In another less-than-successful example of the Obama administration trying to run a kinetic military action by leading from behind, the policy of outsourcing the fight against al-Shabab, the al-Qaida-aligned insurgents in Somalia to Ugandan and Burundian troops hasn’t worked exactly as planned. The problem: a large portion of the ordnance fired back at the African Union troops has a US origin. And, according to one report, it’s being sold to the insurgents indirectly by Ugandan troops the US is supporting with materiel and money…
[M]ost of the fighting against the Islamic terror group, which has lured as many as 50 Somali-American kids to Mogadishu and even sent one on a suicide mission, is done by the roughly 9,000 Ugandan and Burundian soldiers belonging to the African Union’s peacekeeping force in Mogadishu, codenamed “AMISOM.”
In exchange, Washington pays the troops and sends them regular consignments of guns, rockets and ammo. Between 2007 and 2009, the bill for U.S. taxpayers came to around $200 million — and has probably doubled since then.
The problem is, the Ugandan army withholds most of the peacekeepers’ $550 monthly paychecks, keeping the money in bank accounts in Uganda accessible only by the troops’ families. Considering “limited shopping opportunities for embattled AMISOM troops, you would think that makes sense to keep their money at home,” Pelton wrote. “Except that the AMISOM payment debacle leaves thousands of troops surrounded by tons of weapons with no way to buy even ’small small’ things like personal items, sweets or mobile phone recharges to call home.”
So the Ugandans sell their excess weaponry to intermediaries who then sell it on to al-Shabab. And to keep up their racket, the peacekeepers make sure to shoot at every opportunity, burning through “an extraordinary amount of ordnance” to justify continued arms shipments from Washington.
It’s just like federal agencies buying primo tricked out laptops and Aeron chairs for everyone in the waning weeks of the fiscal year to make sure they use up all of their budgeted funds. Otherwise, they might not get the full amount the following year.
It sounds like the problem is a conspicuous lack of direct American oversight and involvement in the process. Of course, the military’s stretched pretty thin these days fighting three wars. And with another $1 trillion in upcoming defense cuts, things aren’t likely to get better any time soon.
