Most of our questions of the day are aimed at the Armed Intelligentsia. Taking the pulse of our readers as it were. But after PoliceOne.com’s revealing poll results (querying over 15,000 cops on the subject of gun control), we thought it might be informative to get President Obama’s reaction. After all, the Prez and the rest of the Civilian Disarmament Industrial Complex take every opportunity to use cops as props — some willing, some not — to push their cause. And let’s face it . . . we’re not likely to hear anyone from MSNBC stand up at a presser and press the POTUS on the topic. But the survey results show that almost 92% of the boys in blue think an assault weapons ban would have either zero or a negative impact on violent crime. So, Mr. President, who knows more about reducing violent crime on the streets: the cops who pound the pavement or you?
This poll will demonstrate the ability of the left wing media complex to cover up the news, as opposed to reporting it.
It’s up to us to bypass them, and make sure the word keeps getting out.
‘Dafuq?
I used to work in Antarctica. On 23rd october 1996 I was literally run over by an F250 dual-cab truck loaded with gear and heavy guys. The tyre started at my right foot, went up my tum tum and both sides of my sternum and we parted company at my my right shoulder, with it clipping my ear. This was on hard ice, and my shoulder blade rubbed right through my shirt and fleece jacket.
I got up and walked away. Well, ’til I was stopped and ordered to await an ambulance and Jodi the EMT. Yes, I’m that physically durable.
I’ve also taken lead. A neighbor was cleaning his 30.06 rifle and it went bang. Two walls later the bullet found my left leg, and I wasn’t walking to the doc – I needed a crutch.
Show that you’re brave and tough by taking on a gun-wielding yoot bare-handed?
The grabber just admitted to being a crack-head. Someone, please arrest him! Please?
I doubt MSM will report this.
“You’d show that you were stronger than they were and smarter and not just that you had some weapon.”
This is literally the dumbest thing that I’ve ever read. Maybe in their pseudo-academic progressive la la land that they think we can live in it makes sense. But in the real world, where we apply things like logic, common sense, and our knowledge of past experiences, it doesn’t.
I recently was rejected for our website’s payment processing…Authorize.net won’t deal with our ammunition company and our bank directed us elsewhere. I know not to use them in the future and find it shameful. I can’t keep up with our orders and that means money hand over fist for a bank, but they won’t deal with anyone who sells firearms or ammunition. (Oh..and I am not gouging our customers. I haven’t raised our prices one cent)…I haven’t signed with any card company yet so perhaps I will look in to you guys!
What does this have to do with George Benson?
we’ve all seen how the NYPD shoot
Dood…
Like most of these types, he ignores the latest reports. The murdered DA had guns in every room of his house according to his grown children, but removed all of them and put them in one spot because of a party for several friends…that is why he could not defend himself and his wife.
Colt, Mossberg, Stag…
> Big gun companies in Connecticut are asking to be exempt
> from the law so that they can keep making the rifles there.
If gun manufacturers get an exemption, then it just demonstrates what a bunch of bloodthirsty ghouls Donkeyrats are.
F*** you, Donkeyrats. As much as I hate the Republicons and Glibertarians, Donkeyrats are the most vile pieces of s*** imagineable.
If the NRA, Republicon Party, etc., had any moral courage (waits for laughter to die down), they would not be shy about telling this truth, and repeat this message for the next several election cycles.
cant wait to buy a ptr91 Gi model when they start to become available again
I guess I am a huge wimp considering I suffered from a traumatic leg injury which required 5 surgeries to get me walking again. I can’t run, and I can’t fight but I would gladly be labeled a wimp if I could defend mine and my wife’s lives. This guy should be hung. How many other disabled people should be cast aside and demonized for wanting to defend themselves against the scum of our society.
Being from the DFW area I saw this on the morning news. Apparently the DA disarmed himself because he had a dinner party and didn’t want his guns out for guests to see. According to his children the man regularly had guns available but had locked them up. This may seem irrelevant but it proves that making people lock up their self defense guns is a bad idea. Also this was a professional hit. Some organization was looking to intimidate the DA of Kaufman county, and whether it is white supremacists or Mexican cartels it just goes to show that bad guys will not be deterred by well meaning laws. Here is the link to the story: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/headlines/20130408-slain-kaufman-da-s-children-say-his-guns-were-out-of-reach-the-night-he-died.ece
Business & votes they will never get back. The pres can flap his yap like nero fiddling while Rome burns. They can’t change, can’t cut their losses, all they can do is blow up their party…pity, Randy
Bread and circuses for everyone!
It’s not that they are that stupid. Otherwise they would forget to breath. Nor do they suffer from this magical worldview that they portray. “Oh, if we just put up signs that designate “GUN FREE ZONES” the little children will all be safe as bunnies,”
They are EVIeeeeL LIARS!
anonymous said,
“The European feudal lords who worried about peasants being able to kill their noble knights thought the same thing.
Perhaps Dr. Hemenway wants to return to Medieval Feudalism, when so-called “wimps” were not as dangerous as those with real “skill and bravery”?”
…and nailed it.
This whole fight is about disarming the American people so Bloomberg can tell us how large a soda we may drink and we will give the PROPER response. Which is of course, “Thank you, ma’ Lord.” From bended knee.
We continue to be frustrated by their facile and ridiculous “logic” or lack thereof. And we ask, “Can they really be that stupid?” Well, no. Not if they managed to master that walking upright thing. It is smoke and mirrors so we will not react with horror at their plans for our future.
This fat boy has gotten wise. I will not be distracted by the jokers they keep sending out to distract us from the man behind the curtain. And I will NOT kneel.
Answer me this riddle gun-grabbers:
49 states allow some form of concealed carry. That means there are tens of millions of law-abiding citizens in the US right now allowed to carry guns on their person for self-defense. Let’s just call this group of people the Militia of America, aka armed citizens.
Now, every year a percentage of this Militia along with the rest of unarmed Americans, find themselves in situations where they have to face violent criminals. The difference now being the Militia is able to protect themselves from criminals with their self-defense tools. By and large, the Militia is very capable in protecting itself against violence.
Unfortunately, the unarmed citizens are at a disadvantage, being unarmed and all, and have a much higher chance of not surviving these violent encounters. But it should be noted that the Militia also happens to save tens of thousands of unarmed citizens every year by sheer luck or fortune by being in the right place at the right time. It is a well-documented fact that the Militia prevents tens of thousands of crimes (including mass shootings) from happening every year and saves the lives of many citizens.
With me so far? Good. Now, we also have the Police. Sworn citizens whose job it is to protect unarmed citizens within our borders. The only difference between the Police and the Militia is the Police are paid to protect citizens and have legal protection via the state or federal government in the event of making mistakes. The Militia only has access to their own individual means of funds in the event of a mistake. So it should be noted that all the lives saved by the Militia are done for the sole purpose of self-preservation and well-being towards their fellow citizen at great personal and legal risk to the individual Militia member.
The Police also operate with well-being toward their fellow citizen, but because they are burdened by the corrupt forces of bureaucracy they are vulnerable to abuse of power and corruption. Whereas the Militia is not obligated to save people on a daily basis, therefore they are not subject to the same bureaucracy or corruption that comes with state-sanctioned authority and power over other citizens. The Militia considers themselves equals with the average citizen and thus has no reason to exercise any kind of authority over them.
With that distinction made, what you have are two good forces that are both combating criminals (evil) in America in the best way both know how. For one organization it’s a job. For the other, it is a natural right.
So answer me this:
How on Earth does disarming the Militia, a body of citizens with no leader, agenda, or single governing organization, operating purely on the laws of Nature and God-given right of life and the ability to defend themselves against those that would do them harm, help lessen crime in America?
We’ve already established that the armed Militia prevents tens of thousands of crimes every year. If the Militia is summarily disarmed, that means tens of thousands more crimes will occur every year as as direct result.
And as Gun Free Zones have proved over and over, in the areas where you prevent the Militia from treading, more crimes happen. So let’s call Gun Free Zones what they really are. They are Militia Free Zones.
How is that any different if you suddenly established Police Free Zones? Do you think crime would increase in those zones? Of course it would, in the same way criminals choose Militia Free Zones to commit crimes.
Let’s define what Newtown really was. It was both a Police Free Zone and a Militia Free Zone.
There is your answer America. When you openly declare any public area to be free of the Police and the Militia, you are inviting criminals to strike with open arms.
The fact remains, crimes are deterred, prevented, and stopped when criminals are confronted by the Police or the Militia.
What is there to understand? If you are going to disarm the Militia, it only makes sense to disarm the Police, because it’s the same damn logic of “guns are evil”.
This gun is on my list, but every time I ask at the store he just giggles a little and says “nope”
I ordered a silencerco ss sparrow to go on it. The way things are going I might get the can out of purgatory before I find one of these.
“if lawmakers won’t pass even a modest reform supported by the vast majority of Americans”
I am assuming she means “universal background checks”
I see these comments, and every time I see a news ticker on CNN/MSNC/ABC etc… it always says “90% of Americans support universal background checks”. Where did they get that statistic from? At last count there were 315,646,769 people in the USA. So that means that 284,082,092 believe in “universal background checks”? Ok, so you take into account children and non- US citizens. That would still leave millions of adult US citizens. Is there a poll that we don’t know about? I have never been asked if I support background checks. Have you?
http://www.petakillsanimals.com
hypocrites each and every one
Your link to the document is broken.