following the date of deposit of its instruments of accession.
- For the purpose of Paragraph 1 and 2 above, any instrument deposited by a regional integration organization shall not be counted as additional to those deposited by Member States of that organization.
Withdrawal and Duration
- This Treaty shall be of unlimited duration.
- Each State Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Convention. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties from this Convention. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties and to the Depositary. The instrument of withdrawal shall include a full explanation of the reasons motivating this withdrawal.
- A state shall not be discharged, by reason of its withdrawal, from the obligations arising from this treaty while it was a party to the Treaty, including any financial obligations, which may have accrued.
- Each State party, in exercising its national sovereignty, may formulate reservations unless the reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of this Treaty.
- At any time after the Treaty’s entry into force, a State Party may propose an amendment to this Treaty.
- Any proposed amendment shall be submitted in writing to the Depository, which will then circulate the proposal to all States Parties, not less than 180 days before next meeting of the Conference of States Parties. The amendment shall be considered at the next Conference of States Parties if a majority of States Parties notify the Implementation Support Unit that they support further consideration of the proposal no later than 180 days after its circulation by the Depositary.
- Any amendment to this Treaty shall be adopted by consensus, or if consensus is not achieved, by two-thirds of the States Parties present and voting at the Conference of States Parties. The Depositary shall communicate any amendment to all States Parties.
- A proposed amendment adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of this Article shall enter into force for all States Parties to the Treaty that have accepted it, upon deposit with the Depositary. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of accession.
Conference of States Parties
- The Conference of States Parties shall be convened not later than once a year following the entry into force of this Treaty. The Conference of States Parties shall adopt rules of procedure and rules governing its activities, including the frequency of meetings and rules concerning payment of expenses incurred in carrying out those activities.
The Conference of States Parties shall:
a. Consider and adopt recommendations regarding the implementation of this Treaty, in particular the promotion of its universality; TR
b. Consider amendments to this Treaty;
c. Consider and decide the work and budget of the Implementation Support Unit;
d. Consider the establishment of any subsidiary bodies as may be necessary to improve the functioning of the Treaty;
e. Perform any other function consistent with this Treaty.
3. If circumstances merit, an exceptional meeting of the State Parties may be convened if required and resources allow.
- States Parties shall consult and cooperate with each other to settle any dispute that may arise with regard to the interpretation or application of this Treaty.
- States Parties shall settle any dispute between them concerning the interpretation or application of this Treat though negotiations or other peaceful means of the Parties mutual choice.
- States Parties may pursue, by mutual consent, third party arbitration to settle any dispute between them, regarding issues concerning the implementation of this Treaty.
Relations with States not party to this Treaty
- States Parties shall apply Articles 3-5 to all transfers of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty to those not party to this Treaty.
Relationship with other instruments
- States Parties shall have the right to enter into agreements on the trade in conventional arms with regards to the international trade in conventional arms, provided that those agreements are compatible with their obligations under this Treaty and do not undermine the objects and purposes of this Treaty.
Depositary and Authentic Texts
- The Secretary-General of the United Nations is the Depositary of this Treaty.
- The original text of this Treaty, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic.
point 14 lists uses of firearms but i don’t see self defense as 1 of the uses. am i being paranoid here.
“Each State Party, when authorizing an export, shall consider taking feasible measures….to avoid the transferred arms:being diverted to the illicit market; be used to commit or facilitate gender-based violence or violence against children; become subject to corrupt practices; or adversely impact the development of the recipient State.”
What? So I’m assuming that all foreign gun manufacturers are going to insist in micro-stamping, really aggressive gun registration, repeated firearm owner education (otherwise the gun could be used in gender-based violence / crimes against children or become the subject of “corrupt practices.”)
Here we go – we’ve found a way to import European gun bans into the U.S. by restricting the market. Now all they need to do is kill off the American gun producers’ ability to sell to civilians and they’re golden….
The self defense bit–
Guided by the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations, States Parties, In promoting the goals and objectives of this Treaty and implementing its provisions, shall act in accordance with the following principles:
A.The inherent rights of all States to individual or collective self-defense;”
I am still vehemently opposed to this treaty. More regulation, more money wasted, and more potential for abuse. Kill it before it grows, and smack any politician that supports this or similar actions. The UN has no business here.
OHgunner, the section supports the self-defense of nations (States) to defend themselves or to join with other nations (think NATO). The section does NOT support the right to self-defense of individuals.
Damn, my reading comprehension is terrible today. You are correct. I’ll put myself in the corner. Now if only I could find that dunce hat… Where did I leave it??
Each State Party shall adopt appropriate legislative, administrative or other measures to monitor and control, where necessary and feasible, conventional arms covered by this Treaty [e.g. small arms, Article 2.1.h] that transit or transship through territory under its jurisdiction, consistent with international law with due regard for innocent passage and transit passage;(Emphasis mine)
AKA, big brother will watch you as you travel with fire arms.
I don’t like that provision or this one (Section 8(B)):
“State Parties shall put in place adequate measures that will allow them, where necessary, to monitor and control imports of items covered by the scope of the Treaty. State Parties shall also adopt appropriate measures to prevent the diversion of imported items to unauthorized end users or to the illicit market.”
While these provisions could be implemented in a fair way–meaning targeted only against illegal gun trafficking, with law abiding citizens carved out–they could also be used by members of Congress as an excuse to broaden gun regulation in general.
And how many states have already been in or violated a large number of these policies?
It is vague in many areas, and certainly open to interpretation. I say no!
i already belong to the nra. read this and went to the website for the second amendment foundation and signed up there as well.
Do we even need to discuss this? It is a vague, ambiguous, and abstract. We all know that this will be used as another anti-liberty and anti- private citizen weapon. Like so many other previous treaties, programs, laws, acts, etc it will be expanded upon over the years and decades to become ever more restrictive and suffocating. Think boa constrictor wrapped around you and slowly taking your breathe away.
Secure PDF available?
Cool story brah. Real talk though could someone post a cliffs version?
I did not take/waste the time to read through this gigantic turd of a piece of “legislation”. No offense to turds, they actually hold some value. All the tyrant mustafas and other third world dictators must just laugh their ass off when even a portion of the drivel they pour out actually gets enacted into law by a real country.
WHY DO WE LISTEN TO THESE PEOPLE?!?! Imagine a guy on a ledge getting screamed at to jump, we’re not even on the ledge yet, but they’re in our cubicle, somehow gaining traction. For the love of America, EJECT the monstrosity that is the U.N. from our hallowed shores, GAH!
Honestly, I’m not terribly worried about this treaty, and here’s why:
Because this is an international treaty, it would (in theory, at least) have to go through the Senate for ratification, and a 2/3 majority would have to sign off on it. Since more than 1/3 of the Senate has declared opposition to it, this should not get off the ground. Maybe I’m naive for thinking that, when it comes to something like this, the Constitution still matters, but I’m more worried about domestic gun control than any attempt by the U.N.
TL;DR – There aren’t enough Senate votes to ratify the treaty if Obama’s administration signs it.
I would like to respectfully suggest you re-read that part of the Constitution. Treaties require ratification by 2/3 of the Senators that are PRESENT, and that could lead to a very different outcome…
Apparently, Latin is also one of the official languages of the United Nations, since I saw “inter alia” almost as many times as “arms.” What this tissue of verbage boils down to is third world dictators may continue acting as before, first world nations that hate guns will pass more restrictions, and more and more people will come to the United States, seeking freedom.
We need a president who will tell the U.N. that unless it confines itself to handing out rice and vaccines and making catalogues of statues and such, it can feel free to pull up stumps for the banana republic of its choice.
The term “inter alia” is a common legal term. It essentially means “among other things” denoting that the list that follows is not complete.
Here’s my interpretation of the treaty (for what it’s worth I am an attorney, but I don’t practice international law. I practice complex commercial litigation).
This treaty is designed to prevent the export of weapons to human rights abusers, which is something that I think we can all agree is a laudable goal (whether this will accomplish that goal is another question entirely).
At its core, this treaty requires that the signing state (e.g., the U.S. federal government) create a “control system” (i.e., bureaucracy) to review the proposed export of weapons to make sure they won’t be used in genocide or other such things. For example, if Colt wanted to sell 10,000 rifles to a warlord in Africa, the newly created government agency would say no. If, instead, Colt wanted to sell a ton of M4s to the French military (all that rail space is perfect for mounting their white flags), the sale would be approved.
I don’t think this concept is a problem from a 2A prospective. The new federal “control system” would only cover exports, which doesn’t affect us. Nothing would stop companies for selling their guns domestically. From an economic prospective, however, requiring government approval for international sales would be a burden on American businesses. The question is whether the regulatory burden is worth it. I’d say no. Countries like the U.S. are not the problem. The problem is countries like Iran, and I doubt we can trust them to properly govern their own exports.
The other thing this treaty requires, and the one thing that could cause a problem from a gun rights prospective, is the requirement that the State “monitor and control, where necessary and feasible, conventional arms covered by this Treaty that transit or transship through territory under its jurisdiction.”
While this requirement doesn’t necessarily mean that firearms in private hands will be tracked, it would require Congress to take some action on the subject, and that is risky. It is one thing to prevent a bill from passing. Here, however, a bill must be passed. So, we are left battling over the terms. This provides gun control advocates the opportunity to try to slip in language that goes beyond the bare minimum required by the treaty.
Overall, while I certainly would like to prevent the transfer of weapons to warlords and terrorist organizations, given that each country is essentially self-regulating under this treaty, I doubt it would have any effect. Add in the uncertainty of the “monitor and control” provision, and I am definitely opposed to the treaty.
That system already exists for most arms and ammunition, from pistols through artillery systems. Most sales to legitimate governments are done through Foreign Military Sales (FMS), where the government in question is purchasing directly from the US Government (can you say Mexico?). Those that aren’t FMS go through Direct Commercial Sales, which the US Government still has approval for. Technically, I don’t think that there is anything directly stopping a private company in the US from selling arms to a party overseas, but the shipment still has to clear customs, and if the company wants to stay in Uncle Sugar’s good graces, they will use one of the means above to get there wares overseas.
None of these measures stop illicit arms trading, and neither will the proposed treaty.
This treaty is designed to prevent the export of weapons to human rights abusers, which is something that I think we can all agree is a laudable goal
That’s a specious argument. Sorry, but I don’t think that it’s a laudible goal, since “human rights abusers” will be defined by people who wouldn’t know a human right from an organic tomato.
I assure you that Israel is considered a “human rights abuser” by Islamic republics, that Islamic republics are considered human rights abusers by anyone with a brain, that the US will be considered a human rights abuser by numerous nations, including some of our allies, and I could go on and on.
Representatives contacted. I took the time to read the entire draft, and needless to say, the vague wording and open endedness of this document is disgusting. This serves as a means of prevent rebellion of repressed populaces (under the label of terrorists/criminals), a drain of taxpayer dollars in funding infrastructure, (monitor and control) is treading on thin ice, and the most suspect (v.Perform other duties as mandated by the Conference of States Parties.) sounds a lot like a loophole to slip in more control if the whole world just shrugs and stops paying attention.
More government, more “controls,” more restrictions = more tax $ and more chances for gun control. That cost burden has to be carried by someone.
Secondly, I don’t see why they couldn’t just pass a law that would make it illegal to sell firearms to known international felons. It is already illegal to sell guns to felons in the US.
Thirdly, the Fast and Furious scandal was clearly a violation of morality and common sense. No Arms Trade Treaty was necessary for us to see that.
Fourth, those who would support this treaty are the same Pols trying to bury the F&F scandal.
Fifth, international pressure would be placed on the US to sign this treaty. Cost, constitutionality, and common sense be damned – there are a host of liberals who want to jump on this bandwagon.
I therefore vehemently oppose this treaty.
A strongly worded letter, if there ever was one.
Article 2(A)1: Each State Party shall establish or update, as appropriate, and maintain a national control list that shall include the items that fall within Paragraph 1 above, as defined on a national basis, based on relevant UN instruments at a minimum. Each State Party shall publish its control list to the extent permitted by national law.
That’s registration, folks.
Hard to say. The treaty is aimed at bulk sales, so it may mean a way to track transactions from the exporter to the buyer who then resells in bulk to a third party. It does not say that, which is why this treaty is open for abuse. In its current form it is a piece of crap.
I understand the intent of the treaty. As you say, it is incredibly poorly worded. What’s the old saying? A camel is a horse designed by committee.
Yep, and this committee sucked.
Here is an example of a control list.
Well boys and girls, this is obviously a document that promotes freedom and independence and expanded liberty throughout the world.
No wonder all the powerful people want it signed. No wonder all the little Marxists are in love with it.
What do you think. Is it going to promote liberty or diminish it? Has any act by any of these people actually ever done anything to improve liberty for anyone?
They are lying and they know it! But they want to do it anyway and so the lies will continue until they get what they want, And the media of course, agree with them!
“Has any act by any of these people actually ever done anything to improve liberty for anyone?”
Yes. Without the UN we would have one large Korea under harsh dictatorship.
Both the liberation of Kuwait and the war in Iraq were conducted under the auspices of UN resolutions.
There are more examples, but those are the most relevant to the US.
Let us not forget, this is the same UN that was set to give the UN Humanitarian Award to Gaddafi.
Yep!! The same UN that seems to think that being on US soil gives them the right to dictate any and all US Laws through the buying and selling of our political machinery and all it’s little gears and cogs(politicians)!!!!
What? The UN does not do that. Sorry, but this crosses into tinfoil hat territory.
It is plain and simple!!! It is just another means to over regulate and control our ownership of firearms!! Although it is vague and poorly worded for the common man it is way too open to be passed or approved by any common sense person or persons!!!
But we all know how much common sense our government has and uses!!!
I SAY NO!! Kill this treaty before it becomes a noose around our proverbial neck!!!
The following parts of the treaty would be used by the anti-gun left in the US to create a national registration scheme – one of their consistent wet dreams for America:
” A. Covered Items
– 1. This Treaty shall apply to all conventional arms within the following categories:
– h. Small Arms and Light Weapons
– 2. Each State Party Shall establish and Maintain a national control system to regulate the export of munitions to the extent necessary … [firearms registration]
– 3. Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of parts and components … [magazines and ammo registration]
– 4. Each State Party shall establish or update, as appropriate, and maintain a national control list that shall include the items that fall within Paragraph 1 above, as defined on a national basis, based on relevant UN instruments at a minimum. [UN determines which items have to be in the national database].”
Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe the statements of the anti-gun left that “this won’t interfere with your 2nd Amendment rights”?
This “TREATY” can kiss my whole white ASS.
Each State Party shall take all appropriate legislative and administrative measures necessary to implement the provisions of this Treaty and designate competent national authorities in order to have an effective, transparent and predictable national control system regulating the transfer of conventional arms;
Not only does it call for a National Control System…..You need “competent” national authorities. Two problems in one paragraph.
i’ve got only one thing to say, if these a$$holes think i am giving up my constitutional right to keep and bear arms then they must have their heads tremendously far up their buttholes,PERIOD!!! kiss my ass.
As a retired police officer after reading the the draft of the UN arms treaty I am 100% opposed to it. there are several sections of it that will affect the rights of law abiding citizens rightsto carry a firearm for self defense as shown in the above replys which I have read. I believe that this treaty will lead to a national registery list by the federal government which be access by the UN. I hope that the Senate has the courage and wisdom not ratify this treaty.
So sick of our government trading on us.
need i say more . Soooooooo sick of our government trading on us.
Having read this I thought it was very informative. I appreciate you finding the time and effort to put
this information together. I once again ind myself personally spending way too much time both readig
and posting comments. Buut so what, it was still worth it!