What if the government didn’t need to ban your guns to kill the Second Amendment?
That’s exactly what’s happening in Connecticut right now, where lawmakers are introducing a bill that doesn’t outlaw firearms—but could absolutely destroy the gun industry as we know it. The strategy? Open the legal floodgates.
In the latest video from Colion Noir, he breaks down how this bill weaponizes lawsuits to punish gun manufacturers and retailers—even when they follow the law. We’re talking about financial ruin through endless litigation, insurance companies backing out, and manufacturers closing their doors for good.
This isn’t accountability. It’s war by paperwork.
Key Takeaways from the Video:
- Gun stores and manufacturers can be sued for crimes they had nothing to do with—just for selling a legally purchased firearm.
- The bill uses vague terms like “reasonable steps” to justify legal attacks.
- This isn’t about stopping crime—it’s about bankrupting the firearms industry from the inside out.
- If gun shops vanish, your right to bear arms becomes irrelevant.
Noir also explains how these underhanded tactics are part of a broader effort to gut the 2A community without ever passing a direct ban. If you care about the Second Amendment, this video is a must-watch.
📺 Watch the full video here:
Prominent Constitutional attorney, Sue Therassoff, says CT is opening the door for a lawsuit against the state for undermining the first and second Amendments.
Solution is to print your own guns with a 3D printer.
Check out the FGC-9 Mk2.
For about $300 worth of printer you can make them yourself.
You were born with this right.
Sure thing. Now try to actually use that expensive paperweight.
DOGE should cut CT out of the union.
Thanx to Bill Clinton I’ve got a lifetime supply of guns and ammo and even enough for my friends and relatives.
Parrabelum to the 7th power.
Thanx to Bill Clinton I’ve got a lifetime supply of guns and ammo and even enough for my friends and relatives.
Parrabelum to the 7th power.
Lawsuits filed against ILL annoy haven’t stopped squat lately. Has to come from SCOTUS or even DJT. Or resistance ala April 19,1775🙄We aren’t Canaduh>yet!
It’s been what a few weeks? If you aren’t measuring steps to victory in years you already got played.
Holy delayed blow back Batman, did my comment comment today or tomorrow?
” I think the Joker has had his hand in this Boy Wonder”
🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
Tune in next week
Same Bat time
Same Bat channel.
Typical action from Legislators who know less than nothing.
“Reasonable steps” are already in place, its called NICS.
The first suit under this bill would include a counterclaim against the ATF, FBI and United States as a whole for detrimental reliance by the dealer for selling to someone with a clean NICS.
Bring it on, Id love for a mom and pop shop to take down the ATF.
That should be an absolute defense to any lawsuit of this nature. The dealer literally asks the federal government for permission to give the person the firearm, and the FEDS are supposedly conducting a real time background check before giving their assent.
It’s really not possible to do anymore due diligence than contacting law enforcement on the spot before transferring a firearm.
This is also one of the reasons I wish that the ATF would *not* encourage dealer discretion in selling you a weapon. It just opens the door to Monday morning quarterbacking: “Sure his NICS was clean, but you should have known he looked sketchy anyway, and ATF says you can stop a transfer for any reason”. I wouldn’t want any avenue available to assign liability.
This is currently happening in Washington state. They have such severe restrictions on gun shops that many are closing because they can’t comply with the ridiculous regulations.
Reasonable steps are already in place, it’s called NICS.
If by reasonable you mean the “New, Electronic” 4473/NICS where you can still be held up on a transfer for days for even a spelling mistake or having a common name, and the Gatekeepers of The Records cannot provide proof that those records are being retained afterwards, in violation of Federal Statutes, then you do you, boo.
I much prefer private cash transactions, or at worst dealing with a local nearby brick and mortar shop (that still uses the paper forms and will probably only quit the business after a mysterious fire inside of his records storage area.)
Isn’t everyone here tired of being pissed on by the Government while they tell you it’s not infringement, just a light rain?
Maybe things will be different when we move to Mars,,,har har har
NICS does not have a registry of owned firearms. What it has is a list of all persons who have been disqualified from the possession or ownership of firearms, at least to the extent that those convictions or other disqualifications have been reported to the FBI as required by law. (In the past, the military services had a very poor record of compliance with the reporting requirements. Reports of involuntary mental health admissions and perhaps restraining orders may lag as well.)
This sort of devious attempts to undermine legal gun ownership and use (while ignoring criminals as usual) is exactly why the PLCAA exists.
There’s already a federal law to prevent this. The doj will need to stomp CT as soon as their governor signs it into law. Removal of government funding at all levels. It will hurt the citizens but they are the ones that voted the dems into power.
All this will ultimately accomplish is a brutal civil war, where citizens will bring a primal end to anyone who attempts to abridge their God Given Rights.
There are already hundreds of millions of firearms and billions of rounds of ammo, and there are more than 100 million more armed citizens than even our military of 1 million, most of whom would turn against their superiors if given an unconstitutional order against the people they are sworn to protect. Same goes for state and local LEO’s.
Judicial tyranny is wholly unacceptable to those with functional brains, and there is a limit that is edging closer and closer with each retarded attempt to remove guns from the hands of those allowed by God himself to carry and use.
” Same goes for state and local LEO’s.”
Not
By that thought, we should be able to sue alcohol manufacturers when a drunk driver causes an accident, and car manufacturers when some gets in an accident, or maybe fork manufacturer’s if you happen to be over weight.
If gun shops vanish, your right to bear arms becomes irrelevant.
Nice that some people are waking up to this. The only question now is if they realize that the law doesn’t have to survive court challenges to do this damage, it merely needs to avoid an injunction while being litigated.
Ie fine a friendly activist judge to shop for in the right district/circuit. Thankfully this will not be an immediate national bandwagon and the regions effected should be limited but the damage to be done in those regions will be significant if it proceeds.
But there are of course other attacks on going. California is now proposing to ban Glocks (and perhaps others), and well as proposing to require background checks to buy replacement barrels. Plus of course the nearly identical restrictive CCW laws as NYS as to here CCW is permitted, expensive lengthy permitting requirements including 16 hours of training, perhaps a mental health exam, and hefty application fees, letters of recommendation, and whatever else they can think of to reduce the numbers of permits in the state. The state has banned gun shows on state property. And the beat (down) goes on.
It was going on for over a century before we began to see an improvement. What’s another decade or two?
Thankfully this will not be an immediate national bandwagon and the regions effected should be limited…
This will depend to some degree. I 100% agree that it won’t be immediate but what the Left understands, and the Right apparently does not, is that there are infinite permutations of these laws that can be passed.
If running FFLs out of business shows returns, it will be copied. If the laws in question are struck down, new slightly different laws will be suggested/applied elsewhere with an eye towards the same goal.
They aim for an anaconda strategy here. Surround and squeeze.
There’s a saying in investing when it comes to betting against large institutions if you are not also a large institution: They can stay stupid longer than you can stay solvent.
These people aren’t stupid but they do aim to ram that same basic idea down your throat from any angle they can.
More what I was getting at was there are a solid half of the states that are not looking to pass any gun control and are in the same circuits as states that are. These things inevitably tend to conflict with each other and bring up fun legal issues. The reason NY only outlaws purchase of body armor within their state is PA doesn’t give a damn and will sell that as well as all kinds of ammo without any kind of check. This is important because it is an issue of interstate commerce and such a lawsuit would jump the entire star chamber of the NY court system and involve 2 circuits immediately. They want their choking to be slow because sudden reactions tend to draw attention and rage that their logic does not tend to survive. Sometimes acceleration is the strategic move.
They want their choking to be slow because sudden reactions tend to draw attention and rage that their logic does not tend to survive.
They also prefer to be slow because staying below the radar is how you poison people irreversibly, which is their goal.
Keep in mind, these people would like to take over but their win conditions include being willing to accept simply burning everything to the ground.
Because, ultimately, they’re revolutionaries at heart. Maybe SRs, maybe RevComs, maybe a certain stripe of anarchist… doesn’t much matter. They all work together until they take power, then they off each other for control of the new system.
Wonder if they realize there is a growing number of those willing to burn everything down on the other end as well who are already positioned to start over. Would be a silly way for the Latter Day Saints to take over but these are getting to be silly times.
Some do, some don’t.
As I’ve pointed out before, the other side isn’t a monolith. Some of them are smart, many are not.
The truth is that the smart ones don’t care. You doing their work for them is within their set of win conditions and that’s how they view such a thing. Their goal at this point is systemic instability which they believe they can exploit. As such, they believe that in such circumstances they are better positioned to completely take over regardless of who starts the fire.
Whether or not that’s true isn’t something I think we can know and, for most of us, it wouldn’t matter anyway since we wouldn’t survive long enough to find out who wins if it really comes to blows. It really comes to a full blown fight and 80%+ of Americans are gone and who makes it is more a function of luck than much of anything else.
Fortune may favor the prepared and the bold but she doesn’t smile on them exclusively or all the time.
That last bit is pretty much ignored by everyone involved. Ah well if it gets to that point the poor bastards have me surrounded.
Correction: “can know” was supposed to be “can’t know”.
It’s this simple, I’ve pointed this out before to some derision:
The rural areas are, and always have been, the base of Conservatives for 5000 years. If you live in a city or a ‘burb, you’re in hostile territory. The messed up part is that you will be treated as hostile by the rural people if things go sideways because, statistically, they’re right, you’re a lib.
bUt wE cAn’T aFfOrD tO bUy a FaRm oR RaNch!
First, you don’t have to, Second, if you cared, you could because wills find ways and whatnot. It’s that or your prioritize convenience, which is what most people, regardless of political affiliation prioritize.
Dam* them, for wanting to take away our God Given Rights to self-defense and our Constitutional Right as well! Stop them at all cost and defy that proposed law!
Sounds like a violation of the PLCCA to me.