Бронестекло 400 мм против РПГ-7. 16′ bulletproof glass vs RPG-7 [VIDEO] by Robert Farago | Sep 24, 2015 | 27 comments facebook twitter linkedin email The real FPSRussia? BTW: the dude missed. The first time . . . [h/t andypantera69] comments jwm says: September 24, 2015 at 14:14 Crude. Simple. Effective. The Russian soldier. The rpg works good, also. Reply Geoff PR says: September 24, 2015 at 15:54 ” The rpg works good, also.” Hell, yeah. By far the biggest ‘Bang for the Buck’ in anti-armor. Brilliant design. A hot jet does the the work for you. Slat armor (looks like a venetian blind) makes the warhead detonate a little ways away from the armor and keeps the jet from doing its thing… Reply 16V says: September 24, 2015 at 14:27 Nothing resembling an actual test, but kinda fun to watch just for the goofy Russian-ness of it. Barely looked like armored glass. 1.5″ of ALON will stop a .50BMG AP round, I think it would have sailed right through the 16″ of that stuff. Reply pwrserge says: September 24, 2015 at 19:21 You’d be surprised. A PRG-7 plasma jet will jack up any armor not protected by reactive defenses or a DU matrix. Reply 16V says: September 24, 2015 at 21:31 Wasn’t trying to denigrate the 7, it’s a well-proven piece. My recollection of the HEAT round for it is a double-charge, so it actually will defeat most reactive armor, and there’s a bunker-buster that forms a charge shaped penetrator. Just looked a bunch of mid-temper glass with some laminate material was where I was going. Reply Ralph says: September 24, 2015 at 14:31 “Dmitry, where is dummy?” “In Kremlin.” Next Russian experiment — screen door on submarine. Reply Silentbrick says: September 24, 2015 at 14:41 I don’t know if they had a real reason for doing that but hey, looked like a load of fun and lucky Dmitry gets to fire TWO RPG’s in a single day. See, this is why we should be allowed military grade weapons. “I’m bored, lets see how many toilets an AT-4 will go through.” “Sounds fun, let’s head to Home Depot!” Reply BillC says: September 24, 2015 at 15:24 RPG is the launcher, PG is the rocket projectile. So he fired two PG-7s. Reply LarryinTX says: September 24, 2015 at 16:49 You don’t know he didn’t have two launchers! Reply JR_in_NC says: September 24, 2015 at 15:43 ““I’m bored, lets see how many toilets an AT-4 will go through.” “Sounds fun, let’s head to Home Depot!”” Think of the economic activity this sort of thing would generate. Reply barnbwt says: September 24, 2015 at 17:46 Broken toilet fallacy. Reply JasonM says: September 24, 2015 at 18:04 By Frederic Bath-stiat? CTstooge says: September 24, 2015 at 14:48 Мытх Бустерс Reply Geoff PR says: September 24, 2015 at 15:33 Путин хуйло! Reply vatnik says: September 26, 2015 at 15:24 Я твой рот ебал твой пиндостан шатал Reply BillC says: September 24, 2015 at 15:23 The copy and paste title is wrong. 400 mm is nearly 16 inches (“), not 16 feet (‘). Reply int19h says: September 24, 2015 at 15:25 It’s 16 inches, not 16 feet… Reply Geoff PR says: September 24, 2015 at 15:59 int19H, I couldn’t find a translation for “Мытх Бустерс”, my Google-Fu sucks today. What’s the rough gist of it? Reply Ralph says: September 24, 2015 at 16:26 Myth Busters. Reply tufty says: September 24, 2015 at 15:46 … And that’s why the Russians make tough military opponents. The do simple, cheap and effective better than anyone else. Ask a German. Reply LarryinTX says: September 24, 2015 at 16:53 Yeah, back in the day, our strategy was to spend billions delivering a tiny nuke within inches of aim point, thus saving the lives of many Russians. The Russians’ strategy was to toss 20 megaton nukes in the general direction of the target, at a cost of mere millions, thus saving the lives of many Russians. Reply Defens says: September 24, 2015 at 19:32 Helps to have a few thousand miles of frozen Russian wasteland for the attackers to trudge across, too. Reply Will says: September 24, 2015 at 16:29 “this is a clear proof of why tanks doesn’t have big windows” ROFL Indeed. Reply Nate says: September 24, 2015 at 17:15 Non-sense! If the dummy had a simple OTV with IIIA soft armor it would have been fine! /sarcasm Reply Sian says: September 24, 2015 at 17:37 Shocker. A warhead that can penetrate 19.5″ of RHA can blow through 16″ of bulletproof glass like it’s not even there. Reply Fuque says: September 24, 2015 at 18:02 Whatever your opinion is, at least the Russians get access to these toys to even do these experiments.. can you imagine the permits, and overly melodramatics every branch of Government would want in on, if it was even legal in your state?… Not to mention Geraldo would want in on it, ( for the Safety of the children ).. and lets not forget the brady clan…. Sucks that we can’t drive out into some field in a flatbed with some conjured up idea and execute it…. Reply pwrserge says: September 24, 2015 at 19:25 You’d be surprised. Gun control in Russia makes California look tame. A shame, really. Russia had a gun culture going back to Peter the Great before the Bolsheviks took over. The reason Russia was able to field so many spectacular snipers in WWII is because most people in the eastern part of the country still hunted to put meat on the table in the 1930s. Reply Write a Comment Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.