Home Gun Nation What Could Possibly Go Wrong: Nighthawk Edition Gun NationHandguns What Could Possibly Go Wrong: Nighthawk Edition By Robert Farago - March 17, 2011 7 Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Email RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Two of Smith & Wesson’s ’90s Stainless Metallic Fantastics Heads-Up Comparison: P365 vs. Hellcat vs. MAX-9 vs. M&P9 Shield Plus Where Will You Wear Your ATF Branded Gear? 7 COMMENTS Holy crap! A whole new causality for negligent discharge and broken thumbs! How the hell would you holster it? Do you really want an ever wider stance and print when you carry? Moreover, how would anyone execute a draw without it flinging off and dropping on the ground? Stoooooooopid. Reply There are almost too many objections to list, so I’ll just sidestep them and go straight to the obvious: If you need higher capacity from your .45 ACP, GET A HIGHER-CAPACITY .45 ACP! FNPs, Springfield XDs and XD-Ms are outstanding pistols, and you won’t be the laughing stock of the shooting range. Reply Or Para Ordnance for those of us with infinite patience. Reply What a dumb and dangerous idea. Reply Just because you can do something, does not mean that you should. I agree with Joe Matafome. Reply You can tell it is a gearqueer toy, just look at the wristwatch the shooter is wearing. Reply How can you even get a decent grip with the magazine in the way? Reply LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Please enter your comment! Please enter your name here You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.