You know the old saw: if you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. Words to live by if you’re in government. Or journalism for that matter. Do whatever you can to gloss over a bold-faced screwup. It’s hard to distinguish what’s worse in this case. Is it the knee-deep BS story fed to the Newark Post by cops trying to cover their conspicuously crappy gun-handling skillz? Or the Byzantine wording of the published story by an unnamed reporter (would you want your byline on a punchbowl turd like this?) that makes it as difficult as humanly possible to decipher what happened? And by the way, is there a rule against identifying a public employee involved in a shooting when that might be embarrassing? Either way, it’s not all that hard to ID the issue here…
The problem was that the offending cop appears to know next to nothing about safe gun handling. He sure didn’t know enough to keep his damned finger off the trigger. Never mind keeping the muzzle pointed away from his buddy’s leg.
Officers had completed firearms training and were at police headquarters when one officer noticed what he thought was an abnormality with the physical condition of his handgun. He handed the gun to a second officer so that officer could inspect the weapon and render an opinion on the perceived abnormality. The handgun fired shortly after it was transferred to the second officer.
Sure is a good thing they’d completed their firearms training. Otherwise someone really could have gotten hurt.
The fired round struck the initial officer in the lower leg. First aid was rendered and the officer was transported to Christiana Hospital, where he was treated for the non-life threatening injury.
So welcome to the IGOTD fold, Mr. Incognito Officer, sir. We’re sure you’ll be quietly returned to duty soon, no worse for wear. Too bad we can’t say the same for “the initial officer.”