Previous Post
Next Post

Lost in a sea of go-fast bits for the AR-15, its aftermarket support rivaling that of the Honda Civic, your humble TTAG scribe stumbled upon Adaptive Tactical’s EX Performance Adjustable Stock. Okay, so this thing is filling a unique niche with a big, squishy recoil pad and a street price of a scant $35. Let’s check it out . . .

A big recoil pad for an AR may seem silly at first glance, but this platform isn’t limited to the mild-mannered .223. Nor are AR-15 receiver extensions (buffer tubes) even limited to AR-15s. These days everything from shotguns to AK-47s to bolt-action, magnum caliber rifles are equipped with a good ol’ AR buffer tube, and for the very reason of compatibility with an endless breadth of replacement stock options like the EX Performance here.

Seen above, I chose to slap this stock on CMMG’s ANVIL, an AR-10/AR-15 hybrid that’s in for testing (review next week). The ANVIL’s .458 SOCOM chambering ensures enough recoil for the shooter to notice. For example, Underwood’s 300 grain JHP load makes 2,405 ft-lbs of energy, which is double that of a typical 55 grain .223 and it’s pushing a projectile with 5.5 times more mass.

Adjustment? Check. It fit the ANVIL’s Mil-Spec receiver extension properly (note: verify whether you have a Mil-Spec or Commercial Spec tube, as the diameters are not compatible) and solidly locked in all six available positions. Adjustment was smooth and easy, with what I’d call an appropriate balance between snug fit for limiting wiggle and sufficient clearance to avoid sticking. There’s wobble, but it’s less than with a parts kit M4-style stock.

The rapid adjustment lever is easy to use, and the large tabs at its front provide simpler removal/installation of the stock as compared to the narrow steel cross pin found on many other stocks. The adjustment pin that indexes into the receiver extension holes is “oversized extra strength” to accommodate heavy recoiling calibers.

A bolt-in, steel QD cup comes installed on the left side, but can easily be swapped to the right. At bottom, just in front of the recoil pad, is an attachment point for a standard sling swivel mount. No specific slots for a sling strap exist, but the open area under/in front of the QD cup can be used with a strap-style sling.

On the range, the first thing I noticed was a surprisingly nice cheek weld zone. It doesn’t really look like anything to write home about, and the obvious mold flashing along the top is a blemish, but the diameter and shape is very comfortable.

This one’s hard to quantify, but you know how some plastic feels really hard and cold, and some has a slightly warmer, more rubber-like feel? The EX Performance stock’s polymer is closer to the latter. Again, it feels better on the cheek than expected.

Less of a surprise: the recoil pad soaks up recoil like the soft rubber honeycomb trampoline that it is. While .458 SOCOM in a semi-auto ain’t 12 gauge from a lightweight pump, after another 100 rounds of reliability and accuracy testing through the ANVIL’s factory Magpul CTR stock, switching over to the EX was like a day at the spa.

The EX’s soft rubber recoil pad also provides plenty of gription on the shooter’s shoulder; it won’t migrate on you even with the thump of an AK, a .308 AR-10, or a semi-auto 12 gauge. Or mag dumps of 500 grain .458 SOCOM. Its curve also fits just right, finding a natural home where it belongs on one’s body.

Comfort and control lead to confidence, which means better shooting. It may be overkill for an AR-15 in .223/5.56, where something lighter would be a more typical choice, but with myriad larger calibers to choose from in the AR-15/AR-10 platform and more and more non-AR firearms accepting AR stocks, the Adaptive Tactical EX Performance Stock brings solid functionality and comfort to the table at a cut-rate price.

Specifications: Adaptive Tactical EX Performance Adjustable Stock

Fits: Mil-Spec AR-15 receiver extensions
Weight: 0.8 lbs
Length: 6.25″
Height: 6″
Width: 2″
Colors: Black
Made in USA
MSRP: $49.99 (street price about $34.95)

Ratings (out of five stars):

Fit  * * * *
It strikes a nice balance between getting rid of slop — wiggling less than a parts kit M4 stock — and still adjusting easily. If I had it my way, though, I’d take it one notch closer to a wiggle-free fit.

Comfort  * * * *
The recoil reduction afforded by the squishy, rubber pad is excellent. The cheek rest is comfortable and has a nice shape to it, though an overmolded rubber section would be the trick to five stars.

Finish Quality  * * *
It’s absolutely fine at this price point, but obvious mold flashing prevents a higher rating. Fit of the recoil pad to the polymer stock is good, but not perfect.

Value  * * * * *
There’s a lot of junk at this price point — when anything can be found in the sub-$35 range — but the Adaptive Tactical EX stock is not junk. In fact, it’s well-made, fits properly, and does what it’s advertised to do, while generally looking, feeling, and functioning like a more expensive piece. It even offers some “extras” vs. the quality products in this price range (e.g. Magpul MOE), like a steel QD cup, oversized removal tabs, that cushy recoil pad, etc.

Overall  * * * *
It’s a heck of a lot of stock for the money, and it really excels at taming the felt recoil of hard-hitting calibers. For small shooters, beginners, and the generally recoil-averse among us, it would even do well on a .223/5.56. Anything to make shooting more comfortable can help to reduce flinch and increase enjoyment, which is a great thing. Short of mold flashing that I have since taken a razor blade to, it’s a five star stock for the price. Considering that okay finish and the bit of wobble on this particular buffer tube, though, it crosses the line at four stars…albeit a strong four stars.

Previous Post
Next Post


  1. OMG, an adjustable AR15 stock! My overseers say that just the sight of one will make me go crazy and want to do bad things. My overseers say that owning one will do harm to my family and me. My overseers say they should be banned, so we will be safe. Ok rant over. Looks cool maybe my next build will have one.

    • It’s an affordable, adjustable stock that seems to get the job done. For those who subscribe to the mantra, “Life is too short to buy expensive guns that don’t fit me.”

      • Relax. Like I said, I get it. But, aesthetically pleasing and functional are not mutually exclusive. Neither are aesthetically pleasing and inexpensive. Ruger’s AR is a perfect example. The idea that these categories are mutually exclusive is due to marketing. I will grant that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

  2. I’m looking good for a stock with less wiggle than the one which came on my LR308. If I can find one in basic black I’ll buy it.

    • You might consider shimming your buffer tube with strips of electrical tape (or similar). Basically, take the stock off, put a couple strips of tape along the buffer tube, then put the stock back on over it. If the fit is relatively close, you can get rid of all of the wiggle without having to double-layer any tape.

      Alternatively, a fixed stock ain’t so bad. Or there are certainly a few adjustable ones — some that go on a standard buffer tube and some that include a proprietary one — that are known for a wiggle-free fit. But they typically cost more. And you usually pay for it in ‘stickier’ adjustment (they don’t slide as easily).

  3. ++++++++++++++++++

    If you have a woman in your life (you’re a lucky man [not certain if you’re a lucky woman]) you will get her to get in more RDR (that’s not a euphemism for something) with this stock. No joke. very comfortable stock, good for all day shooting.

  4. Just build an AR-10, .308 rifle. Very light weight with carbon fiber hand guard and barrel. I have a Magpul gen 3 PRS on it currently which almost makes it the heaviest part of the rifle. It has a large rubber pad but I was still a bit concerned about the recoil. Also, with the scope I have the eye relief is shot and I barley get a good cheek weld within the eye relief length. This looks like a perfect solution. I’m going to compare both and see what the difference will be.

  5. The main issue I have found with this stock is that two or three of the collapsed positions will cause interference with the charging handle. The comb is just a tad too high.

    I still want this cushy for my F5 Can Cannon so I’m going to JB Weld a raft/stop across the slot to form a new stop. This will keep the stock from being accidentally shortened into an interference position.

    Pros: Great cushiness; Great value for the money.
    Cons: Interferes with charging handle in 2 or 3 of the positions.

    I bought one for my 450 Socomm and returned it for this reason and bought a Magpul CTR Limbsaver pad.
    I re-bought it for my new F5 Can Cannon project where squishy cushy is required and the most collapsed positions aren’t required.

  6. Update on my 1st review, which as I re-read was not too clear. I was comparing the Magpul PRS stock and the Adaptive Tactical stock. These are really very different so it’s not a great comparison. I’m saving the PRS for a 6.5 precision build on an AR-15 / AR-10 platform which it’s really meant for. My AR-10 .308 is just a hog hunter and I wanted light weight parts with some additional recoil control, both of which the Adaptive Tactical has. My set-up had no issue with the charging handle as other may have had so it’s something to look at based on your build. As far as toughness goes, I had some initial jamming issues (not related to the stock) and had to bang the stock on the shooting bench multiple times over multiple test firings to figuring out what was happening. This stock took it with no issues at all. Great stock, great price, great quality.

  7. Its terrific! No wobble, great fit….zero recoil. These put the others to shame! It’s like having the HK416 buttstock on your rifle. Zero complaints….job #1 well done.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here