Gab: We Are the Backbone of Free and Open Internet

courtesy wnycstudios.com

What could possibly go wrong?

Troubles continue to pile up for Gab, the social media platform that pitches itself as the anti-politically correct alternative to Twitter.

Gab recently contracted with 2nd Amendment Processing, a little-known Michigan-based payment processing site. The site is urging people to sign up for its paid GabPro service, even as it blocks all new signups due to a wave of bot attacks.

Gab is best known for its refusal to moderate its content in any way, making it home to a toxic stew of racism, anti-Semitism, gore and misogyny. Many prominent white nationalists maintain Gab accounts, and neo-Nazi terrorist organization Atomwaffen has tried to recruit members on the site.

In an unsigned statement over the weekend, Gab praised 2nd Amendment Processing for working with companies who have “difficulty securing payment processing services for political reasons.”

“Companies like our own, like our DNS hosting provider epik.com, and our new payment processor, 2nd Amendment Processing, recognize both the danger of kowtowing to online mobs and the significant upside potential of serving as the backbone of the free and open Internet,” the statement read.

– Allegra Kirkland for Talking Points Memo, Gab Links Up with Fringe Gun Rights Sight

comments

  1. avatar Pg2 says:

    You lost credibility at “white nationalists”.

    1. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

      Do you believe that the 1st Amendment doesn’t apply to white nationalists? And what other individual rights protected by the Bill of Rights should be void to people whom you disagree with?

      1. avatar TrueBornSonofLiberty says:

        I believe you’ve misconstrued his comment. I suspect, but I’m sure he’ll chime back in, that Pg2 is upset that Kat framed white nationalists as a pejorative. I’m indifferent. I’m absolutely a nationalist. I understand the efficacy of their position as it relates to opposing the identity politics of the filthy left. Let’s not forget that in America right now, the group that is most often under attack is straight white males. If you happen to own guns, well, they’d kill us if they could.

        1. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          Ah, then his problem is with Allegra Kirkland not Kat. But even leftists get 1st Amendment rights.

        2. avatar pg2 says:

          Gov, you are correct, I should have said I stopped reading at white nationalists due to lack of credibility.

        3. avatar pg2 says:

          “The importance of this scene, left, from Gillette’s toxic masculinity commercial cannot be overstated. A white guy sees a hot white woman and is about to speak to her. He is restrained by a black guy implying that any white heterosexual overture is toxic, and, more subtly, white women are the domain of “cooler” black men.” Henry Makow PhD

          If you haven’t watched the video, you should.

        4. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          Can you imagine if the roles were switched and it was the black man who wanted to go after the white woman and the white man stopped him and said that wasn’t cool? I’d have had to pop some popcorn and jumped on Twitter for the evening if they’d have done that.

        5. avatar pg2 says:

          Or if a white man prevented a black man from pursuing a hot black woman and said “not cool, not cool”…..

        6. avatar Miner49er says:

          “He is restrained by a black guy implying that any white heterosexual overture is toxic, and, more subtly, white women are the domain of “cooler” black men.” Henry Makow PhD”

          In psychology Mr. PhD is doing what some coal projection, projecting his inner feelings on to those around him. There’s nothing in that scene to imply that the black man is indicating that white women are just for a cooler black man. This scene is actually showing an inappropriate harassment of an unknown woman on the street, no one wants their wife mother daughter sister accosted by strangers on the street, and that’s the point of the scene.

          What Mr. PhD is doing is revealing his insecurity and fear of the big black man taking the innocent white woman away. Mr. PhD has provided us with a window into his soul and it’s not a pretty picture. He needs help.

        7. avatar pg2 says:

          Miner, no he is pointing out the obvious, which trolls lie yourself like to downplay. Very much like how you try to falsely project that childhood vaccines have valid safety trials.

        8. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          So Minor, why do you think they brought race into it in the first place? Why not two white guys or two black guys? And why is it the white guy misbehaving and not the other way around? Why is it OK to portray whites in a bad way but not blacks?

        9. avatar anonymoose says:

          Hey gov, goo’ mornin beautiful! how you doin? needa chocolate daddy in yo life?

          Remember the video a couple years ago where the frigid White intersectional feminist walked around for like 4 hours getting catcalled by dozens of black guys, and maybe a couple white guys? It completely backfired since she intended to showcase the evil toxic masculinity of heteronormative white shitlords.

        10. avatar Miner49er says:

          Very interesting perspectives on the video I’m hearing. Actually in the seams before, we have a young black man being guided by white folks. In the video, producers did not insert race in anyway, they just showed a cross-section of American society.

          The scene in question is not about race, it’s about a young male accosting a woman he does not know on the city streets and being admonished by an older male. None of us want our wives, sisters, daughters or girlfriends accosted by strangers on the street, that’s the point of the scene.

          To perceive it as a black man calling dibs on the white woman is tragically humorous.

          There seems to be some sort of strange obsession white men have regarding black man, look at the episodes of black face costumes by multiple white men and the testimony by the murderers of Emmett Till discussing the sexual nature of their anger towards the 14-year-old black boy. Very enlightning but still mysterious, why the white maless’ obsession with black men and white women?

        11. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          The issue I have with the scene in the commercial isn’t so much with the scene itself, but the fact that if the races were switched there’d be holy hell to pay and even the key grip and best boy would be fired and probably never work in the industry again. I remember a few years ago joking about the ADT ads and all the white people breaking into peoples’ houses because every single one HAD to be white. Not even one minority out of a hundred could be portrayed as a burglar. This is pernicious nonsense. We’d all be better off going back to the days when Blazing Saddles and The Jerk were considered acceptable. By appeasing the race baiters we’re contributing to the soft tyranny of low expectations of minorities.

          Also, I highly doubt any man (black or white) would ‘accost’ a young woman in front of so many witnesses (well, maybe in NYC). Unless by ‘accost’ you mean walk up and introduce himself, but then I guess nowadays that’s probably considered a ‘micro-agression’ for assuming the woman is cis-gendered or something.

        12. avatar Miner49er says:

          C’mon Gov, from your other post I know you’re much smarter than this.

          “I highly doubt any man (black or white) would ‘accost’ a young woman in front of so many witnesses (well, maybe in NYC). “

          It happens so often it’s almost a joke, have you ever seen a pretty girl walked past a construction site and heard the cat calls whistles and offers of sex from the workers? I’ll bet your wife girlfriend sister or daughter has.

          “The report also looked into locations where people experienced harassment. The majority of women — 66 percent — said they’d been sexually harassed in public spaces. “The public forums are where you see the more chronic experiences of sexual harassment,” says Raj. These include verbal harassment and physical harassment, like touching and groping.”

          Again, to lay some kind of racial component to this issue just betrays the inner workings of the observers mind.

          I think men know the truth about this constant sexual assault and intentionally distract, divert and blame others for their own bad behavior.

          Again, the strange obsession that white man hold about black men and white women is an interesting phenomenon.

        13. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          ‘…have you ever seen a pretty girl walked past a construction site and heard the cat calls whistles and offers of sex from the workers?’

          I’ve worked in residential construction for 33 years and have never once observed anything like that.

          Do you actually believe that if the roles were changed and it was the white guy telling the black guy that his behavior wasn’t cool that that would fly? You’re smarter than that.

          I didn’t see any indication that the (white) guy going after the girl had any malicious intent. You seem to buy into this fantasy of ‘toxic masculinity’ where all men need to castrate themselves and be beta males. How the species is supposed to procreate is beyond me though. The feminists have created a situation where the women have to seek out the men and they’re all in their moms’ basement jacking off to internet porn because actually interacting with the opposite sex is a one way ticket to being expelled out of college because the girl got drunk and agreed to sex. Nobody is happy with this arrangement.

          As for the black man / white woman obsession, it seems to me that you’re the one who’s obsessed. I have no issue with it.

        14. avatar pg2 says:

          https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DyktIrvUUAALzAv.jpg

          Miner, can you cite or post examples in pop culture, advertising, etc that display black women with white men?

      2. avatar Jonathan-Houston says:

        When did he say anyone’s rights should be voided? I only read that he said they lost credibility with the white nationalist nonsense. One person’s right to speak does not imply any right to be listened to, let alone to be believed or even taken seriously.

    2. avatar miforest says:

      ” white nationalist ” in modern terms is anyone who wants fair treatment for everyone. If you don’t hate white people , you are a “white nationalist!!!” . convington anyone. Thats why the banks are insurance companies are refusing to do business with the NRA. POC like gun control and bans (see Obama) , the NRA opposes gun control and bans, so clearly they are “white nationalists”. hope you don’t belong to the white supremacist NRA. and since the white supremacist are Nazis, the Antifa is doing us a public service by punching nazis, be sure to thank them. I mean you can’t deny that all nazis were white so only follows all whites are nazis.

      There . perfect justification for directing a 2 minute hate at anyone the media says is a bad person. Enjoy.

      1. avatar Ed Schrade says:

        The Nazis also had an Islamic group in their organization.

        1. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          Hitler lamented that Germany was a Christian nation rather than Islamic because Islam would have been much more conducive to the Nazi agenda.

        2. avatar Southern Cross says:

          I think that was a Bosnian Muslim SS unit “Handscharr” that was raised as an anti-partisan unit in the Balkans. They were eventually disbanded after committing atrocities that made the SS punishment unit Dirlewanger Brigade look mild. The latter were infamous for their actions in the Warsaw uprising.

        3. avatar Miner49er says:

          Yes, Hitler did indeed court the Islamic world during world war two. It may be because they shared his hatred for the Jews and Hitler did admire the militancy of the Muslim religion.

          “As early as 1941, the Wehrmacht distributed the military handbook “Islam” to train its soldiers to behave correctly towards Muslim populations. On the eastern Front, the Nazi occupiers ordered the rebuilding of mosques, prayer halls, and madrasas — previously destroyed by Moscow — and the re-establishment of religious rituals and celebrations in order to undermine Soviet rule.”

          So it is very interesting to find the Aryan nation and other nazi groups in the USA celebrating Adolf Hitler’s birthday and glorifying his life when he actually was a lover of the Islamic faith. And Hitler considered Christianity meek and flabby.

          But that didn’t stop him from entering into treaties with the Catholic Church, enjoying the Vatican’s support until the end of the war. And after the war the Catholic Church did not excommunicate a single Catholic concentration camp guard or SS member.

        4. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          Hitler courted the Muslim world for the same reason the Kaiser did – they control the Dardanelles. Germany could easily blockade Russia’s Baltic ports and with the Dardanelles blocked the only other ports were Archangel on the Arctic Ocean that is only open 3 months every year and Vladivostok about 6000 miles away and I think only open 7 months. It also opened up supply lines for Germany from the Persian Gulf, and as I recall the Soviet oil fields were in the Caucuses that neighbor Muslim territory. Both times Germany had a compelling strategic need for keeping the Muslim world on it’s side.

        5. avatar Miner49er says:

          Good point, Gov.

          And don’t forget, Getmany’s alliance with the Ottoman Turks during world war one, so there is a historical relationship between the two empires.

        6. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          98% of history is geography.

          You also can’t discount the fact that the British navy could easily blockade Germany’s Baltic ports. The primary reason for starting WWI was something called the Baghdad to Berlin railway. The problem was the Germany and it’s allies, Austia-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire controlled all the territory except Serbia.

      2. avatar strych9 says:

        “Thats why the banks are insurance companies are refusing to do business with the NRA.”

        Actually a big part of this is the fact that a lot of those companies are headquartered in NY state where Cuomo has threatened to use the the NY regulatory apparatus against them if they don’t do what the governor and various commissioners want.

        1. avatar miforest says:

          Cuomo said that the NRA were white nationalist and white supremacist. he is perfectly justified in withdrawing services from Nazi’s . are you gouing to argue that Nazi’s should be allowed unfettered access to the banking system ??? that’s just outrageous . Cuomo is doing god’s work in fighting Nazi’s

        2. avatar Excedrine says:

          @miforest — If you actually knew what a Nazi really is, which you don’t so don’t LIE to me by saying you do, either, you’d be raging at Cuomo. Period.

        3. avatar miforest says:

          Don’t be silly , anyone can find out what a Nazi really is by going to any antifa website. If you oppose the democratic party and their agenda , then you are a Nazi , so don’t make excuses . they’re everywhere now and you should not condem Cuomo for going after them . just look at how the legal system persecutes good people trying to fight the rise of Nazis . https://capitalresearch.org/article/antifa-activist-faces-jail-time-for-nazi-punching/

        4. avatar Excedrine says:

          Take your own advice, for once, and don’t be silly yourself. AntiFa has been rightly designated as a terrorist group and has no legitimate views on anything whatsoever. They don’t know what a Nazi or a fascist is, which is why they act exactly like fascists, and consequently you don’t know what you’re talking about, either. Much less some shit-smeared mongoloid tyrant living in his ivory tower built with stolen money extracted at gunpoint who probably hasn’t even had to so much as pump his own gas in a quarter-century. If you support the DemoKKKratiKKK Party and their fascistic agenda, you’re a Nazi and you’re simply projecting if you call anyone to right of Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, et. al., a Nazi. I’m really starting to think you’re simply a troll and not actually this mind-numbingly stupid. But, then again, leftists like you (or as you’re portraying yourself to be if that’s the case) can and have shown themselves to be even dumber than this.

    3. avatar Dog of War says:

      I love how leftist assholes love to screech that Gab.AI is ‘Twitter for Nazis’ but not a gorram one of them has a thing to say about the fact that Twitter itself is apolitically full of violent black nationalists, Islamo-facists, and violent wanna-be communist revolutionaries. None of those scum-bags ever get called out, but some ‘journalist’ finds out that a scant handful of actual white nationalist post on Gab and the entire weight of the MSM and Big-Tech go out of their way to drive the entire platform off the internet. I’m sure that entire situation has nothing to do with the fact that Twitter is in decline and Gab is a small but growing competitor to Twitter.

      1. avatar That One Guy says:

        The only difference between Nazis and Socialists is that when you point out the failings of the Nazis, nobody ever says “but true Nazism has never been tried”.

        1. avatar Big E says:

          Well said

    4. avatar jakee308 says:

      They lost me at “toxic stew”. That is one of the hazards and joys of free speech; a lot of it you’re not going to like, agree with, want others to hear etc.

      However. The same applies to any of YOUR speech on that platform.

      You can form groups and other associations which will cut down on the static and make it easier for people to find you without wading thru other people’s goo.

      This is why (altho I know it’s not going to happen) as far as I’m concerned there should be very few laws concerning the exercise of one’s 2nd amendment rights. Just as there are not that many and the prohibition of certain types of laws to exercise one’s 1st Amendment rights. So should it be for the 2nd Amendment. I know quite a few will disagree but by agreeing to even a few that are out of line because they have not purpose other than to abridge those who think that way have allowed them to burden the 2nd to the point where we’re at now. And where we’re at is about only a few steps from out right rebellion.

  2. avatar pwrserge says:

    Oh look, the Demokkkommies don’t like it when you set up a free speech platform that actually supports free speech. My personal favorites are how the commies on the actual site are claiming that left wing economic cartels and trusts are not a form of tyranny.

    1. avatar TrueBornSonofLiberty says:

      Too bad what those terrorists don’t like.

    2. avatar anonymoose says:

      How deliciously ironic.

      1. avatar pwrserge says:

        Yeah… watching the alt-left bend over and grab their ankles for their corporate overlords is rather special.

        1. avatar Indiana Tom says:

          Nailed that one.

  3. avatar TrueBornSonofLiberty says:

    I don’t do social media. But if I did I would join Gab. Part of liberty and freedom is accepting that other people have views I find abhorrent, but have the right to express them. That there’s someplace where that’s a reality, away from the control of the filthy, virtue signaling, post modernist, social justice warrior subhumans, is refreshing. And if enough people were to sign up in protest of Twitter, those abhorrent voices would eventually be drowned out. Because the truth of the matter is that the number of skin heads, Neo Nazis, KKK and alt right lunatics number in the 10’s of thousands. Comparatively, there’s millions of socialists, communists, Marxists, Antifa, progressives etc. in fact, because democrats have lurched so far left, I’d say that the alt-right’s counterparts are the average democrats.

    1. avatar uncommon_sense says:

      TrueBornSonOfLiberty,

      I will argue that our First Amendment right of Free Speech does not protect speech which promotes harming innocent people.

      Thus, today’s Nazi party calling for harm to innocent people (often based on ancestry) should not be protected speech.

      Note that such a standard would mean that speech which promotes discrimination/unequal treatment of innocent people would also be unprotected since discrimination and unequal treatment are harmful.

      1. avatar TrueBornSonofLiberty says:

        For speech to be “illegal”, there must be a specific threat to a specific person/group, along with being immediate. That is already against the law. As it should be. The Supreme Court has long established precedent. Saying you hate someone or some group is the very definition of free speech.

      2. avatar BehindEnemyLines says:

        By that standard, advocating for gun control is not protected speech, since it is literally advocating for the state to harm millions of peaceable gun owners.

        But alas, we cannot trust those in power to uphold such restrictions on speech fairly. According to a painfully vocal minority, it is not okay to be white, and being white is inherently oppressive to people of color, so it is okay to discriminate against white people wherever and wherever possible. Arguing against this position makes one a white supremacist, and thus acceptable to censor.

        Yeah, I think it’s better that we not censor the racists, last you be labeled one and have your voice taken.

    2. avatar LibertyToad says:

      Gab is pretty good and now that is has been around awhile, it has a decent sized membership. It truly is a site that respects free speech–on both sides–although most of the posts I see there lean more towards conservative/libertarian values.

      1. avatar TrueBornSonofLiberty says:

        Would you care to issue me an invite code? I could give my email address to be done privately.

        1. avatar Hamchuck says:

          No rush. I’ve been a member since they first started it. I received an email update that they suspended open registration due to a massive “bot” attack. 50k bot accounts joined, started following users and attacking Gab’s infrastructure. Gab closed registration, erased the bots and is working on stopping them in the future. You’ll be better off just waiting until they figure it out and open back up again. It’ll be a better experience.

        2. avatar TrueBornSonofLiberty says:

          Thx. I actually emailed Gab directly and they responded within an hour or so with an invitation. I signed up. We’ll see how it goes. If nothing else, I’ll add to the number of people there who are obviously there in protest of twitter.

  4. avatar Shire-man says:

    He’s doing it right. No matter what:
    -never apologize
    -never rationalize
    -never compromise
    Stake your claim and hold it. That’s how you beat Alinsky.

  5. avatar ollie says:

    Liberals-progressives-democrats are anti free speech, anti freedom, anti-middle class and want a two caste system comprised of ruling elites and ignorant peon smurffs. Basically the same as the Soviet Union fro 1918 to 1990. Only the ruling elite will have rights.

    1. avatar No one of consequence says:

      On paper, the ruling elites would have the same rights as the peons.

      Of course, the ruling elites have connections … which, especially in societies like that, are far more important and useful than “rights” given and revoked on a whim of the State.

  6. avatar Marcus says:

    I’m just waiting for the day when liberalism goes full circle/retard and NAZIs actually get accepted as “people of a different political identity.” Even the worst hate speech platforms are far better then the “benevolent” dictatorship of Jake Dorsey.

  7. avatar DapperGunsmith says:

    So you just want a little bit of free speech? Is that like wanting to be a little bit pregnant?

    1. avatar Enuf says:

      Have always appreciated the added “glow” of a woman who is a “little bit pregnant”.

    2. avatar uncommon_sense says:

      DapperGunsmith,

      Progressive sympathizers who are okay with some level of infringement of free speech are much more akin to being okay with some level of sexual assault of “deplorable” women (e.g. being okay with unwanted groping/fondling).

  8. avatar Aaron Walker says:

    God I wish there was another Earth like planet near-by. Free of other malcontent humans… Where I could retire for the rest of my life…

    1. avatar Enuf says:

      Mars. All you need is Mars.

      Bit of a fixer-upper though. The planet’s core is busted. You will have to take a shovel, dig down deep, and get that restarted. Needs to be really hot and spinning to give the planet an electromagnetic field. To shield the atmosphere from cosmic and solar radiation, which erodes atmosphere.

      Once you that done simply snag some ice and gases from around the solar system to recharge the planet with water and air. Air is about 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen and then some trace gases. There’s lots of that stuff around, you don’t need to steal any from Earth. I mean, why start a war when you do not have to?

      Take some seeds with you. And some compost. Farming will be a big deal.

      Of course, after a couple of years other people will see what you’ve got going there and will want to move in. The first will be Realtors. Loads and loads of Realtors.

      So definitely you wanna’ be on the ground floor of the Mars Rush.

      1. avatar GS650G says:

        Sort of like liberals moving into your state and voting for gun bans mars will be ruined as soon as it’s colonized.

      2. avatar Chip in Florida says:

        “..Mars. All you need is Mars.”

        Yeah, Mars is pretty and all. A lovely shade of red, named for the God of War, the canals are interesting too.

        But…. Venus is the better option. Yeah the air sucks but at least there actually IS air there. And the gravity is a bit more comfortable. It would take about the same amount of work to fix the place up and make it liveable and the advantage is that it is much more energy-rich than Mars. And the commute time between here and there is considerably less so you could still occasionally visit ‘the old homestead’ to see what’s what.

        1. avatar GS650G says:

          Sulfuric acid rain and crushing pressures along with several hundred degree temperatures. Florida on steroids. The days are too long anyway you only get 4 in a year.

        2. avatar Chip in Florida says:

          “…. Florida on steroids”

          Just like home .

          But with fewer mosquitos.

    2. avatar strych9 says:

      “If even 1/16th of you doesn’t believe that Elon…”

  9. avatar Enuf says:

    Thought I’d take a look, see if they have opened their website up again. Nope, still have to be a registered member and you can only become that if someone already a member sends you an invitation.

    Guess that’s it then. F__k ’em.

  10. avatar 22winmag says:

    Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm yum!

    Toxic stew!

  11. avatar napresto says:

    I’m trying to fathom this new trend in matters of speech, which is that you must accept one of two positions: either 1) you believe that “offensive” speech should be censored, or 2) you believe that the first amendment requires you not to disapprove of gross, offensive speech – or even actively embrace it.

    Now I don’t know much about Gab, and I tend not to believe the media about anything at this point, so I’m open to being educated. But I will say that, even as a free speech absolutist (which I am), I’m still perfectly happy to disapprove of offensive people and the nasty things they say.

    Should their speech be restricted by law? Absolutely not. Even further: should social media companies continue to play the “I’m a publisher when it’s convenient and a platform when it’s not” game in order to restrict the speech of their users? Absolutely not.

    But does that mean I should eagerly sign up to hang around white nationalists, racists, bigots, and jerks because of the purity of my ideals? Heck no. If that’s the price of an account, then I’ll take my speech somewhere else. I have standards.

    (Once upon a time, not all that long ago, so did western civilization).

    1. avatar Big E says:

      Way too much common sense here. I’m not interested in Gab, not because of who’s using it, but because of the same reason I’m not on facebook or other “social media”- I don’t care to hear what most people have to say. They have the freedom to speak and I am free to not listen. And being polite goes a long way- just because we can say something doesn’t mean we should.

  12. avatar rc says:

    Talking Points Memo? Really? Why didn’t you just get the hot take from the DNC or Antifa about this? It would have been the same.

  13. avatar ZOD says:

    The real problem is not understanding that Talking Points Memo is basically a DNC shill operation. Any of their opinions are going to be heavily slanted against firearms, free speech, and their opinion of GAB is worth less then the dust on my shoes.

  14. avatar former water walker says:

    Golly I’m an OFWG. I am a fan of America. But I gotta brown wife and caramel colored kid’s. Where’s MY platform?!? Don’t say “here”…TTAG barely works. I don’t tweet,constantly post on FB or put pics up. I have no plans on Gabbing.

    1. avatar Ralph says:

      “TTAG barely works.”

      No edit function, no navigation buttons, fewer posts — I’d say it works about a well as a 1981 Plymouth Semi-Reliant K-car with the 2.2 liter four banger.

      1. avatar jwm says:

        Red Greens favorite car.

      2. avatar Indiana Tom says:

        The car that saved Chrysler…for awhile.

        1. avatar jwm says:

          Mostly cause the .gov mandated buying them for their fleet cars. Too big to fail in action. I drove a bunch of them from the motor pool. Basic white and full of interesting rattles and quirks when brand new.

          They were front wheel drive. They did a little better in snow than rear wheel drive. So there was that.

  15. avatar anarchyst says:

    I am PROUD to be a “racist”…

    The term “racism” was invented by communists, and is used to destroy cultures and defuse (and render impotent) those with differing points-of-view on “racial” issues.

    True “racism” is desirable as it merely cements cultural and social bonds that are necessary for a society to function and flourish.

    True “racism” merely denotes commonality of purpose and advancement within each respective racial group.

    Blacks have the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanics have La Raza and Mecha, Jews have the $PLC, ACLU and ADL. These are all “racist” organizations that serve to promote the interests (and political power) of their respective races.

    It is only whites who are castigated and threatened for attempting to show any signs of racial solidarity.

    Let’s look at what us “evil, privileged” whites have done for Western society and the world:

    1. “Civil-rights (for some)” laws (that effectively destroy “freedom of association” for whites, but not for other races) and do not apply to whites–only “people of color” are covered by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” protections.

    2. “Affirmative action” policies (that push better qualified whites out of positions and jobs that they would ordinarily qualify for) in favor of lesser-qualified minorities. In fact, “affirmative action” policies actually damage those minorities who are quite capable of “making it on their own” because they get “lumped in” with the groups that cannot make it on their own without “help”,

    3. “Contract set-asides” (that are specifically targeted for minorities (that white people are prohibited from bidding on) and immigration policies (that specifically exclude whites, most of who have skills that would benefit the USA) in favor of those from the third-world (with no marketable skills).

    4. Scholarships that specify particular ethnic groups are looked upon favorably by most people, save one–scholarships that are intended for whites only are looked upon as being “racist”, and therefore impermissible and improper in today’s racially-charged climate of “political correctness”.

    NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).

    Whites possess an externalized altruism that no other races possesses. This externalized altruism that “looks out for the other guy” will be the demise of the white race. This altruism needs to be internalized and focused inward, just as other races have done. There is NO SHAME in looking out for one’s own kind.

    I blame those of the “greatest generation” for selling out our birthright with the passage of the “Civil-Rights Acts” of 1957 and 1964, and the “Hart-Cellar immigration act of 1965”. To those of the “greatest generation” (who are still alive) thanks for NOTHING…

    Let’s not forget that “freedom of association” (but only affecting the white majority) was eviscerated by the enacting of these clearly unconstitutional acts.

    As whites comprise only 6% of the world population, it is us whites who should be the most protected and cherished of minorities…

    “Multiculturalism” and “diversity” are code-words for white genocide.

    When I am confronted over my “racism”, I attempt to shake my accusers’ hands and profusely “thank them for noticing”. The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless.

    1. avatar pg2 says:

      Dead on. Whitey has been marked for extinction. European whites are the only culture that is not allowed to show pride for its heritage and culture. All other ethnic groups/cultures are socially encouraged to do so. White males are being conditioned to understand that they will not reproduce, and that the white women who do reproduce will reproduce with other ethnic groups/cultures.

      1. avatar jwm says:

        It’s evolution/darwins law in action. If we whites go extinct it will be because we were not strong enough, smart enough, or resilient enough to survive. Like millions of other species that have gone extinct.

        It’s nature in action.

        1. avatar pg2 says:

          Women rape victims deserve it too then, right? Or the Jews deserved Hitler? Or the 20+ Million Christians murdered by the Bolsheviks deserved it too? Could expose your idiocy all day long.

        2. avatar jwm says:

          Went completely over your head. Doesn’t surprise me a bit. One of your examples are the Jews and hitler in the same thread you defended anarchyst, a hitler worshipper.

          You said whitey is being driven to extinction. If that is possible then we are not the master race, after all. We would just be a failed side branch of humanity. Has nothing to do with deserve. The Dinos didn’t deserve the asteroid. But here we are.

          Now, you go ahead and make a ‘witty’ comeback which will just highlight why we are a failing side branch. Go ahead. I’m waiting.

        3. avatar Pg2 says:

          No such thing as a witty comeback ro outright stupidity. Carry on.

        4. avatar jwm says:

          awww, I told you the truth and now you’re pissed. Too bad, so sad.

        5. avatar Pg2 says:

          Literally laughing , worst comeback. Ever. What’s really sad is people like yourself refusing to believe what they see with your own eyes, and instead believing what your told to believe. Pathetic.

        6. avatar jwm says:

          Really? You argue like a 12yo. You’ve said nothing that makes sense and just resort to name calling.

        7. avatar Pg2 says:

          At least you have the sense to admit you don’t have the reading comprehension to understand my posts. And by the way, can you show me where I resorted to name calling?

        8. avatar jwm says:

          ‘idiocy’, ‘stupidity’. No valid argument so you throw insults.

        9. avatar Pg2 says:

          Lol, those are accurate descriptions, not name calling.

        10. avatar jwm says:

          You couldn’t buy a clue with the key to Fort Knox. I’m tired of arguing with a clueless child. So I’ll be the grownup and end it here.

          No doubt you’ll rush in to get one last snarky comment in. If the white race survives extinction it will be in spite of you.

        11. avatar pg2 says:

          Lol, no snark needed to expose a fool. Yes, now I’m name calling.

    2. avatar jwm says:

      You’re only pissed at the greatest generation cause they gob smacked your hero, hitler.

      You’re an idiot. But I may be an even bigger idiot for arguing with you. An old timer told me some wisdom once. “The more you stir shit, the more it stinks.” He was part of that greatest generation and had an eye patch for his efforts. He was worth 10 of you losers and proved that against the master races supermen.

      1. avatar pg2 says:

        Hitler is his hero? Where did you get that? You slung a lot of shit, did he post something a little close too home?

        1. avatar jwm says:

          In one of his previous comments he stated that the holocaust never happened and that hitler would be vindicated by history. Make what you will of that.

      2. avatar Miner49er says:

        Yep, JWM you’re right, We should follow grandpa’s lead and shoot every swastika carrying nazi we see. The Holocaust was real, and the Nazis killed millions of Jews, gypsies, blacks and other ‘sub humans‘.

        The main problem with the anti-fascist of today is their violence and property crimes, but I admire their enthusiasm.

        1. avatar jwm says:

          What you call an ‘anti-fascist’ is nothing but a fascist. They are the modern brown shirts and if you support them you are as big a loser as anarchyst and pg2.

    3. avatar balais says:

      You must be a hoot at parties.

      People like you damage the gun rights cause better than any group of fuckwits from the brady campaign bunch ever can

      The door’s that way —————–> and may you be endowed with a lovely parting gift on your way out.

  16. avatar GS650G says:

    Free speech means we are free to speak out minds without the government arresting us. Now threatening people is one limitation and bullshitting people for fraud is yet another. But expressing distasteful views isn’t covered. However a medium like a web site or newspaper owned by one person is not an open forum for everyone’s views. The owner maintains ultimate control over the output.
    Don’t agree ? Then start your own site or paper.

  17. avatar Nanashi says:

    “Gab is best known for its refusal to moderate its content in any way”

    Not true. Gab is well known for banning cartoon porn if they make an arbitrary decision the character looks “underage” (since there is absolutely no way to make such a determination objectively). Hypocrisy at its finest.

    1. avatar jwm says:

      So you’re pissed they squelched kiddie porn? Good to see the real you coming out.

  18. avatar Lee says:

    Every single commerical during the super bowl showed white men as weak, ugly, balding, and comical. The white man was the punchline. Every commerical is the white husband is a loser who should listen to his wife, cause shes always right. Or it was an office setting where the white guy is wrong and a more masculine non-white steps in to offer a solution to a problem. If a white woman is in an ad, its with a non-white man. The only strong traditional couples you see are non-whites.

    The fact is…whites have been put on a path of extinction. The splc has the chart on their wall, tracking the decline of white america. The decline is their goal. They want to disarm you, make your daughter a whore, make your son effeminate, and they think it is funny.

    There needs to be a free space to discuss these issues. Everything i have said would kick me off twatter. So i 100% support gab. Free speech is about protecting the rights of those you disagree with.

    I see people trashing whites ever day, i dont call for banning. I debate respectfully. Other groups should act the same. My guess is…the go for the ban cause they know that they are wrong and cant win the debate.

    1. avatar Southern Cross says:

      Search on YouTube for “Oh My Goodness the chips”. Today that ad would have the agency burnt to the ground by feminists.

    2. avatar balais says:

      You know what’s sad?

      America, whether its controlled by actual no shit nazis or feminists/sjws/other retards, is going to lose anyways and be replaced by a power that is terrifyingly racist, extremely misogynist, and blatantly imperialist with no regard for human life whatsoever. That would be China and other countries in NATO’s replacement, the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization)

      Our current paradigm (material abundance, freedom, the privilege and luxury of having pathetic groups like SJWs and feminists and even motorcylists) is a historical aberration, never to happen again once the long emergency occurs and democracy fades in the face of harsh decisions and the inevitability of civilization decline.

      We had a good run for a while

      “When you lose and fail, that is understandable; but when you win and fail? that brings madness” -General Petya Samanov, Amerika (that obscure 1980s miniseries nobody’s probably heard of)

      1. avatar CZJay says:

        If you look into the eugenics history of America you will see this country was fated to fail since the 1800s. The refusal to accept the history of early America has lead to the destruction of the idealistic concept that America was supposed to be. So, yes, we are doomed. We are doomed because very few people want to accept history, therefore they are doomed to repeat it forevermore.

      2. avatar anonymoose says:

        There will be a great war before we get to that point. I guarantee it. Communist China is in decline. They are actually afraid to go to war because they won’t be able to console all the families who had #1 (and only) son die for no good reason.

        1. avatar CZJay says:

          China is not on the decline and the one child policy is no more. China is surging and there are more Chinese people in the world than there are white people. A lot of Chinese nationals are buying up land/property in America, they don’t mind overpaying for it, which is inflating housing prices in places like California.

          The well off Chinese send their kids to America to attend university, they pay for their housing, buy them a car and give them allowance. These Chinese have no problem shopping at the most expensive stores and driving around in high dollar cars.

          China is not like North Korea.

        2. avatar strych9 says:

          “China is not on the decline…”

          This depends heavily on how you look at things and on what time frame.

          In the short term the Chinese are a thorn in our side. In the medium to long term they best slow their roll because their technological, logistical and C&C structures do not provide for the kind of weight they’re trying to throw around. If they keep acting the way that they are they will quickly find that the world doesn’t have much tolerance for their shit and, at that point, they’ll stand alone against a world determined to screw them.

          That’s a fight they can’t win and their current behavior sets them on a collision course with this nasty part of reality.

        3. avatar jwm says:

          In the 80s japan was buying up the west coast. I don’t spend much time worrying about china. But then I was raised during the ‘duck and cover’ of the cold war and served when the iron curtain was still up. We were fed a steady diet of nuclear holocaust horror stories.

          I have one remote concern about china. If they ever overcome their differences with india then I’ll get nervous. That would give them north of 2 billion bodies to throw at a problem.

          But while not impossible such an alliance isn’t very likely.

        4. avatar strych9 says:

          “That would give them north of 2 billion bodies to throw at a problem.”

          Ignoring the current reality for a moment, even if this did occur, how would one move 2 billion people in a way that kept them fed and otherwise supplied?

          At a certain point the number of people you can “throw at a problem” becomes a problem in and of itself.

        5. avatar jwm says:

          One of the least likely scenarios, thankfully. But you don’t need to move over 2 billion people. If you could field, feed and support a combined military of 2-3 hundred million you would have a military of staggering proportions and I doubt anything short of a nuclear holocaust would stop them.

          If I was a good writer I could make a hell of a story out of that scenario.

        6. avatar Geoff "Bring the EDIT button back, will ya, TTAG?" PR says:

          “I have one remote concern about china. If they ever overcome their differences with india then I’ll get nervous.”

          Currently, you don’t have to worry about that. India is currently freaked out by all the new Chinese international naval bases effectively ‘encircling’ the India peninsula. China calls them aprt of their “String of pearls”. China claims it to ensure the safety of Mideast oils shipments, but India isn’t buying it. I have heard that India is very pleased we are currently in Diego Garcia, as a counter to China’s dominance in the area.

          India is balancing a lot of international relationships. China and Russia are the two biggies.

          I’d hate to have to play the international games India is forced to play…

        7. avatar Geoff "Bring the EDIT button back, will ya, TTAG?" PR says:

          This is an enlightening read on Indian ocean geopolitics :

          “Here Is All You Should Know About ‘String Of Pearls’, China’s Policy To Encircle India”

          https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/here-is-all-you-should-know-about-string-of-pearls-china-s-policy-to-encircle-india-324315.html

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_of_Pearls_(Indian_Ocean)

        8. avatar strych9 says:

          “If you could field, feed and support a combined military of 2-3 hundred million you would have a military of staggering proportions and I doubt anything short of a nuclear holocaust would stop them.”

          I can’t see this as realistic. The largest army ever fielded was by the United States in 1945 at ~12 million in uniform. 200 million would be more than 16 times larger. Larger than every army combined in WWII. The logistics of moving, never mind feeding and equipping a force that that size, even for us, would be impossible. Doing it without a blue water fleet of nearly unimaginable size wouldn’t even fall into the category of “pipe dream”. I mean, currently the Chinese total armed services is 2.69 million with the Indians having about 4.21 million people in uniform. Combined they total out to 3.45% of the force you’re imagining.

          Then there’s the real issue that China, the ones who actually have a ton of people fit for service, like 750 million of them, can’t even control their own aircraft in a modern sense. They’re still using the same fighter techniques we used in WWII and Korea. Their pilots have no decision making capability without ground control (this is not a rule, it’s just the way they role) and the Chinese haven’t even started to develop a training program to create such a capability.

          Even China’s “superweapons” in the form of Mach 5+ anti-ship missiles are really kind of a joke and that’s assuming that they work as advertised and can be properly targeted. Both of those questions are huge “ifs”.

          Then you have to consider China’s political situation. China’s government lives and dies (quite literally) on continually increasing the living standard of it’s people. They cannot do that without robust trade. A war against the US would mean they’d have to fight at least the US and it’s allies plus an insurrection at home.

          China, for all it’s increased capabilities in the last few decades has no ability to truly project force, can’t really manufacture things for shit and is completely reliant on the outside world. In the context of a serious war they’re a paper tiger. In the context of a political foe and “great power” player against us, they’re much more serious of a threat.

        9. avatar Pg2 says:

          Are we on same planet? China is not on decline. Very much the opposite.

        10. avatar balais says:

          Have you heard of the SCO? thats the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

          it is essentially the basic framework (doesn’t have teeth now) for a Eurasian NATO-like economic and military alliance between Russia, China, and Central Asian countries.

          Instead of treating Russia like a partner rather than fantasizing about going to war with them, we have now driven them into the hands of China in a partnership not based on a unified ideology, but a mutual feeling of contempt for the US and west and aspirations to right previous wrongs (Russia, the fall of the USSR and pilfering by oligarchs. China? the century of humiliation)

          We really are that fking stupid as a nation and have our CFR and neocon dregs to thank for that. Now we are suck in a impossible position faced with an inevitable war we do not have any hope of winning.

  19. avatar Michael says:

    We are Americans, we have a right to our own beliefs and thoughts long as everyone has the right to be as big a jerk as they please and as long as it doesn’t hurt anybody else. -30-

  20. avatar CZJay says:

    I like true freedom of speech because it allows bad and dumb people to expose themselves to everyone and it will be documented forever.

  21. avatar Mad Max says:

    I signed up for Gab early on but only signed in a few times.

    Just about every conversation at the time was from the viewpoint of anti-Semites and all the topics drifted into being mainly about that or were overtly racist.

    I wanted to discuss the Bill of Rights, guns, etc. but couldn’t seem to find a thread that really focused on anything but racism and anti-Semitism.

    I haven’t been back recently so it might have changed with more membership.

  22. avatar Indiana Tom says:

    I am a white supremacist because i drink white milk and show off my superior lactose tolerance. Just cannot wait to join gab as obviously it is a top secret nazi base in amerika.
    Remember…Orange man Bad. White man bad.
    Antifa good. Ocasio Cortez good. Pelosi good. Communism good.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email