Previous Post
Next Post

German artist Simon Menner has shot – er – photographed snipers doing what snipers do. You can see a few more at‘s post or all of them at Menner’s site. Menner says that the German Army was kind enough to loan him two shooters for a day to get it done. Can you spot the shooter?

Previous Post
Next Post


  1. Not in that one, no. I did find the sniper in two of the pics, but that was only because I knew there was one in the picture.

  2. Well, I failed trying to locate the sniper and probability would be dead if I had to go up against this guy. But it is cool as hell how hid himself like that.

  3. I went to the website with all of the pictures and I could not spot one! Which means, at the very least, that if the government sends snipers after me I am screwed.

    • When they circled the sniper, I think I could see something, but even then I didn’t see a sniper. *BANG* I’m dead. Glad I was never on sniper duty in Vietnam.

    • There are thermal netting that can be applied that can significantly reduce a mans thermal signature. But it is incredibly variable dependent. Cold weather, completely open terrain, deserts make it harder to hide, but drones are nowhere like the movies, I have watched motorcycles disappear cause the sensor operator lose sight of it cause it took a left when he thought it would take a right, and he couldn’t find it again. Its like looking thru a soda straw sometimes. Its a great asset and a game changer, but they still have a lot of weaknesses.

      • What seans said. I was looking for a carjacking suspect who fled into heavily forested hillside on a warm day. A helo arrived with a FLIR (forward – looking infrared). Even though the suspect had taken his shirt off, neither the chopper nor I could see a damn thing. The suspect was subsequently found with a patrol dog.

        If a chopper with a FLIR couldn’t see that dirtbag with his shirt off, a FLIR may very well have trouble against a trained sniper intentionally minimizing his thermal signature. Your FLIR mileage may vary.

    • It depends on which scene we’re talking about. Probably pretty effective in the one above. Some of the ones taken in wooded area? Not very. Even a thermal imager can’t see through thick vegetation. The canopy would break up the heat signature to some extent. The thicker the canopy, the more invisible the sniper.

    • A drone with a thermal image device would do quite well against the snipers, I think. They’d be toast, which is what all snipers should be.

      • Snipers are a necessary part of warfare when you need one guy to shoot the enemy without them being able to hit him back. Your wording seems to imply that it is morally wrong for the sniper to do what they do. So how are they supposed to fight? No war is about fighting fair.

  4. Not even gonna lie. I didn’t get a single one at theguardian. However, theguardian has one marked incorrectly, at least according to his site. The sixth one down, the grassy field, they have a small dark patch circled, and noted as “just left of the centre.” The same photo on his site doesn’t have it marked, but has it noted as “slightly right of the center,” and you can see what the photographer is referring to. Once you’ve looked at several of his images, the same “tuft of grass” seems to be more obvious in some of them. I mean, I still didn’t find it on first examination, but once you know where it is, you find a consistent shape/size/texture in some, but not all of the photos. The trick would be learning to recognize that in the wild.

    Also, theguardian’s final photo, I think they may have it mismarked, though I can’t tell for sure. The photographer’s site has it noted as “behind the sapling in the left center,” and I think theguardian’s mark isn’t far enough to the left.

    Either way, I wouldn’t have seen him, and I’d be dead before I found him. Glad he’s not pointed at me.

    • My first thought was the tuft on the right and then switched to the left before scrolling down. I actually got more than half of them. Not quickly enough to keep myself from being shot, but yeah.

  5. Dan: The artist makes it crystal clear who the snipers were: The German Army, Bundeswehr, loaned him two snipers for a day.

  6. On of my favorite shows on TV in recent years was a show featuring sniper training. I can’t recall was service branch it was from, but the practical test was amazing to watch. They had to maneuver into position, signal to an observer they were going to take a shot, take the shot, then wait as instructors with binoculars look for them. If they couldn’t spot him, he took another shot, and they looked again. If they couldn’t find him, the observer would walk within several feet of the sniper with a large pole standing straight up, and the instructors would look for the sniper again. If they couldn’t see the sniper, the sniper passed the course. Amazing. Even my wife was amazed and loved it.

      • Yep, that’s what I meant by “They had to maneuver into position…” but didn’t detail it enough to give them the credit they deserve. Amazing stuff!

      • Its the marines not the army, the army has you fire, then a observer comes within the set distance radios it in, then is walked on, if he is within a foot of you when the observer calls sniper you fail, if not you then have to read a card the observer holds on his chest. Read it correctly you pass. You don’t have to fire a second shot for the army’s stalking portion.

  7. Spotted six, but only because I knew there was a sniper there to begin with which isn’t really fair. And I was only *sure* of two of them (the two where you can see the guy’s scope as a perfect circle), the rest were mostly guesses based on where he could be and what didn’t look right.

    Once you realize that the camera has the viewpoint of the sniper’s target, you can filter out most of the picture as places where a sniper definitely wouldn’t be if he wanted to shoot at the camera.

    The one where the guy set up a fake hide blew my mind. I totally thought I had him. =/

  8. Barely, in a couple images. They’re very, very good at what they do. Even if what they do is disreputable, in my humble opinion…

    • Disreputable? You have no stomach for effective warfare?

      I gotta say, I’m a bit surprised given some of the other comments you have made here.

    • Disreputable? Individual marksmen and quasi snipers are our best bet in the event of insurrection. You’d better get over your objection to them quick and start training or else stop espousing the inflammatory rhetoric you’re know for.

    • WB, its was Redcoats in formation and colonials behind trees. What is disreputable is grapeshot aimed at disarmed peasants, whether that grapeshot is the original or the high-tech versions.

    • So you’re against assymetrical warfare? One of the most cost effective assets a country can have is snipers.

      And for the record, I’d have been dead if I’dhad to spot those snipers.

    • People have been hating snipers for as long as snipers have existed. It is a natural extension of the Greek phalanx style of fighting, since Western Civilization since that time on has admired the courage of men who have stood up tall, shoulder to shoulder and faced death head on. Probably why we like football better than soccer, too.

      Archers were hated by knights, until the English realized what they had with the Welsh longbow. Captain Patrick Ferguson decided not to shoot George Washington in the back because he felt it was dishonorable. And the US Army shut down formal sniper training after Korea and after Vietnam. The current school was started in 1987.

      • My guess is that they are hated precisely because they are no bs effective and highly efficient. For some reason, we seem to live in a world where such decisive efficiency is anathema.

        • For some reason though ‘sniping’ from three miles away with a tank gun guided by electronics, or from 30,000 feet with a laser-guided bomb…is honorable.

          I think it is the “I can see him as I pull the trigger” that bothers people. It may also be the fear of such men walking the world. People are shallow.

    • Just a guess, but maybe his dislike is because snipers are often used as a tool of covert assassination outside of declared warfare.

  9. I spotted three on his site. but like others have said, it was only because I knew that there was a sniper to look for. Interesting photos. I’d like to know what changes they made to their uniforms for the different terrain.

  10. This irrevocably proves that a sniper, given ideal conditions and allotment of time can conceal himself in such a fashion that the point man is a goner. What he can’t do is conceal himself from those who saw the first shot or necessarily exfiltration from that position before he is engaged, outflanked and destroyed.

    The concept of recon by fire applies here. After a concealed sniper shot protocol is to hose the assumed location of the sniper with fire and see if anything moves then continue the suppressive fire while a maneuver element begins to flank the snipers position in defilade from his fire.

    Lacking a serious back up force that can hold the surrounding positions, snipers attempt a suicide mission when they fire on even platoon sized elements without a concealed/defiladed exfiltration route.

    Having said all that, my own inability to spot any snipers while knowing I’m looking for a sniper makes me shiver about being the point man.

    • I think you’re supposed to patrol the zone after the Spectre gunship has warmed it up, not before.

      Thermal Imaging might help. In fact, it would have been fun if Menner had taken a TI photo matching each of the hidden sniper photos.

  11. I saw one simply because the angle provided a “human shaped shadow”, and he was relatively close to the camera. Though I don’t claim that I would have been able to see them otherwise, I think the pictures are too small and muddled, due to being only 620×496, that it is far from a legitimate comparison to standing there in person.

  12. Saw most of them. Or at least was suspicious of the location.

    they are good though as, had I not been looking for them, I probably would not have noticed them.

  13. Is it possible to spot the snipers in these pictures, or are they just showing where the snipers are, but otherwise are still hidden.

    • On the two or three I could see, I didn’t actually see the outline of a person. I just saw that something was out of place. There was maybe one or so where I thought something was out of place, but didn’t trust my instincts.

  14. it’s cheating to use low resolution photos and then ask someone to pick out the sniper pixels. The task would be easier with the human eye, or with high-res photos.

      • If you’re good enough at the craft you can be invisible from touch distance! Our instructors actually stood on my spotter and I during finals for graduation at Ft. Benning.

  15. I did loss prevention in most stores for 30 yrs. A man could stand still by a wall and never be seen. Don’t susprise me none.

  16. Yeah wish they had high res photos of this snipers. Reminds me of the scene from “Clear and Present Danger” with Chavez sneaking up on the observers.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here