| Image | Product | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Check Price |
We tend to have an obsession with thin. Anorexic fashion models, “thin” cream in your coffee, tiny, thin houses… thin is definitely in. I remember the British model, Twiggy, in the 1960s… she helped start the craze back then, and it stuck. Slaves to fashion have been measuring their waists with micrometers ever since.
But fashion is a galaxy away from guns. What’s “thin” got to do with the pistol we’re looking at? Stoeger markets it as their ThinLine 9mm carry gun. Thin is good for a carry weapon. Single-stack pistols are naturally thin because there’s only one row of cartridges in their magazines. So, how thin is it, and does that affect capacity? Is it a single stack? Before we get to that, there’s something else I want to say.
In my reviews of polymer 9mm pistols (of which I have done dozens over the years), I tend to get comments like “we don’t need yet another plastic fantastic” or words to that effect. The market is fairly saturated with these types of guns, thanks to Gaston Glock and his wunderkind. They make a good point that I subscribe to.
We DO have a lot of cookie-cutter poly 9mms. However, if a gun comes out that does things a bit differently, is made in such a way that validates its existence, and has a good feature set, then I say “go for it”. This pistol fits that category, in my opinion. It is eminently carryable, if that’s a word. It also seems to me to be a good value for the dollar.
The ThinLine is an inch-wide, 21-ounce-empty pistol with three double-stack magazines. Right there, you get my attention. Plus, it’s compensated and has an optics cut. More of my attention… my head is up and I’m wanting to see this gun.
The capacities of these double-stack magazines are 14 (you get two of those), and one 16-rounder. So, no, it’s not a single-stack gun, and capacity is not affected. You get the best of both worlds here… a skinny, night-sighted, compensated 9mm with a decent round count that fits in your hand easily.
The gun fits my hand like some of my .380s, it’s that skinny. It might be too skinny (if that’s a bad thing) for some with larger hands. I’ll try it on my friend Ed, who can easily palm a basketball, and report back. I know that sometimes, I would like to be too skinny. Not happenin’. (Note: Ed said it fit fine and he liked it. He especially liked the three different types of grip texture, too. More on that later…)
Stoeger: The Company
Stoeger is a name that should be familiar to American shooters. Here’s a bit about the company.
Stoeger is part of the BenelliUSA family of brands and owned by the Beretta Holdings group. While the company is headquartered in Maryland, its firearms are manufactured in Turkey and Brazil. The ThinLine, for example, is made in Turkey.
History
Beretta acquired Stoeger in 2000, but before that, it was located in New Jersey. Prior to that, it existed as the largest gun store in New York City. Wow… Can you imagine that today?
I remember when they commissioned a company in Germany to build a .22 replica of the famous Luger in the late ‘70s. I read about it in the gun rags of the era and wanted one, but alas… It wasn’t to be. They imported them and sold a bunch. Later, in the ‘90s, they sold an American-made version of the pistol, but it was all stainless, in 9mm, and came in either a 4- or 6-inch barrel. (Legalese trivia: Stoegeer has owned the name “Luger” in the U.S. since about 1924.)
Now, moving up to more current times… Known primarily for shotguns and airguns, Stoeger opened eyes in 2019 with the introduction of the full-size STR-9. After branching out with variations on that theme, the latest version is what we have before us here, the ThinLine. It came out earlier this year (2025).
Specifications
The Stoeger website is a bit sparse about specific details for the ThinLine, but here is what they have…
- Finish: Black Synthetic
- Barrel: Nitride-hardened Matte Black
- Grip: Standard
- MSRP: $529
- Frame Size: Crossover
- Hand: Right-Handed (mag release can be moved to the other side)
- Capacity: 16+1
- Magazines: 2 14-round, 1 16-round
- Sights: Tritium Night (Stoeger and Mepro sell replacements)
- Optics-Ready: Yes, RMSc Shield
- That was what they provided. Here are a few more details that I found or measured…
- Overall Length: 6.1”
- Height: 4.4”
- Width: 1”
- Weight: (empty mag) 21.2 oz.; (full 14-round mag) 26.1 oz.
- Trigger Pull Weight: 4 lbs. 10 oz., average
Features
Here we go, from what I can tell about this pistol. As I said, their website was not the best with details.
Forward Slide Serrations
The slide has four deep cuts, both fore and aft, to aid in grasping it.
Compensator
Speaking of the slide, Stoeger has done something unique, from my perspective. They have extended the slide about a half-inch from the end of the barrel and made two cuts in it that partially wrap around the sides and the top. The barrel was left untouched. This is one of the few times I’ve seen a compensator cut that doesn’t cut the barrel as well as the slide. Interesting. Plus – it works. Recoil came mostly straight back, and the muzzle didn’t rise much.
Magazines
I’m going to list the magazines as a feature, because you get three of them. That is how it should be done – kudos to Stoeger. You get one each, Small, Medium, and Large, in terms of baseplates. The two smaller ones house 14 rounds, while the largest one holds 16. They are made in Italy, presumably by Mec Gar. (If you need to order more, start here).
Grip Texture
There are three different textures. The first is applied to the sides of the grip and is the most aggressive of the three, where you need to get a solid grip. The second, less-grippy texturing is in the front. The backstrap has a different kind of texturing, what I call “Glock Blocks” – symmetrical little raised squares. There are also two pads over the trigger guard to rest your trigger finger or off-hand thumb on. Each area of the grip has a texture that works for that particular zone. It’s been well thought-out.
Rail
You get a three-slot rail on the dust cover. That should house whatever goodie you choose to install.
Optics-Ready
The ThinLine is directly compatible with RMSc Shield red dot optics. Here’s one as an example… a Burris Fastfire C with an RMSc footprint. It works very well.

Night Sights
Tritium three-dot sights are standard. If you want to swap out your sights, here’s one possibility.
Trigger
The trigger has a flat face with the typical safety blade and breaks at . It has about a half-inch of take-up and very little creep. The reset is short.
Summary: This is a small, 9mm carry gun with a decent capacity, a good trigger, night sights with optics cut, and a feature set that won’t break the bank to own. I will say that, for a pistol that typically sells for under $450, the features list is impressive.
Range Time
(Yeah, I know… rifle rest. It works for me.)
I waited for the rain to take a break and then headed to my backyard range. I placed targets at 15 yards, since this is a gun whose raison d’être is personal protection. A long-distance bullseye buster, it ain’t, although it did alright. The very decent trigger and compensator helped.
I shot several targets and chose three to post here. The ammo I shot included (all 115-grain FMJ) Fiocchi Range Dynamics, PMC, and Monarch. Here are the targets…
Range Dynamics
PMC

I mention an issue below that I had with the sights. They were regulated very low, about 6 inches below P.O.I. You will notice a red diamond below each target – that was my aiming point. I think that a quick and easy solution to this is to mount a red dot. That’ll fix it. Of course, there is a decent warranty with the pistol, so you could send it back or buy replacement sights. Anyway, it wouldn’t deter me from using the gun. These groups were fired from a bench… “hind-leg” shooting may show different results.
Cleaning
I won’t dwell on this, as hopefully, most know how to clean a semi-auto pistol. The gun comes apart like a Glock, so it’s easy. Remember to put a drop of oil on the frame rails and the top of the barrel hood when you put it back together. If you need help, here’s a link to the owner’s manual .pdf download.
I had trouble with the take lever. I always have trouble with Glock-style takedown levers. They are never long enough for my baloney fingers to grab, and when I tried to pull the slide off, it didn’t “take”, so I had to do it again. I figured I didn’t need to physically disassemble the pistol, as that type of takedown is pretty standard. Oh, how I wish manufacturers would all employ a rotating take-down lever!
Niggles
Is there anything I don’t like about the gun? Sure. I mentioned the short takedown levers above (well, they’re standard size, but I guess I need oversized ones…).
A more important nit to pick… the gun shot about six inches high. This is the second 9mm in a week that I’ve reviewed with that issue. I was shooting plain-jane factory 115-grain loads… the most common type of 9mm ammo. You would think the factory would regulate the height of the sights to hit the bullseye with a center hold.
My second point about things I didn’t like about the gun has to do with the recoil spring. I have no way of measuring how many pounds it takes to move the slide rearward against the spring, but it’s got to be many. I was not the only one to comment on it. My stronger son and Gorilla-grip friend Ed each made a face when they retracted the slide and commented on how strong the spring was. I would imagine someone with reduced hand strength would have problems retracting the slide. I’m not sure they need a 10mm-weight spring in a compact 9,
But, nitpicks aside, I liked the gun overall, and I’m not the only one. Here are four definite “hits”…
Width: I think my son’s reaction to the gun when he first got his hands on it sums it up… he immediately wondered how much it would cost to keep it. For everyday shooting and competition, he’s usually more of a 1911-and-that-size gun guy. In terms of concealed carry, he likes appendix carry – very popular for you shooters who can see your feet – and was intrigued at the TrimLine’s sveltness, its one-inch thickness. Of course, there are many other carry guns out there that are an inch or so wide, but this one not only accomplishes that but also has a nice feature set and capacity, at a good price.
Grip Texturing: I appreciate its smaller grip, as well. Its grip girth reminds me, as I alluded to above, to that of a .380 pistol. It isn’t a whole lot bigger than my S&W Bodyguard 2.0, and that is a pocket pistol. The difference is, you get 14 – 16 9mms, not 10 – 12 .380s. The Stoeger is not a pocket pistol, unless you’re Captain Kangaroo (younger shooters, Google it). Even so, its light weight and small size surely make it a carry gun, no doubt.
As for the grip texture, I mentioned how it is three zones, each done differently. That in itself shows that someone has put a lot of thought into how a hand grips a pistol. I don’t know how many guns I’ve reviewed that have one texture all over the grip. Of course, I’d rather have one texture that works over some types I’ve seen that are ineffective, but the ThinLine’s grip is done right.
Compensator. The clever way Stoeger has compensated this gun is very interesting, and it works…the recoil was straight back, and not too much.
Optics Cut. Add an RMSc red dot easily.
Magazines: You get three. What’s not to like about that?
Value: For a street price under $450, this gun will be hard to beat. Add a red dot to the mix, stick it in a decent holster with good ammo, and you are good to go. (Even if you use the included night sights with no red dot, you’re still GTG… I just mentioned it because it’s an option, unlike with some pistols. And, for many shooters, it is a definite plus.) The fact that it comes with three magazines doesn’t hurt, either.
Summing Up
If you are in the market for a micro 9 but want a little more capacity, night sights, extra magazines, and a sweet-shooting pistol, take a look at the ThinLine. For a pistol that only came out this year, Stoeger will probably not be able to build them fast enough for the polymer-frame, striker-9 crowd. Its tiny overall size and weight, plus its “big-boy” 9mm capacity, will make it a sure seller, once word gets around.
I said above that I believe the polymer-framed, striker-9 market is a bit saturated, but when a company brings out something that breaks the mould, I pay attention. I think you might want to not only take a look at this gun, but put one in your hand – that will most likely make you a believer. For me, the gun just fits and ticks most of the right boxes. Why not check one out?
Where To Buy









Thin has always been in for those who understand.
Sight regulation is poor- I have tried several of these pistols and reliability isnt good at all. Why waste your money when the Glock is reliable???
bc cz.
the thinline is made in…
No real info on this gat on all 3 websites mentioned. Sultanate gat I assume? For the $ the Ruger RXM looks pretty good if I wanted a new gat🙄Oh & ILLannoy made any magazines Over 15 verbotten.
So far the thinnest handgun with any substantial power I’ve found is the tt33.
“I don thin so Qeeksdraw.”
I’ll do the thinning around here Bobalooie.
“what is an el kabong?”
“thin” cream in your coffee, tiny, thin houses… thin is definitely in.
what kind of writing is this? thin cream and thin houses? lol
Just trying not to be boring. I write with tongue firmly in cheek.
No Glock clone is worth $529. Especially ones made in Turkey.
Yep. I’d buy it used.🙄
… except that the somewhat comparable 43x at $485 to $500 comes with 1 mag, no optics adapter plate, shitty plastic non- tritium sights, isn’t ported, and comes in a “high-tech” cardboard box.
Oh, and it’s still a Glock, with its hate it or adapt to it grip angle – can you guess I’m not a fan?
I shot a Glock once. Didn’t hold up as well as the HiPoint.
Shooting high a bit may be attributed to a loose fitting slide, barrel, weak recoil spring, crown burr, etc. I like Steoger and still have their 12ga. coach on my want it but don’t need it list. Nonetheless it cannot run with my Sar 9s.
Does it have a barrel ? Maybe tell us how long it is .
A compensated 9mm? Really? Why?
On a recent range day with my Cousin’s sons, I noticed that they were really shy when it came to .45ACP and .357 Magnum. They weren’t particularly comfortable with .40 S&W either. Accuracy was nominal.
These boys, Army and Marine vets appear to be too recoil sensitive.
Have we raised a generation of pansies?
For comparisons sake, I’m damn near 70, carry a .45ACP 1911, or a .357 Magnum revolver, daily, at home too. I can hit what I’m aiming at with regularity.
I’m still sitting on most of the last full pallet of 9BPLE (+p+) that I got shipped direct from Federal 7 or 8 years back. This gun with a comp and already heavy recoil spring would be a hoot to run that spicy stuff through – the only other gun that I have that likes that load is a 92c with a Federal Arms twin ported 5 3/4″ barrel.
Also, no one above has mentioned the Stoeger 5 year warranty, where if you send yours in for warranty work that requires replacement of the gun, the replacement one starts out with a fresh 5 year warranty on it – which I can personally verify from past experience.
Have raised and will continue to raise until it all crumbles down.
It all started with power steering and TV remotes.
Jack and Jill had to climb a hill to fetch a pail of water.
That’s a lot of work to water pansies.
I know what you mean – TV remotes! … when did we get too lazy to tell our wives to get up and turn the channel??
Thin was the name of the game until plastic fantastic kitchen Tupperware made its way into gun room because … you know …. cheap.
S&W makes a non plastic semi auto and you’d think they’d invented something new. What a bunch of Maroons.