Home » Blogs » BREAKING: George Zimmerman’s Girlfriend Recants on Brandishing Charges

BREAKING: George Zimmerman’s Girlfriend Recants on Brandishing Charges

Robert Farago - comments No comments

Samantha Scheibe (courtesy ibtimes.com)

It’s not the most flattering picture in the world but I reckon George Zimmerman’s girlfriend is a looker. She provides yet more anecdotal evidence validating my theory about beautiful woman. Specifically, the only way the crazy gene can survive (i.e. reproduce) is to shelter within a physically appealing package. The crazier the woman, the more beautiful she’s likely to be. And vice versa. “George Zimmerman’s girlfriend is asking a judge to lift an order that blocks her from seeing him and says she wants charges against him dropped,” cnn.com reports. “In a court document obtained by CNN Monday, Samantha Scheibe says she wants a no-contact provision against Zimmerman lifted so the couple can ‘talk and be together . . . I am not afraid of George in any manner and I want to be with him.’ Scheibe says Zimmerman ‘never pointed a gun at or toward my face in a threatening manner’ and claims police misinterpreted her.” See what I mean? There’s no mistaking this episode. Run George run!

Photo of author

Robert Farago

Robert Farago is the former publisher of The Truth About Guns (TTAG). He started the site to explore the ethics, morality, business, politics, culture, technology, practice, strategy, dangers and fun of guns.

0 thoughts on “BREAKING: George Zimmerman’s Girlfriend Recants on Brandishing Charges”

  1. I just added up Canada’s laws, and we only score 50/100 (I adjusted certain questions to meet our legislative environment). Keep that in mind when looking at various states.

    Reply
      • When it comes to laws like the Firearms acts, it’s a Federal matter- provinces and cities don’t have authority beyond things like bylaws. Quebec is trying to keep a registry, and also attempting to control firearms with other laws (loi 9). This is being challenged in court at the moment. As far as I can tell they’ll lose- they’re overstepping the bounds of their authority.

        Quebec is a world unto itself, however.

        Reply
    • To be honest, I’m dumbfounded that he STILL lives in Florida. And on that note, it’s got to be scary as hell to be in his shoes right now…disarmed and all.

      Reply
  2. The story so nice, we get to read it twice!

    I wanted to come up with a way to express that I knew this would happen, and at the same time express the colossal amount of don’t give a damn I have for this guy or anything to do with him. I would seriously be OK going the rest of my life never hearing his name again. This is what I came up with.

    I I still told don’t you care. so.

    That was fun to write.

    Reply
  3. I would not be surprised if she was “placed near him” intentionally by those with a “grudge” against him.After all he has gone through how could he possibly manage to think straight? I agree that he should move to the land of never, change his name & tend bar in some remote island tiki hut.

    Reply
  4. E.E. Cummings much?
    I liked it & I agree. GZ needs to step off the media “X” if he can manage it & the sooner the better.

    Reply
  5. I thinks it’s worth noting that physically it is easy to see why he upgraded from his ex wife. The crazy obviously runs in both of them though. I guess if you’re going to get stuck with crazy no matter what then it might as well be packaged nicely.

    Reply
  6. Nick, a little help from one husky guy to another, when you go to take a picture stick your chin out as far as you can. It feels a bit goofy when you are doing it, but trust me it makes your face look skinnier and eliminates that double chin. You are welcome.

    On a gun related note I built my own 9mm AR with a dedicated lower and upper for the price of their upper, and it runs flawlessly. Takes standard 9mm AR mags though. I am waiting for the SIG MPX.

    Reply
  7. I can’t figure out why Washington State got a C. As far as I can tell, the gun laws there are less restrictive than the gun laws in Texas.

    Reply
  8. This was in Mahwah? I think Teaneck has a larger Jewish community. Can’t we find even a single gun-loving Rabbi there? A real pro 2A mensch?

    Reply
  9. One of two possibilities… either she’s the kind of woman who tolerates abuse and recants her story whenever the rubber meets the road, or she’s the kind of woman who will make shit up to try and screw her mate in the most painful way possible when scorned.

    Either way, “run, George, run” is right…

    Reply
  10. It was probably stolen and they were looking to get rid of it. Gun grabbers like criminals surrendering gun owners stolen property so they can further the disarming agenda.

    Reply
  11. Probably not a good time to take on TSA because the dead agent is still on the public’s mind. Off course, the control advocates tried to paint the shooter as one of us “law abiding citizens” with an assualt rifle. Can’t see how we advance the Second Amendment cause by speaking against TSA. However, there is the First Amendment which allows us to express it as we see fit.

    Reply
  12. damn I want to do a gun buyback right across the street from these.

    200 for an AR!

    I could make a mint selling those at the gunshows in dallas.

    Reply
  13. The NY Daily News- the libtard urban trash version of the Sun/Star/National Enquirer. What frightens me is all those pictures of fat celebrities and the three headed alien babies, right where THE CHILDREN can see them in the checkout line. Maybe Bloomberg could pass a law to protect their brain cells.

    Reply
  14. I really like this map! It makes it really easy when looking for states to move to once I can afford to get out of New York! 😀

    Reply
  15. Go to the link and see that there isn’t really a lot of correlation between their ‘grades’ and the gun murder rate. The gun murder rate is the only rate that should matter because there isn’t a law in the world that can do FA to stop gun suicide. It’s just as easy with a double barrel as it is with an AR. There ain’t nobody talking about getting rid of double barrel shotguns, not even Biden.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States_by_state

    Reply
  16. There most certainly is a way to change the U.S. Constitution without amending it: the U.S. Supreme Court issues a “ruling” any way they want.

    Reply
  17. I guess no one noticed the author’s absolute paranoia:

    “As a gun owner who has had my house broken into, and who knows the experience of picking up that shotgun and laying my hand on the box of slugs while watching an unfamiliar vehicle pass very slowly or stop completely in front of my house ”

    I can only speak for myself, but I have never grabbed a gun just because a car drove by my house. Jesus H Christ, this guy needs to be checked in somewhere and get on some meds.

    Reply
    • Yeah, I don’t even necessarily always answer the door with a gun in my hand (or within reach). If I’m already carrying it, well, then yeah, I’ve got it on me. But I’ve never done anything like what the author describes, overreacting to a car driving by or whatever… He needs therapy.

      Reply
  18. Stories like THIS are what need to be on CNN, etc. Is it possible for these kinds of stories to at least get more attention locally?

    Reply
  19. What is the probability GZ’s ex-g/f will be prosecuted for filing a false charge? My guess is low to no chance.

    On Sunday, a fifty-year-old Jewish woman that I had recently become social friends with (and yes I knew she was a bit kooky) went ballistic at me when I informed her I would choose my own spiritual path and course of religious studies and not do what she kept telling me I should do. She ordered me out of her house calling me an azz-hole for choosing to study under two local respected male rabbis (she called them bums) and not taking advice and teachings from someone such as herself who is a far greater spiritual teacher. As I walked out, I said to her that there is a good reason she was still single and unable to find a husband (I’ve wanted to use that line on a crazy entitled woman for years). I could still hear her screeching at me as I walked away down the street. She lives in a very orthodox neighborhood in Queens NY and I hope the neighbors heard her screeching 🙂

    I am grateful that the two homeowners (husband and wife), of the home she sublets from, were home at the time. Otherwise, I can imagine the possible false accusations Miss Psycho might have filed against me.

    Reply
  20. So what you’re saying is F is great if you include all the gun-related suicides and accidents. It seems like the F states need to take a course in gun-safety to me. D’s and C’s are the real sweet spot! Yeah CO for having lots of guns AND a lower fatality rate! woo hoo! (well… at least the western part of CO has the guns)

    Reply
  21. ” She provides yet more anecdotal evidence validating my theory about beautiful woman. Specifically, the only way the crazy gene can survive (i.e. reproduce) is to shelter within a physically appealing package. The crazier the woman, the more beautiful she’s likely to be. And vice versa. ”

    Sorry, but there is just no excuse for this. Putting aside that’s not how genetics work, it’s ignorant of the etiology of mental illness, and that there are numerous counter examples to your weak induction. It’s blatantly sexist and disrespectful of women in general, and horribly insulting to any woman reading it. As you are telling attractive women they are crazy, and telling less attractive women they have nothing else to offer.

    It also has nothing to do with guns.

    Reply
  22. From the order:
    “In terms of intermediate scrutiny, neither of the bases argued by Harris is sufficient. There is no indication that the WPL is necessary to weed out unqualified purchasers. While it is appropriate to have a background check, the current systems and data available do not make the 10-day waiting period reasonable. In terms of cooling-off, there is no evidence to support the efficacy of the law in preventing impulsive firearm violence. Moreover, for those who already legally possess firearms, the WPL would have no effect in terms of creating a “cooling off” period. Any spontaneous desire to perform a violent act can be manifested through the weapon that is already in the individual’s possession. Because the WPL fails intermediate and strict scrutiny, Harris’s motion must be denied.”

    Reply
  23. By the way, the full comment is a long read, but it’s pretty impressive how they laid out all the problems with this proposed rule. Keep in mind that if someone points out an area where the proposed rule is in error as far as the financial and time impacts (and MANY have done so), the ATF has to answer those issues before it can proceed.

    Reply

Leave a Comment