Site icon The Truth About Guns

Daily Digest 4.28.16: Oz Hearts Gun Control, Russia Set for Civilian Disarmament and More

Previous Post
Boxer Tactical Daily Digest 5.2.16: Less is Moore">Next Post

Australia data shows gun controls a huge success 20 years after mass shooting – provided correlation equals causation. Which it doesn’t. Unless you want it to. Proponents of civilian disarmament do. That’s why they do the voodoo that they do with crime statistics. My journalism teacher told me never to put stats in the first ‘graph of a story, so, suffice it to say, rubbish. Australia has more guns than before Port Arthur massacre. Next up, another op ed piece saying Ms. Clinton screwed the proverbial pooch by allying herself with gun control . . .

Clinton Doesn’t Get It on Guns – “She won Connecticut in spite of her stance on manufacturers, not because of it.” The National Shooting Sports Foundation poll showing public support for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act strikes again!

Editorial: Why not smarter guns? -Reacting to the Obama Administration’s plans to push for “smart guns” for law enforcement, Albany’s timesunion.com asks a stupid question. And provides a stupid answer.

Anne Arundel Co. sheriff facing charges wants guns back – Second degree domestic abuse charges, no less. Sheriff Ron Bateman (above) wants his shotguns back to go hunting with his sons. He made the request by text.

Russians, Their Guns And the StateThe Moscow Times reports that Russia’s “tolerance” of civilian firearms ownership may be over soon. “On April 14, President Vladimir Putin, announced the formation of a new National Guard, and declared one of its key fuctions would be to control firearms. “We are creating the National Guard to limit the circulation of weapons in the country.”

Cops have to assume a fake gun that looks like a gun (with or without an orange tip) is a gun. Amirite?

The army to set our nation free’ – That would be Constitution-respecting law enforcement officers, according to Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, Oathkeeper, and his fellow members of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. I wonder what Connecticut gun laws would be like if they hadn’t ditched popularly elected sheriffs for politically appointed police chiefs.

Previous Post
Boxer Tactical Daily Digest 5.2.16: Less is Moore">Next Post
Exit mobile version