FPC Sues City of Philadelphia Over Shutdown of Gun Permit Unit

Philadelphia police commissioner Danielle Outlaw

Philadelphia Police Commissioner Danielle Outlaw talks with the media. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

From the Firearms Policy Coalition . . .

Yesterday, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and two individuals filed a new federal Second and Fourteenth Amendment lawsuit against the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, its Police Commissioner, Danielle Outlaw, and Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Colonel Robert Evanchick, challenging their laws and policies that infringe law-abiding individuals’ right to bear arms in public. The case, Fetsurka, et al. v. City of Philadelphia, et al., can be found at FPCLegal.org.

The plaintiffs are represented by Adam Kraut, FPC’s Director of Legal Strategy, FPC litigation attorney William Sack, Raymond DiGuiseppe of The DiGuiseppe Law Firm, and Joshua Prince of Civil Rights Defense Firm.

“The recent shutdown of the City’s Gun Permit Unit places Philadelphians who want to carry handguns for self-defense in a particularly dangerous position,” said FPC’s Adam Kraut. “Pennsylvania law prohibits individuals from carrying a firearm in Philadelphia without a license to carry firearms. And State law also prohibits individuals from carrying firearms in public during a declared State of Emergency, which Pennsylvania has been under since Governor Wolf’s 2018 proclamation. Philadelphians who do not have a license are now being completely denied their rights on pain of severe criminal penalties. The Commonwealth’s and City’s laws and polices, and their related enforcement actions, are an unconstitutional total ban on the the right to bear arms. We look forward to vindicating the rights of our clients and all who wish to carry firearms in public for self-defense.”

Open carry I voted protest pennsylvania

A gun rights advocate with an “I VOTED” sticker on his holster gathers with others for an annual rally on the steps of the state Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

“It is ironic and outrageous that people are being denied their fundamental right to keep and bear arms in the same city where the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution were signed,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “The City of Brotherly Love doesn’t have any love for the Second Amendment or the rights of its residents, but the Constitution and our Supreme Court have taken their policy choices off the table. FPC will continue fighting forward and work to restore the right to keep and bear arms across the United States. Through this case, other FPC lawsuits, and many more cases that will be filed very soon, FPC will fight for the People who should and must prevail over unconstitutional policies and authoritarians.”

Recently, Firearms Policy Coalition has filed several major federal Second Amendment lawsuits, including challenges to Pennsylvania’s ban on carry by adults under 21 years of age (Lara v. Evanchick), California’s Handgun Ban and “Roster” laws (Renna v. Becerra), Maryland’s carry ban (Call v. Jones), New Jersey’s carry ban (Bennett v. Davis), New York City’s carry ban (Greco v. New York City), the federal ban on the sale of handguns and handgun ammunition by federal firearm licensees (FFLs) to adults under 21 years of age (Reese v. BATFE), and others, with many more cases being prepared today. To follow these and other legal cases FPC is actively working on, visit the Legal Action section of FPC’s website or follow FPC on InstagramTwitterFacebookYouTube.

comments

  1. avatar The Crimson Pirate says:

    Nice.

    FPC is really on the attack.

  2. avatar Iggy says:

    Larry is probably buying a new suit

    1. avatar Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR says:

      I highly doubt Larry’s suit costs 20 thousand USD…

      1. avatar Montana Actual says:

        Two suits then?

  3. avatar Steve Eisenberg says:

    “Police Commissioner Outlaw” pretty much says it all.

    1. avatar Tom in Oregon says:

      Yup. She left Portland when things got warm over here.
      If you look back at her career, she’s done nothing but get promoted from one position, division, etc. to the next.
      it doesn’t appear that she was in any position long enough to really do anything except be able to check a box that she was there.

      Good riddance to bad rubbish.

  4. avatar Darkman says:

    It’s a good thing the Founding Patriots didn’t wait on a Court to secure Our Rights. Instead they kicked the King’s Courts Ass. Keep Your Powder Dry.

    1. avatar Victoria Illinois says:

      Around here, the DMV is closed. If your driver’s license or license plate has expired, it is automatically extended. Same should be for this. If they prevent you from following the rules, they void their ‘rules’.

  5. avatar LarryinTX says:

    WTF is an “electronic arm”?

    1. avatar Hush says:

      Larry, I don’t know, I’d like to know. Most likely it is battery operated and rechargeable. Might come in handy, who knows…………

    2. avatar TheAnonymousLawyer says:

      Exactly what it sounds like in the context… electricity based weapons (tasers, shockers, etc)

      1. avatar Hush says:

        That’s it Larry, cattle prods. Now it makes sense……..

    3. avatar MICHAEL A CROGNALE says:

      tasers and like items.

  6. avatar Burbank3 says:

    Slowly trying to whittle away at our rights.

  7. avatar albert sand says:

    Thats true thats GOVT

  8. avatar Montana Actual says:

    I applaud the effort, but the system does not care about your lawsuits or your rights. Only one way to “make them respect the right to carry.

    Show them. (and not the Virginia way)

  9. avatar GS650G says:

    Philly hates the preemption clause. They want their own little rules. It’s a shame they cant redraw the State lines and give it to Jersey.

    1. avatar Alan says:

      Yes, Philadelphia has always wanted it’s own little laws. Of course, it also wants full access to State funds. Can it have it’s cake haven’t eaten it is an interesting question, the answer to which might well be even more interesting.

  10. avatar Top says:

    Why has PA been in a state if emergency since 2018? Did Chancellor Wolf know something about COVID a year or so ahead if the rest if the world?

    1. avatar Who Dat Ninja says:

      Dipshit Wolf declared a state of emergency over the “Opioid Crisis.”

      1. avatar Top says:

        Oh, that seems like a good use of infringement of civil rights. Sorta opened the door for whatever Herr Wolfe wanted to do in the future.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email