Previous Post
Next Post

investigation

Guns and booze don’t mix. We all know that, right? Throw some sex into that admixture and you’ve got yourself a really combustible situation. Sadly, that’s a lesson Denver officers Steve Loan and Jeremy Ownbey never learned in their time on the force and now there’s an active investigation into the two coppers. Copper? I hardly know her! Well, that seems to have been part of the problem . . .

As usatoday.com relates,

Two Denver police officers are being investigated after a fight that allegedly occurred at an officer’s home during a swingers party…An argument started and the two women allegedly started fighting. The officers also got into an altercation. Aurora police say Sloan pulled his gun during the incident.

And by “pulled his gun” we think they mean his GLOCK.

Compounding the fun and games, the Aurora PD’s response to the carnal commotion apparently wasn’t exemplary either. “Aurora police also said four officers who responded to the incident are now the subject of an internal affairs investigation for not conducting a DUI investigation on Ownbey.” Apparently Mrs. Ownbey’s thong wasn’t the only thin blue line that went up that night.

Previous Post
Next Post

84 COMMENTS

  1. Its all good! Because police are the only ones responsible enough to own a gun. Us regular peasants would just get ourselves into a stupid situation and hurt ourselves or someone else….. Help! Im being repressed!

    • I’m sure that there have to be at least a few ladies who’ve earned the nickname “N.W.A.” for precisely that reason.

  2. Theres more than a few cops in the swinging scene. Not as many as military though…

    uh…. so I`ve heard, I mean!

    • Yeah I’d like to see a cover story of Army Times be “Top Ten Duty Stations For Swinging”… It would be more interesting than just another article about what our next combat uniform will look like.

        • I’m shocked at your last comment!… I can’t believe that Tundra Pigs… Errr, I mean women from the Fort Drum area would engage in such behavior.

  3. If this occured in the home, what does a DUI have to do with it? That must be an awfully rare home that moves, unless they all live in an RV…

    • The DUI would be for the drunken cop pulling his pistol for no good reason. They need to be held to at least the same standards as they would hold us to.

      • How is that “driving under the influence”? Being an idiot, yes. Reckless endangerment or assault or some similar charge, sure. Driving, not so much.

    • It seems like the DUI was prior to this incident. I think the point they poorly made, was that he should have already been investigated for a DUI charge, before this occurred.

    • I used to know a guy who loved to watch the shocked looks on the faces of his straight-laced co-workers when he announced “I think I’ll go and f*ck my first wife.”

      Of course, he had only ever married once, and never divorced.

      • Worked with a guy who would say something similar. The usual response to him was along the lines of:
        “So that takes care of the first five minutes of your evening. What are you going to do with the rest of it?”

    • Funny most of the swingers I have known had strict rules against breeding during play time, hygiene concerns and the like.

  4. Swinging is dangerous, I’ve known a couple people into it, and was even invited to partake in it once. Declined. This dude literally showed me naked pictures of his wife and asked if I’d go home with him to do her while he watched. Something just inherently wrong with that. It always ends ugly for people, and sometimes people end up getting killed. Sure, it may seem just peachy to let your bro plow your wife and you plow his but then someone gets emotionally attached and things turn ugly real quick.

    • You realize the logic there is almost exactly the same of gun control advocates. Please tell me this was dripping with sarcasm. You offer no statistics, vague anecdotal evidence and a statement of personal morality superimposed on others.

        • A tad offended, actually, yes. Not a swinger, in a poly-ship.

          Moreover, though, the logic you use was so close to the typical irrational, gun control advocate, I was hoping that you could see through that.

          “Guns are dangerous! I know a couple people who are into it, even had one ask me to partake. DECLINED! My friend wanted me to go to the gun range and shoot his scary black gun. What’s wrong with that person. Doesn’t he know that it may seem like a “fun” afternoon can turn tragic and ugly in a moment! Someone gets angry about something, or slips and then next thing you know, people die!!”
          ^^ not a valid statement.

          “I know a few people in swinging; it’s not for me.”
          “I know a few people into guns; it’s not for me.”
          ^^ valid statements.

        • Ok buttlove. You have fun with that, Don’t let me know how it turns out…

        • Actually, the anti-sexual and close minded views on sex that people like you hold cause a lot of relationship and social problems. Much more so than the open views swingers or poly people have. However you can keep thinking how you think with your self-righteous attitude. This is America after all. Though ironically the sexually repressed and close minded often try to legislate their morals into law.

        • I don’t visit this website to be lectured by polyamorous people who say that close minded (traditional) views of relationships are akin to those of gun confiscating statists… The Brotherhood of Steel’s original comment was far from inflamatory or offensive… And I think that his central point that swinging is a high-risk behavior due to human nature is a simple fact, not a condemnation of someones lifestyle.

        • @S. Cautela — Far from offensive? His language in his first to his last post was extremely demeaning and dismissive towards people of alternative lifestyles. There was an implication that we’re just a violent homicide waiting to happen (as opposed to all the domestic violence in straight, monogamous relationships or what?).

          I don’t come to this site to be lectured by ignorant people on how my lifestyle is morally repugnant and violence waiting to happen. When someone is attacking my personal relationships by proxy (swinging is a related subset of polyamory, but different), I feel I am in the right to defend it.

          When his logic is virtually the same as the dribble that comes from the gun grabbers, I’m going to say so.

          Now, may we continue to discuss firearms?

      • Is there a swinger registry or data base where one could get statistical information?

        I would think everyone’s opinion on swinging would be based solely on anecdotal information.

        • …actually there are a lot of studies on alternative relationship models out there. Polyamoury, swinging, hook-up culture, kink, asexual/aromantic arrangements, etc. This stuff is a goldmine for sociology types. =P

    • Dated a woman once, on date three she informed me she was happily married.

      As shocking as this was, she informed me it was OK for her to date, so she could bring home men, apparently hubby liked to watch.

      That was our last date.

      • Yeah, good thing you got out, it could’ve been one of those things were they try and lure you into sex with the husband like what happened to that guy on Rescue Me hahaha.

        • I never watched the show.

          But, that’s kind of what I was thinking. I figured I was going be drugged and wake up, naked, tied face down on a bed, covered in canola oil with some big, hairy guy in a batman costume attempting to mount me.

        • Could also have been luring you into attempted blackmail. Or bashing you in the head and taking off with your wallet and car.

        • Batman? or Bloomberg wearing a french maid outfit like they did in the Little Nicky movie with Hitler taking a flask up the a$$

      • Your right. I remember when my ex cut me down to twice a week. I didn’t feel THAT bad cause I knew there were two other guys she cut off completely.

  5. “Guns a booze don’t mix.”

    and on the internet, neither does spelling, punctuation, and grammer! 😀 Ban me please!! 🙂

  6. Guns and booze don’t mix. We all know that, right?

    /OT grumbling on

    That’s debatable. For years many of us have partaken of beverage (and for some, other substances). It all depends upon what one is doing with the firearm at the time. If it is in a holster for defensive purposes then it’s a non-issue. I know the line worked well for the article so I’m not complaining about that aspect. It’s just that I see this line thrown about more often and it just doesn’t fit reality. If it’s repeated often enough, it will be taken by many as gospel. Off duty cops and other citizens drink while armed everyday. A few irresponsible people shouldn’t drink while armed or in possession of any other tools or equipment; but that’s it.

    /OT grumbling off

  7. Maybe it was not a DUI but CUI or carrying under the influence which they likely use the same legal limit for carrying under the influence as they do for driving.

  8. I see no one pointed out that Aurora is also home to the state senator that helped sponsor the gun mag limit bill and where the movie theater shooter (dressed like batman) went wild. . . . . can’t wait to see what she offers for constitutent services. . . .

  9. From the article the DUI charge seems to be a prior offense and unrelated to this charge. I see a trend with this guy. Alcohol and…anything doesn’t mix with him.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here