Home » Blogs » NRA History Revisited
NRA

NRA History Revisited

TTAG Contributor - comments No comments

Jeff Knox writes  [via Ammoland.com]: On January 15, 2018, Marion Hammer, NRA past president and a current member of both the NRA Board of Directors and Executive Council, published an editorial on Ammoland Shooting Sports News. The article warned of current and past threats to the NRA, and listing a slate of candidates she supports for the upcoming NRA Board of Directors election . . .

Mrs. Hammer is free to endorse any Board candidate she likes. But in her endorsement she can’t rewrite history to suit herself, nor can she expect to cast aspersions on the motives of good people without challenge

In her comments, Ms. Hammer carefully avoids naming names, but anyone who has been paying any attention at all to NRA politics – past and present – knows exactly whom she is referring to.

She begins with muddy praise for the stalwart NRA members who staged a revolt at the NRA Members’ Meeting in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1977. It was the night when the members wrested control of the NRA from a hidebound and self-perpetuating management and put the Association on the road to being the premier defender of the human right to armed self-defense.

Then she jumps forward to 1997 to talk about an attempted “coup” by a group of “dissident malcontents,” but fails to mention that both actions were staged by many of the same people, and for many of the same reasons.

I put “coup” in quotes in the second instance because the group that she claims was staging the “coup” was the duly elected Officers and Directors attempting, unsuccessfully, to exercise their fiduciary responsibility against actions by paid staff and critical contractors with multimillion-dollar contracts.

The 1997 fight was not a coup; it was a mutiny.

In contrast to Cincinnati, the prize in 1977 was not the heart, soul, and destiny of the NRA, but control of the organization’s checkbook and prudent management of its resources. The goal in both instances was to give the members control over their NRA. The 1997 action included First Vice President Neal Knox, Second Vice President Albert Ross, and a majority of the NRA Board of Directors.

Many on the Board wanted to fire Wayne for his duplicity. Neal Knox was not among those. But, history is written by the victors, so the attempts of the Board of Directors to demand fiscal accountability from their hired staff was later reported as a “coup.”

The core issue was how the NRA’s PR company, Ackerman McQueen, was drawing millions of dollars a year from the organization and improperly controlling NRA staff. The Board directed Wayne to sever ties with Ack-Mac, and Wayne promised to do so, then claimed to have done so, by bringing in a new PR company called Mercury Group.

The “new” PR company turned out to be a wholly owned subsidiary of Ack-Mac, with all of the same players in all of the same positions, still bleeding the association of the same millions of dollars.

The Finance Committee responded to the charade by calling an emergency meeting to demand accountability, demand dismissal of Ack-Mac, and require the treasurer to pull NRA’s meager remaining funds out of risky investments.

Marion Hammer, as President of the Board, used her power to push that meeting into executive session to quash the reports from the meeting, then at the subsequent Board meeting, used her power to suppress debate, spread disinformation, and bully members to her position.

Read her editorial. She brags about her use of heavy-handed tactics.

Many on the Board wanted to fire Wayne for his duplicity. Neal Knox was not among those. He merely wanted Wayne to obey the instructions of the Board, and he was willing to use the threat of firing Wayne as a lever to force him to comply, and he was ready to follow through on the threat if Wayne balked.

But Wayne, backed by Ack-Mac, other vendors, and allies on the Board, many of whom had business dealings with vendors, had sown enough confusion to keep the Board from forcing him out. The bylaws required a 2/3 majority vote to fire the EVP, and while a substantial majority was in favor of firing him, they couldn’t muster the 2/3rds needed to do it.

Rather than taking my word for what happened in, and leading up to that meeting, you can get the story from one of Wayne and Marion’s staunchest allies in that fight. Writer/director, and NRA Board member John Milius, who was interviewed by a reporter for the Washington Post in 2000, and provided a stunningly frank description of the machinations he and others engaged in.

John Milius

He also described the situation as a coup attempt, then said: “So we used our best techniques: lying, cheating and disinformation. I didn’t tell the truth for weeks.”

The story goes on to explain how Milius and Ack-Mac manager Tony Makris invited a “Knox loyalist” out to dinner in LA and convinced him that Wayne would be willing to go quietly if he were provided with a large enough severance package.

As anticipated, the “Knox loyalist” spread the word that he had brokered a deal that would save face for everyone and began lobbying for Wayne’s severance. But when the meeting commenced, Wayne rose publicly to declare himself shocked that the Knox faction would stoop so low as to try and bribe him.

Milius reported that LaPierre gamed the moment perfectly, and, with Mrs. Hammer’s help, was able to cling to his position as they headed into the Annual Meeting of Members in Seattle.

At that 1997 meeting, two unprecedented events took place:

Charlton Heston

First, a person who received write-in votes in the Board of Directors election was deemed to be qualified to run for the 76th Director seat that is elected at the Annual Meeting.

The bylaws said that only people who were candidates in the election were eligible, and that had always been interpreted to mean people who had been nominated by the Nominating Committee or by petition of the members, but this year it suddenly included anyone who had received write-in votes.

And by an amazing coincidence, one of Tony Makris’ PR clients happened to get some write-in votes. That client was Charlton Heston.

The second unprecedented event at that meeting was the election of a brand new Board member to the leadership. In a surprise move – which in retrospect should have been no surprise at all – Mr. Heston was nominated for the office of First Vice President, to run head-to-head against Neal Knox.

Heston won that election by four votes, and immediately left the meeting to jet back to LA and appear on a radio talk show, during which he repeatedly stated that it was inappropriate or civilians to own AK47 type rifles. He eventually learned his script better, and the following year stepped up to become President of the NRA.

In her rewrite of history, Mrs. Hammer is correct that the fight was primarily about money, and that one side was trying to personally profit off of the NRA. I believe that’s true, and here’s the record on that.

As a result of the “Knox faction” raising a stink about the NRA’s finances, the treasurer moved funds out of those risky investments right before the markets crashed.

Over the next several years, NRA engaged in a barrage of cheesy sweepstakes, fire-sales on memberships, and heavy-handed direct-mail fundraising to rebuild their depleted coffers, eventually returning to solvency – and making Ack-Mac a huge pile of money in the process.

Marion Hammer, who has been paid by NRA to run the Unified Sportsmen of Florida since Neal Knox recruited her for the job back in 1979, saw her paycheck go up from $30k a year to $120k a year after she sided with Harlon Carter against Neal Knox in 1983.

It has been reported that it is now between $250k and $300k per year. So far as I am aware, she is the only director of a state organization to ever receive direct or indirect payment from the NRA.

Harlon Carter

In 1997 Wayne LaPierre was being paid about $250k per year, up from the $186k that had been paid to his predecessor a dozen years prior.

After Neal Knox and his allies had been purged from the Board (with “Don’t Vote For” lists published in full-page ads in NRA magazines – paid for by whom?), Wayne’s compensation jumped to $400k.

Then a couple of years later to $800k, leveled at around $900k for several years, and is now reported to be approximately $1.4 million, though a couple of years ago, due to some retirement pay-out, he received a cool 4 million dollars in one year.

Salaries of other top NRA officials have kept pace with Wayne’s.

As First Vice President of NRA, Neal Knox never received a salary. He had a small travel and expense account, and at one point he and Marion Hammer joined forces to ask the Board to approve a small stipend for them and other officers who dedicated a significant amount of time and talent working for NRA, but that modest request was turned down by their fellow Board members.

During the five years Charlton Heston served as President, he traveled exclusively by private jet and limousine. NRA paid for that, along with Presidential Suite accommodations, and private security.

There are people with ulterior motives involved in NRA. Some accuse me of profiting because my organization, The Firearms Coalition, gets a slight bump in donations when I publish articles critical of NRA.

That’s probably true, but my annual salary from The Firearms Coalition is less than what Wayne LaPierre is paid every month, so it’s a bit of a different ballpark.

Mrs. Hammer offered her list of candidates she encourages you to vote for, so here is my list:

  1. Adam Kraut.

  2. …….

That’s it. While there are several other people, both incumbents and new candidates, whom I like and would be comfortable endorsing, this year I’m bullet-voting for Adam, and I encourage you to do the same.

If there are others whom you know personally and appreciate, throw them a vote, but remember that if they are likely to be toward the bottom of the pile, a vote for them could bump Adam out of the running.

There are even people on Mrs. Hammer’s list that I like and have endorsed in the past, but it’s probably a pretty safe bet to avoid voting for any long-term incumbent.

That’s probably the best way to push out the “enemy within.”

Another good idea is to ask every candidate to comment on the editorial. Simple question: Do they agree with this version of NRA history, and do they think that people who are critical of the NRA leadership are trying to destroy the organization?

Go to AdamKraut.com. Read his bylaw proposals. Take action.

Jeff Knox
Jeff Knox

It’s your NRA. VOTE!

About Jeff Knox:

Jeff Knox is a second-generation political activist and director of The Firearms Coalition. His father Neal Knox led many of the early gun rights battles for your right to keep and bear arms. Read Neal Knox – The Gun Rights War.

The Firearms Coalition is a loose-knit coalition of individual Second Amendment activists, clubs and civil rights organizations. Founded by Neal Knox in 1984, the organization provides support to grassroots activists in the form of education, analysis of current issues, and with a historical perspective of the gun rights movement. The Firearms Coalition has offices in Buckeye, Arizona and Manassas, VA. Visit: www.FirearmsCoalition.org. 

0 thoughts on “NRA History Revisited”

  1. I’m not inclined to give this guy a dime.

    Now if all (and I mean ALL) of the proceeds from sales went to pro-2A groups, I would consider purchasing one.

    Reply
  2. I do not know, personally, any of the people named in the “history” lesson. I do know of one person named who is guilty of dealing from the bottom of the deck, and has been identified openly as such (that is, actions are public record). However, the point here is that the prime directive of any organization is to survive; intact if possible. Stayin’ alive becomes the primary consideration, mission is negotiable. Seen it up close and personal.

    At one time, I was a fund raiser for a well known charitable group. It was an umbrella of charities in the local area. As an orientation, I visited each agency to learn the mission, goals and challenges. The singular characteristic that knitted them all together was a complete lack of coordination, even though many of those served by one agency were also served by another (or more). A person seeking assistance from several agencies had to endure the near duplicate intake process, answer the same questions, provide the same documents. As time went on, I learned that the agencies considered every “client” as private property, not to be shared with any other agency. Getting together with the IT department of the umbrella agency, we developed a program (code) that would present each “client” (assistance seeker) with a single intake form to be used by any other agency the “client” might approach. It was then that I learned about “private property”, and that the real mission of the umbrella organization was to support each agencies declaration that they were the “premier agency” in their specific area of interest. Bottom line, even the “altruistic” charitable organizations in town had self-preservation as the premier consideration, not service to the community (which was merely a tool to prop up the agency). NRA is no different; the prime directive is to survive as an organization, and sustain the perks of the leadership.

    Reply
  3. I can just see a couple of Glock Engineers saying, “let’s put together the dumbest model we can think of and see if the fanboys fall for it.” Looks like they have.

    Reply
  4. Since writing an outline can occasionally be tedious job since this is the location where you actually start contemplating your essay critically. Feelings that will keep you from writing your own book. Essay writing normally comes as a challenge for men and women who aren’t utilised to writing essays and it’s an extremely enormous job typically for the pupils who don’t have any type of experience in writing essays.
    Every story needs to have dialog. As a student, you should not just think about having a look at classification composition, it’s also smart to think about composing a sample essay which may be seen as a sample paper by other students.
    Personalised assignment writing service business will probably have their own sites Online services are somewhat more dependable and affordable also.
    You might also want to indicate more research or comment on matters that it wasn’t possible that you discuss in the newspaper. The writing profession consists of many perks. This primer about the best way to compose an essay sheds light on the procedure and empowers the author get organized.
    Another aspect to consider is that by employing an essay support like this you, you also run the danger of your teacher having a look at the essay and finding that it sounds nothing like your prior attempts. So, as soon as you are performing your assignment you should be conscious you’ve put all essential information regarding your research. A student looking for quality financial research papers ought to go to a company with a fantastic reputation on filing its job punctually.
    Students using a copywriting service should know about a couple of things before choosing a service. After moving through the company advice and terms and conditions, if you’re pleased with their solutions, you may pick a particular business. The writing service should additionally have a guarantee that all work is distinctive and original from many other content.
    http://www.peruvision.net/2018/01/10/the-debate-over-helpmewritemyessay/

    Reply
  5. “The stoke is real y’all.”

    It’s rare times like this I regret not being ‘hip’.

    (But ever-so-grateful I’ll *never* be a ‘Hipster’.)

    Anyways…

    Just WTF is a ‘stoke’?

    (And is Jeremy sniveling to T&E it?)

    Reply
  6. Someone should take this idea to the next level and make a short smoothbore barrel and make some kind of barrel extender (not legally a barrel) that has the rifling that the bullet transitions to.

    Reply
  7. Hmm.
    Its been my observation that folks in the market for an AR platform rifle just dont want a pistol cartridge, thay want a rifle.
    The new Ruger 9mm PCC shouldn’t have any trouble holding its own from this.

    Reply
  8. Okay, now all I have to do is wait for someone else to follow suit with the same idea in a gun that won’t cost $2000(I’m guessing. Franklin armory is a bit to rich for my blood).

    Or maybe an upper. I know it’s not legal to convert a rifle to a handgun or SBR without hoop jumping, but what about converting a rifle to a “firearm” or “other”?

    Or should I just wait until the ATF changes their mind and makes this thing and anything like it illegal with a letter saying something akin to, “We didn’t think you’d actually do it”?

    Reply
  9. Wal-Mart SafetyVu – $5-7 with or without bifocals in various styles and lens colors. Z87+ rated. I once compared them to a pair of $300 Oakley and there was minimal difference in clarity. They last a year or two in everyday use and longer for the ones I only use for the range or golfing. The bifocal option is fabulous!

    Reply
  10. Adam Kraut supports gun laws. He thinks these infringements are fine. I can’t support Adam Kraut.

    Reply
  11. One minor correction that I can say: when you mentioned there is no other state organization head that is paid by the NRA directly or not, I would argue that CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) would qualify as their President is the NRA Attorney, Mr. Chuck Michel.

    I have only heard the NRA er….NRA’s Liaison to the EVP’s… version of events and they were not exactly as you have stated.

    I appreciate how clearly written this article is, what I learned from reading, and how much my eyes have been opened to some of the shameful behaviors certain leadership permits to cover their own bums.

    Reply

Leave a Comment