Site icon The Truth About Guns

Federal Register Publishes DOJ’s New Stealth Universal Background Check Rule for Public Comment

Joe Biden moms demand action

"Sure it's illegal, but so what? It will take them years and millions of dollars to challenge it. I'll be long-dead by then. And in the mean time, I can tell idiots like you that I closed the gun show loophole. You'll then clap and bark like an obedient seal. Are you starting to see how all of this works?" (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

Previous Post
Next Post

The Biden Department of Justice, under cover provided by John Cornyn’s disastrous Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, has moved to vastly expand the definition of people who are considered by ATF to be “engaged in the business” of selling guns. It’s a not-so-stealthy move toward backdoor “universal” background checks and closing the alleged “gun show loophole.”

The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register today, which officially opens the requisite 90-day public comment period. Here’s the DOJ’s summary of the proposed rule . . .

The Department of Justice (“Department”) proposes amending Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) regulations to implement the provisions of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (“BSCA”), effective June 25, 2022, that broaden the definition of when a person is considered “engaged in the business” as a dealer in firearms other than a gunsmith or pawnbroker. This proposed rule incorporates the BSCA’s definition of “predominantly earn a profit,” creates a stand-alone definition of “terrorism,” and amends the definitions of “principal objective of livelihood and profit” and “engaged in the business” to ensure each conforms with the BSCA’s statutory changes and can be relied upon by the public.

The proposed rule also clarifies what it means for a person to be “engaged in the business” of dealing in firearms, and to have the intent to “predominantly earn a profit” from the sale or disposition of firearms. In addition, it clarifies the term “dealer,” including how that term applies to auctioneers, and defines the term “responsible person.”

These proposed changes would assist persons in understanding when they are required to have a license to deal in firearms. Consistent with the Gun Control Act (“GCA”) and existing regulations, the proposed rule also defines the term “personal collection” to clarify when persons are not “engaged in the business” because they make only occasional sales to enhance a personal collection, or for a hobby, or if the firearms they sell are all or part of a personal collection.

This proposed rule further addresses the lawful ways in which former licensees, and responsible persons acting on behalf of such licensees, may liquidate business inventory upon revocation or other termination of their license. Finally, the proposed rule clarifies that a licensee transferring a firearm to another licensee must do so by following the verification and recordkeeping procedures instead of using a Firearms Transaction Record, ATF Form 4473.

You can read the full rule and comment here.

Just like the earlier frame and receiver and pistol stabilizing brace rules, this rule will be adopted by ATF, too…and then it will immediately be the subject of multiple lawsuits challenging the new rule’s constitutionality and ATF’s authority to issue a “legislative rule” under the Gun Control Act without legislation by Congress.

Same as it ever was.

 

Previous Post
Next Post
Exit mobile version