Some Statistics about NICS (Background Checks for Firearms Ownership)

All those statistics and I got hung up on 10 mins waiting – try ten days for those of us in PRK.

Election Day for Obama was 2008, not 09 – Inauguration day is Jan 20, 2009. As for October 2008 – Reading through this might give you some idea of why – the housing markets, uncertainty and the odds for Obama winning increasing after McCain suspended his campaign… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2008

Now I await the anti gun statistician to explain to me how this is actually the death of firearms through excessively fast growth. My B of S was only through a state school, not Harvard so I probably just don’t get maths.

Wow. Re the graph, I would have expect to see spikes after Obama’s election and 9/11… but what happened in 1999? Or is that just when they started using the system on a large scale?

How many of the 821,000 denials were in error? How many times was Joe A. Smith denied a gun due to a violation from Joe B. Smith? Or from Jose “Smith” with a stolen social security number?

Also, of those 821,000 denials, how many were followed up on and resulted in conviction for illegally trying to purchase a firearm?

With this information, how is it, that many pro-gun sites have lowered the number of American gun ownership and the amount of guns in the United States? Around five years ago it was 90 million gun owners and 250 million guns, now some very influential pro gun sites (like Keep And Bear Arms) have it down to 80 million gun owners and still at the 250 million guns. What’s up with the discrepancy?

So – 124 million background checks on purchases of guns since Nov. 1998, with major yearly increases (10-15%) every year since 2006. That’s a whole lotta’ gun buying by what the media calls “an ever-decreasing number of households owning guns” (based on polling of the gun-owner subset described as “gun owners who are stupid enough to tell some stranger on the phone that they own guns”.)

At the same time, we have seen statistically significant DECREASES in violent crime in America, running about 3-6% lower every year, with a 12% decrease in violent crime in 2010. Liberal politicians and anti-gun pundits are at a loss to explain this reduction in crime during hard economic times.

Criminals, on the other hand, could probably explain it quite easily: “Ain’t no percentage in taking on some old fart or woman who might be carrying a gun.” Of course, these unsophisticated criminals lack the advantage of a Harvard degree, so they cannot be expected to understand the delicate nuances of how evil it is for potential victims to arm themselves against crime.

Let’s see, 124 million new gun purchases, reduced violent crime, hmmmm – maybe it can be explained by the crime data collected by John Lott in every county in the lower 48 states, where he found a 4-6% reduction in violent crime in every state that passed “shall-issue” concealed firearms permit laws. (See his book, “More Guns, Less Crime”.)

Some of those NICS checks were transfers. I sold three guns that went through the NICS during this period so that contributes to the numbers, new owners not necessarily new guns. But the gun business is indeed booming. Prices are going up in response to demand.

Interesting. Was 1998 a full year? The jump from 1998 to 1999 was incredible. 1999 was the year the artificial Bill Clinton economic bubble burst. It is also interesting that the checks actually dipped after 2001 (9/11/2001 year) for a few years. It doesn’t appear that gun checks really started climbing quickly (beyond average) until 2006.

Also note that these numbers are NICS checks, not firearms purchased.

yeah except domestic violence as a reason to deny a firearm is stupid. Apparently you can grab a stranger and still own a gun but grab a woman who keeps coming back for more and you’re too dangerous.