Anti-gun lawmakers and organizations are always looking for a way to blame the criminal use of firearms on the companies that manufactured the guns instead of the violent criminals who misuse those products for their ill-gotten gain. That’s why Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed into law the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) back in 2005.
Still, that hasn’t stopped many from trying to make whipping boys out of the gun makers, not the least of which is Glock, maker of some of the most reliable striker-fired pistols on the market for the past several decades. Recently, New York has targeted Glock in a lot of ways because criminals have learned to illegally modify their pistols to fire full-auto, instead of the normal one shot for each trigger pull (semi-auto).
The latest from the Empire State comes from Democrat State Sen. Zellnor Myrie and Democrat State Rep. Michaelle Solages, who have introduced legislation that would prohibit the future sale or manufacture of any handguns—specifically Glocks—that they say are “especially” easy to convert into “machine guns.”
At issue is the so-called “Glock switch,” which is decidedly misnamed since Glock doesn’t produce the “switches,” doesn’t sell the switches and doesn’t condone their use. The “Glock switch,” or “Glock auto-sear,” is a piece of metal or plastic that can be used to illegally convert Glock pistols to fire full-auto. The switch works by applying force to the trigger bar to prevent it from limiting fire to one round of ammunition per trigger pull.
What Sen. Myrie, Rep. Solages and others don’t really want you to know is that auto-sears are already prohibited by federal law. Converting any firearm to fire fully automatic is a federal felony, and even possessing a “Glock switch” can result in a federal prison sentence of up to 10 years.
Consequently, what Sen. Myrie and Rep. Solages are trying to address is a violent criminal problem by blaming the manufacturer, not the felons who could already face hard time just by being caught with one in their possession. Still, it’s easier for them to pick on gun companies than their constituents, so the drumbeat of Glock bashing continues.
“Last year, the law was amended to require that firearm manufacturers take steps to ensure their handguns cannot be easily turned into machine guns with Glock switches,” Sen. Myrie and Rep. Solages wrote in a recent news release announcing their legislation. “The law makes clear that if they don’t take such steps, the manufacturers can be held accountable in court by those affected by modified weapons. Despite this, Glock has failed to address the lethality of the design of its handguns. In the face of the company’s continued inaction, it’s time to end the sale of these DIY machine guns in New York.”
The hypocrisy of such a statement is palpable. Criminals are already violating federal law by converting pistols to full auto. A better approach than targeting a storied firearms company is to arrest criminals who possess or use these devices, put them in jail, and clearly communicate that this will be the consequence for anyone else doing the same.
Ultimately, the attack on Glock might not end up mattering in the long run, as there is at least somewhat of a trend right now of judges ruling that regulating full-auto arms violates the Second Amendment. In August 2024, a federal judge in Wichita, Kansas, ruled that the federal law tightly regulating the ownership and transfer of full-auto firearms is unconstitutional under the 2022 Bruen decision. In January of this year, a U.S. district judge in Mississippi also ruled that the federal law effectively banning the sale and possession of newly produced or unregistered machine guns was unconstitutional.
Is this an April Fools joke?
Better to get rid of Dims. More damaging to life than a GLOCK brand Glock.
Does this effort include Glock clones???
Would need to read up on it, wasn’t expecting this one to make it this far compared to the other options this session.
Mass-endangerment and Mass-Threat to all on or near roads/streets by DUI… but worst of all is the endangering/abuse/neglect for her own child … car-violence: Anti-gun Democrat Lumberton, New Jersey mayor Gina LaPlaca arrested for DUI…
“You actually pulled over an elected official. You’re not pulling over a random. You’re pulling over your boss. I am literally your boss. Don’t think I ain’t going to talk to [Police Chief] Gary [Kille] about this. I’m the one that hired you!
…
‘Brady Endorses Gun Safety Champions for New Jersey General Assembly,’ a press release from the gun grab group announced. ‘These Brady-endorsed gun violence prevention champions will create an even stronger majority in the General Assembly, ensuring a safer future for New Jerseyans.
Among Brady’s ‘champions’: Gina LaPlaca.
…
She was charged with endangering/abuse/neglect of a child, driving while intoxicated, reckless driving, careless driving likely to endanger, driving with an expired license and having an open container of alcohol in her vehicle.
…”
https://www.ammoland.com/2025/03/do-you-know-who-i-am-anti-gun-mayor-busted-for-dui/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=4249a64cc1-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-4249a64cc1-479250612
Well look at you exerting all your hypocrite in privilege and stuff to be all left-wing’y ‘morally superior and above the law’.
It all circles back to the Discrimination inherent with Gun Control.
1. Just because federal laws may be unconstitutional does not mean that NY can’t pass a state law regulating automatic firearms (which it probably already has, just as California has). Alternately, there is nothing stopping NY from banning specific firearms, laws which to date have been upheld (e.g. the California Roster and assault weapons ban).
2. PLCAA probably bans the portion of the law that attempts to hold Glock liable for misuse and alteration of its handguns.
3. Will there be an exception for the police, or will tens of millions of $ need to be spent to re-equip all of them?
4. NY passed a law requiring Glock to re-engineer its guns to prevent use of Glock switches. Glock said it couldn’t be done. Although there is an exception under the PLCAA for products defects, the plaintiff cannot prevail unless if it cannot be shown that the guns could be modified to prevent the installation of these switches.
5. In the alternative, Glock could pull a Barrett. It would save millions in attorney’s fees as well as the risk of an adverse judgment, and cost NYS millions to replace tens of thousands of duty firearms.
They need to let me name some of these bills.
This one I’d call “VP9’s For All Because the HK Gang is the Master Race”.
Also, will the FBI help NY ban Glocks?
GOA submitted this to an unusual place.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-weaponizes-background-checks-enforce-california-gun-ban
The latest WP update sure is gold.
Posts sometimes take a few minutes to actually post, other times they take hours. Sometimes they never do.
Yay, WP! That’s seven hour update’s working out just as I’d expect.