You asked for it and we got it – a Benelli M4 Civilian. Supposedly this is the gun that settles the Mossberg SPX vs. FN SLP vs. Remington Versa-Max tactical debate. For those who aren’t familiar with the M4, this is the same gun the U.S. Marine Corps are using. The M4 strays away from traditional and sometimes complex (not to mention dirty) gas-operated actions and utilizes its unique Auto Regulating Gas Operating system (ARGO). The ARGO system instead uses dual stainless steel, self-cleaning pistons to operate the action and was designed to handle everything from low power rounds to hard-hitting buckshot. But here’s the big question . . .
Is the Benelli – with its $1629.99 sticker price – worth it? Nick has had great luck with his Mossberg 930 SPX and I’m a Mossberg 590A1 fan. My 590 has put thousands upon thousands of rounds down range with little issue. With that in mind, I’m planning on torture testing the M4 for our loyal readers.
Not a bury-this-thing-in-the-mud kind of test. It’s safe to say that the Marines have probably done that for me already. Instead I’ll do my best to try to get it to jam up or fail. From there, she’ll get turned into a 922(r) compliant 3-gun beast! If you have any suggestions or specific ammo you’d like to see me run through her, leave your ideas in the comments section below.
Initial Impressions:
– Solidly built. Everything about it feels very solid. My 870 Talo pump
feels like a piece of aluminum foil compared to this thing. Lockup, stock
fitment, barrel fitment, and finish are all what you’d expect from
Benelli.
– The ARGO system is indeed very simple. There are very few moving parts
and once you get it all apart, it becomes very clear and obvious.
– The buttstock is nicely sized and proportioned for me. The pistol grip is
made out of a fantastic rubber/poly blend, but the forend is
surprisingly slippery. For the time being, though, I’ll hold off from making any
judgments until after some thorough testing.
– The LPA sights are great and provide a very useable sight picture. We’ll
see how they do at the range.
Stay tuned. This should be fun.
$1629.99 sticker price?!?!?!?!
My $400 Remmingtion 870 pump action always works like a champ. Unless the bottom of that Benelli pistol grip is shapped like Jennifer Garners mouth and comes with an articulating tongue, I doubt Benelli has added over $1,200 worth of improvement over anything else on the market.
Coyote, you’re a sick man….and I like it!!!
#1
Like everything else in the world, the “cost vs. performance” chart is not linear. Is the Buggati Veyron nine to ten times “better” than the Corvette ZR1 Supercar (the fastestand most advanced production Chevy ever)? Is a LWRC M6A2 two or three times as good as a DPMS Sportical? Aside from that, the notion of “better” is subjective. What you’re looking for in a HD gun may not be what someone else is looking for their HD gun.
Keep an open mind and follow this space to see if the M4 is at least somewhat worth the extra $1200 🙂
LOL…or Jessica Biel’s mouth…
http://www.realbollywood.com/up_images/Jessica-Biel12230l.jpg
😉
Definitely 2 thumbs up for that link to Jessica!
Top 10 comment ever!
shooting the benelli M4 is like being on the receiving end of Jennifer Garner’s tongue. trust me. The Benelli is worth every penny.
Dex, if you were able to make that comparison empirically, I’m impressed.
Agreed. The M4 is the gold standard in auto loader, tatical shotguns. I love when people bash on something immediately on here before they have even handled or shot it. Just because its expensive, its not worth it. Ususally the case is “i cant afford that so its a waste of money”. Wrong. very wrong they all are. I can tell you right now that the M4 is worth the money. Smooth, simple, extremely reliable and has been tested in the harshest conditions by the USMC and was proven to be perfect. I too had reservations when i bought mine and even after for several days i had buyers remorse. Then i took it to the range. I felt how well the ARGO system absorbed recoil. A pump shotgun has double the felt recoil. And lets be honest. A Moss 500 and Rem 870 are cheap, affordable and basic pump shotguns. They are not built for rigorous and constant abuse. They are flimsy and cheap compared to a M4 or even an SLP. There is no comparison. And if you still sit here like a blind fool and claim there is, or its just a shotgun, then well, you obviously havent shot one. I own a mossberg 590A and i can tell you the Benelli M4 is 10 times the gun that the 590 is. People just talk out of their ass on here cause they are butt hurt that they dont make enough money to afford the guns they bitch about.
A smart consumer will want justification for spending way more money for a given product when they could spend less on another brand. Just spell out your reasons for justifying the extra money for the Benelli and spare us your shit arrogant attitude. Who the Hell shit in your oatmeal this morning? What an asshole!
I love the 870. Everyone should own one. But this is tier 1, no compromises.
Here is what you get for $1,200:
1. Speed. Your 870 recoil plus pump action is not even close to an M4. This is a faster, more accurate weapon.
2. Stainless steel self-cleaning pistons=Few moving parts. Piston drive is the cleanest, fastest, simplest, coolest and smoothest technology of any shotgun.
3. Modular. You can fix anything or reconfigure it by hand in seconds. Grab your home defense weapon, shoot skeet and then nail some cans at 100 yards, all without a single tool. This makes it vastly more versatile than an 870.
4. Accessible. What if your wife or 14 year old daughter needs to grab a shotgun? An 870 is difficult for many people to handle. The M4 has far less recoil and will not fail. Your wife not only can shoot it, she will like to shoot it.
5. Everything you like about the 870: Military heritage, simplicity, ultra reliable.
For $1,200 you get a notably superior defensive weapon.
Well said…
Thank you for the thoughtful points you made. I want to get my wife a shotgun for self protection. I love the firepower a shotgun delivers but I do have reservations as well. I’m concerned about my wife handling the recoil and having the presence of mind under stress to chamber subsequent rounds if needed. Reliability in life and death situations is a top priority along with simplicity of operation. Ease of maintenance and repair is a plus. You have sold me on the M4 and will gladly pay the price for my wife’s protection.
Just like you Cayote, my M4 can pump itself. So just keep stroking your POS 870, junior.
until you need to operate it one-handed.
Every once in a while a great gun comes along at a shockingly high price. I should stop being shocked.
It’s a great value. I don’t know anyone who owns an M4 who would call it overpriced.
I agree that the M4 seems fairly priced. I’ve had mine for three years, and paid 1,300. It’s built like a tank, is soft to shoot even with 1 3/8 oz loads, and perfectly reliable so far. It is, in truth, a specialized design. For perspective, my long-term shotgun interest has been in skeet and wing shooting, and I only own double guns otherwise. I have three double guns for skeet that I also use for upland bird hunting. I wanted a semi-auto defensive shotgun, and couldn’t, three years later, have more confidence in a firearm. With a Geiselle hammer, 7 round tube, and Urbino stock, it fills the niche well, and is a joy to shoot.
Hi. I know it is 3 yrs later but where did you get the M4 for $1300. The lowest i have seen is 1799. Can you tell me where I can buy the M4 for the best price? Thanks
Want to know why it costs 1600$?
The US Military will pay that much. They will pay that much because they are spending Someone Else’s Money (in this case, yours and mine). Who cares what it costs? Uncle Sam is picking up the tab. Go ahead and have desert too.
In the grand scheme of things, 1600$ for a shotgun is peanuts to the US Defense Budget (funny way to use the word “budget” huh), but those peanuts really do stack up.
I doubt that the M4 is really that much better than…say an FN SLP which runs around 1000$. Maybe…and for 1600$ I hope it really is the cat’s ass…
At least the DoD produces an annual budget, unlike the Federal Government at large.
The military pisses away money, no argument there. But I *seriously* doubt the Army would purchase something at sticker price. Especially civilian sticker price.
Military discounts apply for bulk weapon sales too, you know.
No kidding! I work for a state govt’. If I want to buy pens for my office, I can’t get the $0.99 pack from Walmart, I have to use the GSA catalog and pay $8.99 for the exact same thing. It’s the same with every single thing the government buys.
Reliability.
The FN SLP is fantastic and very fast, but it also is less forgiving with ammo. It is well made and a good value for the price point, but it is laughable to say it is of similar quality and reliability as the M4.
The FN has two gas pistons for heavy and light loads. Lame. The M4 is auto adjusting.
“Oh, hey zombies, time out. I put in the wrong pistons for these shells. Hang on while I look for the right pistons and swap them out.”
Go hold them side by side, shoot them with different ammo, and then come back and tell us if you still think they are in the same league.
As a grunt and live my life in combat, the M4 has save my ass and my buddies many time over, your comments about uncle same spend your money so we can defend your pathetic life and ensure your freedom to enjoy. To you it may expensive to over paid by my governments to out fit the fighting forces the best to win the fight that you pussy do not want to the fighting. Your freaking comments just offended this grunts to no ends. Any way enjoy your fucking freedom on our behalf.
you’re too stupid to be a grunt. would not want your illiterate ass on my team.
No shit dude. Chill out bro nobody is trying to piss you off. The government maybe could afford to teach you how to be a little more literate with their endless budget.
If you are interested, I’ve done a few videos on my M4, demonstrating it’s function and speed, I was able to get six rounds out of it in under .7 seconds. Also, I did a video overview and complete field stripping/reassembly video. You are going to love how easy it is to take it down.
Here are links:
Shooting the M4/Speed Demo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dibSfoBtGU
Overview and Field Stripping/Reassembly
Remington has this video of the Versa-max where they load every kind of 12ga shell they could find into the gun and always mix up the order, etc. At least in that video it ran everything flawlessly. I’m sure it isn’t the only gun that can do that, but I think that shows what should be expected these days. Do something like that!
Also, are you going to test it with or without that sex-toy magazine block?
Haha, that will be Part II and I will acquire some goodies from Freedom Fighter Tactical (FFT) that will ensure 922r compliance and will help transform this into a very capable HD gun into a 3-Gun monster…
this is america, buy whatever makes you happy. but as has already been stated. is it three to four times better than a remington or mossberg, because it costs that much more?
The Germans and Chinese also buy what suits their taste. It isn’t just us. The M4 isn’t expensive. A Holland & Holland is expensive. A pro-grade Gamba or Perazzi skeet gun is expensive. Is an H&K pistol twice as reliable and durable as a Glock? No. “Comparisons,” they say, “are odious.” For that matter, shooting three-gun for a year or two makes the cost of the M4 small beer.
Federal OO Buck is the cheapest big name buckshot in my neck of the woods. If it will reliably eat that and cheap birdshot and it’s truly more reliable and easier to clean than my 930 then it’s got my interest.
Granted, it’s going to be pretty much impossible to, definitively, be “more” reliable than my 930 seeing as I haven’t had a single malfunction in ~1800 rounds of bird/buck/slugs. So if you’re willing to put more than 1800 rounds and you don’t have a malfunction of any kind then I suppose it could technically be more reliable… I think.
Derek, have you cleaned the gun at any point during the 1800 rounds? I’m thinking a good way to judge the M4’s “worth” would be an ultimate long-term no cleaning test to see where (and if) it will jam. Benelli touts this gun as being super reliable in the dirtiest conditions with minimal maintenance. Knowing what I know about the SPX and FN SLP (and many semi-auto hunting guns), both of those guns have a hard time making it past 250-300 rounds before FTE/FTL’s increase exponentially (the reason why you’ll never see a semi-auto in any national skeet match where the round count for the day normally exceeds 400). Obviously, if you clean your gun every 100-200 rounds, there is nothing to be worried about. I hoping to see the M4 “go the distance” in that regard. Stay tuned…
I’ve cleaned it a couple of times but I’ve gone a lot more than 200 rounds between cleanings. I’m no expert, in fact my 930 is the only semi-auto shotgun I’ve ever shot, so I’m not saying one’s better than another because I simply don’t know. I’m just saying the 930’s a lead throwin machine. Either way, I’m excited for your review. Now get to shootin already 🙂
cleaning routine for my mossberg 500. cut large patch from old t shirt. open action of shotgun, unloaded of course. spray clp down barrel and into action. use t shirt patch to wipe out. never had a ftf or fte.
Perhaps just from a day at the range. I use my 590 for coyote hunting, dove hunting (yup, even with a 20″ barrel it works well), 3-Gun (just learning btw), etc. Mine, although 100% reliable, does require more than just a patch down the barrel. I’ve pulled pebbles out of my trigger pack, luckily none of which were large enough to block anything.
Just ask the Marine Corps, Navy SEALs, and other Special Operations what they think of the M4 Benelli.
Or offer them a free choice, the Benelli or a Mossberg 590….
The comment that price increases are not linear as construction quality and manufacturing costs rise, is the sad truth of the world. I’ve blown more money just to get a somewhat better HP server, and it isn’t involved in defense of my life, just somewhat faster data handling and backup.
There are shotguns and there are Benellis. To own one is to know.
Word.
+1. I spent 1,500 on my Benelli and it was worth it. Similar to H&K, Benelli gets ridiculed for being over engineered and expensive, though you have to own one to understand.
I just purchased one of these and pick it up Thursday from on order from my local FFL. I already have waiting in the box my Urbino OD Green Stock and FFT Foreend along with the full mag Titanium tube to go on once I get the thing. I personally can’t wait.
How does the OD stuff look? I’m thinking about it myself vs the standard black furniture. Did you get the cheekriser stock with Limbsaver pad? I spoke with Todd yesterday on the phone and he was very helpful and provided a lot of insight. I’ll be doing a “3-Gun Monster4” build using many of the Freedom Fighter Tactical parts.
I got the whole deal.. cheek riser, limbsaver pad etc. The OD green is dark but not quite as dark as I thought it’d be but its fine. I plan on a EOtech XPS2 I think it is or a Reflex sight soon
My registered username is now timer00 but anyways I took a quick video of my M4 I picked up finally yesterday along with a quick look at the Mesa accessories.. I’ll be doing a video that has it taken apart and put together with the Mesa gear. Just look up “zarack00” user on youtube.
Adam, you will love it. If you’re married, you might have fidelity problems though 😉
haha.. my wife of course is kind of on board.. she knows how the world is getting and isn’t too naive 🙂
I sold our 3rd car a 95 Volvo wagon that I had for 3 years to pretty much pay for the gun.. though the extras I bought ahead of time by a few weeks.
if you have to donate bodily fluids for money and prostitute yourself, the Benelli is worth it LOL 😉
Im dead serious.
http://www.stoegerindustries.com/firearms/stoeger-model-2000.php
buy stoeger if you want the argo system without the benelli price. both are owned by beretta.
I thought the Stoeger had the Inertia Drive system, not the ARGO system.
I’m curious as to how it’s different from the military version.
Fixed buttstock and a 5-round magazine tube… the USMC uses a collapsible stock and a 7-round tube. Other than that, it’s the same gun.
The civilian version comes with a restricted mag tube, and no collapsible stock plus I think they get the 14″ barrel standard for the military instead of the 18″ civilian
To my knowledge, the 14″ barrel (aka the M4 “Entry”) is mostly for law-enforcement or specialized units. The Standard M1014 (military M4) has an 18″ barrel.
Your right .. I was just thinking along the lines that certain military areas might prefer the 14″ 🙂
I think I heard a while back that Benelli was manufacturing a m4 in the US – that being the case, do you think it would be possible to find an extended mag tube along with collapsible stock? I had thought there was some weird obscure rule where it prevented the import of a completely foreign made rifle/shotgun? Maybe TTAG made an article on it?
Mine was mfg’d within the past 6 months and says “Made in Italy” right on the barrel.
However, the collapsible stock and mag extension are available. One needs to remember that swapping parts or adding a mag-ext will require the gun to maintain 922r compliance. The adjustable stock runs about $599 and is available from multiple vendors. Keep an eye on this space for more info…
Benelli is assembling the M4 H2O models in the US because they are coated in the US before assembly. The main components are still made in Italy.
There are enough aftermarket parts available to allow the installation of the Italian-made telescoping stock and pistol grip (which are two parts; not one part like the standard “pistol grip stock”). You’d have to replace foreign parts with US-made parts to be compliant with federal restrictions. US-made hammers, forends, magazines, and followers are available to facilitate this reconfiguration, but it can be pricey to acquire all the parts.
As for import regulation, the M4 has a 5-round magazine so that it falls within the guidelines to determine it a “sporting” shotgun. This allows it to be imported in ATF-approved configurations for civilian sales (which is just one configuration).
I’d love to have one…but not at that price. My FN TPS or Mossberg 930 are fine, thank you (with a wad of cash left over for ammo).
I own an 870 and a Benelli. The Benelli is a sporting clays model, granted, but it shoots much faster than the 870. It also needs very little maintenance. I’ve shot my gun buddies Benelli M4 head to head with an 870. The M4 put 00 buck on target much faster. Yes, the M4 is damn expensive. It’s also what I’d want in combat.
That being said, the 870 is my duty gun because my department cannot afford Benelli M4’s. I train with the 870 on and off duty to avoid training scars.
went out to the country for a shooting day with some friends. And one of the guys brought one of these. that was a pretty bad ass shotgun. could toss a milk jug full of water up into the air and put 7 shells into it before the jug hits the ground.
Nice shotgun but I think I’ll stick with my 590A1.
I am very interested in your review of this shotgun. Really wring it out for us. I’m also interested in what you do to make it a 3-gun happy shotgun. That’s something I’d like to get into eventually, once I have, y’know, 3 guns.
i know most semi’s wont cycle the aguila short shells.
but for shits and giggles.
mind trying a few short shell slugs in this ?
I am a Federal LE and can assure you Beretta charges the Govt a $$$$$ less than the $1600 sticker. Our department bought several of the civilian versions that has the magazine tube limiter, which is easily replaced with an extension for a few $$. We are experiencing a problem with Federal 00 buck rounds splitting in the chamber and only the brass section ejecting. MOST of the time the broken hull slides out the barrel. Beretta markets this weapon as being compatible with “any” ammo. However, when contacted about this situation, they are blaming it on the ammo. I wanted to find out if anyone else was having this issue.
This weapon is amazingly fast, I can load and shoot 6 rounds before a Mossberg 500 can shoot six.
Any semi auto will shoot faster than any pump, so the comparison is not accurate. I have a Benelli M$ and have been VERY satisfied with it. I wish my house was cheaper also but we pay for those things we want.
My Stoeger M2000 was $420 with all the chokes. I can’t seem to make it jam. It’s made by Benelli but if it had the Benelli logo it would cost $1200.
Well I have been out twice with my M4 with Mesa Tactical stock/limbsaver and FFT 3/4″ Ti charging handle and matching FFT OD green forend.
I shot Federal 7 1/2 shot, Federal #4 Buck, Remington 3″ Magnum #4 Buck, and Remington 2 3/4 00 Buck. Probably about 200 rounds total and everything went fine.
Yes if I didn’t have an extra car to sell to buy the M4 I probably would have went Mossberg but I decided to splurge and haven’t regretted it. I have heard from various people from reading gun boards: In general buy the best quality weapon you can afford. I only plan on having a 3 gun type setup (pistol, shotty, rifle, eventually hunting gun possibly) Again this is all my preference and situation.
Comparing a pump gun cost with a semi auto cost is comparing apples to oranges. Very different function as well as cost. Having fired all the mentioned guns I own a Mossberg 500 for a pump and a Benelli M4 for a semi auto gun. The Benelli simply runs all the time and I can not say the same for the others. If you can’t afford it or simply do not wish to pay that much the don’t. It is still a free country, but don’t bash something you have not ever tried. In my mind the cost is retaliative to what you expect to get out of it. I wish I could have spent less but I am also very satisfied with what I have purchased. In my mind the 590 does not really have anything over the 500. I have several thousand rounds through my 500 and absolutely zero problems. Someone can say the same for a Remington 870, but you cam not compare the 500, 590 or 870 to any semi auto as they are different tools.
Compare it to a 1100 or something semi auto but not a pump gun. I hands down choose the Benelli M4 over the other semi autos. But again the M4 is not the same as any other semi auto in the design of the gun over all. The configuration of the M4 is unique for it’s intended purpose.
I, currently, own a Mossberg 500 tactical and have owned Remington 1100 and 870 tactical shotguns. I have also spent countless hours in the dove fields of Alabama and Mississippi with various 1100’s, Model 12’s, 870’s, Browning humpback autos and Citoris and Mossbergs. Sometimes I was the shooter and other times, I was next to the shooter. Over the last 35 years I have run thousands of shells through those guns, from low brass #9 generic birdshot, to various grades (and ages) of buckshot and slugs. I have never had a failure to fire, stovepipe, jam, disintegration or failure to feed. EVER. Every single time I pulled the trigger, the gun went “bang”. I also don’t know anyone who has experienced any of those in the field.
The same goes for thousands of .45, .22, .38, .357, .44 Mag and .40 rounds sent down the tube in various pistols and rifles.
I can assure you that the maintenance of those guns was spotty, at best.
What am I doing wrong? I should have had a few dozen misfires, misfeeds, jams and whatnot in that time, at least.
Weird.
Dale, I would suggest that you play the lotto then, as you are the luckiest woodsman ever. To never experience a misfeed, misfire, or jam is simply remarkable. Even the military accepts the facts that anything mechanical is inherently doomed to fail or hiccup at one point or another and has certain “failure limits”…
I do hear your point though, guns over the past 30-40 years have become boringly reliable. Looking at the four 5-gallon buckets I have in the garage, I would say I put an honest 10,000 bullets down the pipe each year – both at the range and in the field. Even then, I couldn’t “name” my last malfunction. However, even so, I have had misfires with factory ammo in factory guns, had failures to eject with a brand-new 887 shotgun, misfeeds with a Custom Shop SIG, had sights fly off (Glock), a broken firing pin (numerous guns), bent magazine lips, busted 1100 gas rings (I always bring a couple spares dove hunting myself), worn-out extractors (10/22), broken a hammer (A5), had a frozen safety/selector (Charles Daly), a turret “pop” off on a high-end hunting scope (Leupold), and on and on and on. Statistically, these failures are low – we’re talking fractions of a percent, but they DO happen. Add the possibility of user error, and the figures goes significantly higher. To add to that, I am also a competitor and I see guns break and malfunction ALL the time (I’m not talking about user-induced failures here) – including some of my own.
If you look through some of the gun reviews here on TTAG, you’ll see that these types of issues do happen, even if not often. Some guns, simply by their design, are more robust and less prone to breakage and failure than others. Semi-auto shotguns can be notoriously prone to failure – especially when the gas system isn’t “tuned” to the rounds selected. This is why on guns like the 1100, the A5, etc. you can “adjust” the gas system for whatever loads you choose. The Benelli M4 is supposed to change all that (I guess the Versamax is getting good marks in that department as well) and I can report as of now that there hasn’t been a single hiccup with this gun. I’ve literally lost track of how much rounds have been shot through and will have to go through my range books to see. Off the top of my head, there was a single round that I could not get to fire – a super light, 7/8-oz #7 shot handload that a 70 year old man loads for his C.G. Clay’s gun.
PC: What a delightful summary of things that go wrong on guns. Thanks. The only guns I have that are even more reliable than my M4, and measurable only in the sense that they absolutely don’t care about super-light loads, are my skeet double guns.
MSRP is $1900 to $2100 based on version and they are impossible to find for sale.
Isn’t it great when not only do we have to suffer being victimized by criminals, but then suffer re-victimization by iatrogenic politics and public hysteria?
Benelli M 4….shoots everything I put through it, bird, buck & slug. 1,300 plus rounds and never a malfunction. The truly impressive bit for me is to be able to consistently hit the 8 or 9 ring at 100 yards with a slug. No optics, just the factory ghost ring sites. Used to be a pump owner….no longer. The M 4 is the funniest gun I have ever owned. Multiple target acquisition is fast, fun and seamless. Now looking to add a Mesa Tactical stock and possible some optics to see how far out I can get with a slug. Love my Armalite AR & my Glock 22, but if I had to pick one gun, and only one gun, it would be the M 4.
Good article. Very fine shotgun. I was lucky enough to add a Benelli collapsable stock and extended magazine tube to mine, after the tedious process of making it 922 compliant (see freedom fighter tactical’s site for regulations). Anyone wishing to convert to the extended mag tube, remember you will need a new spring, or the last shell will not chamber.
It has been two years since Patrick Carrube promised a review of the Benelli M4. Does anyone know if this was ever completed?
I paid 1200 for a used example with some extras. This is my go to defense shotgun. I am not a pump guy so this was my obvious best choice. I own 4 other Benellis including an early M-1 Defense rotary bolt example. To each his own but the M4 is an absolute no brainer in my book based on design features and prior experience with my Benelli hunting guns. You get what you pay for.
So is a high point 9mm just as good as a CZ 75 SP 01 Shadow? I mean……they both shoot 9mm right? They are both pistols. Ahhhh……hell those CZ’s Shadows are overpriced and aren’t worth 1200 dollars. The high point is just as good. Um no. There is always a reason why something is more expensive. Whether its cars, TV’s, watches, electronics, ect. Sure there is always a cheaper brand or alternative. But the more expensive brands are of much higher quality and attention to detail. Same goes with guns. I get so tired of hearing the argument when a gun is priced high that it somehow makes it overrated or not worth it by those who have never shot it or even picked one up. These people are simply pissed off at life because they cant afford the gun they are complaining about. Its not the guns fault you dont make money. People on here are so stupid.
And you lead the pack. People shouldn’t slam what they don’t know or have experience with but your obsession with money is annoying. I suspect you’re not as well healed as you want everyone to believe.
More expensive brands are NOT always better. Generally speaking, you get what you pay for, but price is an unreliable gauge of quality. Some brands, especially “prestige” brands are just overpriced. Only an ignorant sucker believes that a higher price always correlates with higher quality.
This is an old thread, but I have had my Benelli M4 for about 5 years, and i’ve long forgotten the pain of the cost. I now have a top tier weapon that I own and will serve me well the rest of my days. I also have an old Winchester pump, which is like a toy compared to the Benelli. If it’s my family’s life that is in danger, I will be awfully glad to have that M4 with 9 rounds of alternating 00 buck and PDX-1, tin my grubby paws.
Could a Remington 870 or a Mossberg 590 do the same job? Practically, for most people, yes. But I get so much confidence from my M4 that it makes a difference to me, but that is certainly just an opinion,, not a fact.
Pistol, rifle, shotgun, 9mmvs .45, SCAR vs the world, ad nauseum, we all have our opinions. I think we can agree Benelli has hit one out of the park with this one, and our economy sucks when nobody has had a real raise since 1980 and we can’t afford slightly expensive items like this. Now a Barrett .50 with a Night Force Scope requires another level of financial commitment, but people don’t seem to bitch as much about its cost. In any case, is it worth it? Benelli and Barrett!, Two thumbs up!,
Sienna Miller, a stunning and lovely actress, is well-known among fans for her great design sense. Further, this time, we launched Anatomy Of A Scandal Sienna Miller Poncho, as part of our ongoing effort to present her with creative collections. Furthermore, In the Anatomy of a Scandal series, Sienna wears this outfit.